Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Landlords not allowed to sell home?

1235

Answers

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Why? What will they say? If I'm renting it out I'll be doing it through an agengy and RTB etc all legit...



  • Administrators, Business & Finance Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 17,002 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Toots


    It can change your rate. Buy-to-let rates are a lot higher than standard mortgage rates, so your repayment will increase.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I'm on a fixed rate until 2030.

    Maybe renting isn't for me I don't know. The stress alone of calling the bank and having them involved.

    Thanks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,985 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    It is almost certain that that fixed rate is dependent on it being your PPR; and will change as soon as you inform the bank it is now a rental.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,135 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    "a terrible war imposed by the provisional IRA"

    Our West Brit Taoiseach



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,441 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    OP if I was on your situation I think I’d live in the house but rent out the rooms and avail of the rent a room scheme.
    14k a year tax free under this scheme and the people renting would be licencee’s as opposed to tenants which gives you a lot more flexibility.
    14k tax free is not to be sniffed at.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 845 ✭✭✭GSBellew


    If you sell it now it is your PPR and you escape liability for CGT on the sale proceeds, if you move out it is no longer your PPR and whilst it may go up in value in the interim your CGT liability on the sales proceeds will instantly dig into any future gains.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,272 ✭✭✭mrslancaster


    Check with your lender about the higher btl rate. Calculate the mortgage increase, rental taxes, agents fees, insurance, maintenance, plus cgt when you sell after x years. It might be better to rent a room as others have suggested, or short airbnb lets that are allowed in your ppr. If you need to move for work or family reasons, or you hate the area and will never live in the house again, selling in a strong market is not the worst option.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Thanks for replies. I've arranged a call with the bank tomorrow to ask what the options are.

    I'll have to put all the figures down on paper and decide.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It's a good option alright but I can't stand the area anymore.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 263 ✭✭travist


    " The stress alone of calling the bank" …yet you want to be a landlord !?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,507 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    If you sell it, invest the proceeds (if any) and the save/invest the equivalent mortgage repayments in all likelihood you will end up in the same place as if you were to hold onto it, without any fear of getting "stuck" with tenants.

    Otherwise set it up as AirBNB until you know what you want to do with it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,659 ✭✭✭SupaCat95


    Ahhhh Jaysus, Dont go there. Being a Landlord will send you to an early grave. Tenants late rent, is the ESB paid, Damage, maintenance, pets, arguements with neighbours, the list is endless without mentioning the taxman (love them audits). American economy will go into a natural small recession soon and there will be a quick bounce back. That will be shown here to proportionally



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    If the contract is irrelevant then why is there any mention of a duration on a contract?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,985 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Because that defines other things like rent reviews. But it is not a way around the rules



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,023 ✭✭✭csirl


    What about people who want to be short term landlords? Many people have to move out of their homes from time to time for reasons such as working abroad, moving in to look after an elderly relative, moving into a nursing home if elderly etc. etc. Traditionally many rented out their home for maybe 2-3 years. These properties were a much needed addition to the countries rental stock. Now gone. Nobody in their right mind will rent out their vacant home short term from now onwards.

    I know someone myself who is moving in with a elderly parent who needs care. They've decided to leave their home vacant rather than rent out. In the past they've rented it out for a couple of years when working abroad. But cant take the risk of being homeless when their elderly parent passes away.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I spoke to lender today about all options. They said if I rent it out it becomes a buy to let status and my rate will change but they said it won't change until my fixed rate expires in 2030...

    I asked how much it would go up (just based on today's calculations) and it adds a lot to my mortgage repayments! It would't be worth it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,985 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    That's the result of the legal structure here; and its not likely to change.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    This is the thing about selling it now before I'm ready to buy again, circumstances could change in my mam's house. I calculated I would need to save for 3.5 years to save for next house. If I sell now that could be 2 years but maybe not if property prices are still this high in Dublin.

    After all this talk I might end up doing option 3 - leaving it vacant!!! I'd have to install a doorbell camera or something like that hooked up to my phone though. Almost every time I go back to house the gate is open and there are no letters in letterbox. Front garden table was robbed too.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    And on another note, I know for a fact that Sinn Fein's advice to people who ring up their local TD about the landlord selling is - overhold. They explicitly tell them to do this. I'm not saying this with an agenda or anything but it's what I've heard a lot through other people.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,985 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    You will seriously, seriously struggle to find insurance for an empty house that will satisfy the requirements of your mortgage lender. I'd be tempted to say you just won't.

    Leaving houses empty is really only an option for those who own them outright.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,023 ✭✭✭csirl


    There are summer only AirB&B and holiday homes that are vacant most of the year, yet still insured without any difficulty. Many of them have mortgages.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,985 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    I'd guarantee that none of them have insurance that actually meets what their lender wants

    Typical holiday home cover requires the water, at least; and sometimes power and gas if fitted, to be turned off if unoccupied for 30 days. Many lapse to covering virtually nothing if there's less than monthly visits.

    Having insurance is absolutely useless if you didn't read the terms and don't realise you aren't covered.

    Now, try find insurance for a completely empty house. Seriously, try.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,023 ✭✭✭csirl


    Monthly visits arent difficult to do. Nor is someone staying overnight the odd time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,985 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Bit of a pain to drain down the water after each overnight visit.

    I would suggest that the vast majority of people who think they're insured for a holiday home or vacant property, basically aren't due to not following the T&Cs of the insurance.

    Also, empty while living somewhere else is still not a PPR for purposes of a PPR mortgage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,023 ✭✭✭csirl


    Note that Im not familiar with the OP, their mortgage or their insurance.

    But , I was a "reluctant landlord" for a period of time a few years ago. Bank was fully aware. Had zero impact on the mortgage etc. In reality, the banks dont care if its your PPR or not so long as you have sufficient income to pay the mortgage.

    I dont buy that its impossible to insure an occasionally occupied house. Insurance may be higher, but you will get insured.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,985 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The OP has already said the bank will increase the interest rate punitively, albeit after their current fix ends. They absolutely do care; BTL rates are much higher and require a lower LTV%, they cannot legitimately securitise a BTL property as being a PPR mortgage.

    Go find insurance for empty houses - you just won't; or the conditions will be expensive (property must be heated, monitored alarm etc) or implausible (visit every 14-30 days, drain down the water tanks etc).

    People think they have insurance for their holiday homes or empty former PPRs and get horribly surprised when claims are denied as they never read the T&Cs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,023 ✭✭✭csirl


    That's interesting. I may be able to help the OP with this one.

    I was a reluctant landlord when we had to move due to my wifes job post financial crash when our house was in negative equity. We were lucky that my wifes family allowed us live in a vacant house one of them owned.

    Banks will initially allude to an interest rate rise as they assume you're turning it into a rental/investment property. They assume that you're more risky as you'll have to pay a mortgage or rent on another property and people will prioritise payments to keep a roof over their own heads ahead of those on a rented out house.

    But once it was explained that the house was going to be the only home we owned and there are no other priority outgoings,or any other PPR mortgage they agreed that it was less risky than before, as obviously rental income adds to capacity to repay!

    Banks are fine with it if its your only mortgage. Different story if its a second property and you've 2 mortgages.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,303 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    Just to point out another issue described here about CGT. It would only start from the year you rented it out. That would only be charge on the increase since it was rented not from purchase.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,985 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Experience from the crash and experience now can't be compared - banks were trying to stop people going in to arrears then. Now they want/need to keep their books in an orderly fashion and aren't going to agree to keep a non PPR on a PPR deal; particularly as a loan book could be sold at any stage and needs to match its description.



Advertisement