Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Hail To The Chief (Read Mod Warning In OP)

18384868889193

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,348 ✭✭✭Jimmy Garlic


    Did anyone see the pathetic speech that slob Micheal Moore gave at the womens march on Washington? The guy has lost every single shred of dignity. All I can feel is pity as I cringe when I see the likes of him protest against democracy and pathetically self implode as they descend into obscurity and irrelevance.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭InTheTrees


    130Kph wrote: »
    CNN saying now 125,000 protesters in Boston. That is huge.

    Chicago looked as big.

    If these figures are correct these have to be the biggest worldwide protests since the pre-Iraq war protests in 2003.

    Donald trump. The great uniter and healer of divisions. lol.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    Did anyone see the pathetic speech that slob Micheal Moore gave at the womens march on Washington? The guy has lost every single shred of dignity. All I can feel is pity as I cringe when I see the likes of him protest against democracy and pathetically self implode as they descend into obscurity and irrelevance.

    #pleaseletstalkaboutanythingbuttrump

    Though I guess he did get a hell of a bigger audience than Trump did.


  • Posts: 31,896 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Meanwhile, in the land of Trumpton
    Trump disputes reports that he replaced a bust US civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr with one of Britain's wartime leader.

    "In the Oval Office there's a beautiful statue of Dr Martin Luther King. And I also happen to like Churchill. Winston Churchill. I think most of us like Churchill."

    At his meeting at the CIA headquarters
    Iraq: 'We got out wrong'


    Trump is saying that the US should had "kept" Iraqi oil, after the invasion.

    "But if you think about it Mike," Trump says to his CIA nominee, "if we kept the oil, we probably wouldn't have had ISIS because that's where they got their money in the first place.

    "So we should have kept the oil."

    "But ok. Maybe we'll have another chance."

    On ISIS
    Trump: 'We have to get rid of ISIS'
    Posted at 20:26

    "We have to get rid of ISIS, we have no choice.

    "Radical Islamic terrorism, and I said it yesterday, has to be eradicated just off the face of the earth.

    "This is evil."


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,624 ✭✭✭Little CuChulainn


    Did anyone see the pathetic speech that slob Micheal Moore gave at the womens march on Washington? The guy has lost every single shred of dignity. All I can feel is pity as I cringe when I see the likes of him protest against democracy and pathetically self implode as they descend into obscurity and irrelevance.

    Is there an anti-democracy protest somewhere?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,034 ✭✭✭Sonics2k


    I have to admit it, I'm baffled by all the Trump supporters going on about Obama launching drones and whatnot, but seem to be under same vague belief that Trump will just stop all current wars the US are involved in.

    So many like to say things like Killary and Obomber and all other kinds of absolute trash, but do they really really think Trump is gonna just stop doing it and still destroy ISIS.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,624 ✭✭✭Little CuChulainn


    Sonics2k wrote: »
    I have to admit it, I'm baffled by all the Trump supporters going on about Obama launching drones and whatnot, but seem to be under same vague belief that Trump will just stop all current wars the US are involved in.

    So many like to say things like Killary and Obomber and all other kinds of absolute trash, but do they really really think Trump is gonna just stop doing it and still destroy ISIS.

    he's going to eliminate radical islam without violence don't you know.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,375 ✭✭✭✭kunst nugget


    Sonics2k wrote: »
    I have to admit it, I'm baffled by all the Trump supporters going on about Obama launching drones and whatnot, but seem to be under same vague belief that Trump will just stop all current wars the US are involved in.

    Obviously they get deeply upset because killing brown-skinned people is totally meant to be a Republican thang... The libtard hippies don't shout 'America Fook Yeah!' anytime they bomb a wedding. It's bitterly disappointing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,256 ✭✭✭metaoblivia


    Billy86 wrote: »
    No offense, but good luck with that, at least in terms of holding themselves accountable on any level. In a few years if/when it goes it'll be all "how were we to know he was a fraud, we're the victims here!" - despite it being pointed out over and over and over to them for more than a year now.

    And good luck with that too. Remember Bush's "free speech zones" that Republicans were so fond of?

    I didn't say hold themselves accountable - I said the people will hold them accountable. And we get that chance every couple of years in elections. As of yet, no party has been able to hold on to power for more than a few election cycles. I have doubt no that this will continue.

    And they can try to suppress free speech - I have no doubt that they will. But that doesn't mean people will stop. :)

    In other words, you're being short-sighted and also kind of missed the point. Better luck next time!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    I didn't say hold themselves accountable - I said the people will hold them accountable. And we get that chance every couple of years in elections. As of yet, no party has been able to hold on to power for more than a few election cycles. I have doubt no that this will continue.

    And they can try to suppress free speech - I have no doubt that they will. But that doesn't mean people will stop. :)

    In other words, you're being short-sighted and also kind of missed the point. Better luck next time!

    I think you might have misjudged which side of said divide my comments were coming from and what I was getting at to be honest. ;)

    Though history will not be kind to this Trump regime if it is anything like expected, that much is for sure. But you'll need a far more pressing media (when Trump lies to their face they just say 'OK' and carry on, BushCo was no different) and due to the religious-like fanaticism a lot of Republican voters have to the point of caring more about their political party than their own country, a large chunk of the US voter base will still find a way to convince themselves it's somebody elses fault, and we'll likely be back in this scenario in 3 or 4 cycles time.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,775 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    Sonics2k wrote: »
    I have to admit it, I'm baffled by all the Trump supporters going on about Obama launching drones and whatnot, but seem to be under same vague belief that Trump will just stop all current wars the US are involved in.

    So many like to say things like Killary and Obomber and all other kinds of absolute trash, but do they really really think Trump is gonna just stop doing it and still destroy ISIS.

    The thing is the hypocrisy of the people who went on about Guantanamo and it holding prisoners without trial, and how quiet the same people seem to be due to the president being a Democrat, when he has mostly replaced capture with kill, guilty if killed in a drone strike unless proven otherwise - after death, people who worked with the drones saying they don't know most of the people they kill, they are just corpses.

    When I hear people say Obama was a good president, it says to me that person is saying 'I have kept myself suitably ignorant to believe this', or the person is gullible with a 'I believe what the media tell me and I lack critical thinking', or 'I believe he is good because he is a Democrat'.

    The problem is Trump can continue these policies, which went to a scale never seen before with Obama. Guantanamo was needed and I would argue still needed but with proper trials, as the other option is to keep killing people and assuming the people not on the kill list who also get killed are guilty - with no evidence.
    So will Trump keep the policy of summary executions via drone strikes, no doubt he will, but the acceptance under Obama is where this policy became accepted.
    That is the Obama problem, and a weak media who sided with the president and avoided keeping the heat on the President for his murderous policies.
    I will find it too late if the media suddenly finds a conscience now that Obama is no longer there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,723 ✭✭✭MightyMandarin


    Did anyone see the pathetic speech that slob Micheal Moore gave at the womens march on Washington? The guy has lost every single shred of dignity. All I can feel is pity as I cringe when I see the likes of him protest against democracy and pathetically self implode as they descend into obscurity and irrelevance.

    :confused:

    Dunno where you get this idea from. Presumably from your own head.

    Moore actually predicted Trump's election, as he knows his state and 'rust belt' folks really, really well. The guy is far from an idiot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,256 ✭✭✭metaoblivia


    Billy86 wrote: »
    I think you might have misjudged which side of said divide my comments were coming from and what I was getting at to be honest. ;)

    Though history will not be kind to this Trump regime if it is anything like expected, that much is for sure. But you'll need a far more pressing media (when Trump lies to their face they just say 'OK' and carry on, BushCo was no different) and due to the religious-like fanaticism a lot of Republican voters have to the point of caring more about their political party than their own country, a large chunk of the US voter base will still find a way to convince themselves it's somebody elses fault, and we'll likely be back in this scenario in 3 or 4 cycles time.

    No, I know you're not a Trump supporter - it was clear from your first comment.

    American politics is both tricky and completely predictable. One party gets in for a few years and then they get booted out. Unless Trump and his people truly attempt to dismantle American democracy, they will face the same scrutiny they themselves placed on Obama when he was in a similar position in the first two years of his first term. Most wins, including this one, are short term wins. Long term wins take decades in this country due to the back and forth. What's important is that we don't let the GOP hold on to this kind of power for very long. There's not much that can be done about the next two years from the liberal point of view - I agree. But we can do our best to make life very difficult for them by taking advantage of the next election cycle in 2 years.

    What's interesting about Trump though is seeing to what extremes he'll go and how quickly he'll lose the mandate which is a weak mandate because, again, he doesn't have the popular vote behind him. The GOP might try to downplay that, but if the roles had been completely reversed and had Hillary won under these same circumstances, I would be very nervous as a liberal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,500 ✭✭✭✭DEFTLEFTHAND


    It's so depressing hearing some of the anti democratic protesters speak. It's obvious that many are suffering with deep seeded psychological issues.

    The look so sad, weak and pathetic. I sincerely hope that Trump prioritises mental health reform in the States. It's a 1st world country, there's no excuse.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,624 ✭✭✭Little CuChulainn


    It's so depressing hearing some of the anti democratic protesters speak. It's obvious that many are suffering with deep seeded psychological issues.

    The look so sad, weak and pathetic. I sincerely hope that Trump prioritises mental health reform in the States. It's a 1st world country, there's no excuse.

    Do you even know what democracy is? The whole point of democracy is to give a voice to everyone. It is necessary for a functioning democracy to have an opposition to the government and the status quo. Speaking against Trump isn't anti-democratic, it's the fundamental idea behind democracy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,498 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Sky News tripping over themselves with references to the "special relationship". I doubt Trump cares too much about it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    needs no comment really...the man speaks (or should that be rambles?) for himself :rolleyes:



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,874 ✭✭✭threeball


    Trump is so flaky and with such a short attention span I could see him ditching the gig inside two years. Past presidents have aged badly obviously due to the demands of the job and I can't see Trump being up for that.
    Once the novelty wears off and reality of day to day sets in I could see him saying fcuk this for a game of cowboys and heading back to the prostitutes in Trump tower.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,067 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    *****give the man a chance********

    he's in power for one day and people want him out already?? at least let him do something outrageous first

    feck it! i find him entertaining ..and i ask you how many politicians can you say that about???


  • Posts: 31,896 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    fryup wrote: »
    *****give the man a chance********

    he's in power for one day and people want him out already?? at least let him do something outrageous first

    feck it! i find him entertaining ..and i ask you how many politicians can you say that about???
    The point is that a lot of people never wanted him in in the first place, so every day he's there, is a day too long.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,067 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    ^^^^^^^^^^^^

    well tough, that the way democracy works.............how about the other half who voted for him should they be over looked??


  • Posts: 31,896 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    fryup wrote: »
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^

    well tough, that the way democracy works.............how about the other half who voted for him should they be over looked??
    Yes that's correct, I sometimes wonder just how many of these protesters actually bothered to vote! there was a sizeable percentage who didn't bother to vote.
    But all these demonstrations really show is that they're bad losers and that they disrespect the principals of democracy!

    When he starts to carry out his manifesto, then they can protest against the implementation of the plan, a real reason for a protest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,833 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    trump-inauguration.jpg

    http://waterfordwhispersnews.com/2017/01/20/america-tries-to-ignore-pale-horse-that-just-appeared-beside-trump/
    “STAY on Trump, stay on Trump” barked the director in the TV control room, trying his best to maintain a sense of calm order following the sudden appearance of a ghostly pale horse onstage with the newly sworn-in POTUS in Washington DC.

    “Camera 2, stay on Trump. Camera 3, 4, wide crowd shots only, okay? Keep an eye on the horse, and keep him out of shot”.

    A hush fell across the assembled crowd at the inauguration ceremony when the animal appeared moments ago, cloaked in mist and curling its lips back to reveal some very sharp un-horselike fangs, to the left of Donald Trump just as he was sworn into office as the 45th president of the United States.

    The arrival of the horse, whose mane on close inspection seems to be made up of the shrieking, miniaturised souls of the trapped dead, was accompanied by what many described as a ‘terrifying peal of thunder’, or perhaps the bellowing roar of some dreadful horn or similar wind instrument, blown with gusto by some unseen heralder of doom.

    Despite the clear ramifications of the appearance of such a beast, Americans are currently doing their best to assure each other that everything is fine, and that sometimes pale horses show up and it doesn’t really mean anything about Trump, America, the world, or indeed the end of days.

    “The pale horse? Yeah, that’s probably… that’s probably just a stray horse that wandered onto the stage,” said one inauguration attendee, from under a sweat-soaked ‘Make America Great Again’ cap.

    “Nothing to worry about, certainly not a harbinger of anything. Just a horse, showing up, saying ‘hello’ in his own horsey way. Now, let’s just all go home and hug our loved ones, everything is going to be just super”.

    UPDATE: A skull-faced rider has now appeared on the back of the pale horse, which onlookers are assuring each other is ‘just part of the show’.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,360 ✭✭✭blackcard


    You have to laugh at Trump blaming the media for saying he had a feud with the CIA, saying that no one in the world admires the CIA more than him (reminds you of his statement that no one in the world respects women more than him) and then takes issue with the media reporting of the attendance at his inauguration. He really is delusional and thin skinned


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭InTheTrees


    fryup wrote: »
    well tough, that the way democracy works.............how about the other half who voted for him should they be over looked??

    The other half have the president they voted for. Theyre hardly being overlooked. They should be happy for that instead of whining about protesters.

    The protests and negativity towards trump will continue as long as he promotes division. Why wouldn't it? He has no interest in healing wounds or reaching out to anyone and he's said so and continues to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,067 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    InTheTrees wrote: »
    The other half have the president they voted for. Theyre hardly being overlooked. They should be happy for that instead of whining about protesters.

    but they're not whining....the only people who are whining are the protesters themselves...they're sore losers


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭InTheTrees


    blackcard wrote: »
    You have to laugh at Trump blaming the media for saying he had a feud with the CIA, saying that no one in the world admires the CIA more than him (reminds you of his statement that no one in the world respects women more than him) and then takes issue with the media reporting of the attendance at his inauguration. He really is delusional and thin skinned

    What a moron.

    Additionally he's threatened the media saying they'll "pay a high price" for misreporting his attendance numbers.

    Except they didnt.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭InTheTrees


    fryup wrote: »
    but they're not whining....the only people who are whining are the protesters themselves...they're sore losers

    This thread is filled with posts from trump supporters who don't understand political opposition.

    The new snowflakes.

    They should just ignore it, if it upsets them so much.


  • Posts: 45,738 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That press briefing by Sean Spicer was nuts. Sent out by Trump to complain about the press coverage on the attendance :eek:

    Talk about thin skinned. Trump can't handle criticism.

    https://twitter.com/FoxNews/status/822939003234041856/video/1


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 279 ✭✭SkinnyBuddha


    RoboKlopp wrote: »

    Amateur hour :D:D

    Sounds like a somebody not having a clue what they are at :)


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement