Why did Gardai destroy possible burial site of Irelands longest missing child?

oranbhoy67 wrote: »

there was a few people holding those placards, they were entitled too , i would have held one if i wasnt asked to go up the front

yes they are making a public statement , dont you get it ??? a corrupt politician is covering up for a child killer in our opinion .. what would you suggest we hold on our placards instead

Don't you get it?
I am entitled to express an opinion also, and I did.

If you want to try to deny me that then I will post it multiple times until you quit harassing me for holding and expressing a different opinion to yours.

I found that placard disgusting and out of place.

When the opinion expressed on it is proved I will have no objection to it.

evancostello wrote: »

There you are , I just knew I could keep prodding and the bully would appear couldn't contain yourself. I have said that I just felt the Doc was off. I dont trust what I as presented with. I am in camp one way or the other, but I do hate bullies.

What do you mean constructive? Oran? If it does just fall in line with your view. I am not abusing you but I am contesting your view , I would hope in a civilised way.

nah its in a trolling way , I have debated on here with many people i have had negative things to say about the doc myself , you have been purely negative about this campaign using an account that so far has been purely set up to do so

Your a troll

Johnboy1951 wrote: »

Don't you get it?
I am entitled to express an opinion also, and I did.

If you want to try to deny me that then I will post it multiple times until you quit harassing me for holding and expressing a different opinion to yours.

I found that placard disgusting and out of place.

When the opinion expressed on it is proved I will have no objection to it.

whos harassing you , the placard wasn't against the law , it holds the opinion of a fair few people who have every right to express that , im not trying to deny you anything , the demo is over & those placards will be seen in countless places and if thats what it takes the gards to do there jobs then so be it , your easily disguted btw.. imagine being offended at a placard , offended at the truth more like , but hey ho thats your opinion

oranbhoy67 wrote: »

nah its in a trolling way , I have debated on here with many people i have had negative things to say about the doc myself , you have been purely negative about this campaign using an account that so far has been purely set up to do so

Your a troll

It says something about you that you actually look for pattens in posts. If I'm negative in your view, tough. Get over it and respond to the post. I am critical of the documentary, I have said that day 1. Its deceptive. But you dont and there you are thats healthy debate. I could say there are patterns to all posts if I had the time or inclination to read them from that perspective.

evancostello wrote: »

There you are , I just knew I could keep prodding..

So you admit you were just trying to get a rise out of oranbhoy?

I'd be interested if you could clarify your interest in this case, and explain why you registered on boards solely to post in this thread?

thats the first person I've ever had to add to my ignore list on all my time on here. ill happily debate civilly with anyone about this case and the doc and even placards, that guy is on here for one reason and one reason only and i Personally am cutting off the oxygen he craves before he gets a decent thread closed

oranbhoy67 wrote: »

well do have have a look at my post history on here you will see i have my own criticisms of the documentary and its maker also.

You have came on here and made an account just to "Prod" at someone campaigning for justice for a murdered child. you have had an agenda from day 1. and you go on about Bullies , what was your wee personal dig about Margo about then ? oh yeah another prod to get a reaction , the definition of a troll

I actually came on here today not to prod you at all. But I feel you may have a problem with a person who may hold an alternate view. What I came on for was that I found that the placard was deeply offensive. You speak about Justice for Mary and you have people marching your through Ballyshannon distracting from the main issue.

evancostello wrote: »

should have kept the crazies away

As your first post on this thread was in relation to the (now discredited) story in the local paper, it seems reasonable to assume you are from the locality.

Given your antipathy to the campaign for justice for Mary, it seems reasonable to ask:

Do you have any connection to the protagonists in this case?

evancostello wrote: »

Antipathy to what case?

Your antipathy to the people campaigning for justice for Mary:

evancostello wrote: »

All of what she is saying isnt supported anywhere except by Seanchais like Margo. I dont mean this in a derogatory sense but is Margo for real.

evancostello wrote: »

should have kept the crazies away.

evancostello wrote: »

I would say that Margo maybe should stick to singing but on second thoughts..... I am not a fan.

evancostello wrote: »

There you are , I just knew I could keep prodding...

Again, I ask, do you have any links to the protagonists in this case?

oranbhoy67 wrote: »

<snip>, your easily disguted btw.. imagine being offended at a placard , offended at the truth more like , but hey ho thats your opinion

Apparently you do not really read what is posted.

You now say that what is on that placard is 'truth'.
If that is the case then show the proof.
Show it for all to see.
Post it here!
No? Because there is no proof?

The fact is there is no known truth.
There is supposition and opinion.

I look forward to the truth being known ..... it is my opinion that to defile someone's name - and you have often posted that the name is well known - is completely wrong until the truth is known.
As another posted here .... it does smack considerably of 'mob rule'.

Johnboy1951 wrote: »

Apparently you do not really read what is posted.

You now say that what is on that placard is 'truth'.
If that is the case then show the proof.
Show it for all to see.
Post it here!
No? Because there is no proof?

The fact is there is no known truth.
There is supposition and opinion.

I look forward to the truth being known ..... it is my opinion that to defile someone's name - and you have often posted that the name is well known - is completely wrong until the truth is known.
As another posted here .... it does smack considerably of 'mob rule'.

so do you not believe in an opinion being posted on a placard at a march??

Originally Posted by evancostello 
The justice for Mary is inextricably linked to to the idea that Mary was the victim of injustice. that someone close to her killed her and that the cops and politicians cover it up.

JohnCash0260 wrote: »

That's what happened.

This type of bald statement, as if it is proven fact, is worrying.
If this is what the campaign is based upon then nothing will come of it as no one will take it sufficiently seriously.