Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Liverpool FC Team Talk/Gossip/Rumours 2016/2017

1207208210212213336

Comments

  • Subscribers Posts: 32,868 ✭✭✭✭5starpool


    ~Rebel~ wrote: »
    Away to Swansea is a Sturridge game if he's fit alright I reckon though. Conceding a lot of goals, lost their best defender over the summer. They're at home so need to push forward at least to some extent. If this isn't a game we use Sturridge in, then there isn't a game we use him in imo.

    I think our best attacking trio is Coutinho/Firmino/Mane and that's what I hope we see tomorrow.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭ElTel


    https://twitter.com/LeicsREDS/status/781938495631790080

    Predicted lineup.
    They were right last week.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    That's the strongest team we have so hopefully it's right and they are all fit and ready to rumble.


  • Subscribers Posts: 32,868 ✭✭✭✭5starpool


    ElTel wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/LeicsREDS/status/781938495631790080

    Predicted lineup.
    They were right last week.

    I'd be fairly surprised if it was not that team.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,749 ✭✭✭mormank


    ElTel wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/LeicsREDS/status/781938495631790080

    Predicted lineup.
    They were right last week.

    I could have told you that! Maybe I should set up an ITK account on twitter just stating the obvious stuff. Sure some people would think I'm a demi-god! :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,672 ✭✭✭ElTel


    mormank wrote: »
    I could have told you that! Maybe I should set up an ITK account on twitter just stating the obvious stuff. Sure some people would think I'm a demi-god! :D

    They were right with Lovren last week.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,987 ✭✭✭Kerrigooney


    5starpool wrote: »
    I'd be fairly surprised if it was not that team.

    I'd be fairly disappointed if that wasn't the team.

    Everton and Palace just drew and a draw between City and Spurs would be nice. Assuming we win that is. You'd expect Utd to smash Stoke and Arsenal should beat Burnley...yep we've got must win games already :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,749 ✭✭✭mormank


    ElTel wrote: »
    They were right with Lovren last week.

    As were many other sources and sites.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,775 ✭✭✭✭Gbear


    After thumping Hull 5-1 it's hard to argue against that.

    I would like us to try, even if it doesn't work, dropping Wijnaldum for Sturridge, moving Lallana into midfield and just going ****ing ape**** on someone. It'd be nice to see. It certainly wouldn't work against everyone but there'd be so many threats you'd be sure to bang a few in.


  • Subscribers Posts: 32,868 ✭✭✭✭5starpool


    Gbear wrote: »
    After thumping Hull 5-1 it's hard to argue against that.

    I would like us to try, even if it doesn't work, dropping Wijnaldum for Sturridge, moving Lallana into midfield and just going ****ing ape**** on someone. It'd be nice to see. It certainly wouldn't work against everyone but there'd be so many threats you'd be sure to bang a few in.

    Away to Swansea isn't the day to try something mad like that. Home to Hull might have been, but if he didn't do it then, he won't do it now. Lallana is sort of in midfield now as it is anyhow. We'd get overrun there at times if we made that change.

    Are you Toby in disguise?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,884 ✭✭✭✭BorneTobyWilde


    Would be hard to change a winning side, except for Lovern coming back. This will be a good test tomorrow, a test to see whether we have learned from the Burnley game. To go a goal down tomorrow in first 15 mins to a break away would suggest not. We can score that's for sure. We do have that option to keep it tight and win 0-1, we can score.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,749 ✭✭✭mormank


    :Par wrote: »
    After thumping Hull 5-1 it's hard to argue against that.

    I would like us to try, even if it doesn't work, dropping Wijnaldum for Sturridge, moving Lallana into midfield and just going ****ing ape**** on someone. It'd be nice to see. It certainly wouldn't work against everyone but there'd be so many threats you'd be sure to bang a few in.

    Lallana has already been playing in a 3 man midfield in case you hadn't noticed. So dropping Gini for Sturridge would mean FIrminho dropping back to midfield, not Lallana who has been playing there all season. Watch a game, you might figure it out. :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,749 ✭✭✭mormank


    8-10 wrote: »

    Ok the last thing I wanna do right now is get into a hypothetical argument with you about starting lineups. The point is, Lovren had an illness. I think we could all name the starting lineups at this stage apart from last minute things like illness or black eyes in training. That guy I replied to, not you, put out a lineup like it was gospel, a lineup that we all could have named. If anyone gets ill tomorrow however it will be incorrect just like my theoretical lineup would have been if there was an illness like lovren last week.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 990 ✭✭✭amber69


    mormank wrote: »
    Lallana has already been playing in a 3 man midfield in case you hadn't noticed. So dropping Gini for Sturridge would mean FIrminho dropping back to midfield, not Lallana who has been playing there all season. Watch a game, you might figure it out. :P

    In that case Coutinho would be more likely to drop back.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,901 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    mormank wrote: »
    Lallana has already been playing in a 3 man midfield in case you hadn't noticed. So dropping Gini for Sturridge would mean FIrminho dropping back to midfield, not Lallana who has been playing there all season. Watch a game, you might figure it out. :P

    I think they're referring to going with more like a 4-2-3-1,

    With Hendo and Lallana as the two, Coutinho, Firmino and Mane as the 3, and Sturridge as the 1.


  • Subscribers Posts: 32,868 ✭✭✭✭5starpool


    ~Rebel~ wrote: »
    I think they're referring to going with more like a 4-2-3-1,

    With Hendo and Lallana as the two, Coutinho, Firmino and Mane as the 3, and Sturridge as the 1.

    I still think it would be unbalanced, especially in an away game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,139 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    mormank wrote: »
    Ok the last thing I wanna do right now is get into a hypothetical argument with you about starting lineups.

    It's not hypothetical. You said many sources and sites also got the Lovren news right. I shared my results of a quick Google that don't show that so I'm asking for the non-hypothetical links where these sites predicted he'd be out?

    If you're saying now that they would have had it right but for the illness then that's fine, it shows the twitter account was either in the know or lucky. But you didn't say that, you said other media also predicted him out and you were able to predict it yourself.

    This isn't hypothetical, either the many other sites had the prediction that he'd be out the day before the game same as the twitter page as you suggested, or they didn't, meaning the twitter account was unusually right and we don't yet know if it's luck or in the know


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,775 ✭✭✭✭Gbear


    5starpool wrote: »
    I still think it would be unbalanced, especially in an away game.

    I didn't mean right now.

    But some day. Just for madness' sake.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,083 ✭✭✭Chesty08


    Gbear wrote: »
    I didn't mean right now.

    But some day. Just for madness' sake.

    Let's play Sturridge in goal. Just for madness sake!

    Stop getting complacent my friend


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,667 ✭✭✭Pepp1989


    Looking at the Liverpool bench today and finally I think we have a squad. There are genuinely good players on the bench. Very happy with that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,633 ✭✭✭✭Buford T. Justice XIX


    Pepp1989 wrote: »
    Looking at the Liverpool bench today and finally I think we have a squad. There are genuinely good players on the bench. Very happy with that.

    I was thinking the same myself.

    It's like a good squad sneaked into the club without us spotting it happening.

    A 1-0 away win here and I would be quite happy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,749 ✭✭✭mormank


    8-10 wrote: »
    It's not hypothetical. You said many sources and sites also got the Lovren news right. I shared my results of a quick Google that don't show that so I'm asking for the non-hypothetical links where these sites predicted he'd be out?

    If you're saying now that they would have had it right but for the illness then that's fine, it shows the twitter account was either in the know or lucky. But you didn't say that, you said other media also predicted him out and you were able to predict it yourself.

    This isn't hypothetical, either the many other sites had the prediction that he'd be out the day before the game same as the twitter page as you suggested, or they didn't, meaning the twitter account was unusually right and we don't yet know if it's luck or in the know

    No I didn't see the websites with the line ups predicted but if you get a bunch of monkeys in a room together with a bunch of type writers eventually they will produce the works of Shakespeare was kinda my point. People use a source on twitter cos they "got it right" last week. I'm saying I could start guessing line ups too on a twitter alias and, like the monkeys, I will "get it right" occasionally and then follow me as a demi-god as a result. And no I never said I culd have predicted Lovren's illness, I said I could have predicted todays lineup, which I could have along with half the people on this site. Why does this matter so much to you anyway? I don't wanna be rude and ignore you but my original post that you took issue with was a throwaway, cynical comment about twitter, I did not mean to be still discussing it the next day. Most (if not all) twitter ITK's are BS, simples. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,492 ✭✭✭Wheety


    Great :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,749 ✭✭✭mormank


    Borja was offside before that corner! :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,775 ✭✭✭✭Gbear


    Chesty08 wrote: »

    Let's play Sturridge in goal. Just for madness sake!

    Stop getting complacent my friend

    If a drunk man can't propose a 415 formation then we may as well just pack it in and go home.:p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,083 ✭✭✭Chesty08


    Gbear wrote: »
    If a drunk man can't propose a 415 formation then we may as well just pack it in and go home.:p

    Looks like the players have started like some fans attitude.

    Will we ever get rid of it!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,252 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


    Karius having a ****in shocker. Dropping Mignolet may have been a mistake.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,252 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


    This is a game for Can, a bit of steel


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,749 ✭✭✭mormank


    mormank wrote: »
    Borja was offside before that corner! :mad:

    And he was offside again for that header with no flag. This linesman better make terrible decisions in our favour in the ssecond half!!


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement