Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Will and inheritance to our children

  • 22-08-2025 07:48AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14


    Hi all, just wondering I am married but myself and my husband are no longer together in practice. We live separate lives. We have two grown up kids together. I would like to create a will where we leave 1/3 to my husband and 1/3 each of our children.

    Can we do this or is this contrary to the Succession Act?

    Thanks



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,893 ✭✭✭dennyk


    If you have children, your spouse would be legally entitled to 1/3 of your estate regardless of what your will says, so that wouldn't be contrary to your husband's statutory entitlement. If you're fully separated and your children are grown, though, wouldn't it be easier to simply get divorced? If either you or him eventually want to start a new life with another partner, your continuing marriage will only cause difficulties and complications.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,137 ✭✭✭jackboy


    The complexities will depend on what is in the estate, how many properties, land, cash, investments, pensions etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,142 ✭✭✭✭Dial Hard


    It sounds like a recipe for complications, tbh. If you're living completely separate lives why not just divorce and then you're both free to do whatever you wish in your wills?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,650 ✭✭✭SupaCat95


    Guessing divorce isnt that simple, if there are assets like a house and money…… solicitors get a lot of it(and you are presuming an amicable parting, what if one partner digs their heels in?). The cost and time of getting a divorce may be outstripped by the cost (eg if they are in their 50's or one partner suspects they are sick). Yeah its too late then for cost over benefits.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,890 ✭✭✭✭coylemj


    It sounds like it's a pretty amicable separation if the OP proposes to bequeath 1/3 of her estate to her husband. So I think divorce is currently not on the agenda.

    Provided she leaves at least 1/3 to her husband, she can do whatever she wants to do with the remainder of her estate. Leaving equal parts (1/3) to her two children should remove the prospect of any litigation after her death. Though it should be pointed out that the children have no absolute entitlement to any part of her estate.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 38,679 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Maybe provide knowledge rather than guesswork.

    But the reluctance of many Irish people to actually get divorced when their marriage clearly ended years ago is bizarre.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,714 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    Shocker! Irish people are reluctant to enrich lawyers. Who would have ever guessed!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 38,679 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    A DIY divorce is quite cheap. What costs money is not the divorce but the rows, and a separation is just as bad in that respect.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,650 ✭✭✭SupaCat95


    If it were that simple everyone would be doing it. Everything is split evenly three ways, one part for the wife, one part for the husband and one part for the solicitors. "billable hours", anyone who deals with solicitors know how the love to drag everything out ………as long……as they …… bloody …..can.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,650 ✭✭✭SupaCat95


    That only works when you dont have any assets and when you dont have two solicitors egging on two very suggestible people to screw each other over.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 38,679 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    No, it works when the couple can agree on the division of their assets and on access to any children.

    But if they were capable of being civil and adult to each other they might not have split up in the first place.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,650 ✭✭✭SupaCat95


    "If "ifs" and "ands" were pots and pans there would be no need for tinkers " George Bernard Shaw.

    YYou have completely disregarded that there are two very hurt people sitting across from eachother not willing to give an inch. You show me two reasonable people who can impartially agree on a fair settlement in the best interest of their offspring and I will show you a marriage that could have been saved. Real people arent like that. Real people getting divorced are petty, defence orientated, protect assets, restrict access to children. Its not fair its about expressing hurt against another hurt individual. Mean while the lawyers are laughing to the bank advising to hold positions.



Advertisement