Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Twisters

«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,200 ✭✭✭✭Basq


    The original was a stone-cold classic.. this looks all a bit lame and lazy, even by Hollywood standards.

    I'm even betting that character at 1:30 is trying to emulate Philip Seymour Hoffman's "shouty character" in the original.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,807 ✭✭✭speedboatchase


    The original holds up really well but that trailer got my attention. Glad to see Glen Powell leaning into the 'cocky handsome prick' archetype he did so well in Top Gun Maverick.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,462 ✭✭✭Aisling(",)


    I was a fan of the original so I'll give it a go. I think it'd be a good popcorn film to see on a big screen.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    From the director that brought you ... wait, Minari? Ok that's a bit weird.

    I suppose we should be grateful it didn't go full Legacy Sequel and write a blank cheque for Helen Hunt or Cary Elwes (Bill Paxton RIP).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 327 ✭✭SheepsClothing


    It doesn't look great, but I'm basically a sucker for any natural disaster film, so I'll be there day one.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 900 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    They should have called it The Suck Zone. Depending on how bad it is, it could work on a number of levels.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,256 ✭✭✭Decuc500


    That's some jump from Minari to Twisters but I see Lee Isaac Chung also directed an episode of The Mandalorian.

    Not the career progression I would have expected after watching Minari.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,741 ✭✭✭✭bodhrandude


    Looks fun, the original to me seemed a bit TV Movieish although I did like the effect with the cattle caught up in the middle of the twister.

    If you want to get into it, you got to get out of it. (Hawkwind 1982)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,140 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    looks like remake more then a sequel, every scene point the same



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,892 ✭✭✭silliussoddius


    ...




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 198 ✭✭OrangeBadger



    2.55 there is a section about the original Twister film, amazing amount of work went into making it look so good



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 89,021 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    How is it connected to the original, just name, subject etc., ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,100 ✭✭✭Mr Crispy


    DOROTHY is returning, so there's some sort of connection to the original.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    $200m budget.

    I kind of want it to bomb now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,104 ✭✭✭fatbhoy


    All the Einsteins in this thread saying that the original was a classic 🤣. News flash: the original was absolutely mediocre.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,200 ✭✭✭✭Basq




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,561 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    Every time there's a report on the radio during a storm of debris on the road I just think of the "We have debris" "DEBRIS!?!" scene.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,878 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Early reviews look good!



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    In a true surprise, the initial reviews leaking out, from usual names I'd listen to, have been near universally positive. If not effusive in places



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 907 ✭✭✭El Duda


    A lot better than anyone could have expected when it was first announced



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,399 ✭✭✭sonic85


    I thought the original was a much better film than this. I felt nothing for any of the characters in this - they could've all been taken out by a twister and I wouldn't care. Compared to the original that had likeable charismatic actors this was just meh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,462 ✭✭✭Aisling(",)


    I enjoyed it. I thought the first film was a good popcorn flick but didn't go into anything too deeply and I'd say the same about this.

    Glen Powell is very easy to watch on screen but I thought Anthony Ramos was the weak link.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 907 ✭✭✭El Duda


    You won't get a better example of a 'does what it says on the tin' film than this

    Easily on par with the first one. Personally, I think it's a bit better. The first Twister was a load of nonsense really. Anyone who claims that it is miles better than this new one clearly has the old rose-tinted specs on.

    It's a properly old school blockbuster, with genuine spectacle. The decision to shoot on 35mm pays off. It's so refreshing to see a big movie like this that doesn't look like it was entirely shot in front of a green screen. It's a far cry from the recent super-hero trash.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,399 ✭✭✭sonic85


    Twister is nonsense I agree 100%. But it's enjoyable nonsense. Twisters is also nonsense - the difference being it's not as entertaining as the first.

    The original had a decent pretty simple story well told with a solid cast. There wasn't a memorable performance from anyone in Twisters. Powell was OK but the rest were personality vacuums. I'm not going to get into the actual story because of spoilers but it was twaddle.

    Twisters is worth a watch definitely but in my opinion the first is a better film



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,849 ✭✭✭✭AMKC
    Ms


    Don't bother going to see this. It's rubbish. The acting is crap. Half of them look like they would prefer to be somewhere else and the story is just stupid.

    A truck that just magically drills through the smenth outside an Airport lol in like seconds.

    Live long and Prosper

    Peace and long life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 907 ✭✭✭El Duda


    I disagree with everything in the first paragraph

    I struggle to see the issue with the last 😂 That was brilliantly stupid.



  • Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators Posts: 2,322 Mod ✭✭✭✭Nigel Fairservice


    Not long back from this. I thought is was great summer fare and nice change from all the super hero stuff that's been served up during recent summers. The plot is a bit silly but I didn't care. The movie gets away with it. Decent performance from Glen Powell.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 378 ✭✭Hold My Hand


    I couldn’t stop laughing when this was over. Utterly ridiculous.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 797 ✭✭✭gossamerfabric


    Glen Powell channeling Mathew McConnaughey.

    If you are looking to go to the cinema it is as good a movie as any to see but not a movie which will live in your memory.

    Perfectly fine entertainment but nothing more.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,631 ✭✭✭✭antodeco


    Went to see this in 4DX. It was very enjoyable as you got battered and thrown around the cinema seats. Combined with lots of wind blowing around the cinema and the occasional water spout, it was a typical "disaster" movie. Could read the story very easily, but if you want to turn your brain off and enjoy a bit of usual "oh no what's going to happen" type cinema, you'd be hard pushed to find another this year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭gym_imposter


    The original is rubbish itself and I'll watch almost anything with Bill Paxton



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,103 ✭✭✭monkeybutter




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,638 ✭✭✭Homelander


    I thought it was fairly good - a well made big-budget popcorn movie, good pace, (mainly) reasonable acting, plenty of spectacle, storyline was perfectly fine in the context of what it is.

    I like Twister, and I'd say anyone that does will find this watchable at worst. It's no masterpiece but it's a lot better than I actually expected it to be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,878 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Would agree with this if I had to some it up in a word I would say...grand.

    Kind of what I expected. The two leads had chemistry, Glen Powell in particular has real charisma, story wise it was all very predictable.

    Some of the secondary characters were pretty irritating though especially the ones with Glen Powell. David Corenswet (aka the new superman) has a very one dimensional minor character but it is always nice to see Maura Tierney.

    The fire tornado was a bit sharknado esque but the sequence with wind turbines was a lot of fun. I did roll my eyes at parts of the big finale, the tram pinning Glen Powell etc. Effects solid enough.

    6.5/10



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 89,021 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    Was anyone else expecting Helen Hunt cameo as the mother

    Daisy reminded me of Anne Hathaway but herself and cocky charisma jock Tyler worked as leads, Glen Powell does well with southern charm

    I felt I was watching new Ghostbusters at times 🙈☺

    Was Daisy's wardrobe a tad Sarah Connor ish



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,807 ✭✭✭speedboatchase


    Thank god there was none. Tired of that IP trope, where the oldies return to say some catchphrases and save the day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,332 ✭✭✭santana75


    I enjoyed this way more than I thought I would. What the point of it all is......I'm not quite sure, it bounced from set piece to set piece with no real plot to speak of. But it was never boring, Glen powell was great, and daisy Edgar jones decent enough, I just wish they'd let her use her normal accent and not have to put on the American twang. It's just not necessary. Anyway it's pretty entertaining and not a bad way to spend a weekend afternoon



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 797 ✭✭✭gossamerfabric


    Annoyed me that they tried to preach about climate change.

    Twisters is 2024, Twister was 1996, Twisters and Twister had Dorothy from Wizard of Oz 1939 based on the book from 1900.

    Tornados happen, have happened for a long time before Europeans came to north America and will continue to happen in to the future…that is nature, not climate change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,878 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    Did they?

    Even the director himself said it was a conscious decision not to include a message like that.

    "While the new movie doesn't explicitly send a message about climate change, Chung said there is a scene where a local farmer complains about storms and floods becoming more frequent and driving up the price of wheat."

    It's literally a tiny passing scene (that mentions storms and floods - as far as I know plenty of evidence floods are linked to climate change) I can't remember even after having seen the film, so nothing was being "preached" no idea where you are getting that notion from.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 797 ✭✭✭gossamerfabric


    Did they? They did.

    Daisy's life goal is the stop Tornadoes with Nappies because these storms are happening so much more often nowadays and of course corporate America is profiting from it all with their funding of 3-d modelling of live Tornadoes to target victims.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,878 ✭✭✭✭gmisk


    No they didn't. Literally read the directors words.

    A silly film about stopping tornadoes is now pushing climate change? Lol...is sharknado the same now? What about the upcoming catnado?

    Certain sectors in corporate America do profit from tornadoes etc...that isn't "preaching" about climate change.

    It's a stupid disaster flick not a documentary or some climate change pushing Hollywood propaganda.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 797 ✭✭✭gossamerfabric


    We must have been watching different movies. Are you sure you didn't see a screening of the mockbuster version?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Opening US box-office of $80 million: not too shabby at all; even if one accounts for inflation vs. ticket prices it's a pretty strong opening & further complicates this reductive pearl-clutching that cinemas / movies are in trouble.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,019 ✭✭✭I see sheep


    That main actor irritates me immensely.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,321 ✭✭✭riddles


    Went to see it with the young lad really enjoyed it. it’s ridiculous which is what makes it enjoyable- grain silos and truck trailers etc all getting picked up. The maverick guys drops two drills which drill into cornfield about two feet down and this means he can park in the middle of the tornado to send up fireworks.

    Another clip the main female character is getting out of the truck and the other guy says here put these on - pair of safety glasses. She’s wearing a tank top with galvanise sheets and all manner of debris flying around the place.

    It’s good cinematic entertainment a perfect to take your early teens to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,602 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    I watched it on Sunday, don't think I've actually watched it since renting it on VHS when it was released.

    Was still great fun. Huge amount of practical effects that still look great. Better than a lot of similar films I've seen in the last decade.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,270 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie


    where did you see it?
    There’s no 4DX in Ireland is there?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,878 ✭✭✭✭gmisk




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,270 ✭✭✭✭tom1ie




  • Advertisement
Advertisement