Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Eamon Ryan: What we need today is a much bigger State

Options
«13

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 24,863 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    What we need indeed is a state minus Eamonn Ryan as a politician.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,407 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    He lost it before so it won't be a new experience to him if it happens again.

    Are you collecting nominations for the worst politician ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 21,506 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    We need him to emigrate to cloud cabb8ge land.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,404 ✭✭✭Bobson Dugnutt


    He’s right. We need less EY, Deloitte and various other consultancies slowing things down and issuing reports, and more people in secure State employment tasked with making decisions and implementing change.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,447 ✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    Ive seen the word self-awareness mentioned when talking about politicians. Bringing in the deposit return scheme(and arguably not fully thinking it through) in an election year shows a serious lack of self awareness for the green party.

    I hope they get decimated at the election.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,504 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    Also cycling lanes. Don't forget the cycling lanes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,225 ✭✭✭nc6000


    So Eamon Ryan thinks we need more Eamon Ryans?



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,407 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    You do know that the DRS was coming in anyway no matter who is in power.

    The opposition support it.

    If the GP are only decimated it will at least be an improvement on 2011 when they were annihilated.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,622 ✭✭✭✭zell12


    Yes. Nordic tax levels and Nordic services. That's what we want. More people need to pay tax on assets and income, everyone should pay something even those on welfare a minimal amount. Win-win for all.



  • Registered Users Posts: 424 ✭✭scottser


    If he means ending public private partnerships bias in favour of private and shareholder interest, then yeh. If that means that taxpayer's money doesn't get used to guarantee shareholder profits or bank bailouts then yeh. If all that means a return to a public owned and funded capital works programme then I'm all for it. If it was backed by a subsidised education programme to address shortfalls in professions like doctors, nurses, engineers and trades of all kinds in return for a 5 year contract working for the state, then yeh. If the state fully controlled things like the housing market, then yeh.

    Privatisation of state assets was not a good thing on balance. Getting back to public works and public ownership is the best way to stop this interminable race to the bottom.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,646 ✭✭✭TinyMuffin


    Hopefully he gets lost in the Amazon jungle in Brazil over st Patrick’s weekend.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,404 ✭✭✭Bobson Dugnutt


    He’s right about lots of things. A truly visionary and reforming minister in his two terms in Government. Not afraid to deal with various vested interests either.

    Did the State some service and the history books will be kind to him.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,407 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    It's an interesting debate and timely.

    We have been independent and running the country for just over 100 years.

    We got some of it right and also made some very bad moves.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,041 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    So you did not bother actually reading the article then and are not actually interested in discussing the issues raised..... No doubt when public services reach breaking point because they have not kept pace with the growth in the economy you'll be posting links to that complaining as well. When you find Eamon Ryan and the IBEC on the same side, it is worth checking out..... but obviously not in your case.

    Oh and BTW, you don't know much about socialism either.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,404 ✭✭✭Bobson Dugnutt


    Like what?

    By any metrics the Irish State has been a tremendous success. Quality of life, life expectancy, access to education, healthcare outcomes. The narrative that we live in some sort of banana republic is nonsense .



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,885 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Cycle lanes, recycling schemes, pedestrianisation, a focus on public transport rather than private cars, how dare he do exactly what he said he'd do to get elected.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,114 ✭✭✭✭jmayo




  • Registered Users Posts: 13,885 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    Blame FFFG for 100 years of ignoring public transport. Vote Green if you want continuing improvements in public transport.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,114 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    Ehh are you for real?

    The Irish state for most of it's existence was a failure.

    The only thing we avoided was war.

    I grew up in an area where emigration was the norm until the 1990s.

    There was nothing for people in Ireland, well apart from the connected ones who got whatever was on offer.

    We had a state riddled by bowing and scraping to the catholic church.

    We institutionalised thousands for daring to not conform and often sold their children.

    And finally when that was ended and it looked like we were finally making our own way, we have a head long rush to now bowing and bending over backwards to the whims of bureaucrats in Brussels, Geneva or New York, to connected NGO taxpayer funded loons.

    We are even back to the place where daring to not conform to the political and social agenda set by some should see you ruined and even jailed.

    Hello hate speech legislation.

    We were at pinnacle of our achievements perhaps in the early 2000s.

    Economy was ok before construction madness took off and the shackles of the church had been removed.

    We have been going backwards since, first was construction bubble's inevitable end, then austerity to pay for that fookup, then growth but only really growth for the MNC sector that is really only here for the cheap taxes.

    You talk about health care and education.

    I would say you had better chance of a hospital bed and better chance of being seeing within 6 hours in A&E in 1980s than today.

    We could even find ways to build hospitals up until the 2000s.

    I was able to get a school bus in the 1980s something my kids are not guaranteed today even though I now pay for it.

    Third level students could afford and get accommodation in the 1980s something they can't today.



  • Registered Users Posts: 14,407 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    I didn't say we live in a banana republic and I don't think we do.

    I said we made some mistakes but point out a country that didn't.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 689 ✭✭✭foxsake


    the green party are merely the khmer rouge-lite and over time are evolving into more extreme versions of their previous . It wont be long before they go full communist.

    He has no compunction about driving us back to tenement buildings if he deems it to good and proper despite none of his policies being anything more than tax grabs.


    You often get the vibe from Ryan , he would cheer Thanos in real life.

    Post edited by foxsake on


  • Registered Users Posts: 424 ✭✭scottser


    Well, you're quite the alarmist eh?

    Literally nothing in your post has any grounding in reality, which is quite the achievement in fairness.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,806 ✭✭✭archfi


    ..

    The issue is never the issue; the issue is always the revolution.

    The Entryism process: 1) Demand access; 2) Demand accommodation; 3) Demand a seat at the table; 4) Demand to run the table; 5) Demand to run the institution; 6) Run the institution to produce more activists and policy until they run it into the ground.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,380 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Bigger state is a good thing. Look at Covid, the second things went to pot everybody was clamouring for a larger state and the supports that go along with it. The only thing that's preventing it now is that people want loads of services but don't want to pay the tax to fund it...



  • Registered Users Posts: 558 ✭✭✭Gussoe


    If the State should grow in tandem with the economy & private sector, then I expect the State to shrink in tandem as well. But that never happens.



Advertisement