Survivor: Boards.ie - Round 6

Sherifu

Mr.Nice Guy wrote:

rkm nice guys finish last always just ask my ex girlfriend full stop

I did, she says she wasnt satisfied with you sexually.

Mr.Nice Guy

rkm meee dislikes dirty hoes steered well away from her sexually full stop

Sherifu

yes because maybe why I and you, but they no me! we the . ?
Do you like my command of sacred words question mark

Horsefumbler

wtf is this

gimmick

Question - Do sigs count? If so, there has been an offence!

Trojan

Only idiots browse with sigs turned on.

Trojan

(Apologies, no offense to any idiots present)

funky penguin

gimmick wrote:

Question - Do sigs count? If so, there has been an offence!

eye emussa s'ti enim ruoy gniklat tuoba

bobsyouruncle

What'd you say about my ma? I'll F'U'C'Kin kill ya ya bastard. Where do you live I'll brick ye. And yer wee doggie. Do ya like yer kneecaps? cos i'll feckin break 'em.

Schwaaaaaaaa!

funky penguin

Trojan wrote:

(Apologies, no offense to any idiots present)

ygolopa detpecca

Sherifu

Trojan wrote:

Only idiots browse with sigs turned on.

Then you miss out on ratting out sig rule breakers.

Gordon

gimmick wrote:

Question - Do sigs count? If so, there has been an offence!

Only if you can somehow prove that the signature was posted after the challenge has started. I'm inclined to ignore signatures but if the sacred words are being abused then it is something to consider.

Mr.Nice Guy

meee thinks winner of this challenge deserves chance of immunity full stop

funky penguin

eye llits kniht taht renniw dluohs esoohc neewteb ytinummi RO gnitcive enoemos

srenniw eciohc

yeh, eye epyt sdrawkcab retteb nehw eye ma knurd

Mr.Nice Guy

agreed

funky penguin

Gordon wrote:

Only if you can somehow prove that the signature was posted after the challenge has started. I'm inclined to ignore signatures but if the sacred words are being abused then it is something to consider.

eye tup gis pu retfa egnellahc detrats

esimorp

Gordon

do you indeed funky?

Not sure meself, I would lean more towards funkys idea of an either immunity or a vote off situation for the winner of this round.

I have a challenge waiting, this can be an immunity challenge instead of the next challenge.

What do people think - the winner of this round should get immunity for being voted off the next round, OR they get to vote someone off (apart from tovalee) OR both OR seperate immunity round for the next round?

Bah I'm lost, I never understood those immunity clauses on Survivor. In fact I hardly ever watched it.

funky penguin

Mr.Nice Guy wrote:

agreed

tuoba em gnieb knurd noitseuq kram

funky penguin

soc eye eerga

oot ynam kcaj sleinad

Gordon

funky penguin wrote:

eye tup gis pu retfa egnellahc detrats

esimorp

I remember seeing that before the challenge started but are you saying that you typed a sacred being after the round 6 challenge started funky?

funky penguin

reven noitamalcxe

lysuoires eye t'ndid

tub eye ma dessip

lpeh em

Gordon

Coffee and lots of water!

funky penguin

eye etah eeffoc

em sknird retaw

eye lysuoires epyt sdrawkcab retteb nehw eye ma knurd

funky penguin

eye kinht eye og hctaw ytironiM tropeR

eye evol moT esiurC

Mr.Nice Guy

funky what is translation for french word pourquoi question mark

funky penguin

yllems noitseuq kram

tsuj ekil tsop nopu rehto fb fg daerht

tovalee

Gordon wrote:

do you indeed funky?

Not sure meself, I would lean more towards funkys idea of an either immunity or a vote off situation for the winner of this round.

but that would mean that, since i would have had to fosake my immunity to compete in this round, i wouldn't have a chance to compete for immunity in the next one. see my point?

Mr.Nice Guy

tovalee should have immunity for poll not challenge join challenge tovalee exclamation mark

mayordenis

If tovalee is alowed join i should be re-instated . . .
love being controversial

funky penguin

tovalee wrote:

but that would mean that, since i would have had to fosake my immunity to compete in this round, i wouldn't have a chance to compete for immunity in the next one. see my point?

tub uoy lliw eb efas fi enoemos sediced ot etov tnatsetnoc ffo taedsni fo ytinummi