Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

DCM 2016 Graduates: Keep On Running

18911131421

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,428 ✭✭✭scotindublin


    Great stuff Andy! Hopefully get there in the next couple of weeks (for some reason I am under 1000 miles on Strava but over on Garmin Connect so want to hit it on Strava)

    kin9pin wrote: »
    7 mile easy run home from work tonight took me to 1000 miles for the year :) Never thought I'd be able to say that.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 19,493 CMod ✭✭✭✭The Black Oil


    Bungy Girl wrote: »
    Let me know if you need more info.

    The plan says
    Warm ups / cooldown should be a minimum of 10-15 min easy jog

    Should this be based on a pace from the calculator?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 959 ✭✭✭kin9pin


    Great stuff Andy! Hopefully get there in the next couple of weeks (for some reason I am under 1000 miles on Strava but over on Garmin Connect so want to hit it on Strava)

    Only 48 miles to go Craig and you've got 25 hours to do it in to beat my time of 160h 55m :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 959 ✭✭✭kin9pin


    A few more questions on the intermediate marathon plan :)

    For progressions, should "MP" be my planned marathon pace (9:05) or the calculated marathon pace based on my 5k time (8:00)?
    Any tips on changing the schedule so as not to run on Christmas Day? Should I move the 1hr45 LSR to the Saturday?

    I have a half marathon on 19th March which clashes with one of the longest runs (2hr30 easy). The plan also shows a 60min moderate run on the Saturday 18th. I'd expect to race the HM so should I just scrap the two planned runs or rearrange?

    Thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,355 ✭✭✭Bungy Girl


    Should this be based on a pace from the calculator?

    Sure, you could choose to start at very easy pace and progress through to easy pace during the warm up (and vice versa on the cool down) or you could simply ignore the watch (would be my preference) and warm up based on effort. The idea is to prepare the body for the training ahead, not necessarily to hit a particular pace, so use the paces as guidelines rather than gospel.
    kin9pin wrote: »
    A few more questions on the intermediate marathon plan :)

    For progressions, should "MP" be my planned marathon pace (9:05) or the calculated marathon pace based on my 5k time (8:00)?
    Any tips on changing the schedule so as not to run on Christmas Day? Should I move the 1hr45 LSR to the Saturday?

    I have a half marathon on 19th March which clashes with one of the longest runs (2hr30 easy). The plan also shows a 60min moderate run on the Saturday 18th. I'd expect to race the HM so should I just scrap the two planned runs or rearrange?

    Thanks

    MP definitely based on PMP. The MP based on your 5K time is an indicator of your potential with appropriate training, at the moment that pace would be closer to your HM pace, I think ? So way too fast at the moment for MP.

    If you want to take Xmas day off as an extra rest day, then just move the LSR to the Saturday. If you want to stick to the weekly plan with your usual number of rest days then I'd suggest as above and move the other runs back a day so you're not doing two 'hard' sessions back to back. So the Saturday workout is now on Friday, the Friday now on Thursday and so on.

    As for the half, assuming you're talking about week 9 on the plan, I'd look at moving the 2:30 to week 8 switching out the 90 min progression with the half and also reducing down a couple of the 60 min runs that week. I would change as little as possible though, you need to keep the main thing the main thing.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 959 ✭✭✭kin9pin


    Thanks BG, that's a great help.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 244 ✭✭ToriV


    kabuxa wrote: »
    On a little 'sour' note Malaga marathon was cancelled this morning due to flooding and red alert. Imagine!
    Sure it is always good weather in the south! ;0/

    I saw some pictures . It was like biblical flooding....definitely not normal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,355 ✭✭✭Bungy Girl


    kin9pin wrote: »
    Thanks BG, that's a great help.

    Sorry kin9pin, I just spotted an error in the above. Must have been half asleep writing it :o. I've corrected it now, should have said the MP based on your 5k time .....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 959 ✭✭✭kin9pin


    Bungy Girl wrote: »
    Sorry kin9pin, I just spotted an error in the above. Must have been half asleep writing it :o. I've corrected it now, should have said the MP based on your 5k time .....

    Yeah I noticed that. I knew what you meant :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,090 ✭✭✭paddydriver


    So tried to start new regime at 6AM this morning.. getting to bed at 12AM did not help but all the same did get up and out OK for 5.3M. Did feel tired and really missed my brekkie beforehand. Going to try it again for next 2 mornings and that will set me up for 2 x Christmas parties on Friday and Sat night.. won't be much running done at weekend unfortunately.

    Like Kin8pin (Well done BTW!! - great achievement) I am just shy of 1000M for the year so need to get circa 25M per week done for next 3 weeks to just get there.. don't want to having to be doing a 20 miler on 31st Dec...:eek:


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,009 ✭✭✭✭The Muppet


    I think I know the answer to this one anyway but I'll ask none the less.

    The very easy pace from the calculator linked on the plan is well, very easy, I'd imagine it will require some restraint to keep to those paces, for instance my own very easy is 12:10 to 13:03 off my 25:53 5k last weekend.

    How important is it to stick within those easy and easy moderate ranges?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,080 ✭✭✭✭Maximus Alexander


    There is absolutely no way I'll be sticking to the easy pace it gave me, if that helps at all. :pac: I simply wouldn't enjoy running at that pace.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,009 ✭✭✭✭The Muppet


    There is absolutely no way I'll be sticking to the easy pace it gave me, if that helps at all. :pac: I simply wouldn't enjoy running at that pace.

    Tut Tut , BG will be out to tie your laces together Max.

    They are very slow, even for me but my guess is we'll be advised to adhere to them. Stick to the plan and all that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,672 ✭✭✭hillsiderunner


    The Muppet wrote: »
    I think I know the answer to this one anyway but I'll ask none the less.

    The very easy pace from the calculator linked on the plan is well, very easy, I'd imagine it will require some restraint to keep to those paces, for instance my own very easy is 12:10 to 13:03 off my 25:53 5k last weekend.

    How important is it to stick within those easy and easy moderate ranges?

    Myles gave a conversion from 5k pace to paces like easy/tempo/MP etc last year and for easy the conversion was 5k (mile-pace) + (2:30 - 3:00), which is a good bit quicker than what you mention (our 5k paces are similar so I notice immediately).

    For my 5k at 26:00 the 5k pace-per-mile is was 8:22 and then my "easy" is 10:52-11:22.

    Realise than you guys are mostly using these exotic CV/AP/etc ranges which I know nothing about :rolleyes:. The new plan caught my eye, but I'm already 5weeks into the 2015 version ....
    The Muppet wrote: »
    Tut Tut , BG will be out to tie your laces together Max.

    They are very slow, even for me but my guess is we'll be advised to adhere to them. Stick to the plan and all that.

    Naaaahhh, think you might be ok. From BG's log I think, I think her own "easy" is closer to the relationship I mention above ;)....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,090 ✭✭✭paddydriver


    There is absolutely no way I'll be sticking to the easy pace it gave me, if that helps at all. :pac: I simply wouldn't enjoy running at that pace.

    Yes MA.. I feel the same. I enjoy having a little bit of pace and I thought now that DCM is over that I could release the shackles a little. The main quandary I have now is that I don't actually know what I am training for. I do not have a PMP to aim at.. So think I will target 5k and 10k times but want to still get the long miles in - its the only times during the week I can leave phone at home and get out for some head time!


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 19,493 CMod ✭✭✭✭The Black Oil


    How are the book sales, paddy?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,009 ✭✭✭✭The Muppet


    Yes MA.. I feel the same. I enjoy having a little bit of pace and I thought now that DCM is over that I could release the shackles a little. The main quandary I have now is that I don't actually know what I am training for. I do not have a PMP to aim at.. So think I will target 5k and 10k times but want to still get the long miles in - its the only times during the week I can leave phone at home and get out for some head time!


    I agree with you guys re the paces but the nerd in me thinks there must be a reason for the paces being as they are and i'd want to do the plan justice when I get back running.

    @hillside runner. Cheers for that . Your paces would suit me better tbh but this plan is different with runs at quite a few different paces so my fear is if o run the easy too fast technicall it could actually be a tempo etc.


    I did that plan you are on earlier this year and loved it . I achieved a 5 k pb of 24.07 on it . The best of luck with it. I'd be tempred to go at it again tbh but will give the new one a go first to see how it goes for me just to be on the same page as the other graduates


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,306 ✭✭✭Myles Splitz


    FWIW regarding the paces

    Take a look back through my log and you will see that a good chunk of my running in the build up to 2.43 in Dublin came within the easy/very easy pace ranges

    Speaking to a 2.15 marathon runner a few weeks back on the topic and interestingly he was telling me what kinda paces his easy days were and they would come in as even too slow for the very easy section of the pace calculator.

    This is something my old coach instilled in me (a 2.16 man himself) initially I was dubious also and thought he was trying to go easy on me when he asked if I minded slowing down pace once in a while when we ran together.

    I specifically chose this calculator because of these pace ranges. While I am not saying that they are golden standard for improvement often times the hardest thing to stress is not running too hard on your easy days. It stresses something often preached but rarely truly implemented; hard days hard and easy days easy.

    In terms of "letting loose" that is what the hard days are for. Better to save the faster running for when your ego can capitalize on it most; your racing ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,090 ✭✭✭paddydriver


    How are the book sales, paddy?!

    All coming together.. its called the "Unknown Running Journey"..:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,090 ✭✭✭paddydriver


    FWIW regarding the paces

    Take a look back through my log and you will see that a good chunk of my running in the build up to 2.43 in Dublin came within the easy/very easy pace ranges

    Speaking to a 2.15 marathon runner a few weeks back on the topic and interestingly he was telling me what kinda paces his easy days were and they would come in as even too slow for the very easy section of the pace calculator.

    This is something my old coach instilled in me (a 2.16 man himself) initially I was dubious also and thought he was trying to go easy on me when he asked if I minded slowing down pace once in a while when we ran together.

    I specifically chose this calculator because of these pace ranges. While I am not saying that they are golden standard for improvement often times the hardest thing to stress is not running too hard on your easy days. It stresses something often preached but rarely truly implemented; hard days hard and easy days easy.

    In terms of "letting loose" that is what the hard days are for. Better to save the faster running for when your ego can capitalize on it most; your racing ;)

    Thanks Myles.. Yes much of my reading has told me the same but I guess I am still relatively new to the running game and I am just happy to be able to go out and run when I want but now I guess I need to get some more format to it so that I can achieve more goals and try stay relatively injury free.

    I do prefer to try work more towards endurance long distance running but the logic seems to be that the short distance times will also tumble as I build that long distance endurance.

    Appreciate all the help and putting together the plans for us!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,672 ✭✭✭hillsiderunner


    I specifically chose this calculator because of these pace ranges. While I am not saying that they are golden standard for improvement often times the hardest thing to stress is not running too hard on your easy days. It stresses something often preached but rarely truly implemented; hard days hard and easy days easy.

    So the change from "suggested easy" from last year's range is deliberate, I take it - just ask because myself and Muppet have almost identical current 5ks and the calculator is giving a range for "easy" about 1:20 slower compared to last year's formula.

    Very much enjoying the 2015 plan btw! I am just 5 weeks in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭hot buttered scones


    So the change from "suggested easy" from last year's range is deliberate, I take it - just ask because myself and Muppet have almost identical current 5ks and the calculator is giving a range for "easy" about 1:20 slower compared to last year's formula.

    Very much enjoying the 2015 plan btw! I am just 5 weeks in.

    Are following the week to week plan as laid out in the 2105 thread or one of the plans Myles posted when the thread finished up?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,672 ✭✭✭hillsiderunner


    Are following the week to week plan as laid out in the 2105 thread or one of the plans Myles posted when the thread finished up?

    I am following the week-to-week plan ... using just one post for reference, the post where you amalgamated all the weeks into one :)

    (of course there have been some little changes as there was no goal mile last week, for example)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,355 ✭✭✭Bungy Girl


    The Muppet wrote: »
    I think I know the answer to this one anyway but I'll ask none the less.

    The very easy pace from the calculator linked on the plan is well, very easy, I'd imagine it will require some restraint to keep to those paces, for instance my own very easy is 12:10 to 13:03 off my 25:53 5k last weekend.

    How important is it to stick within those easy and easy moderate ranges?

    What Myles said :D
    There is absolutely no way I'll be sticking to the easy pace it gave me, if that helps at all. :pac: I simply wouldn't enjoy running at that pace.

    See above
    The Muppet wrote: »
    Tut Tut , BG will be out to tie your laces together Max.

    They are very slow, even for me but my guess is we'll be advised to adhere to them. Stick to the plan and all that.

    Very wise, TM ;)
    Naaaahhh, think you might be ok. From BG's log I think, I think her own "easy" is closer to the relationship I mention above ;)....

    :o
    In my defence, if I put my 800m time into the calculator I am *almost* compliant. I do tend to go by effort rather than pace and would encourage everyone to 'tune in' to the different effort levels associated with each of the paces on the plan.
    Yes MA.. I feel the same. I enjoy having a little bit of pace and I thought now that DCM is over that I could release the shackles a little. The main quandary I have now is that I don't actually know what I am training for. I do not have a PMP to aim at.. So think I will target 5k and 10k times but want to still get the long miles in - its the only times during the week I can leave phone at home and get out for some head time!

    Fine to release the shackles, but not on every run. As Myles says, save that for the hard days, the sessions and most importantly race day. Plenty of opportunity with the 5k/10k plan to work on speed while getting decent mileage in.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,355 ✭✭✭Bungy Girl


    FWIW regarding the paces

    Take a look back through my log and you will see that a good chunk of my running in the build up to 2.43 in Dublin came within the easy/very easy pace ranges

    Speaking to a 2.15 marathon runner a few weeks back on the topic and interestingly he was telling me what kinda paces his easy days were and they would come in as even too slow for the very easy section of the pace calculator.

    This is something my old coach instilled in me (a 2.16 man himself) initially I was dubious also and thought he was trying to go easy on me when he asked if I minded slowing down pace once in a while when we ran together.

    I specifically chose this calculator because of these pace ranges. While I am not saying that they are golden standard for improvement often times the hardest thing to stress is not running too hard on your easy days. It stresses something often preached but rarely truly implemented; hard days hard and easy days easy.

    In terms of "letting loose" that is what the hard days are for. Better to save the faster running for when your ego can capitalize on it most; your racing ;)

    If it's good enough for Myles (and Mo Farah I believe) it's good enough for the Graduates. If Carlsberg did fridge magnets.....

    Thanks Myles for the excellent advice.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 19,493 CMod ✭✭✭✭The Black Oil


    Good to suss out that pace question, was wondering similar. The calculator was suggesting I run slower (very easy: 13:06 - 12:13) than I've ever trained at, including for the DCM, but I can understand (I hope) the thinking behind it. Wednesdays and Saturdays are a little busier, like a certain June-October plan I was on, cough.

    Stride - from BG: 'Ignore your Garmins. Really, ignore them.'

    Burning that into the brain now...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,080 ✭✭✭✭Maximus Alexander


    Ok ok I'm convinced! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,355 ✭✭✭Bungy Girl



    Stride - from BG: 'Ignore your Garmins. Really, ignore them.'

    Burning that into the brain now...

    Juuuuuuuust in case any Graduates think (hope?) I mean by this that you can run with abandon and ignore the paces as set out in the plan.....I DON'T.

    What I mean by the above in relation to ignoring your Garmin on the strides is that a) the distance is so short that to be focusing on your watch/pace instead of your form kind of defeats the purpose and b) GPS is notoriously inaccurate over short distances.

    I also suggest that you tune into your effort levels at each of the designated pace range. Practice this and soon enough you'll know without even looking at the watch whether you're running easy, very easy, moderate etc.

    Hope that makes sense ?

    The only other thing I'd say at this point, for those of you in despair at having to run so slowly, is that it is not forever. Follow the plan, you will get fitter, and your paces will get faster for the same effort levels. It does take patience but it is worth it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,009 ✭✭✭✭The Muppet


    Bungy Girl wrote: »

    The only other thing I'd say at this point, for those of you in despair at having to run so slowly, is that it is not forever. Follow the plan, you will get fitter, and your paces will get faster for the same effort levels. It does take patience but it is worth it.

    I'll be sticking to the plan, Like max said in his log I too am glad its time based runs as if it were distance based it might be more difficult to adhere to it.

    I'm hoping to start the plan next week all going well.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 19,493 CMod ✭✭✭✭The Black Oil


    Chunk of toenail fell off, lovely.


Advertisement