Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

6 Nations 2017 General Discussion Thread

12122232527

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,779 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Granny15 wrote: »
    I think we'll beat them but without a bonus point so we'll be going into last weekend with nothing to play for.

    Any win for us on Friday would have us well in the hunt against England. We're just 3 points behind them so even if they get a TBP win over Scotland (unlikely from the looks of it) then there'll be a 4 point difference. An 8 point win in the Aviva would win us the Championship on PD.

    If both England and ourselves win without BPs this weekend then any win at all will do in the Aviva.

    If we win in Cardiff we'll have it all to play for against England.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 609 ✭✭✭English Lurker


    Buer wrote: »
    Hasn't played in 3 months and has had significant fitness issues in the past due to his weight. Whatever about his destructive ability, he's not going to be a defensive tower of strength for them.

    We'll need to make sure he's moved around the pitch as much as possible.

    The significant fitness issues due to weight are a couple of seasons in the past. He's probably not capable of 70 minutes hard work at international level regardless though, and I imagine his role would be similar to Hask's was at the start of tournament i.e. 30 minutes at the end.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,301 ✭✭✭Snickers Man


    Shero1985 wrote: »
    Can anyone confirm what the rules are if teams are level on match points at end of the tournament? Is it still the same as previous years?- i.e. points difference.

    This could become crucial, and the perfunctory piece on the Six Nations website is no help at all.

    Consider a possible scenario at time of writing.

    England are currently on 13pts, Ireland on 10 and Scotland on 9.

    Let's say just for the crack that Ireland beat Wales on Friday in Cardiff. We will have 14pts (No Bonus)

    Let's say, just for the crack, that Scotland beat England narrowly at Twickenham this weekend. They move on to 13 and England move to 14 with a losing bonus.

    Then on the following week, Scotland, first up against Italy, win with a bonus point. They therefore move on to 18pts, and will have beaten both England AND Ireland.

    For the last game of the season, Ireland and England will take to the field on 14pts each, both having lost to Scotland. Does this mean that somebody will have to win that match with a bonus point in order to overtake Scotland?

    Scenario: If the winner of Ireland v England DOESN'T get a bonus point and finishes level with Scotland on 18 does head to head separate the teams or points difference?

    If it's head to head, Scotland wins.
    If it's points difference, it will depend largely on what Scotland will have achieved against Italy but they will find it hard to overtake Ireland.

    The difference is crucial.

    Does anybody have a special channel into the Six NAtions organisers? Their website is as useful as an ashtray on a motorbike!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,047 ✭✭✭Bazzo


    AFAIK the introduction of bonus points hasn't changed the rule that if teams finish level on match points it goes down to points difference.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,899 ✭✭✭✭BBDBB


    This could become crucial, and the perfunctory piece on the Six Nations website is no help at all.

    Consider a possible scenario at time of writing.

    England are currently on 13pts, Ireland on 10 and Scotland on 9.

    Let's say just for the crack that Ireland beat Wales on Friday in Cardiff. We will have 14pts (No Bonus)

    Let's say, just for the crack, that Scotland beat England narrowly at Twickenham this weekend. They move on to 13 and England move to 14 with a losing bonus.

    Then on the following week, Scotland, first up against Italy, win with a bonus point. They therefore move on to 18pts, and will have beaten both England AND Ireland.

    For the last game of the season, Ireland and England will take to the field on 14pts each, both having lost to Scotland. Does this mean that somebody will have to win that match with a bonus point in order to overtake Scotland?

    Scenario: If the winner of Ireland v England DOESN'T get a bonus point and finishes level with Scotland on 18 does head to head separate the teams or points difference?

    If it's head to head, Scotland wins.
    If it's points difference, it will depend largely on what Scotland will have achieved against Italy but they will find it hard to overtake Ireland.

    The difference is crucial.

    Does anybody have a special channel into the Six NAtions organisers? Their website is as useful as an ashtray on a motorbike!




    55110663.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,301 ✭✭✭Snickers Man


    BBDBB wrote: »
    55110663.jpg

    Watch the round ball game then. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,899 ✭✭✭✭BBDBB


    Watch the round ball game then. :D


    Im afraid I wouldn't fit in with my rough uncouth ways ;-p


  • Posts: 20,606 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Match points
    Points difference

    Head to head doesn't come into it as there are no return fixtures.

    If Scotland beat England and we beat England and Wales, Scotland need to cricket score on Italy to win, our points difference is a ways ahead.

    Ireland win our last two games I'd say we will take the championship unless England obliterate Scotland. If England get a TBP and a decent win margin I'd say they will take the tournament.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,830 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler


    Match points
    Points difference

    Head to head doesn't come into it as there are no return fixtures.

    If Scotland beat England and we beat England and Wales, Scotland need to cricket score on Italy to win, our points difference is a ways ahead.

    Ireland win our last two games I'd say we will take the championship unless England obliterate Scotland. If England get a TBP and a decent win margin I'd say they will take the tournament.
    Yeah. Currently Scotland are 43 points behind us and England are 29. That's on points difference obviously.

    If Scotland did beat England, they'd obviously gain something on us. It would still need us to barely beat Wales and England for them to have a chance of putting a big enough score on Italy to overhaul us. Having said that, we put 53 points on Italy, so it's possible.


  • Posts: 20,606 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Yeah. Currently Scotland are 43 points behind us and England are 29. That's on points difference obviously.

    If Scotland did beat England, they'd obviously gain something on us. It would still need us to barely beat Wales and England for them to have a chance of putting a big enough score on Italy to overhaul us. Having said that, we put 53 points on Italy, so it's possible.

    We benefit from Scotland going first.

    If Scotland and Ireland win it sets up another super Saturday like 2015 with 3 teams in the running

    If Ireland and England win then it's a head to head for the title.

    If Wales and England win then England have it with a week to spare.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,636 ✭✭✭✭errlloyd


    If Scotland and Ireland win it sets up another super Saturday like 2015 with 3 teams in the running

    Well not quite. Super Saturday 2015 had a potential winner in every game. And in fact, France could also have won the championship on the final day!

    We may never see a day of rugby like that again - in fact I'd bet that it'll stand as being the best final day in 6 nations history forever (as I don't expect it to be equaled for the competition changes).

    What an incredible day. Thank you Rory Kockott.


  • Posts: 20,606 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    errlloyd wrote: »
    Well not quite. Super Saturday 2015 had a potential winner in every game. And in fact, France could also have won the championship on the final day!

    We may never see a day of rugby like that again - in fact I'd bet that it'll stand as being the best final day in 6 nations history forever (as I don't expect it to be equaled for the competition changes).

    What an incredible day. Thank you Rory Kockott.

    The stress of that England game. Still produced some absolute beaut's, this in particular:



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,697 ✭✭✭elefant


    The stress of that England game. Still produced some absolute beaut's, this in particular:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vh9kk-ddwRo

    And when the Nakaitaci almost forgot to ground the ball when walking in a try, just running straight over the dead ball line :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,301 ✭✭✭Snickers Man


    Match points
    Points difference

    Head to head doesn't come into it as there are no return fixtures.

    If you say so. Anyway, the chances of Scotland winning in Twickenham are remote. They NEVER win there. Well, almost never. Only two wins in Twickers since the War.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,830 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler


    If you say so. Anyway, the chances of Scotland winning in Twickenham are remote. They NEVER win there. Well, almost never. Only two wins in Twickers since the War.
    The bookies are giving +11 for Scotland. I think that's certainly generous, whatever about their chances of winning.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 676 ✭✭✭turnikett1


    Very random question...

    In one of the 6N a while back, it must've been 2015 or 2014, there was an Italy match build up thread. I don't remember if it was for Ireland v Italy or another team. But in the OP, there was a picture of an Italian fella, I believe it was Campagnaro, scoring a try. For whatever way he landed, his skin was all contorted and he looked about 80 years old :D It was all very funny and I would like to see it again.

    Anyone remember that picture!?


  • Posts: 20,606 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    turnikett1 wrote: »
    Very random question...

    In one of the 6N a while back, it must've been 2015 or 2014, there was an Italy match build up thread. I don't remember if it was for Ireland v Italy or another team. But in the OP, there was a picture of an Italian fella, I believe it was Campagnaro, scoring a try. For whatever way he landed, his skin was all contorted and he looked about 80 years old :D It was all very funny and I would like to see it again.

    Anyone remember that picture!?

    Was this the one?

    article-2292779-18A18941000005DC-288_634x668.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 676 ✭✭✭turnikett1


    Ha, genuinely doesn't look that far off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 45,433 ✭✭✭✭thomond2006


    Dulin ; Nakaitaci, Lamerat, Fickou, Vakatawa ; (o) Lopez, (m) Serin -
    Gourdon, Picamoles, Sanconnie - Maestri, Le Devedec - Slimani, Guirado (cap), Baille.

    Tolofua, Ben Arous, Atonio, Jedrasiak, Le Roux, Dupont, Trinh-Duc, Huget.

    First cap for Fabien Sanconnie of Brive. Ollivon is injured.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,728 ✭✭✭Former Former


    Brown; Nowell, Joseph, Farrell, Daly; Ford, Youngs; Marler, Hartley (captain), Cole, Launchbury, Lawes, Itoje, Haskell, Hughes.

    Replacements: George, M Vunipola, Sinckler, Wood, B Vunipola, Care, Te'o, Watson

    Billy Vunipola on the bench, Joseph back in at 13.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,258 ✭✭✭✭Buer


    Interesting that Mako Vunipola misses out after coming back against Italy. I imagine Billy V will get 25-30 minutes off the bench.

    Watson back into the 23.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,433 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Nowell starting again is a pox.

    Fabulous winger.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,047 ✭✭✭Bazzo


    Farrell apparently picked up a knock in training and had to sit out the remainder afterwards. Jones says he'll be ok but I think best practice is mostly just to ignore anything and everything Jones says.

    Anyway, could be bad news for England, hugely important player for them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,636 ✭✭✭✭errlloyd


    Dulin ; Nakaitaci, Lamerat, Fickou, Vakatawa ; (o) Lopez, (m) Serin -
    Gourdon, Picamoles, Sanconnie - Maestri, Le Devedec - Slimani, Guirado (cap), Baille.

    Tolofua, Ben Arous, Atonio, Jedrasiak, Le Roux, Dupont, Trinh-Duc, Huget.

    First cap for Fabien Sanconnie of Brive. Ollivon is injured.

    Is Spedding injured?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,641 ✭✭✭Dog Botherer


    errlloyd wrote: »
    Is Spedding injured?

    No mention of it, probably just rotation. More of a horse for courses pick too, Dulin will shred the Italians.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,638 ✭✭✭FACECUTTR


    No mention of it, probably just rotation. More of a horse for courses pick too, Dulin will shred the Italians.

    John Hayes and Mike Ross would shred the Italians at this stage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,641 ✭✭✭Dog Botherer


    FACECUTTR wrote: »
    John Hayes and Mike Ross would shred the Italians at this stage.

    Mike's been practicing.

    https://mobile.twitter.com/MikeRoss03/status/836243552426422272


  • Posts: 20,606 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]



    Everytime I see that it's like someone pushes a button and I'm instantly happy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,638 ✭✭✭FACECUTTR



    I seen that. Who says you can't teach an old dog new tricks.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,433 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Looks like Farrell is dropping out of the England side and Te'o starting in his place.


Advertisement