After Hours ban (happy now, sweet)

expert101

when can i get back into after hours?

seamus

Dunno. Who banned you? Have a look at the thread where you got banned and try figure it out.

sceptre

Have you sent a PM to the AH mod that banned you to ask?

Beruthiel

expert101 wrote:

when can i get back into after hours?

PM the mod who banned you and ask

WhiteWashMan

you should PM the mod that banned you in the first place and ask them what the story is.

seamus

By the way, your sig is too big. Edit it please or I'll do it for you.

fade2black

There's a babtism of fire for ya...

Endurance Man

Banned after 8 posts , maybe its a blessing in disguise.

PS: Can we all have sigs that big ??

Beruthiel

Endurance Man wrote:

PS: Can we all have sigs that big ??

no
you can't!

Vikings

expert101 wrote:

when can i get back into after hours?

If you didnt post crap like this im sure you wouldnt have been banned in the first place.

Mimikyu

This post has been deleted.

Giblet

You were banned for being a worthless poster.

expert101

please....

Endurance Man

Oh, your that guy :rolleyes: , may i suggest http://www.teenireland.com/.

Stompbox

By the way it's called After Hours, not 'After Hourz'

Amz

Wow!

You sure told him Sweet!

By the way, your signature is in violation of the boards.ie signature rules.

Sparky

he was banned for having a sig with the A hole of a cat.
didnt you read the charter expert101, pointless threads will be locked, and since your thread was all about your sig, im sure it was worth banning you tbh.

GoneShootin

Its people like you that drive the suicide numbers UP.

LOOK

What part of

This is for FEEDBACK. If you have a query, complaint or need help, use the HELPDESK.

do you not understand?

CuLT

expert101 wrote:

when can i get back into after hours?

Go into the wardrobe, past the fur coats, into the wood and beyond the lamp post.

Endurance Man

Crisis, this kid is getting a virtual beat down , lovin it .

Stompbox

My name is actually spelt with a capital S.

Stompbox

Amz wrote:

Wow!

You sure told him Sweet!

By the way, your signature is in violation of the boards.ie signature rules.

Me or expert101?

Baz_

Sweet wrote:

Me or expert101?

You are the culprit I'm afraid sweet, but just barely.

Expert101 of course deserved his ban, I haven't seen the original now, nor would I like to.

Sweet is only barely in breach, just read the newbie faq thread on signatures Sweet.

Stompbox

Hey Baz ,Did that idea of yours about a Forum Bouncer ever get implemented? That was a pretty good idea.

Giblet

A lovely thread started by expert101 showcasing his signature showing the arse of a cat...

Stompbox

Exactly!

Baz_

Sweet wrote:

Hey Baz ,Did that idea of yours about a Forum Bouncer ever get implemented? That was a pretty good idea.

No it didn't sweet, netwhizkid threw his support behind it, which effectively ruined the idea forevermore

Stompbox

LOL.Great idea though.

Amz

Sweet wrote:

Me or expert101?

You.

Change it.

Stompbox

Amz wrote:

You.

Change it.

Is it OK now?

Baz_

Amz wrote:

You.

Change it.

If I was the target of such aggressive language, I would consider it bullying, not once have you provided sweet with a link to the signature rules, you just presume he knows them.

Why?

aidan_walsh

Sweet wrote:

Is it OK now?

Image: Acceptable size.
Text: Error detected. Listing image rules:
Regular text: max 4 lines.
Small text: max 8 lines.

Text plus image not allowed*.

*This appears to the the loosest rule.

Baz_

Sweet wrote:

Is it OK now?

Technically no.

Try this:
[code]
<img>http://members.boards.ie/sweet/images.jpg</img&gt;
<SIZE=1><b>Man of Faith</b>
<url=http://www.getphpbb.com/phpbb/sweetslr.html>Come To My Forum and Have A Great Time!</url>
Come quick and you can moderate your chosen forum.
<url=http://www.sparkysforum.linkhttp.com/>Come To Sparky's Forum For Good Times And Free Grog!</url>
</SIZE>
[code]

Except replace the angle brackets with square ones.

Baz_

Amz

Baz_ wrote:

If I was the target of such aggressive language, I would consider it bullying, not once have you provided sweet with a link to the signature rules, you just presume he knows them.

Why?

Would you rather I used lots of superfluous, flowery and ultimately unnecessary language in order to sugar coat the request?

The Sweeper

See "Trainee" before "Diplomat" under Amz' username...

Baz_

Amz wrote:

the request?

Theres a large difference between an order and a request.

Oh and it costs nothing to be nice.

Amz

Oh, you'd be surprised.

1

Small point... but because mods do not bother to tell people they banned them these days.

And given there are more than one mod on certain forums....

Who is he or she supposed to PM?

Automation... it worked for Honda...

Baz_

1 wrote:

Who is he or she supposed to PM?

Automation... it worked for Honda...

All of them?

Automation would also be good though.

Giblet

Amz, your own sig is breaking the rules, change it lest I become rabid.

Amz

And you defy Darwin's theory of survival of the fittest.

1

Baz_ wrote:

All of them?

Automation would also be good though.

Why?

If a mod can't be assed PM'ing one user because they are lazy and un arsed...why so should a user be arsed PM'ing more than one Mod? it's like hassel that could be done without. Sure is that not how the mods see it? One would have though mods would have understood the efficency of just posting here tbh.

Automation works by the way. Robots/and/or .. systems work. There are lots of books on the subject.

Giblet

Amz wrote:

And you defy Darwin's theory of survival of the fittest.

Excuse me? I fear there is a baby going unchanged somewhere.

Giblet

1 wrote:

Why?

If a mod can't be assed PM'ing one user because they are lazy and un arsed...why so should a user be arsed PM'ing more than one Mod? it's like hassel that could be done without. Sure is that not how the mods see it? One would have though mods would have understood the efficency of just posting here tbh.

Automation works by the way. Robots/and/or .. systems work. There are lots of books on the subject.

Well he bothered his ass posting here didn't he without following the rules, I don't PM posters who are posting stupid crap deliberately. I figure they would already know.

Amz

Giblet wrote:

Excuse me? I fear there is a baby going unchanged somewhere.

Why? Is it yours?

1

Giblet wrote:

Well he bothered his ass posting here didn't he without following the rules, I don't PM posters who are posting stupid crap deliberately. I figure they would already know.

You have to think of the lowest common denominator.

It's real simple.
Figuring "they" would already know is a error.

Baz_

1 wrote:

Automation works by the way. Robots/and/or .. systems work. There are lots of books on the subject.

First and foremost, I wasn't mocking your automation idea, I agree that it would be a superb, if ultimately time consuming, idea to implement. I think the time consumed is generally thought to be larger than the perceived value.

1 wrote:

Why?

Merely because the bannee broke the rules, if they want to find out how, and why, they PM all of the people who could have banned them. If they don't want to find out, well then they wouldn't have started the thread in the first place would they?

Baz_

P.S. I have to say this, but for some reason I find QUOTE=1 to be quite funny

1

Baz_ wrote:

First and foremost, I wasn't mocking your automation idea, I agree that it would be a superb, if ultimately time consuming, idea to implement. I think the time consumed is generally thought to be larger than the perceived value.


Merely because the bannee broke the rules, if they want to find out how, and why, they PM all of the people who could have banned them. If they don't want to find out, well then they wouldn't have started the thread in the first place would they?

Baz_

P.S. I have to say this, but for some reason I find QUOTE=1 to be quite funny

So what you are saying is that even though a simple PM from a mod could cut out a lot of bollix it's better for the banned person to "knock" themselves out PM'ing people who can't be arsed sending a simple PM but who would rather a banned person send a complex one.

I think?

1

Baz_ wrote:

First and foremost, I wasn't mocking your automation idea, I agree that it would be a superb, if ultimately time consuming, idea to implement. I think the time consumed is generally thought to be larger than the perceived value.

it's not time consuming. It's just manipulating code that already exists. See Smod tools...

Baz_

1 wrote:

it's not time consuming. It's just manipulating code that already exists. See Smod tools...

Wasn't aware of that, sorry, now its just a case of convincing the powers that be to turn it on I suppose...

Giblet

Amz wrote:

Why? Is it yours?

YOU SUCK! :cool: