Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

SIGPO - Notify

Options
1…139140142144145…147

Comments

  • Options
    #4232
    Gordon
    Registered Users Posts: 35,523 ✭✭✭✭Gordon


    No, there's no facility at the moment to do this. If anyone needs to privately report signatures, PM me.


  • Options
    #4233
    MunsterCycling
    Registered Users Posts: 4,864 ✭✭✭MunsterCycling


    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/member.php?u=72143

    Offensive


  • Options
    #4234
    Gordon
    Registered Users Posts: 35,523 ✭✭✭✭Gordon


    What offends you about that signature?


  • Options
    #4235
    MunsterCycling
    Registered Users Posts: 4,864 ✭✭✭MunsterCycling


    It is 397 px wide


  • Options
    #4236
    Gordon
    Registered Users Posts: 35,523 ✭✭✭✭Gordon


    397px is allowed, the sigrules state "500 pixels wide, 125 pixels tall and 20k in size" - sigrules. So it isn't offensive?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #4237
    Tallon
    Closed Accounts Posts: 22,569 ✭✭✭✭Tallon


    Why would size be offensive? lol


  • Options
    #4238
    MunsterCycling
    Registered Users Posts: 4,864 ✭✭✭MunsterCycling


    When did that change? At the very start of this thread the size is listed as 300px x 100px


  • Options
    #4239
    Gordon
    Registered Users Posts: 35,523 ✭✭✭✭Gordon


    The first post states this:
    Raphael wrote: »
    As is traditional for Internet bulletin boards, boards.ie provides the facility to users of adding a short signature after each of their posts. Like most facilitys however, this is periodically abused. And so rules were created to control these signatures


    Current Signature Rules



    These rules however, are not a perfect solution, as some feel the need to break them. And that is where the SIGPO come in. If you see a user who's thread is in breach of the aforestated rules, then send them the following PM (remove the space from the url tag)


    then post a link to their profile here. If they do not remove the offensive signature in 48 hours, then proceed to the SIGPO - Report thread and post a link to their profile. An admin will deal with them from this point

    R4ph, Boards.ie SIGPO: "To protect and grass"

    However, the second post contains an old quote so I'll remove that, thanks.


  • Options
    #4240
    Solitaire
    Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 18,377 Mod ✭✭✭✭Solitaire


    What are the rules regarding multiple images and text again? And are Subscribers allowed to post bigger sigs?

    Still think fayer's is a bit Sig2Big - total of 100kb, 655px wide and 155px high plus two lines of regular (Size 2) text and a spacer line...


  • Options
    #4241
    Gordon
    Registered Users Posts: 35,523 ✭✭✭✭Gordon


    It's the total size that matters so you can have more than one image but the total dimensions have to be within the guidelines. No, subscribers don't get any special treatment with signatures, either do mods.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #4242
    jd007
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,094 ✭✭✭jd007


    2 images totalling 599px wide.

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/member.php?u=125222


  • Options
    #4243
    Shield
    Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Help & Feedback Category Moderators Posts: 9,644 CMod ✭✭✭✭Shield


    santry_goonshow
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/member.php?u=149166
    Too wide


  • Options
    #4244
    Nevyn
    Closed Accounts Posts: 43,045 ✭✭✭✭Nevyn


    animated gif in sig
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/member.php?u=294220


  • Options
    #4245
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 81,682 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Could Zohan's sig be construed as trying to circumvent the rule (automagically enforced these days) that you cant have a center or right justified sig?


  • Options
    #4246
    Basq
    Registered Users Posts: 43,774 ✭✭✭✭Basq


    irish_stevo815

    Animated Sig


  • Options
    #4247
    Sharpshooter
    Registered Users Posts: 31,859 ✭✭✭✭Sharpshooter


    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/member.php?u=255147

    Huge sig.


  • Options
    #4248
    Gordon
    Registered Users Posts: 35,523 ✭✭✭✭Gordon


    Overheal wrote: »
    Could Zohan's sig be construed as trying to circumvent the rule (automagically enforced these days) that you cant have a center or right justified sig?
    Yes, it can be construed that way, but technically it's not centred, whether or not I'd allow it in reality, I dunno tbh. The reason centred sigs were disabled was because they break the flow of the thread afair, I guess the question is if that sig breaks the flow of the thread also.


  • Options
    #4249
    Spiritoftheseventies
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,082 ✭✭✭✭Spiritoftheseventies


    Sig linked to an rejected forum from what i can see. Thread link is old
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/member.php?u=151806


  • Options
    #4250
    My name is URL
    Registered Users Posts: 25,060 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Spiritoftheseventies wrote: »
    Sig linked to an rejected forum from what i can see. Thread link is old
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/member.php?u=151806

    That forum was approved but with a different name to the one in that sig.. it's for Ranting & Raving. And does the sig even break any rule? Are outdated links within sigs now against the rules too?


  • Options
    #4251
    Spiritoftheseventies
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,082 ✭✭✭✭Spiritoftheseventies


    Sorry misread that. Thread hadn't been updated since last year so didn't realise it had been approved.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #4252
    Gordon
    Registered Users Posts: 35,523 ✭✭✭✭Gordon


    Either way, it's not against the rules to have an outdated link in your sig.


  • Options
    #4253
    Spiritoftheseventies
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,082 ✭✭✭✭Spiritoftheseventies


    okay


  • Options
    #4254
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 81,682 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Gordon wrote: »
    Either way, it's not against the rules to have an outdated link in your sig.
    ...Yet. MwhahaaAHHaAHaHaAhAHaHAHahahahAAAAAaaaaa!!!!!


    (No it shouldnt be)


  • Options
    #4255
    Spiritoftheseventies
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,082 ✭✭✭✭Spiritoftheseventies


    Problem with the bottom sig. Provocative and based on a personal assumption.
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/member.php?u=101582


  • Options
    #4256
    Bonito
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,399 ✭✭✭Bonito


    Spiritoftheseventies wrote: »
    Problem with the bottom sig. Provocative and based on a personal assumption.
    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/member.php?u=101582
    I don't see anything wrong with that sig. The user is entitled to his own opinion and perogative.

    If you're going to go down that road should I report your sig because I dislike liverpool? You're trying too hard. Maybe you should take a day off at roaming the boards endlessly just to pin peoples sigs?


  • Options
    #4257
    Spiritoftheseventies
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,082 ✭✭✭✭Spiritoftheseventies


    Bonito wrote: »
    I don't see anything wrong with that sig. The user is entitled to his own opinion and perogative.

    If you're going to go down that road should I report your sig because I dislike liverpool? You're trying too hard. Maybe you should take a day off at roaming the boards endlessly just to pin peoples sigs?
    Let the mod decide that Bonito. Not down to you. If the sig isnt right it isnt right. How many sigs have I reported here. Maybe five or six at the most.


  • Options
    #4258
    Bonito
    Closed Accounts Posts: 8,399 ✭✭✭Bonito


    Think it's closer to double that. ;) Bit of common sense comes in handy on here.


  • Options
    #4259
    Keano
    Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,802 Mod ✭✭✭✭Keano


    Bonito wrote: »
    I don't see anything wrong with that sig. The user is entitled to his own opinion and perogative.

    If you're going to go down that road should I report your sig because I dislike liverpool? You're trying too hard. Maybe you should take a day off at roaming the boards endlessly just to pin peoples sigs?
    Taken from sig rules:
    Please make sure that your signature DOES NOT contain, or link to, profanity, bigotry, racism, or any other content that might be considered offensive by others

    OP has found it offensive so has reported it. Simple really.


  • Options
    #4260
    Spiritoftheseventies
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,082 ✭✭✭✭Spiritoftheseventies


    Bonito wrote: »
    Think it's closer to double that. ;) Bit of common sense comes in handy on here.
    Well a lot of those posts are down to explaining my posts to others like yourself. Generally speaking dont report sigs religiously. Nowhere near as many as some on here but thats their business and dont have a problem with it tbh. We provide a service on here at the end of the day. Not a witchhunt.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #4261
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 81,682 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/member.php?u=182379

    Too many lines of size 2 text and... well. I think it flies directly in the face of the Flow of Discussion Ethos for the sake of spite.

    I like center justified sigs too Zohan and Id have one if it wasnt disabled but until somethin changes, im not going to try to cheat one, myself.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement