Partial Moderating

PokeHerKing

I received a ban from Leg End in the CA forum for posting about Irish heritage/DNA.

They said it was because I ignored the mod warning. Another poster who I've flagged in PM with Leg End ignored the warning also, received no ban.

This same poster is continuing to post in the thread telling posters who can or can't be Irish (something leg end specifically called out in PM as part of their reason for banning me).

The biased nature of the moderating needs to be reviewed. I can provide the other poster name if required. Would be great to see some impartiality practiced regardless of Moderators personal opinions on topics.

Unfortunately Leg End not only banned me due to poor comprehension but they also disagreed and tried to correct me on the subject of my post over PM.

Spear

There is no appealing of CA bans until the 7th warning/6 month ban mark.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058368026/new-rules-charter-for-the-ca-forum

PokeHerKing

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/123343367#Comment_123343367

I'm not appealing my ban. I'm pointing out an issue with the moderating on this forum.

It's quite clearly biased. My example is pretty categorical. If you investigate it.

If there's zero appetite to provide an impartial service then that's fair enough.

The site will become an echo chamber.

Spear

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/123343507#Comment_123343507

That makes it a more general complaint, so I've moved it to the proper forum for that, which is Helpdesk.

PokeHerKing

Cheers. Is there a timeline expectation for response and/or investigation?

PokeHerKing

Echo