Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Rescue 116 Crash at Blackrock, Co Mayo(Mod note in post 1)

14647495152136

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2 nidou


    The online maps on osi.ie show it sort of odd - just a dotted outline that disappears as you zoom in and some other smaller islands/rocks don't show either. When you change the map base they show up on the 1913 view and earlier. Maybe this is just a very high level map lacking detail (but it shows a good level of detail for other areas of the country). Maybe I 'm looking at it wrong. Maybe my mobile browser isn't rendering it right. I can see it on marine traffic and google maps OK. Similar happens with some other small islands.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,428 ✭✭✭Dwarf.Shortage


    Is the Prime Time segment in question up on RTÉ player yet (on phone so can't check)? Would like to listen to it for myself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,262 ✭✭✭Gaoth Laidir


    nidou wrote: »
    The online maps on osi.ie show it sort of odd - just a dotted outline that disappears as you zoom in and some other smaller islands/rocks don't show either. When you change the map base they show up on the 1913 view and earlier. Maybe this is just a very high level map lacking detail (but it shows a good level of detail for other areas of the country). Maybe I 'm looking at it wrong. Maybe my mobile browser isn't rendering it right. I can see it on marine traffic and google maps OK. Similar happens with some other small islands.

    No i noticed that too on my laptop. Strange


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,262 ✭✭✭Gaoth Laidir


    Is the Prime Time segment in question up on RTÉ player yet (on phone so can't check)? Would like to listen to it for myself.
    Should be up within the hour I'd say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2 nidou


    nidou wrote: »
    The online maps on osi.ie show it sort of odd - just a dotted outline that disappears as you zoom in and some other smaller islands/rocks don't show either. When you change the map base they show up on the 1913 view and earlier. Maybe this is just a very high level map lacking detail (but it shows a good level of detail for other areas of the country). Maybe I 'm looking at it wrong. Maybe my mobile browser isn't rendering it right. I can see it on marine traffic and google maps OK. Similar happens with some other small islands.

    And I'm not saying this was basis for any db in use either BTW. I'm not familiar with the workings of the systems in use at all.

    Terrible tragedy.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,415 ✭✭✭Negative_G


    Cianmcliam wrote: »
    The EGPWS is the very last resort though, even with it missing in the database it should surely have been on the maps so nothing should be flying anywhere near it unless planning to land you would think.

    EGPWS has several different modes of protection. Provided that the aircraft was configured for landing ie with the gear down (which I am assuming was the case given their intentions), the only mode that would have sounded is the "TERRAIN TERRAIN, PULL UP PULL UP". If this wasn't on the database as claimed then their would have been no audible warning whatsoever.

    For an aircraft that spends a fair amount of time operating at low altitudes both in land and off shore you would think that every obstacle (within reason, outside of urban areas etc) should be listed and marked on their database and reflected on the moving map. The same goes for all wind farms around the country, and the numbers are only increasing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 215 ✭✭Coil Kilcrea


    220 ft, 9 miles out from Blacksod, low cloud base seems very low with so far to go?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 464 ✭✭2forjoy


    Is the Prime Time segment in question up on RTÉ player yet (on phone so can't check)? Would like to listen to it for myself.

    Its there now starts at 25 minutes in


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,428 ✭✭✭Dwarf.Shortage


    2forjoy wrote: »
    Its there now starts at 25 minutes in

    Cheers, will take a look when I get home.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,415 ✭✭✭Negative_G


    If the onboard weather radar had a downward tilt then at such a low altitude would it fail to detect terrain until it was too late?

    It all depends on the tilt angle and the range at which it is painting. Weather radars can be set at different settings.

    Generally they will paint an area up to approximately 120 degrees or thereabouts. So 60 degrees left and right of the aircraft heading. At this setting you may only get a full picture "painted" every 5 seconds or so as the radar moves from left to right.

    Alternatively you cab select a "narrow" sweep setting. This will change the sweep area to 60 degrees (as an example), 30 degrees left and right. The advantage of this is that it will provide more accurate frequent returns. The caveat being that it is of a much reduced area.

    An board weather radar would absolutely be able to "paint" a return on the screen however there are several variables involved that may preclude its use.

    Given the avionics on board I would find it hard to believe the crew were relying on weather radar in isolation. Perhaps as additional aid but certainly not as a primary source.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,090 ✭✭✭✭FixdePitchmark


    if cloud density is very bad / visibility very poor.

    Would a pilot ever go that low that far out ? , just for the purpose of seeing land and sea level ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,111 ✭✭✭The_Wanderer


    I don't recall this being posted on here before.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/discovery-of-helicopter-tail-wreckage-adds-to-questions-around-crash-1.3019244?mode=amp

    Includes the theory that I have of the crew mixing up the two locations, plus several other theories.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,534 ✭✭✭gctest50


    Negative_G wrote: »
    It all depends on the tilt angle and the range at which it is painting. Weather radars can be set at different settings.
    ..........

    They have FliR though ?


    be something like this ? :





    http://bit.ly/2ncG5zh


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,067 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    A rock with a lighthouse must surely be known to experienced aviators.

    Or even a rock with a helicopter landing pad on it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,181 ✭✭✭spaceHopper


    How about we wait for the report findings


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,752 ✭✭✭irishgeo


    Surely this wasn't the first time the R116 crew flew to the west of ireland. If it's not on the map don't you think one of the crew would go watch out for Blackrock Island if one of the crew was unfamiliar with the area. If its not on my map, I would be making note of it on my map. I still don't think CFIT is a possibility.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,111 ✭✭✭The_Wanderer


    How about we wait for the report findings

    How about we lock the thread and allow no more discussion on the subject?

    Unfortunately due to the high profile nature of the incident, people are curious to know what happened. Be it the experts, enthusiasts or the layman with no previous knowledge of SAR operations. People have theories, some more outlandish than others but in fairness that is to be expected. It is human nature to be curious.

    From what we do know of the accident the helicopter was somewhere it shouldn't have been. The official report will hopefully answer those questions. But until then people will have theories and will be curious to know what happened and learn from it. So it may never happen again.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 6,524 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Steve


    I'm not sure that this evening's Prime Time report has added anything new to the discussion that's already happened here over a considerable number of days.

    My Sky Box stopped recording before the end of the program, so I've ended up watching part of the report again on the RTE +1 channel, which is why I am only posting this now, as I wanted to make sure I missed nothing that might be significant.

    So, what do we know about the final flight of 116. They flew from Dublin to the Blacksod Bay area somewhere in the vicinity of 4000 Ft, and then flew an outbound track to close to Blackrock, carried out what looks like a standard teardrop procedure turn back towards Blackrock, and then would have turned inbound towards the Mayo Coast, with an intention of arriving at 220 Ft above the water south of Blacksod, where they would then have had a clear unobstructed run into Blacksod for a landing on the helipad there, with the Blacksod light providing a very good visual confirmation of their position.

    Given the distances involved, I would have expected them to have crossed Blackrock outbound at an altitude of approximately 4000 Ft, and then after completing the outward section of the teardrop turn, they would have left 4000 Ft and started their descent, with the initial descent being to 3000 Ft on the inbound leg of the teardrop, as that would fit with the sort of profile they would fly on a regular basis as part of a standard instrument approach profile, with this approach starting further out to allow cloud break and transition to visual flight with the necessary and required safety distance off shore.

    The systems on the aircraft would have been completely and totally able to perform such a procedure automatically without crew intervention. We do not know if the procedure for this approach profile was pre loaded into the data base of the on board computers, if they were hand flying, this is the sort of procedure they would have been doing on an almost daily basis to make contact with trawlers and the like that they were recovering casualties from, it would have been a very regular process for all of the crew.

    What is not clear at present is that for reasons not yet explained, 116 made contact with the west edge of Blackrock Island, evidenced by the presence of "significant debris" on the island, and the presence of significant wreckage not far off shore which will hopefully be recovered tomorrow.

    Jurgen Whyte has stated that he saw nothing unusual or abnormal about carrying out such a procedure, his investigation will need to ensure that it was carried out correctly.

    Prime Time have stated categorically that Black Rock was not in the EGPWS of the S92, but they have not given a definitive source for that information, and a number of organisations they have asked for comment have specifically declined to comment citing the AAIU investigation as their reason for not doing so.

    Given the profile that was implied in the course they had flown, which was probably related to attempting to make radio contact with R118, I am having problems determining why R116 would have descended to 220 Ft so early in the approach, given that the AIS system should have shown the Blackrock Light on one or more of their instruments, as it is in that database, and a descent of that height over such a short distance would have been outside of their normal operating parameters, and would have made reliable radio contact with 118 and Shannon more difficult.

    We clearly still have as many unanswered questions as we had before this evening's episode of Prime Time, I was hoping that with people on the ground and close to the investigation, Prime Time were going to put some new or updated information into the public domain, but that did not happen tonight, we can only hope that after a productive day on site tomorrow, there may be some more specific news released.

    Shore, if it was easy, everybody would be doin it.😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,769 ✭✭✭nuac


    Suggest we close this thread at least until the bodies are recovered


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,575 ✭✭✭✭Steve


    If people here remain respectful then no need to close it.

    There are a lot of eyes on this .


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,163 ✭✭✭Mech1


    How about we wait for the report findings

    Go tell RTE how you feel about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,404 ✭✭✭✭vicwatson


    I don't recall this being posted on here before.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/discovery-of-helicopter-tail-wreckage-adds-to-questions-around-crash-1.3019244?mode=amp

    Includes the theory that I have of the crew mixing up the two locations, plus several other theories.

    Scary unfounded reading


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,111 ✭✭✭The_Wanderer


    vicwatson wrote: »
    Scary unfounded reading

    Which part? No different to what's been posted on here at times.

    The article went through several different possible theories. Until the AAIU have more information, every theory is still a valid theory.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,575 ✭✭✭✭Steve


    vicwatson wrote: »
    Scary unfounded reading

    I agree.

    It sells papers though. Vampire journalism at it's worst.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 110 ✭✭Shamrock841


    Just a couple of thoughts here.

    Until it's confirmed that the EGPWS did not have Blackrock in it's DB I struggle to believe it.

    If Blackrock was entered in the FMS as the destination would there not be a fail safe alert, something along the lines of a warning message saying destination not suitable for A/C

    I think it more likely Blackrock was entered as a waypoint rather than a destination.

    Finally I believe as with all accidents there will be a sequence of events that lead to crash, not just one event.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 6,524 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Steve


    I don't recall this being posted on here before.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/discovery-of-helicopter-tail-wreckage-adds-to-questions-around-crash-1.3019244?mode=amp

    Includes the theory that I have of the crew mixing up the two locations, plus several other theories.

    In various ways, the themes proposed by the IT have indeed been covered, and most of the scenarios that the IT proposes have been deemed as unlikely or implausible, and reasons for that have been given.

    It is unlikely that there would have been confusion between Blackrock and Blacksod as Blackrock is not a suitable landing site for an S92, it's too small, and has insufficient safe clearance around the pad for a helicopter of the S92 size. so it should not have been automatically selectable as a landing site.

    We have deliberately refrained from going into heavy speculation about possible causes to try and avoid any possibility of tarnishing the reputation of a highly experienced and professional crew, the time for that discussion will be after their remains have been recovered and returned to their families, and they have been able to start seeing closure on their loss.

    Shore, if it was easy, everybody would be doin it.😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,415 ✭✭✭Negative_G


    gctest50 wrote: »
    They have FliR though ?


    be something like this ? :





    http://bit.ly/2ncG5zh

    I was responding to the poster and their question about weather radar specifically.

    A FLIR and WX Radar are two separate systems, serve different fucntions and operate independently of each other.

    Even so, while FLIR imagery can probably be displayed by means of a multi function display unit in the cockpit I would suspect its main users would be rear crew so as to allow the pilots to focus on the task of flying the aircraft.

    Like NVG systems, FLIR imagery does not give accurate depth perception so again I would be hesitant to think it was being used as a navigation source.

    While a FLIR can definitely be used to aid flight it would be used to augment traditional navigation sources. And while it can penetrate fog to some degree, it can only do so much.

    To have spotted black rock, the crew would have had to have the camera set at the appropriate zoom setting, on the same axis as the aircraft heading and be actively monitoring it all during a critical phase of flight.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,404 ✭✭✭✭vicwatson


    Which part? No different to what's been posted on here at times.

    The article went through several different possible theories. Until the AAIU have more information, every theory is still a valid theory.

    All of it. It's pure theory.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,575 ✭✭✭✭Steve


    If they were intending to land for fuel, neither the the PIC nor the PNF would have been using FLIR.

    Negative_G wrote: »
    I was responding to the poster and their question about weather radar specifically.

    A FLIR and WX Radar are two separate systems, serve different fucntions and operate independently of each other.

    Even so, while FLIR imagery can probably be displayed by means of a multi function display unit in the cockpit I would suspect its main users would be rear crew so as to allow the pilots to focus on the task of flying the aircraft.

    Like NVG systems, FLIR imagery does not give accurate depth perception so again I would be hesitant to think it was being used as a navigation source.

    While a FLIR can definitely be used to aid flight it would be used to augment traditional navigation sources. And while it can penetrate fog to some degree, it can only do so much.

    To have spotted black rock, the crew would have had to have the camera set at the appropriate zoom setting, on the same axis as the aircraft heading and be actively monitoring it all during a critical phase of flight.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,415 ✭✭✭Negative_G


    Steve wrote: »
    If they were intending to land for fuel, neither the the PIC nor the PNF would have been using FLIR.

    Yes. Which is why I said;

    "Like NVG systems, FLIR imagery does not give accurate depth perception so again I would be hesitant to think it was being used as a navigation source."

    Am I missing something?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement