Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Getting Google to fine forum pages.

  • 02-11-2005 10:35pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭


    I am using SMF bulletinn Boards but the posts never show in google searches.Is there something that needs to be placed in the meta tags for google to index these pages?


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,208 ✭✭✭✭aidan_walsh


    You could Sitemap it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,522 ✭✭✭✭Gordon


    Firstly have you submitted it to google?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,740 ✭✭✭mneylon


    Gordon wrote:
    Firstly have you submitted it to google?
    You shouldn't have to


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Michele - do you mean that there should be sufficient links to your site from elsewhere?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,740 ✭✭✭mneylon


    Yes.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭beller b


    I've submitted the site...Google finds the site no problem..But the contents of the forums don't show up in any search.. For eg if I search google with BELLER B I will get a load of Boards.ie pages...
    I'll give the sitemaps a go. Thanks for your help.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,188 ✭✭✭Serbian


    From the Google Webmaster Guidelines:
    Allow search bots to crawl your sites without session IDs or arguments that track their path through the site. These techniques are useful for tracking individual user behavior, but the access pattern of bots is entirely different. Using these techniques may result in incomplete indexing of your site, as bots may not be able to eliminate URLs that look different but actually point to the same page.

    I would imagine that the session ids in your URLs is causing the pages not to be indexed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭seo-ireland


    Yes it's your session IDs that are causing the indexing problems. Google see that you have only one file "index.php" so you will need to look in using mod_rewrite to rewrite your dynamic urls into more static, distinct urls.

    Example:

    index.php?PHPSESSID=0f7bd431f7cd452c7c2d959e39de0e18&topic=25.0

    into something like

    topic25.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,522 ✭✭✭✭Gordon


    blacknight wrote:
    You shouldn't have to
    If you have no sites linking to you then Google wouldn't pick you up right?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,382 ✭✭✭✭AARRRGH


    Example of url rewriting (from http://www.staff.ie, the company I work for) -

    RewriteEngine on
    RewriteRule jobs\.html jobseekers_search_results.php?stype=m

    This should be in your .htaccess file in the forum root.

    As you can see, we are turning the rewrite engine on, and then we are turning http://www.staff.ie/jobseekers_search_results.php?stype=m into http://www.staff.ie/jobs.html. If you go to both URLs are will see it is the same content.

    http://www.staff.ie/jobs.html is SEO in two instances -

    1. Google can read it properly (Google does not like ?stype=m)
    2. We now have the keyword "jobs" in the URL. I could easily make this even more SEO friendly by calling it something like "irish-jobs-ireland" or similar.

    See what I mean?

    Go to http://forums.seochat.com for more info.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,382 ✭✭✭✭AARRRGH


    Gordon wrote:
    If you have no sites linking to you then Google wouldn't pick you up right?

    Yes. They need to find you somehow.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Gordon wrote:
    If you have no sites linking to you then Google wouldn't pick you up right?

    Also the more sites you have linking to you, the better the Google rank [along with loads of other factors such as content, host location....]!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,740 ✭✭✭mneylon


    Depending on the software you are using for your forum you should be able to hack it to be more search engine friendly - mod_rewrite alone is not enough


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,740 ✭✭✭mneylon


    kbannon wrote:
    Also the more sites you have linking to you, the better the Google rank [along with loads of other factors such as content, host location....]!
    Quality is more important than quantity ...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 379 ✭✭TheWaterboy


    dublindude wrote:
    Example of url rewriting (from http://www.staff.ie, the company I work for) -

    RewriteEngine on
    RewriteRule jobs\.html jobseekers_search_results.php?stype=m

    This should be in your .htaccess file in the forum root.

    As you can see, we are turning the rewrite engine on, and then we are turning http://www.staff.ie/jobseekers_search_results.php?stype=m into http://www.staff.ie/jobs.html. If you go to both URLs are will see it is the same content.

    http://www.staff.ie/jobs.html is SEO in two instances -

    1. Google can read it properly (Google does not like ?stype=m)
    2. We now have the keyword "jobs" in the URL. I could easily make this even more SEO friendly by calling it something like "irish-jobs-ireland" or similar.

    See what I mean?

    Go to http://forums.seochat.com for more info.

    Am i correct in saying that you now have two pages with the exact same continent - google doesnt like duplicate continent and can punish your rankings for this


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,740 ✭✭✭mneylon


    Google is less likely to index the URI with queries etc., than it is the "static" pages, so they're not going to suffer from duplicate content


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭seo-ireland


    Google likes:

    - Unique well written content (not overly optimized e.g. repeated keywords)
    - Lots and lots (and lots) of quality one-way inbound links. Reciprocal links look to be devalued somewhat.
    - Varying text in the inbound links e.g. hundreds of links with the same text 'blue widgets' is going to look fishy to Google, variations like 'view information about blue widgets' and 'For blue widgets click here' are what to strive for.
    - Natural use of the title tag and header tags, not stuffed with keywords, make it look natural.
    - Validated HTML
    - Static URLs
    - An easily indexable site. Avoid 'clever' Javascript and Flash navigation system, use standard text links with CSS for style instead. If you have a large site implement Google Sitemaps to allow Google to find all of your pages.
    - Use robots.txt, meta tags "noindex, nofollow" and the rel="nofollow" href attribute to guide the Google spider through your site.
    - Get links from major directories like Yahoo, DMOZ, Zeal, Joeant, Gimpsy etc..

    I have written some SEO articles here that should help you further.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,382 ✭✭✭✭AARRRGH


    Am i correct in saying that you now have two pages with the exact same continent - google doesnt like duplicate continent and can punish your rankings for this

    No, you're incorrect. As far as Google/your browser are aware, only jobs.html exist.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭beller b


    Loads to think about there... Thanks a million lads..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭beller b


    Just tried a few other search engines..
    Yahoo MSN & alavista all find the page contents...Could this be google just being slower than the others?
    Anyway I've made a few changes & resubmitted to google. We'll see how that goes. Thanks for all the suggestions..


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,522 ✭✭✭✭Gordon


    Yeah, I got that too with a few sites beller, mind you it can turn up on Google within a day, it just depends on when they do their indexing afaik.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭beller b


    Thanks Gordon.I'll give it a while & see what happens. If the other engines are seeing it I can't be doing too much wrong!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,659 ✭✭✭✭dahamsta


    beller b, you should take the PHP session (PHPSESSID=0f7bd431f7cd452c7c2d959e39de0e18&) out of the link to your forums in your sig. It could lead to someone stealing someone else's session by mistake.

    adam


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭beller b


    Thanks for all the help lads. I've done the sitemap & submitted it to Google. It is showing the last upload etc & no errors.But still no other pages being indexed. What confuses me is that Googles robots are crawling the boards constantly.So if they are finding the pages why are they not being indexed.Also MSN is indexing everything fine. What methods do MSN use that would be different to googles?
    Any help would be appriciated. Thanks again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭beller b


    Just an update on this..I got freefind.com to index my site & all my forun/boards pages show up as discarded (off site) There are links from the boards back to site pages .Why should it see these as off site?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,479 ✭✭✭wheres me jumpa


    i have always found that my sites are ranked higher in msn, yahoo, alta vista and many others than google. at times the gap between the rankings are huge.

    is this an indication as to which engine is better?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,740 ✭✭✭mneylon


    is this an indication as to which engine is better?!
    No. It's totally meaningless
    Ranked better? For what?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭beller b


    Just to let you guys know.Google has started indexing my forum pages from today..Is it that Google is just slower than the others or Just more fussy..
    A added more hidden links bact to my main page from the forums, that seemed to help..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭seo-ireland


    Eeek hidden links! You mean links that are invisible? I would get rid of them, Google delves penalties out for them.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,740 ✭✭✭mneylon


    Eeek hidden links! You mean links that are invisible? I would get rid of them, Google delves penalties out for them.

    When it finds them ....

    A lot of blackhat SEO does actually seem to work.

    One of our competitors was using keyword stuffing, multiple gateway sites and a whole load of other techniques and was doing really well for well over a year. Google seems to have started penalising *some* of their sites now, but their primary site seems to have been unaffected
    *sigh*


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭seo-ireland


    Believe me Blacknight, I wouldn't touch any blackhat techniques with my least favourite barge pole. It may not be today, it may not be tomorrow but in the future these techniques will be discovered and penalised.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,740 ✭✭✭mneylon


    Oh I know, but it still makes me sick that they can get away with it..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭seo-ireland


    Search engine death to spammers! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,740 ✭✭✭mneylon


    Don't get me started!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭beller b


    Still havn't got this right..Google indexed a few pages the other day, but the've disappeared again..
    I ran the sitemap generator on www.blocklayer.com & I got this on about 200 pages

    Link http://****.com/smf/index.php?PHPSESSID=662811ca8df07f5bf2cd3c5c4965a73f&action=who missing www. on page http://www.****.com/smf/index.php (different Domain)
    Link http://****.com/smf/index.php?PHPSESSID=662811ca8df07f5bf2cd3c5c4965a73f&action=who missing www. on page http://www.****.com/smf/index.php (different Domain)
    Link http://****.com/smf/index.php?PHPSESSID=662811ca8df07f5bf2cd3c5c4965a73f&action=profile;u=41 missing www. on page http://www.****.com/smf/index.php (different Domain)
    How can I stop it seeing it as a different domain?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,188 ✭✭✭Serbian


    beller b wrote:
    How can I stop it seeing it as a different domain?

    Looks like you need to generate all your links either with the www. or without, not a mixture of. It's a bit stupid that it doesn't recognise www.****.com and ****.com being the same domain, but that's what the problem seems to be.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭seo-ireland


    Here's a piece of code you can place into the top of your .htaccess file to convert all non-www accesses to the www equivalents in a search engine friendly manner (301 redirects)
    RewriteEngine on
    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^yoursite\.com [NC]
    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.yoursite.com/$1 [R=301,L]
    

    Works like a charm when implemented correctly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,188 ✭✭✭Serbian


    Here's a piece of code you can place into the top of your .htaccess file to convert all non-www accesses to the www equivalents in a search engine friendly manner (301 redirects)
    RewriteEngine on
    RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^yoursite\.com [NC]
    RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.yoursite.com/$1 [R=301,L]
    

    Works like a charm when implemented correctly.

    That's certainly a useful piece of code, but I don't think it will help with Google sitemaps as it will just read the URL and decide that it's not in the same domain as his site, rather than try and visit it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭seo-ireland


    Yes on a re-read I agree. The only thing to do is to make sure all of the links on the site begin with www. This is good practice anyway and the code I posted is essential to avoid link popularity for your site being split between non-www and www versions (the two versions are treated as two different domains)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭beller b


    Thanks Lads I,ve dont that now. But once you enter the forum pages if loses the www after you leave the smf/index.phb page.. Does it make any difference after that or is there something within the SMF code that would need to be changed?
    Thanks again


  • Advertisement
Advertisement