Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 18/03/25

1612613615617618727

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 363 ✭✭CoffeeImpala


    But the US hasn't lost manufacturing output in the last 20 years. Your graph only shows their percentage share of global manufacturing dropping.

    The dollar value of US manufacturing is at/near an all time high but is more efficient than in the past so numbers employed are falling.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 311 ✭✭REDBULL68


    Now hear me out and don't give out ,could this be a way to drop the market so low that Russian shell companies could buy back in to the markets on the sly and I'm sure stocks will rocket next week, and this was part of an agreement about a peace deal with Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 311 ✭✭REDBULL68


    Don't believe it for a minute, all these leaders either had a meeting in the white House or a very long video call, it's all smoke and mirrors, The world is now in the hands of people with a ideology, that to me makes no sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 575 ✭✭✭eastie17


    quiet possibly, this is either sheer incompetence or a look over there while we do something really sly over here approach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,846 ✭✭✭take everything


    Pelosi seemed to be saying essentially the same thing that Trump is saying today about tariffs and how screwed up the American-Chinese trade relationship was 30 years ago. How it was hurting American workers etc.

    She seems quite passionate about what she is saying as well in that video.

    Anyway, aren't these primarily just the start of a negotiation to get some of these countries to wake up a bit.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,159 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    Wake up and do what? Start spending hundreds of dollars on KitchenAid appliances while Americans spend $20 on Amazon Choice appliances?

    The world can't afford to buy American goods, especially the countries most affected by high tariffs. A person in Cambodia isn't going to spend a month's wages on a stand mixer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 420 ✭✭PixelCrafter


    Considering many workers there earn about $150 / month a kitchen aid stand mixer at $500+ isn't even remotely on the agenda.

    Their GDP per capita is only $2429.75 about 34 times less than the US!

    Not that Trump gives a flying **** the guy didn't even seem to know what the word 'groceries' was all about yesterday. Sounded like he's never interacted with such things.

    Basically all Trump's doing to somewhere like Cambodia is deeply impoverishing it and causing it to cut economic likes entirely with the US.

    They just won't be able to trade on that kind of basis.

    All it means in reality is lots of countries on that list will end up far more focused on China.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,159 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    Even Americans can't afford to buy all-American. A KitchenAid mixer made in Greenville Ohio is either a wedding gift or a once-in-a-lifetime splurge by someone who absolutely loves baking. The rest of their kitchen will still be made in Vietnam or India. That's why this plan will ultimately fail. People don't want to go back to when a new appliance was a big financial decision.

    And I don't understand the people who think that other countries can reduce their surplus with America by "waking up a bit". It's a meaningless soundbite. If Americans can't afford to do it, which they clearly can't since they are spending a trillion more dollars abroad than they make, why would someone in Lesotho or Vietnam be able to do it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,489 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Anyway, aren't these primarily just the start of a negotiation to get some of these countries to wake up a bit.

    No, they're not.

    Trump has — presumably deliberately — presented these tariffs in a way that makes it very difficult for other countries to do anything that could count as "waking up".

    Take Vietnam. Trump claims that Vietnam subjects imports from the USA to tariffs of 90%. On that basis he imposes "reciprocal" tariffs of about half that, 46%. Logically, you'd think, if Vietnam wants to get the US tariff revoked it needs to reduce or eliminate the tariff it imposes on US goods.

    The thing is, Vietnam can't do that. The 90% tariffs supposedly charged by Vietnam are completely fictional. Vietnam's trade-weighted average tariff rate is 5.1%. The reason the Vietnamese don't buy a lot of US goods is not because those goods are tariffed out; it's because they can't afford them.

    Vietnam can't eliminate the 90% tariffs that it never imposed in the first place, obviously. What it can do — if the US is willing — is negotiate a trade deal under which it exempts US imports from the average 5.1% tariff rate that it does impose, in return for the US eliminating the 46% tariff rate that it has just imposed.

    This would acheive precisely nothing for the US. Vietnam would not buy materially more US goods, because they still would find them unaffordable. At best, we'd be back to square one, with Vietnam and the US trading on more or less the terms that they were trading on before Stupid Thursday, and with a similar pattern of trade — the US buying skads of clothing, footwear and cheap manufactures from Vietnam, and Vietnam buying a small amount of agricultural produce and motor vehicles from the US.

    Trump would, of course, try to spin this return to the status quo ante as a hugh victory for the US, a massive climbdown for Vietnam, so much winning, etc. And this is a Trump line the more slow-witted have been been willing to embrace in the past. But what he has just done to their savings, to their retirement accounts, to consumer prices and to the government programs from which they benefit has shocked a lot of his erstwhile supporters; they are going to be a bit more critical, and a bit less gullible, now than they were in the past.

    The likes of Vietnam can't afford to buy more US manufactures unless the US starts manufacturing stuff they want to buy at prices they can afford. It's hard to see how the US could do that, and policies aimed at doing that — slashing wages, reducing labour and consumer standards — would be deeply unpopular, even with Trump voters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,437 ✭✭✭halkar


    Xi gives two fingers to Trump 🍿 🍿 🍿



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,437 ✭✭✭halkar


    Xi gives two fingers to Trump 🍿 🍿 🍿



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,048 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Is anyone who gave Biden sh1t over Israel/ Palestine prepared to read the following quote and accept that they now know, when given the binary choice that the American presidential election gives, that Biden was the far better option?

    Trump: "You know how I feel about the Gaza Strip. I think it's an incredible piece of important real estate. And I think it's something that we would be involved in. Having a peace force like the US there controlling and owning the Gaza Strip would be a good thing ... you call it the Freedom Zone."

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,489 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    To be fair, "not as dreadful as Donald Trump" is a pretty low bar. A squashed apricot would have made a better president than Donald Trump.

    You really are damning Biden with faint praise, arent' you?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,381 ✭✭✭jj880


    https://x.com/GeneralMCNews/status/1909264836719976761?t=17qDZBZd2PdThC4G-mEI5g&s=19

    BREAKING: President Trump has issued a 48-hour ultimatum to China to remove its retaliatory tariffs on the U.S., warning that failure to comply will result in an additional 50% tariff on Chinese goods.

    Screenshot_2025-04-08-07-11-03-964_com.twitter.android-edit.jpg Screenshot_2025-04-08-07-10-45-883_com.twitter.android-edit.jpg Screenshot_2025-04-08-07-10-03-586_com.twitter.android-edit.jpg

    Bizarre stuff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,048 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    You really are damning Biden with faint praise, arent' you?

    You are really avoiding the question, aren't you?

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,159 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    There are new rules apparently coming in about shipping in the US. Like millions in fees if the ship was made in China, and additional fees if they shipping company has any Chinese ships on order. There is talk of this choking ports as ships are forced to skip them.

    I wouldn't be surprised if this focuses the attentions of countries like China and Japan. Precisely zero of the biggest shipping companies in the world are American. It's all Europe, Japan, and China. These countries have insane leverage over America if they chose to limit routes to the US.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,585 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Outside of the tariffs, the pushback from the administration on correcting their error of sending a man to an El Salvador prison should terrify US citizens.

    A Federal Judge has ordered the return of the man, with the Supreme Court issuing a stay on the matter. AG Pam Bondi has said she “fully intends to protect the executive from judicial overreach”, so basically do what Trump tells her to do.

    If the Supreme Court find a way to determine that this man does not need to be returned, there is a template for the administration to disappear anyone they don’t like into a foreign prison, never to be seen or heard from again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,040 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,489 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    To be honest, I'm wondering why the question was even asked. (Why did you ask it, as a matter of interest?)

    Was Biden a better President than Trump? Yes, obviously. Specifically, in relation to Israel/Palestine? Yes, obviously.

    Does this in any way vindicate Biden, or provde any defence or mitigation in relation to the sh1t Biden was given over his actions or inactions on Israel/Palestine? No, not in the least. Why would it? Like I say, it's reasonable to hold presidents to a higher standard than "not as bad as Trump" and to criticise them when they fail to meet that standard. A healthy republic should have higher expectations of its presidents than that.

    (Plus, of course, there is a view that if the Democrats had not alienated progressive voters by their position on Israel/Palestine, they might actually have won the election, and we'd all have been spared Trump 2.0. I'm not convinced myself, but it's not an unarguable view.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,489 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    From what you say, it is the US that would be limiting routes to the US. US ports would be closed to a huge chunk of world shipping.

    (The measure would, of course, make the tariffs largely unnecessary. If you can't ship goods to the US, the question of what taxes to apply to goods imported into the US doesn't really arise.)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,234 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    China know this is a once in a generation opportunity to defeat America without having to fire a single bullet (america is busy shooting themselves in both feet).

    Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. By the end of Trumps term, the USD will no longer be the reserve currency and a Chinese tech and manufacturing industries will dominate with Chinese owned brands, instead of simply supplying the raw materials and manufacturing every for america to extract profits from.

    The US is facing a bleak decade, declining political influence, declining international military power, declining economic control, environmental concerns (widespread drought and heat waves caused by the climate change they did the most in the world to cause (and sabotage any attempts to address it).

    Internal division and political chaos as the institutions of the state have been corrupted by decades of regulatory capture and corruption, while income and racial inequality eat away at the foundations of civil society.

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,234 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Fools cheering as they fall into their own bear trap

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,159 ✭✭✭sock.rocker*


    The measures seem to be supported by the steel industry and even Democrats, but not American shipping companies and ports.

    What I meant though was that these countries could actually do immense damage to US trade with a more direct approach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,234 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    There goes his 'External Revenue Service'

    He can't even stick to his own incoherent plan.

    Unless he is stopped, Trump will continue his other plan to cut trillions in income taxes from the rich, the US budget deficit will skyrocket even further.

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,489 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Why bother? The US is doing the job for you. Why position yourselves as the bad guys by mounting things like blockades (definitely illegal, by the way) when you can acheive the same result, at a lower cost, and preserving your reputation, by just letting the Americans shoot their own feet off?

    In a post above Akrasia predicts that Chine will overtake the US as the leading global economic (and, probably, political) power. I agree with her. (With him? With them?) This was happening anyway but Trump has accelerated it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,904 ✭✭✭beggars_bush


    It's bonkers stuff

    Who are the people advising him? Or are there none?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,489 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    The only people allowed to advise him are those who will give him the advice that he wants to hear.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,936 ✭✭✭✭retalivity


    Its The project 2025 people, and they are completely off the rails. Or Russia. Donnie can barely string 2 sentences together, hes just doing what hes told.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,651 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Those numbers are based on averages, which is iffy in the US - states matter. It's cheaper to live in Mississippi with its poverty and bad child and maternal health outcomes (bottom 100 worldwide) than in Hawaii. Cars are cheaper in Michigan. Things like that. You need to include the state ranking, which paints a different picture:

    https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/cost-of-living-index-by-state#the-cost-of-living-in-the-united-states

    20 states above the US average.

    The only thing that's super cheap in my opinion is energy compared to the rest of the world. Take that out of the expenses (which I haven't found unfortunately) I'd guess the picture would be much worse for the US.

    Health care is nearly as important as food prices, especially availability, and far and above the most expensive in the West.

    Anecdotally as a US citizen, food prices are insane, Housing isn't far behind. THe US might've been cheap once, now places like Ireland are far cheaper.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,048 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    The question and the reason for it are quite simple.

    The question is ... Where are the people who gave Biden sh1t over Israel in the lead up to the election and why aren't they slamming Trump for being an utter disaster.

    The reason why it was asked is because for years on this forum, repeatedly, both closet and outright trump supporters constantly criticise his opponents for their stance on issues yet when Trump has one monumental f*ck up after another, they go AWOL.

    I am wondering if any of them will admit to having buyer's remorse at this stage

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



Advertisement