Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

They lied’: plastics producers deceived public about recycling, report reveals

Options
«1

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 652 ✭✭✭Norrie Rugger Head



    Repak was always an absolute see through cop out.

    Companies need to tax taxed on their packaging, hard.

    Not, directly, at the till but as a percentage of turnover.

    ⛥ ̸̱̼̞͛̀̓̈́͘#C̶̼̭͕̎̿͝R̶̦̮̜̃̓͌O̶̬͙̓͝W̸̜̥͈̐̾͐Ṋ̵̲͔̫̽̎̚͠ͅT̸͓͒͐H̵͔͠È̶̖̳̘͍͓̂W̴̢̋̈͒͛̋I̶͕͑͠T̵̻͈̜͂̇Č̵̤̟̑̾̂̽H̸̰̺̏̓ ̴̜̗̝̱̹͛́̊̒͝⛥



  • Registered Users Posts: 698 ✭✭✭marathon2022


    Big tobacco lies about link to cancer

    Big energy lie about link to climate change

    Plastic manufacturers lie

    Big finance lie about everything

    And on and on


    Surprised, really?



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,266 ✭✭✭alias no.9


    PET bottles are just about the only high demand plastic recycling stream. This new deposit nonsense is taking them, along with aluminium cans out of domestic recycling bins. It has been worth sorting everything when there is known valuable materials in there but now the sorting of domestic recycling streams has been rendered much less viable. Domestic refuse collection can only get more expensive as a result of this.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,156 ✭✭✭blackbox


    Recycling plastics may not be economically viable. This simply means that it costs more than using virgin materials.

    This is no reason for not doing it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 683 ✭✭✭JazzyJ


    Recycling should be secondary to a reduction in the use of plastic though. If recycling was not seen to be effective then there would be a greater call for the reduction. But that would mean less €€€ for the plastics companies.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 16,136 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    here in germany there's a pretty good recycling scheme. Beer generally comes in glass bottles. You can buy coke etc in recyclable 1ltr bottles.

    It's not about recycling the materials but about reusing the actual item. A plastic bottle that gets 20 or 50 uses isn't that bad compared to single use. And a single use bottle can only be recycles once or maybe twice. And so a deposit return scheme can make a big dent in plastic use if it's used to encourage the use of multi-use plastics.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,131 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    We should be using re useable containers for products.

    For example- you want another batch of fresh orange juice? Bring your empty 2L glass bottle with screw on cap to the shopping centre and refill from a large vat of fresh orange juice.

    Same for mi wadis, milk, carbonated drinks etc.

    Ya want more corn flakes? Bring your container and fill them up at shopping centre.



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,652 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Recycling plastics may not be economically viable. This simply means that it costs more than using virgin materials.

    Why do you think that is?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,247 ✭✭✭Steven81


    It’s very simple, give PP for example you could purchase that depending on the grade and quantity for approx 2 euro per kg for virgin. With regrind it has to be collected, possible sterilisation process, sorting process usually water baths, material is then either shredded or pelletised.

    The density of certain materials are similar but have a different melt temperature making it a difficult process, PET is unique hence why it is easily recyclable.

    if you look at a product there are numerous materials within, that’s why at times rather than segregating the materials it is easier to see how they react with each and make a product out of them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 849 ✭✭✭MilkyToast


    Taxing revenue might obfuscate the increases those companies pass onto the consumer, but they will pass them on nonetheless.

    “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." ~C.S. Lewis



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,266 ✭✭✭alias no.9


    Valuable materials such as Aluminium and PET have been covering the costs of sorting and recovering other materials. These other materials are much more likely to find new uses when they are already recovered than if they are aggregated with other low value materials. Removing Aluminium and PET from green bins will make recovery of other materials more expensive.



  • Registered Users Posts: 849 ✭✭✭MilkyToast


    I definitely think there should be more options to re-use packaging and to use more durable and re-fillable items, and I'd like to see more refill stations around the place. However, lots of families do their shopping online now - it's not really viable for them, and you'd have to have some incentive to make them restructure their week to include a 1-2 hour grocery trip every week (assuming they have the necessary childcare/transport to do so).

    The refill shops are currently seen as a niche gimmick so their prices are pretty steep - especially considering the reduction in convenience. They would have to sell at prices commensurate with the reduction in packaging costs and then some to entice people into the shops.

    “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." ~C.S. Lewis



  • Registered Users Posts: 652 ✭✭✭Norrie Rugger Head


    Let them oass it on but keep hitting it as a percentage of turnover.

    It has to get to a point where it hurts.

    Why are onions sold wrapped in plastic mesh? If they MUST be wrapped why not cardboard strings.

    Drinks companies started shrink wrapping cans instead of a cardboard wrap, a while back.

    Bread has no reason to be wrapped in plastic.

    Chocolate bars

    Big box items packed with plastic stuffed boxes etc.

    Styrofoam is everywhere. Should never be legal to send out


    Doing nothing (ie Repak) is not working

    ⛥ ̸̱̼̞͛̀̓̈́͘#C̶̼̭͕̎̿͝R̶̦̮̜̃̓͌O̶̬͙̓͝W̸̜̥͈̐̾͐Ṋ̵̲͔̫̽̎̚͠ͅT̸͓͒͐H̵͔͠È̶̖̳̘͍͓̂W̴̢̋̈͒͛̋I̶͕͑͠T̵̻͈̜͂̇Č̵̤̟̑̾̂̽H̸̰̺̏̓ ̴̜̗̝̱̹͛́̊̒͝⛥



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,652 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    here in germany there's a pretty good recycling scheme. Beer generally comes in glass bottles.

    How much is a crate of bottled beer in Germany?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭Firblog


    Reduce, reuse, recycle.

    Don't think the govt have ever really tried to enforce the reduce part of that.

    We all know (give out about) products that have far too much packaging Biscuits don't need to be in plastic trays, wash for windshields should be in concentrate not ready mixed etc - govt needs to put crippling levies on this practice, the product should be examined and evaluated for the min packaging needed, if the company making it uses more, then they can pay generously for the extra.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,579 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    Should do the same with clothing, get rid of Penny's eh?

    Want new clothles, go down to the wool store, bring your needles and start sewing!



  • Registered Users Posts: 849 ✭✭✭MilkyToast


    Let them oass it on but keep hitting it as a percentage of turnover.

    It has to get to a point where it hurts.

    Respectfully, while this is a perfectly valid suggestion on boards.ie on a casual Friday morning, it's not a viable suggestion when you're crafting policy. If anything, telling people upon hearing that they've been essentially 'duped' into the labour of sorting plastics and papers and washing out yoghurt pots for the last couple of decades that they should suck it up and get ready for higher costs to fix the problem seems like a very good way to make sure that you end up in the mid-term future with a government that does not prioritise environmental issues at all.

    As for the rest, I'd largely agree. I don't know if there are preservative reasons for any of the things you stated (though I do know that your bread is more likely to get mouldy if you leave it in plastic). But the key is going to be making sure that the convenience and price of items remains mostly the same for consumers, which will only happen if governments take action that will benefit both companies and consumers, like maybe a x% tax rebate/credit for companies that use more then 95% (or 100%) recyclable/biodegradable packaging etc. (with 'recyclable' and 'biodegradable' tightly defined and tested).

    “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." ~C.S. Lewis



  • Registered Users Posts: 652 ✭✭✭Norrie Rugger Head


    It's an EU level issue, to be honest, not state governments

    ⛥ ̸̱̼̞͛̀̓̈́͘#C̶̼̭͕̎̿͝R̶̦̮̜̃̓͌O̶̬͙̓͝W̸̜̥͈̐̾͐Ṋ̵̲͔̫̽̎̚͠ͅT̸͓͒͐H̵͔͠È̶̖̳̘͍͓̂W̴̢̋̈͒͛̋I̶͕͑͠T̵̻͈̜͂̇Č̵̤̟̑̾̂̽H̸̰̺̏̓ ̴̜̗̝̱̹͛́̊̒͝⛥



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,131 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie




  • Registered Users Posts: 4,947 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    None of this stuff should be news to anyone.

    We all know that recycling is a scam. It should be clear once you see that the waste you meticulously clean and sort is mixed in with the unsorted dirty stuff from your neighbor's bin. It's common enough that bin lorries will put household waste into recycling if one side of the lorry is full up. The vast majority gets burned in a furnace. "Renewable".

    The rest is sent overseas to who knows where.

    Mountains of clothes, tires, and electronics in some African countries. Whole landscapes are devastated by first-world waste. The whole thing is a scam. The deposit return scheme is another such scam. They're going to the same place the plastic bottles in your recycling bin are going.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 849 ✭✭✭MilkyToast


    The same EU that just backed down on agricultural emissions because of farmer protests?

    Top-down brute-force efforts on environmental issues seem extremely unwise, to me.

    “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." ~C.S. Lewis



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,579 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    Similar enough to going down to Dunnes or Tescos with a load of old bottles and boxes filling up the milk and cornflakes..



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,164 ✭✭✭Kaisr Sose


    Anything from €9.29 upward for 20 0.5l bottles plus 0.08c deposit on each bottle and €1.50 deposit on the crate

    https://www.rewe.de/produkte/original-oettinger-export-20x0-5l/3733289



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,652 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Think I gave 11 or 12 euro. The last time I was over there.

    You'd barely get 4 bottles for it here.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,131 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    No that’s not ridiculous.

    Bring your containers and refill them there at the shop.

    No waste.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,136 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    To be fair, the tax/duty on beer is a lot less than ireland.


    I generally order a crate of beer and two crates of coke zero. This crate of 20 x 500ml is about 20 euro.


    When I order them, they pick up the empties from the last delivery.

    You can also buy beer and coke in crates in the supermarket but I don't want to carry them so I get them delivered.

    And of course you can buy singles and return them to the machine in the supermarket afterwards.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,579 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    It's just not practical for most people, and stores that do provide this service currently are quite small and specialist, i.e. a LOT more expensive than Lidl/Aldi etc.

    Do you really think that in a cost of living crisis as we have now that families who are struggling to pay the bills are willing to add up to 50% extra for organic veg etc. etc. ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,164 ✭✭✭Kaisr Sose


    Is that all you wanted to know for ?

    Have you heard of google for answers to pressing information requirements?



  • Registered Users Posts: 39,652 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    It's a discussion forum.

    I asked a gentleman who lived in Germany how much a crate of beer is.

    You decided to answer for him.

    Now you are upset for some reason.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 39,652 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    To be fair, the tax/duty on beer is a lot less than ireland.

    That's the problem really, the alternative to cans of beer is bottles.

    Bottles in Ireland are generally a good bit more expensive than cans, cans are already quite prohibitable expensive.

    So the prices determines choice. So the normal course of action would be to reduce the price of the product significantly that is most environmental. 2 chances of that happening.

    AFAIK in Germany the bottles are not smashed, they are washed, relabelled and reused.



Advertisement