Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Sudden Stratospheric Warming 2016/2017 ?

  • 02-11-2016 11:44am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,693 ✭✭✭


    Hi Folks,

    Things are looking somewhat promising for a SSW event this winter, so we shall keep a watch and see can enough disruption be caused to the Polar Vortex and aid cold towards the lower latitudes, hopefully our direction.

    Firstly the trend is a negative AO to continue as warmer air gets push into the pole.

    aosprd2.gif



    Next image, keep an eye an the climb, we need this red line to keep going north, currently at about record warmth for the time of year.

    30mb9065.png

    pole30_nh.gif




    Very Good negative wind anomoly so far

    time_pres_UGRD_ANOM_OND_NH_2016.png


    More later.


Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 603 ✭✭✭Captain Snow


    Any updates Redsunset.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,666 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    Temperatures over the North Pole are looking like warming up significantly towards the end of January with some stratospheric warming taking place, even a good chance of sudden stratospheric warming taking place. Temperatures on 25 January over the Arctic are currently looking at -28c, -29c, -30c etc which is above the averages of -49c, -50c etc for this time of year. Not a sudden stratospheric warming quite yet on the long range outlook but still quite a bit of warming expected.

    This goes along with the models nicely that the high pressure will build over Scandinavia bringing us bitterly cold easterly winds. This could all end only so well :).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,520 ✭✭✭nagdefy


    https://twitter.com/MJVentrice/status/820283534439051264?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

    Re. SSW

    P.s. I'm a complete novice regarding Stratospheric warming but isn't it crucial whether it's over the western or pacific hemisphere?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,666 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    nagdefy wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/MJVentrice/status/820283534439051264?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

    Re. SSW

    P.s. I'm a complete novice regarding Stratospheric warming but isn't it crucial whether it's over the western or pacific hemisphere?

    Most certainly nagdefy. That's like saying "Isn't it crucial whether the blocking is over the western or pacific hemisphere". It definitely is crucial or else you won't get the expected conditions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,666 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    This chart is absolutely beautiful :).

    gfsnh-10-360.png?6


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭pedigree 6


    sryanbruen wrote: »
    This chart is absolutely beautiful :).

    Could you tell where blocking could occur in the northern hemisphere by that chart?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,666 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    pedigree 6 wrote: »
    Could you tell where blocking could occur in the northern hemisphere by that chart?

    Not a guarantee of a location but you can still estimate by where the stratospheric warming goes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,958 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Well, from what i've been reading this is more likely to be a displacement, rather than a split vortex, so there is the danger a lobe of the vortex will stay over Greenland. Although if that did transpire it's not much different to what we have now - a weakish vortex which still has enough oomph to inhibit blocking near Greenland. Still it does seem to be our best shot of a sustained cold outbreak in the weeks ahead. I wonder will the effects of it show up quicker in the troposphere, given there is not a very powerful vortex this winter


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,666 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    Well, from what i've been reading this is more likely to be a displacement, rather than a split vortex, so there is the danger a lobe of the vortex will stay over Greenland. Although if that did transpire it's not much different to what we have now - a weakish vortex which still has enough oomph to inhibit blocking near Greenland. Still it does seem to be our best shot of a sustained cold outbreak in the weeks ahead. I wonder will the effects of it show up quicker in the troposphere, given there is not a very powerful vortex this winter

    I'd still be up to that, I love this bland weather. Winter 2005/06 was very similar and then we had the extremely good Summer of 2006! Here's hoping it will be like that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,693 ✭✭✭Redsunset


    Sorry folks, I've being living in Poland and doing alot of skiing the last while and just bring skipping in and out of here. Yes hopefully a SSW can be produced and give Ireland some much needed proper winter conditions . All depends on where polar vortex lopes end up in the event of displacement or split. I don't see a split occurring. And mild can often be the outcome if on the wrong side of things.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,666 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    Yep, very disappointing today. The Stratospheric warming is still consistent on the GFS with the same warming expected BUT the AO is trending very positive :(.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,958 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    sryanbruen wrote: »
    Yep, very disappointing today. The Stratospheric warming is still consistent on the GFS with the same warming expected BUT the AO is trending very positive :(.

    According to Chino over on Netweather, it won't technically be a ssw. If one does occur there is usually a lag effect before the effects of it begin to show in the troposphere, so the AO could go positive before that happens

    The UK met office aren't factoring the warming into their long range forecast so far, but they do mention the possibility of us returning to a mid Atlantic high around the middle of February. I have a strong inkling we will see snow in March. Although I am not really interested in snow by then, unless it's an exceptional event.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 787 ✭✭✭ArKl0w



    The UK met office aren't factoring the warming into their long range forecast so far, but they do mention the possibility of us returning to a mid Atlantic high around the middle of February. I have a strong inkling we will see snow in March. Although I am not really interested in snow by then, unless it's an exceptional event.

    Yeah that's my thinking too,blooming nuisance when it comes then ,delays spring and melts by noon
    So you get icy roads night and morning

    There was a significant snowfall in Wicklow and Wexford that stayed on the ground for a week in march 1978
    I don't know the date but it was 6 or 8 inches here by the sea and over a foot on higher ground


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 787 ✭✭✭ArKl0w




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,666 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    ArKl0w wrote: »

    The ECMWF shows some warming to take place on the 29th at 30 hPa i.e. the Troposphere but it's not up to the standard of the warming at 10 hPa.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,958 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Judah Cohen @judah47

    What am I watching with the #polarvortex? If PV displaced deep into W Eurasia could setup a #cold easterly flow into #Europe for late winter.

    Seems like a big if to me. A tweet to get attention.
    A daughter vortex/lobe of vortex could easily be displaced to Greenland after an initial shift. It would be much better to get a split vortex but that does not seem likely to happen.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 787 ✭✭✭ArKl0w


    Mr Bastardi suggests the Strat event will favour North America and BOY he was right about Europe so far

    So I guess it's time to forget about cold and Snow in Ireland or northeasterly' until next winter

    https://twitter.com/bigjoebastardi/status/823235632457715714


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,666 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    ArKl0w wrote: »
    So I guess it's time to forget about cold and Snow in Ireland or northeasterly' until next winter

    Until Spring***

    :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,666 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    The GFS and ECMWF still show some significant stratospheric warming at the end of this week at the same strength as the past few days. Not much signs of it elongating into the Troposphere though which is very unfortunate.

    The AO is trending positive but then the trend goes towards neutral at the very end of the period (4th/5th February). I think it will stay positive at least until mid-February.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭pedigree 6


    ArKl0w wrote: »
    Mr Bastardi suggests the Strat event will favour North America and BOY he was right about Europe so far

    So I guess it's time to forget about cold and Snow in Ireland or northeasterly' until next winter

    See. We don't always get cold conditions from a SSW event in this country.;)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 787 ✭✭✭ArKl0w


    pedigree 6 wrote: »
    See. We don't always get cold conditions from a SSW event in this country.;)

    Well it does depend on where it is,quit trolling me,here and elsewhere,you are now on ignore :mad:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭pedigree 6


    ArKl0w wrote: »
    Well it does depend on where it is,quit trolling me,here and elsewhere,you are now on ignore :mad:

    What the hell?? Sorry.:eek:
    I didn't realise I did anything wrong.

    Say what you want then. I won't say anything again.

    I've never been called a troll before.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,666 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    pedigree 6 wrote: »
    What the hell?? Sorry.:eek:
    I didn't realise I did anything wrong.

    Say what you want then. I won't say anything again.

    I've never been called a troll before.

    Yeah, I don't see how you trolled him. Arkl0w, that was really uncalled for like what the hell?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,520 ✭✭✭nagdefy


    ArKl0w wrote: »
    Well it does depend on where it is,quit trolling me,here and elsewhere,you are now on ignore :mad:

    The way i read Pedigree's post Arkl0w is that he was agreeing with you that an SSW doesn't necessarily bring cold to Europe.

    Think ye just have wires crossed... It happens us all.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭pedigree 6


    ArKl0w wrote: »
    Well it does depend on where it is,quit trolling me,here and elsewhere,you are now on ignore :mad:

    Right to try to defend myself from being called a troll.
    Maybe I should show the bigger picture.
    Arklow posted this in the farming and forestry forum where I naturally post too.

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2057665075&page=26
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=102311014&postcount=376

    You can also see my reply.
    I then sent Arklow a pm of a YouTube clip from Gavin Partridge explaining SSW and the possible implications and that we could just as easily end up with a southwesterly air flow off the atlantic.

    Sorry mods delete this post if you want but I thought I should post something to get the full picture.
    I was being a bit cheeky in posting the "See. We don't always get cold air here from a SSW.;)".
    But I meant no malice in it and I thought it would be taken up as such.

    This is an open forum about weather and like any forum posters will have differing viewpoints and everyone should be welcome without having to resort to blocking posters.

    Anyway that's all.

    I will continue posting here and elsewhere and I hope you will too Arklow.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,958 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Well, this might be scraping the barrel- but the cfs model has been consistently showing a blocked March - they did the same in March 2013.

    Joe Bastardi might be right, but he has often being wrong in the past. Also in a SSW event most of the time( 75 per cent of the time) it leads to a cold solution.

    Although given our luck- or rather lack of luck this winter - blocking will probably end up in the wrong place leading to mild air over us.


    I would sooner listen to the experts over on the netweather forum to see what their views are before giving up. Before any effects show up, we will probably have to deal with a resurgent Atlantic as a response before any blocking high shows up.

    What ever happens i bet we will see pointless snow showers in March.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,666 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    I think it's most certainly safe to say that it's definitely not a SUDDEN stratospheric warming but it is a very significant stratospheric warming.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,958 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    ?page=35

    "Again we don't know how things will exactly work out tropospherically, but in my experience once we have that wave 2 upwell modelled across the board at day 10 then we know that the trop output will all have slightly different paths in the modelling but we end up with the same result. Best chance of deep cold this winter coming up"

    As Sryan' says a significant warming has taken place
    Will we be lucky with the forecasted split of the Vortex? There is a danger we get stuck on the mild side of any cold break, as has been spoken about before.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,958 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    So according to the experts over on netweather a technical SSW has occurred.

    Hopefully this leads to a sustained cold spell, rather than something brief as M.T. seems to think so.
    He seems to be siding with the GFS view of things. Although that model in the past has been known to be too progressive in shunting away blocking highs in the past.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,666 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    So according to the experts over on netweather a technical SSW has occurred.

    Hopefully this leads to a sustained cold spell, rather than something brief as M.T. seems to think so.
    He seems to be siding with the GFS view of things. Although that model in the past has been known to be too progressive in shunting away blocking highs in the past.

    A technical BUT an extremely weak SSW. The zonal winds at 10hPa are -0.1 m/s which is very weak and could potentially be the weakest SSW on record unless they go more negative over the next few days but I don't expect any further drops, I expect the zonal winds to go back into positive territory.

    Meanwhile, the AO is trending very negative up to 16 February. Very interesting but unfortunately, the NAO is still trending rather positive and for a better chance of a sustained cold spell, you need the NAO to go negative. :(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,958 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    sryanbruen wrote: »
    A technical BUT an extremely weak SSW. The zonal winds at 10hPa are -0.1 m/s which is very weak and could potentially be the weakest SSW on record unless they go more negative over the next few days but I don't expect any further drops, I expect the zonal winds to go back into positive territory.

    Meanwhile, the AO is trending very negative up to 16 February. Very interesting but unfortunately, the NAO is still trending rather positive and for a better chance of a sustained cold spell, you need the NAO to go negative. :(

    That's true.
    It's a weak warming because of the westerly QBO state- that is why the NAO is likely staying positive too. The one thing on our side is the size of the block, although with a positive NAO and the vortex forecasted to quickly recover due to the weak reversal, the odds of the Atlantic getting back in over us is high. England, as always, has a greater chance of holding on to a continental feed. Still i wont complain at all if only we get a 2- 3 day cold spell with heavy snow showers


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 419 ✭✭A Battered Mars Bar


    Hi guy!
    I admire all the technical know how. The charts, the edumacation gone into it. But for the life me lads what are ye saying? :( are we getting snow or a hurricane?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,219 ✭✭✭pad199207


    This winter will go down as the winter that promised so much but gave F all


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,666 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    Hi guy!
    I admire all the technical know how. The charts, the edumacation gone into it. But for the life me lads what are ye saying? :( are we getting snow or a hurricane?

    Neither :P, more bland dry weather after a very unsettled spell.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,666 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    UK people could be in for a February 1991 situation as the Polar Vortex looks like being properly split despite the SSW being extremely weak unlike in 2013. I'd like to thank the guys at Netweather for sharing this chart from January 1991.

    This chart in the attachment below shows some very significant warming at the end of January 1991 much like what happened in January 2017 but unlike this year, the 1991 warming wasn't considered a SSW. Nevertheless, due to how weak the SSW is in 2017, it is very similar to 1991's warming.

    For anybody that doesn't know, February 1991 started off exceptionally cold across the UK in particular with the cold far less intense over Ireland but it was still colder than normal. Around the end of the first week, snow started to show its hand across the east of Ireland and there were some heavy falls. After around 2 weeks of bitterly cold conditions, however, the Polar Vortex reformed and we got a much milder and wetter end to February 1991 with 13c on the 23rd. Read more about it here:

    https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwAX53FX4EFMVEdtbTRFTDRCdjQ/view?usp=sharing

    Before January & December 2010, February 1991 was the last month in England to record a mean temperature of less than 2c.

    February 1991 was not the most severe cold or snowy month by any means but I'd take it if I were offered it :D.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,958 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    No doubt if netweather forum was around in 1991 some people there would have looked for the breakdown at week two, rather than enjoy the two weeks of snowy nirvana:D

    I noticed the UKMO added this to their forecast for late next week:'some snow showers are likely to affect the east and northeast. There is just a small chance of these becoming heavy and spreading to central and some western areas this weekend. "


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,666 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    GFS is now showing another significant warming to take place through the 3rd to last week of February. This one looking like disrupting the Polar Vortex more abruptly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,958 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    sryanbruen wrote: »
    GFS is now showing another significant warming to take place through the 3rd to last week of February. This one looking like disrupting the Polar Vortex more abruptly.

    I fear mother nature likes trolling us, by showing us what we could have in winter time


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,238 ✭✭✭Oneiric 3


    blap.gif

    I'll leave this for greater minds than mine to interpret.

    New Moon



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,958 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Joe B tweeted this recently

    strongest phase 8 MJO in 40 plus years record forecasted now on BOMM, NCEP, ECMWF, JMA Amazing
    Just went through major warm phases 5,6,7

    Will the models in response start showing eye candy charts for the second week of March soon? I have acute model fatigue syndrome at this stage.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,666 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    Could this mid-March cold spell that's being shown by the models be the response to the Stratospheric Warming?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,958 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    sryanbruen wrote: »
    Could this mid-March cold spell that's being shown by the models be the response to the Stratospheric Warming?

    The guys over on the Netweather Stratosphere thread believe there is usually a two- three week lag period before the effects begin to show up in the troposphere.
    As i mentioned in the other thread, the uk met office must, to commit to a cold spell at this stage, be picking up a strong signal from their own model.

    Of course it will all go pear shaped in the end:pac: At this time of year it does not bother me if that happens, as without the perfect set up it will be cold rain or sleet, rather than snow that gives accumulations at lower levels.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,666 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    The guys over on the Netweather Stratosphere thread believe there is usually a two- three week lag period before the effects begin to show up in the troposphere.
    As i mentioned in the other thread, the uk met office must, to commit to a cold spell at this stage, be picking up a strong signal from their own model.

    Of course it will all go pear shaped in the end:pac: At this time of year it does not bother me if that happens, as without the perfect set up it will be cold rain or sleet, rather than snow that gives accumulations at lower levels.

    So there was no response to the January SSW (which was extremely weak)?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,958 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    sryanbruen wrote: »
    So there was no response to the January SSW (which was extremely weak)?

    I think there was, remember that brief weak south easterly flow we had due to the scandi high, which quickly sunk.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,666 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    I think there was, remember that brief weak south easterly flow we had due to the scandi high, which quickly sunk.

    You thought that was the response? I thought that was way too fast for a response to the SSW.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,958 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    sryanbruen wrote: »
    You thought that was the response? I thought that was way too fast for a response to the SSW.

    Apparently it was, according to what i read, usually the response takes two- three weeks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,666 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    It looks as though the response to the late February stratospheric warming is taking place now except in the USA where the eastern seaboard is much colder than normal and a nor'easter will take place in the coming days bringing blizzards. This is a contrast to the warm Winter they recorded. Meanwhile, temperatures at home are expected to go back down to average or stay slightly above for the next 7-10 days after a warm weekend.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,958 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    sryanbruen wrote: »
    It looks as though the response to the late February stratospheric warming is taking place now except in the USA where the eastern seaboard is much colder than normal and a nor'easter will take place in the coming days bringing blizzards. This is a contrast to the warm Winter they recorded. Meanwhile, temperatures at home are expected to go back down to average or stay slightly above for the next 7-10 days after a warm weekend.

    I have family over there They say its quite cold at the moment, and it will be cold all week.


Advertisement