Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

PGA Tour Thread

1183184186188189310

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,822 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    HighLine wrote:
    "Exception: A player may not take relief under this Rule if (a) interference by anything other than an immovable obstruction makes the stroke clearly impracticable or (b) interference by an immovable obstruction would occur only through use of a clearly unreasonable stroke or an unnecessarily abnormal stance, swing or direction of play."

    And that to me is where the official bottled it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,822 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    Anyway Karma kicking in on the 1st.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,887 ✭✭✭WHIP IT!


    WHIP IT! wrote:
    I'm really placing my faith in the golfing Gods to 'level things up' karma-wise with Mickelson tonight.


    So far so good! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,150 ✭✭✭✭LuckyGent88


    Anyway I'll move onto tonight's golf. Could be a cracker. That final group could produce fireworks.

    Have to say Iv loved this course. Has produced eagles to triple bogies. Isn't that long but is very tight so actually punishes poor tee shots which is good to see unlike in most us events.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,453 ✭✭✭Felexicon


    Jesus it must be painful playing with Phil in this form. Taking an age to get through holes. You'd imagine he'd be on the clock fairly sharpish if this was in Europe.

    Should be a cracker from this final group


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,872 ✭✭✭Golfgraffix


    First Up wrote: »
    And that to me is where the official bottled it.

    So was there no chance of a swing ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,990 ✭✭✭Potential Underachiever


    Come on Big Deej!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,872 ✭✭✭Golfgraffix


    Do you think that playing a course like this is frustrating for the pros? Kinda like us amateurs turning up and playing Clontarf which forces you to play a differnent game ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,378 ✭✭✭HighLine


    Rory doesn't look good so far. Already losing ground.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 723 ✭✭✭Hoof Hearted2


    Do you think that playing a course like this is frustrating for the pros? Kinda like us amateurs turning up and playing Clontarf which forces you to play a differnent game ?

    Nope, pros can adapt more readily to any conditions and don't generally get frustrated by anything, but the ones that do are usually the ones who don't win that week.
    On the other hand you do have some amateurs who are too precious to play in at a "down market club" and that's what sets the pros and amateurs apart.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,872 ✭✭✭Golfgraffix


    Nope, pros can adapt more readily to any conditions and don't generally get frustrated by anything, but the ones that do are usually the ones who don't win that week.
    On the other hand you do have some amateurs who are too precious to play in at a "down market club" and that's what sets the pros and amateurs apart.

    I think you took me out of context, I never called Clontarf downmarket, it's a nice course but like corballis it's quite unorthodox in the chance to get to hit driver.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 723 ✭✭✭Hoof Hearted2


    I think you took me out of context, I never called Clontarf downmarket, it's a nice course but like corballis it's quite unorthodox in the chance to get to hit driver.

    Might come as a surprise to you, but there's more to golf than just smashing driver.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,098 ✭✭✭Johnny_Fontane


    no birdies in ten holes for mcilroy, some of which are very driveable. Hope hes not running out of puff. lack of golf may hurt him here. Hopefully not....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,453 ✭✭✭Felexicon


    Might come as a surprise to you, but there's more to golf than just smashing driver.

    Give over pal


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 723 ✭✭✭Hoof Hearted2


    For anyone who thinks Phil and Tiger get more "favorable" rulings, you are wrong and just highlighting your own ignorance of the rules.
    The reason they appear to get more "favorable" rulings is because they (and any pro worth their salt or any golfer for that matter ) knows and understands the rules and are in a position in the first place to look for a ruling.
    To the uninitiated it may then look like an unfair advantage when it's simply a case of that onlooker not understanding the rule/s, the answer, well educate yourself on the rules.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 723 ✭✭✭Hoof Hearted2


    Felexicon wrote: »
    Give over pal

    Give over yourself horse!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,453 ✭✭✭Felexicon


    Give over yourself horse!


    Who you calling horse, mate


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,024 ✭✭✭✭FixdePitchmark


    Do you think that playing a course like this is frustrating for the pros? Kinda like us amateurs turning up and playing Clontarf which forces you to play a differnent game ?

    It is not like clontarf . No sprinkler heads at trees in clontarf.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 723 ✭✭✭Hoof Hearted2


    Felexicon wrote: »
    Who you calling horse, mate

    I'm not your mate, matey!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,098 ✭✭✭Johnny_Fontane


    For anyone who thinks Phil and Tiger get more "favorable" rulings, you are wrong and just highlighting your own ignorance of the rules.
    The reason they appear to get more "favorable" rulings is because they (and any pro worth their salt or any golfer for that matter ) knows and understands the rules and are in a position in the first place to look for a ruling.
    To the uninitiated it may then look like an unfair advantage when it's simply a case of that onlooker not understanding the rule/s, the answer, well educate yourself on the rules.

    not having this at all.

    Did you see the three rulings yesterday? like watch them live?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 723 ✭✭✭Hoof Hearted2


    not having this at all.

    Did you see the three rulings yesterday? like watch them live?

    Good for you Johnny, write the PGA tour a strongly worded letter and give them like a piece of your mind.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,453 ✭✭✭Felexicon


    Hopefully that putt can get Rory going


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,822 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    So was there no chance of a swing ?


    From what I could see, none whatever but the commentators weren't going near it - just raving about how creative Phil is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,822 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    For anyone who thinks Phil and Tiger get more "favorable" rulings, you are wrong and just highlighting your own ignorance of the rules.
    On last night's evidence, I know the sprinkler head rule better than the rules official who dealt with it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 723 ✭✭✭Hoof Hearted2


    First Up wrote: »
    From what I could see, none whatever but the commentators weren't going near it - just raving about how creative Phil is.

    Yes but you weren't playing the shot, Phil was and if Phil says he had a shot, then he had a shot and you have to accept that at face value, if you don't accept, you are incorrectly calling him a cheat.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 723 ✭✭✭Hoof Hearted2


    First Up wrote: »
    On last night's evidence, I know the sprinkler head rule better than the rules official who dealt with it.

    It was slugger white who was dealing with it directly and he dealt with it in a thorough and correct manner.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,822 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    Yes but you weren't playing the shot, Phil was and if Phil says he had a shot, then he had a shot and you have to accept that at face value, if you don't accept, you are incorrectly calling him a cheat.

    I didn't call him a cheat. I called him a bully.

    If Phil said he had a shot, then the official's job was to ask him to demonstrate it. I saw no sign of that happening.

    I have sympathy for the official - dealing with a star player live on TV. I don't know how senior or experienced he is but I strongly suspect that someone like Paramor wouldn't have caved so easily.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,822 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    It was slugger white who was dealing with it directly and he dealt with it in a thorough and correct manner.


    I'll await a detailed account of what happened before commenting further.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,024 ✭✭✭✭FixdePitchmark


    They should have events in central America and south America more.

    Best event in a while.

    As it pisses out of the heavens in Dublin - we now know Mexico can look like Clontarf, but from local knowledge the sprinkler head seemed as realistic as the grassy knoll - the course is not about distance - but Dustin just hit a ball there about 34O yards with backspin on the driver. But there is more to golf than distance we know from our horse here who is not a mate.

    Phil must be dropping in on Trump in Mar-a-Lago and Donald said - Phil when you go to Mexico , you show them sombrero wearing rapists - that rules , **** the rules.

    Meanwhile - Lee is falling apart again and it is 4 weeks to the masters and the crazies are on the way for the best thread on boards at Augusta National from your living room.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 723 ✭✭✭Hoof Hearted2


    First Up wrote: »
    I didn't call him a cheat. I called him a bully.

    If Phil said he had a shot, then the official's job was to ask him to demonstrate it. I saw no sign of that happening.

    I have sympathy for the official - dealing with a star player live on TV. I don't know how senior or experienced he is but I strongly suspect that someone like Paramor wouldn't have caved so easily.
    First Up wrote: »
    I'll await a detailed account of what happened before commenting further.

    Slugger eats Paramor for breakfast, he was thorough in his approach.

    Lads ye all need to chill out, ye are starting to sound like the English after they got schooled by the Conor O' Shea last Sunday, just because you don't understand it, doesn't make it incorrect or wrong.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement