Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

is the future of having children outside the womb .... the future?

Options
  • 15-10-2023 3:55pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 11,730 ✭✭✭✭


    I was reading a couple of months back some kind of article where they predicted in the future that it could be possible to grow a baby outside of a womb , in an incubator kind of thing and I thought it sounded a little bit like a crackpot idea until i had more think about it, and i can sort of like see the benefits myself:

    The mother could carry on drinking and smoking without no harm to her unborn child, no morning sickness, the mother could if they wish work all the way right up to the end of the 'birth', no risks from high blood pressure, no risk of loosing the baby for people with medical reasons where they have miscarriages, no overdue or premature babies, no c-sections.

    there are most probably loads more 'advantages' to it. - I dont know how the mother would bond to the baby if they had not been carrying around for 9 months but most probably the same way the father bonds to the baby .

    it would be strange in the future if people started saying "do you remember if you were pregnant years ago and you had to carry the baby inside you for 9 months, it seems alien now!"



Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 13,406 ✭✭✭✭Dial Hard


    I think maybe you should step away from the internet for a while...



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,730 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    and what? - read a paper or watch the tv news instead? - because i do believe originally it was an article on the internet taken from a newspaper or tv news about it.

    same news but it was just transmitted in a different way.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,406 ✭✭✭✭Dial Hard


    Read a book. Go for a walk. Visit a museum or art gallery. Listen to some music. Cook or bake something.



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,915 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Yeah some tech bro usually dreams up this idea every few years, usually while high on drugs

    The premise goes something like we can grow single celled organisms easily enough, ergo we can grow a human in a test tube

    The issues arise when you get into the practicalities of it. For one thing, you'd need some way to manufacture human blood to supply the foetus

    Unless you're planning to hook a woman up to a constant blood transfusion system, in which case what's the point?

    The biggest problem though is that growing humans in test tubes is a solution without a problem

    We already have a good way to produce more humans, it's worked for thousands of years and has generally proven quite popular

    Also, who's going to pay for this system? If you look at the costs of IVF or other fertility treatments and think about how costly growing a baby in an incubator would be, it's pretty clear that only the very wealthy would be able to afford it

    So essentially you've come up with the first season of Altered Carbon with some of Brave New World thrown in

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,510 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Next thing ya know the Bene Tleilax will be wheeling the aloxotl tanks out.

    Then someone else will buy a 2nd hand one that hasn't been PAT tested, and what then!?!

    Surely we must clamp down in the danger of 2nd hand wombs now, before they become a problem 😉



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 20,638 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    It is all for the best motives as Andy says. So that women can keep drinking and smoking.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,612 ✭✭✭nachouser


    The op is the lad who started a thread about not getting a free drink cos he finished the one he paid for before finishing his chicken fillet roll. In a spar or a garage or whatever. It was his best moment on here. Wonderful thread.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,730 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    centuries ago - i have matured since then 😁



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,612 ✭✭✭nachouser




  • Registered Users Posts: 25,713 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    Andy, please don't mature any more. This is After Hours, and your threads are gold.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,438 ✭✭✭✭cj maxx


    Have so called test tube babbies not been done before ? Or is this this about growing a full foetus till babyhood?



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,730 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    well this time its more artificial wombs kind of thing for the future, thats what scientists are looking into and experimenting on:

    https://www.bbc.com/reel/video/p0bmqfk9/what-if-women-never-had-to-give-birth-again-



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,998 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Without pretending to know anything about the article because it wasn't linked and I haven't seen it, maybe it would be good for some people.

    Some women can't successfully carry a child. They end up with devastating miscarriages and so on. So it could be used as a kind of surrogacy.

    Plus, trigger warning, trans women in a couple with a cis man could find it interesting.



  • Registered Users Posts: 625 ✭✭✭ghostfacekilla


    I think we're a step nearer with the Ukrainian surrogacy farms for the lush starbucks mummies who are in addition to being too posh to push, but to posh to carry.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,076 ✭✭✭witchgirl26


    This sounds like the exact plot from a show that I think is on Apple TV called something like the Pod Generation. Basically babies are grown in pods outside the body & you can carry them around if you want or you can leave them to gestate in a facility.

    Look the theory is interesting if it was to be used for people who struggle to maintain a pregnancy (as opposed to those who struggle to get pregnant) but I think we're a long way off it at the moment. And I think the defacto will always be the natural way of baby growing in the womb.



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,730 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    it would mean you could protect the unborn baby i suppose , i mean say if the mother does drugs or is an alcoholic , not only harming herself but her unborn child , then there could well be a case for something like this



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,428 ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    What about using recycled washing machines as a replacement womb? You could use a larger capacity drum for twins, triplets, quadruples etc.

    That would solve your 2 most pressing concerns. 😂



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,429 ✭✭✭thinkabouit


    Hope not, way too much fun making babies



  • Registered Users Posts: 24,515 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Are you saying this as a guess at what might happen or telling us you saw in a vision that this will happen.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,315 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    Seems like the logical next step would be to use a washer dryer so the baby comes out dry.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,730 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo




  • Registered Users Posts: 11,730 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    make babies the normal way then ... and then extract the fetus and finish it off in an artificial womb pod .... gas mark5 for 9months 😁



  • Registered Users Posts: 11,730 ✭✭✭✭Andy From Sligo


    that will be the future - baby will soil its nappy and you will just sit the baby in a washer dryer and go "do you remember back in the day when we had to change the babbies nappy's - its so much easier now"



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,915 ✭✭✭✭the_amazing_raisin


    Yeah... it's actually possible to extract and preserve an embryo very early on in the pregnancy, but once it's implanted and is receiving blood from the mother it's basically impossible without aborting the foetus

    Given a lot of women don't realise they're pregnant until well after implantation, it's already a non runner

    Again, it's a solution without a problem. What exactly is being solved by an artificial womb?

    Women want to drink, smoke and take drugs during pregnancy? Well people probably shouldn't be doing that anyway, so pregnancy seems like a fantastic opportunity to kick the habit. Perhaps a couple's focused program to get the father to also cut down on their negative habits would be good as well

    For woman who have trouble conceiving, or couples who are short on ovaries then surrogacy seems a far better approach. Reforming surrogacy and adoption laws would probably have more positive outcomes

    As for the demographic crisis, typically this is linked to overpriced housing and the costs of having children, both direct costs of childcare and indirect costs because one parent having to put their career on hold to some extent. So affordable housing, childcare and better parental leave laws would help solve that issue

    Once again the high tech solution has been defeated by sitting down and thinking about the problems for 5 mins 😉

    "The internet never fails to misremember" - Sebastian Ruiz, aka Frost



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,188 ✭✭✭Ubbquittious




Advertisement