Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

2016 U.S. Presidential Race Megathread Mark 2.

1281282284286287314

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,725 ✭✭✭ECO_Mental


    Jawgap wrote: »
    .....which is why I think this is spot on......

    401374.JPG

    You could see it in his face in that meeting with Obama. He did not want to be there :) he has no idea what a bubble he will have to live in. People watching him every single second. Going to endless meetings day after day, entertaining obscure 3rd world leaders. The secret service are going to make his life hell. He won't grabbing young ones by the P***y any more either :)

    6.1kWp south facing, South of Cork City



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    ECO_Mental wrote: »
    You could see it in his face in that meeting with Obama. He did not want to be there :) he has no idea what a bubble he will have to live in. People watching him every single second. Going to endless meetings day after day, entertaining obscure 3rd world leaders. The secret service are going to make his life hell. He won't grabbing young ones by the P***y any more either :)

    Could all we'll be true, but for the last point. Long tradition of presidents finding the time for precisely that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,478 ✭✭✭✭RobbingBandit


    I think Trumps blatant disregard for GOP protocols is what caused such a divide in the party backing him on a united front. Sarah Palin and Rudy Giuliani are two party members linked to Trump in the last few days as potential high ranking members of his staff.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    I think Trumps blatant disregard for GOP protocols is what caused such a divide in the party backing him on a united front. Sarah Palin and Rudy Giuliani are two party members linked to Trump in the last few days as potential high ranking members of his staff.

    Scrapings of the barrel there tbh. Rudy used up his 9/11 credit a long time back, and Palin never had any to begin with. If he does go that route it'll give SNL a nice boost for four years all the same.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,152 ✭✭✭26000 Elephants


    I lived in NY during his mayoral stint and liked him at the time. But you have to wonder about a guy who dumps his wife via press conference. And then has the temerity to denounce HRC for marriage fidelity.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,940 ✭✭✭20Cent


    I lived in NY during his mayoral stint and liked him at the time. But you have to wonder about a guy who dumps his wife via press conference. And then has the temerity to denounce HRC for marriage fidelity.

    Was this his he cousin/wife or a different one?


    Yes he married his cousin


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 573 ✭✭✭m1ck007


    Whats all this 'not my president nonsense all about'? If Hilary got elected and the republicans protested they would be branded hooligans


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,152 ✭✭✭26000 Elephants


    20Cent wrote: »
    Was this his he cousin/wife or a different one?


    Yes he married his cousin

    Wow. Didnt know that. Hanover or his press secretary? :eek:

    Either way it derailed his attempt to get on the republican ticket for NY senator. A race ultimately won by HRC. I think he is still sore.

    Edit: Apparently it was his first wife, before Donna Hanover. Who Knew?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,159 ✭✭✭mrkiscool2


    m1ck007 wrote: »
    Whats all this 'not my president nonsense all about'? If Hilary got elected and the republicans protested they would be branded hooligans
    Republicans did that when Obama got elected to be fair. I don't agree with it but sure that is the way politics is!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,331 ✭✭✭Jimmy Garlic


    ECO_Mental wrote: »
    He won't grabbing young ones by the P***y any more either :)

    Grab em by the pussy is a New York turn of phrase, not a literal statement.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,225 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    Hate how Trump supports gloat and provoke the losing side. It was never about that, there was no right or wrong. They're all American.

    Hillary lost
    NH
    by 2528 votes

    MICH
    by 11837

    PA
    by 68236

    It looks a landslide victory for Trump in Electoral Votes, but the Democrats who thought they would take the higher ground and not vote for Hillary are today regretting their decision. The margin is so small in terms of votes.

    http://www.270towin.com/maps/gvpBD
    All she needed


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    Grab em by the pussy is a New York turn of phrase, not a literal statement.

    Oh please. It's really not. It was a literal boast.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,725 ✭✭✭ECO_Mental


    Grab em by the pussy is a New York turn of phrase, not a literal statement.

    I don't know why I am wasting my time with this trolling, so what you are saying its that ........ Ah forget it....I'm out.. I'm sick of the crap excuses do you actually want me to believe this s**t. There you go, you won you got me mad :(

    6.1kWp south facing, South of Cork City



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,328 ✭✭✭daithi7


    Hate how Trump supports gloat and provoke the losing side. It was never about that, there was no right or wrong. They're all American.

    Hillary lost
    NH
    by 2528 votes

    MICH
    by 11837

    PA
    by 68236

    It looks a landslide victory for Trump in Electoral Votes, but the Democrats who thought they would take the higher ground and not vote for Hillary are today regretting their decision. The margin is so small in terms of votes.

    http://www.270towin.com/maps/gvpBD
    All she needed

    Yeah, tiny margins in huge electorates in fairness. She lost by a whisker, but she lost.

    Terry Prone, , who has advised leading Irish Politicians & Political parties for over 40 years now and is ultra savvy, was on the radio earlier today, she made the interesting observation that in every campaign that she ever saw where a party definitely' knew' they were going to win, that every one those campaigns lost. With no exceptions.

    So to add to your point, I think the HRC campaign really believed they were going to win 3-4 weeks out, and they convinced everyone that they were going to do so, which is a fatal flaw as it leads to all sorts of complacent voting practices, etc And as the savvy Prone points out that always ends in electoral failure.

    P.s. I have to wonder how many of the current protestors now giving out about the Trump election win actually voted!?
    I mean wouldn't it have been just easier to vote!?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 573 ✭✭✭m1ck007


    Yea their protest should have been to vote for clinton but they didnt, so they should accept the majority decision that is to appoint trump as president which Seems to be forgotton


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,960 ✭✭✭eire4


    daithi7 wrote: »
    Yeah, tiny margins in huge electorates in fairness. She lost by a whisker, but she lost.

    Terry Prone, , who has advised leading Irish Politicians & Political parties for over 40 years now and is ultra savvy, was on the radio earlier today, she made the interesting observation that in every campaign that she ever saw where a party definitely' knew' they were going to win, that every one those campaigns lost. With no exceptions.

    So to add to your point, I think the HRC campaign really believed they were going to win 3-4 weeks out, and they convinced everyone that they were going to do so, which is a fatal flaw as it leads to all sorts of complacent voting practices, etc And as the savvy Prone points out that always ends in electoral failure.

    P.s. I have to wonder how many of the current protestors now giving out about the Trump election win actually voted!?
    I mean wouldn't it have been just easier to vote!?


    Indeed tiny margins. Again though election turnout was pathetic. 53% was the turnout. But nobody is talking about that again. I am sure there are various reasons why close to half of Americans did not bother to vote but right up there near the top if not the top of the list is the fact that Washington DC is a corrupt place where work is done on behalf of the wealthy and major corporations and the vast majority of Americans are just irrelevant to a large extent and that is what so many Americans think and why so many have simply checked out of a broken system that offers them next to nothing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    RobertKK wrote:
    President-elect Trump being such an unreasonable person has said he is ready to compromise on Obamacare after his talks with President Obama.


    President elect Trump isn't doing any compromising because he is so inclined. He is just being exposed to reality.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,823 ✭✭✭✭First Up


    RobertKK wrote:
    President-elect Trump being such an unreasonable person has said he is ready to compromise on Obamacare after his talks with President Obama.


    President elect Trump isn't doing any compromising because he is so inclined. He is just being exposed to reality.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,262 ✭✭✭fran17


    Grab em by the pussy is a New York turn of phrase, not a literal statement.

    Precisely,very similar to the FHRITP craze of late.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,583 ✭✭✭Suryavarman


    Rjd2 wrote: »
    I haven't read all the thread, but one thing I want to say the attacks on Johnson and Stein are deeply unfair, if I was American I simply would not have voted if it was only HC and DT on the ballot. Clinton was not entitled to those voters, she had to earn them and despite a very pro media, huge money and infrastructure behind her and a LOL opponent she absolutely failed.

    The story of this defeat also needs to focus more on how awful HC was as a candidate rather than just blaming sexism, racism and 3rd party candidates.

    Anyhow with Johnson while he was liberal socially, he still would have drawn plenty of republican supporters as plenty of conservative magazines etc chose to endorse him.

    An example of this was Ethan Coen ranting on the NY Times. :pac:


    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/13/opinion/sunday/2016-election-thank-you-notes.html

    No major party nominee has ever been opposed to the values supposedly supported by the Libertarian and Green Parties as Donald Trump is.

    If the so-called libertarians that voted for Gary Johnson actually cared about freedom they would have voted for Clinton in order to stop Donald Trump from winning as that was the only possible way to beat him. It shouldn't be a surprise that they didn't do that as the libertarian movement is more about advancing white male privilege as opposed to expanding freedom.

    If the people that voted for Jill Stein actually cared about protecting and expanding every progressive and environmental protection policy enacted in the last 8 years then they would have voted for Clinton instead of electing the man that vows to undo every last one of them. It seems to be common among lefties to use their vote to signal how virtuous they are as opposed to advance the policies they support though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,583 ✭✭✭Suryavarman


    eire4 wrote: »
    Indeed tiny margins. Again though election turnout was pathetic. 53% was the turnout. But nobody is talking about that again. I am sure there are various reasons why close to half of Americans did not bother to vote but right up there near the top if not the top of the list is the fact that Washington DC is a corrupt place where work is done on behalf of the wealthy and major corporations and the vast majority of Americans are just irrelevant to a large extent and that is what so many Americans think and why so many have simply checked out of a broken system that offers them next to nothing.

    People didn't vote because corporations wouldn't leave them? Yeah, that makes sense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,419 ✭✭✭Count Dooku


    Hate how Trump supports gloat and provoke the losing side.
    up to 9/11 it was HRC supporters who were laughing all day by posting rubbish from 538
    It was never about that, there was no right or wrong. They're all American.

    Hillary lost
    NH
    by 2528 votes

    MICH
    by 11837

    PA
    by 68236

    It looks a landslide victory for Trump in Electoral Votes, but the Democrats who thought they would take the higher ground and not vote for Hillary are today regretting their decision. The margin is so small in terms of votes.

    http://www.270towin.com/maps/gvpBD
    All she needed
    taking in account how much money have been poured into her campaign and that nearly all media supported her - I would consider it as massive defeat


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap


    This is what a drained swamp looks like.

    Not terribly shocking or surprising given his campaign rhetoric......and even in being tokenistic, he couldn't resist a bit of nepotism.....

    https://twitter.com/georgeaylett/status/797531138403270656

    https://twitter.com/foxnews/status/797497587398017026


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,107 ✭✭✭Christy42


    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/donald-trump-us-election-win-tweets-old-ironic-a7410906.html

    I am curious as to why Donald no longer supports people marching to show their displeasure at an election result. Just can't figure it out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,419 ✭✭✭Count Dooku


    Jawgap wrote: »
    This is what a drained swamp looks like.

    Not terribly shocking or surprising given his campaign rhetoric......and even in being tokenistic, he couldn't resist a bit of nepotism.....

    https://twitter.com/georgeaylett/status/797531138403270656

    https://twitter.com/foxnews/status/797497587398017026

    Just direct result that GOP left Trump on his own


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,950 ✭✭✭B0jangles


    Remember back in September Trump's Washington policy planning team quit because they didn't get paid and no-one in the campaign team was interested in what they were doing?
    The Trump campaign built a large policy shop in Washington that has now largely melted away because of neglect, mismanagement and promises of pay that were never honored. Many of the team’s former members say the campaign leadership never took the Washington office seriously and let it wither away after squeezing it dry.

    Donald Trump often brags about having experts and senior former officials advising him. Wednesday night in a forum on national security, he said, “We have admirals, we have generals, we have colonels. We have a lot of people that I respect.” It’s true that Trump is getting high-level policy advice on a regular basis from senior experts such as Rudy Giuliani and retired Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn. But Trump has never acknowledged the policy shop based in Washington that has been doing huge amounts of grunt work for months without recognition or compensation.

    Since April, advisers never named in campaign press releases have been working in an Alexandria-based office, writing policy memos, organizing briefings, managing surrogates and placing op-eds. They put in long hours before and during the Republican National Convention to help the campaign look like a professional operation.

    But in August, shortly after the convention, most of the policy shop’s most active staffers quit. Although they signed non-disclosure agreements, several of them told me on background that the Trump policy effort has been a mess from start to finish.


    “It’s a complete disaster,” one disgruntled former adviser told me. “They use and abuse people. The policy office fell apart in August when the promised checks weren’t delivered.”

    Three former members, all of whom quit in August, told me that as early as April they were promised financial compensation but were later told that they would have to work as volunteers. They say the leaders of the shop, Rick Dearborn and John Mashburn, told many staffers that money was on the way but then were unable to deliver. Dearborn is Sen. Jeff Sessions’s (R-Ala.) chief of staff, while Mashburn is the former chief of staff for Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C).

    “I heard it from Dearborn, I heard it from Mashburn. It was understood that we would be paid. The campaign never discussed how much the pay would be. It was never in writing,” said one staffer, who quit last month. “There were some people who were treating it as a full-time job. I suspect that those people were quite astonished when the pay didn’t come through.”

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/josh-rogin/wp/2016/09/08/inside-the-collapse-of-trumps-d-c-policy-shop/

    Trump was not planning anything past the election, his team are now desparately trying to put together a policy plan that should have been completed months ago.

    Even the new Trump transition website has large sections directly copy/pasted from a generic non-partisan group:
    According to a Politico report, Trump’s transition website seems to have lifted some passages from the nonpartisan nonprofit the Center for Presidential Transition. The group is a project under the Partnership for Public Service, which was founded in 2001 to inspire and reward those who worked in the federal government.

    At the bottom of Trump’s site GreatAgain.gov, appears a small note saying, “First Posted on Center for Presidential Transition.”

    The citation might be enough to avoid any legal issues but it is a gray area in copyright law.

    The first comes from a post “Help Wanted: 4,000 Presidential Appointments.” The text talks about a “chart below” — but there isn’t a chart. The Center’s website does have a graphic depicting positions that require Senate confirmation in the departments of Justice and State.

    Another is from, “The Offices and Agencies Supporting the Transition,” which is the same page on the Center’s website. It even has a reference to “our own Center library” linking to the Center for Presidential Transition online resources page.

    Both pages have a byline for the author on the Center’s website but that authorship is removed on Trump’s site.

    http://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/donald-trump-policy-portfolio-227919

    They are so totally unprepared for this it'd be funny if it weren't so shameful.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,950 ✭✭✭B0jangles


    Jawgap wrote: »
    This is what a drained swamp looks like.

    Not terribly shocking or surprising given his campaign rhetoric......and even in being tokenistic, he couldn't resist a bit of nepotism.....

    https://twitter.com/georgeaylett/status/797531138403270656

    https://twitter.com/foxnews/status/797497587398017026

    A bit of nepotism?

    A full 25% of his transition team are members of his family!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,309 ✭✭✭✭alastair


    B0jangles wrote: »
    A bit of nepotism?

    A full 25% of his transition team are members of his family!

    Great to see the era of political dynasty's being swept away. Drain that swamp etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,881 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Grab em by the pussy is a New York turn of phrase, not a literal statement.

    NYC born and raised. Never heard the phrase till Trump blurted it out.

    My father his brothers my cousins all lifelong NYC'ers. My wife's family, too. And my mother's and all my uncles and cousins.

    HS locker rooms, college in NYC. Never heard it. Heck, went to my fair share of go-go bars in my youth. Never heard it.

    So, exactly what qualifies you to claim this? Other than, "I'm making things up because I can"

    Dimwit.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap


    Just direct result that GOP left Trump on his own

    So it's the RNC's fault h that they are the only people available? Or he's engaging in 'business as usual' by appointing donors and early supporters to key positions?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement