Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Tesla Talk 2

15678911»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,833 ✭✭✭CMOTDibbler


    I have no idea what you're saying here. We are talking about crashed cars that are category C or D write offs. This is not being reported by the insurance companies who are selling these crashed cars to the trade for repair. The question is why they are not reporting them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭joe1303l


    I don’t think anyone knows the why but it’s very clear car checks on vehicles here are clearly nonsense. Fine for flagging outstanding finance but not worth a s**t otherwise. Motoccheck, Cartell etc. should really be called out for this. I’d have no problem buying a salvage vehicle and having it repaired properly but there would need to be a significant saving to bother. Plenty rogue traders out there selling undeclared repaired write offs. Buyer beware.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,141 ✭✭✭sk8board


    Ireland seems to be an outlier in that we buy twice the number of 3’s vs Y, when the rest of the world is exactly the opposite.

    I was speaking more about the sales being important to Tesla in general moreso that just Ireland, where they’ve never broken into the top 20 for sales by marque



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,141 ✭✭✭sk8board


    sorry, it’s investor **** - use to describe your investment thesis, in other words, the “why” in why are you buying these shares? - what does your analysis say will be the share price on a date in the future when you’d sell.

    In Tesla’s case, valuing the company based on fundamentals or discount cash flow is useless. You’d get $50/share.

    So how do you value them -

    they were definitely a growth story. The CEO said he foresaw 20-30% compound annual growth from 2022-2030, so you could put a value on the shares in 2030 based on that. That is no longer a valid investment thesis - they won’t grow at that level, indeed they are currently contracting.

    So are they now a turnaround story? - comparable to someone like Intel for example; massive company, huge potential, but can management return them to growth …

    This is the sh!t I spent my life doing, but for boring companies that can be valued on fundamentals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,803 ✭✭✭893bet


    Tbey are only contracting based on the silly spike last year that was never sustainable? Well up on 12 months ago, 2 years ago, 5 years ago.

    suspect they will be an interesting case study in 10 years time.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,141 ✭✭✭sk8board


    Revenue in 2024 was only up 1% on 2023, so it’s been an issue for a while now.

    It will be impossible to view 2025 as anything but a contraction year. which brings us back to the original point, the Q2 juniper worldwide sales will answer a lot of questions for tesla in 2025 and probably beyond. There’s no production excuses etc etc



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,530 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Can understand all that but when people say Tesla are incentivising the model y to drive sales, they almost say it as an insult. It’s the norm IMO.

    Look at Cupra, rand new model, the Tavascan, 0% finance, €3500 SEAI booster, VW, free pro plus interior upgrade worth €4k, Volvo, 1.9% finance along with €1500 booster along with €500 towards an EVSE

    These incentives are not just confined to Tesla and their new models.

    Tesla will also never be the volume seller like VW, there’s only 2 models. They also won’t be no.1 seller year on year. They’ve peaked and Into will settle into a more normal sales figure year on year. They can’t be expected to stay at No. 1 indefinitely, especially now with so much competition that’s on par with them.

    It all comes down to personal taste and financial decisions now adays.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,141 ✭✭✭sk8board


    totally agree - however Tesla were always seen as different - it was “are you buying a Tesla, or are you buying some other car”.

    Now Tesla are just one of the bunch, but with a millstone around their neck, and a constant spotlight on their every move.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,523 ✭✭✭September1


    I'm saying that insurers have a clear financial interest in this stuff being unreported. Car with clean record can sell for more and then whoever repairs this car can pay more to insurer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,583 ✭✭✭MojoMaker


    Exactly. Why would they report them?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,141 ✭✭✭sk8board


    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8jg80j771zo

    Look at the complexity of the 7 cameras plus radar and lidar that’s on the Mach-E, and a huge computer in the boot to process everything in real time.

    It’s going to be fascinating to see how Tesla integrate the hardware into the robotaxi concept car they showed last year, for the Austin trial.

    Autonomous cab journeys are a no-brainer imho. Riders will see past the tech and the perceived safety issues in their first journey and it would just become the new normal. Uber price them the same as any other car.

    I can’t see that amount of hardware being economical to put into a private vehicle for many years, or maybe it’s added as a $10-15k option in the configurator, like the original Tesla FSD.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 300 ✭✭prosaic


    Tesla have been testing driverless fsd in Austin for a number of days now. They have set June 12th as the offical start date for the small-scale (10 to 20 cars) rollout of cybercab service there.

    Things going well, they will scale fairly quickly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,758 ✭✭✭pah




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,213 ✭✭✭wassie


    Note they didn't say what year! 😀



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,166 ✭✭✭Mr Q




  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,530 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Don't all these robotaxis have a remote driver somewhere for emergencies?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 300 ✭✭prosaic


    Those are not actually in control unless requested, if I understand correctly. They monitor and where car requires asssitance, they intervene.
    With the 10 or 20 cars, it may be 1 to 1 but I believe the plan is to scale as quickly as cautiously reasonable. If things are going well, it will scale fairly quickly and they wouldn't have the capacity to do 1 to 1 monitoring.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,550 ✭✭✭Buddy Bubs


    Does the world want or need robotaxis?

    Is it a vanity project or is it a viable business plan?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,530 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Good question, but its not a Tesla project, there are a few driverless cars in the US operating already so if there is a market there, then no reason why Tesla or any other company cannot enter that space.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,141 ✭✭✭sk8board




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,902 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Re Robotaxis, concept is your car in parked up at night, might as well let it be a Robotaxi while you sleep if that appeals to you ...

    My stuff on Adverts, mostly Tesla Pre Highland Model 3

    Public Profile active ads for slave1



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,530 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    It won’t work in Ireland due to our PSV regulations. The same reason why uber never took off here in the same way as other countries where people could use it for a bit of extra income.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,758 ✭✭✭pah


    Get it dropped back during the night and have an Optimus robot clean up the puke and plug it in for you.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,530 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,141 ✭✭✭sk8board


    It would have to use the robotaxi providers own insurance, as they’re the one driving the car. It’s a massive hurdle, even if the tech was there.

    Presumably there would be very tight geo-fence controls, for where it can drive, pick-up, or drop-off. (I assume this is also how Waymo works - you can’t just go anywhere, it proposes a nearby robotaxi as an option if the journey is suitable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,166 ✭✭✭Mr Q


    They have remote assistance I believe but I don't think they can actually drive the car remotely.

    And it isn't 1 person per car like Tesla seem to be planning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,141 ✭✭✭sk8board


    the only reason for having one person per car is the maturity of their technology.

    Unlike FSD, Tesla will not be allowed play it fast and loose on robotaxi’s, anywhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,583 ✭✭✭MojoMaker


    When was the last time anyone puked in a taxi?

    Not sure it's a thing as much anymore given how much the social habits of folk have pivoted in recent years (and the huge expense of going out).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,758 ✭✭✭pah




  • Advertisement
Advertisement