Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Stop deleting threads!

  • 13-08-2023 10:57pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,580 ✭✭✭gameoverdude


    Title says it. Who has sign off? Can't just be individual mods?

    Post edited by Spear on


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46 g g murpho


    Moderators are supposed to be impartial but they ain’t.

    Unless you advocate driving 200 km/h whilst weaving and undertaking you’re not welcome on motors.

    Unless you advocate giving teachers triple pay with an extra two months off you’re not welcome in the T&L forum.

    If you dare say a cyclist was wrong even if they were, you’re not welcome in the cycling forum.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,891 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    IIRC if a thread starter is banned and their content deleted, that thread that they also started is deleted. it's part of how Vanilla works.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46 g g murpho


    I’ve seen threads from banned users still visible though.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,891 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    yeah, i think there's a difference between banning a user, and banning them and deleting their content (which is probably justified at times) - i've never banned a user so i'm familiar with the subtleties.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,580 ✭✭✭gameoverdude


    That's fair enough and I really appreciate you taking the effort to reply (I'm not being sarcastic! ).

    It's just confuses me sometimes when a discussion is ongoing and all my posts are deleted and thread as well. Did I do something wrong?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,891 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i've fallen to that too. threads i was contributing to which vanish; i think it's happened twice, and both times the thread starter was a low post count user with an opinion guaranteed to generate debate. so a probable re-reg of a banned user.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 18,809 Mod ✭✭✭✭Kimbot


    It all depends on why the thread was deleted, it could be deleted for been a re-reg, it could also be a duplicate discussion so really you have to ask the mods of the specific forum for information on same.



  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 78,393 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    If you had done something wrong you would in all likelihood have received a warning notice.

    As already mentioned, when we nuke a re-re troll we will also do a "delete all". Otherwise it gives the re-regs the oxygen they crave.

    Only Admins should be doing that though. Mods should only be deleting threads from forums they moderate



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,059 ✭✭✭...Ghost...


    You don't have to break a rule for a thread to be deleted. Just post a thread a mod doesn't like for whatever reason and it will often be closed or deleted.

    Stay Free



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,580 ✭✭✭gameoverdude


    Again threads deleted without mod reason. Why? If its against charter or just a mods opinion, tell us please.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,580 ✭✭✭gameoverdude


    Yet again another thread deleted and scurrilous comments against my family. What are you hiding? I'm sure I can put in an foi request to retrieve them?



  • Administrators Posts: 54,424 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,548 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Well here's an example of a thread a mod did like (initially) which got closed 😁

    Mod (not of that forum AFAIK) opens a very deeply stupid, to the point of trolling, thread. Gets a lot of pushback on their very silly posts, then runs off to the admins (not even the mod or cmod!) to get it closed to save them from further embarrassment.

    I didn't know a thread had "run its course" just because the OP didn't get anyone to agree with them 🙄 and no non-mod would get away with making a post like that.

    In Cavan there was a great fire / Judge McCarthy was sent to inquire / It would be a shame / If the nuns were to blame / So it had to be caused by a wire.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,059 ✭✭✭...Ghost...


    Shortly after posting here, my Tesla referral signature was deleted by Admin. Of course, mine seems to be the only one that was actually deleted. Coincidence I'm sure.

    Stay Free



  • Administrators, Boards.ie Employee Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭✭✭Boards.ie: Mike


    I already PM'd you about this issue last on the 17th of August. Why are you commenting on it here now?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,371 ✭✭✭TheAnalyst_


    Dogshit website. Threads deleted. Posts deleted.


    You wonder why bother with the effort.



  • Administrators, Boards.ie Employee Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭✭✭Boards.ie: Mike


    There are many references available to help users to keep within the rules when posting. The issue with threads being removed or edited and posts being removed or edited is where there is a breach of these rules. Posts made by a re-reg poster, or containing uncivil remarks, attacking the poster, whatever the comment is, it may incur an action like this. It really boils down to being as simple as that. It is impossible to moderate every single comment here on site and obviously the ones with the most reports receive the most attention. Some forums and threads are extremely busy and decisions are made in the moment, it is not impossible to think that when performing all of these moderation tasks in a busy environment that a mistake can be made. We are all human here after all.

    To help us all stay "within the lines" everyone can refer to the terms and conditions that we agree to when signing up, The "stickied" forum charters at the top of every single forum containing all the relevant information and "local" rules relevant to the threads contained in that forum and also Mod posts in a thread or their edited to posts, OP's or otherwise throughout a thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,059 ✭✭✭...Ghost...


    My own rererral signature is the only one I am aware that had been deleted when last I checked the forum after you PMd me.

    I commented here because another poster replied to me.

    Rules are fine, but it is obvious to most people that mods delete posts and threads very often for spurious reasons where no rules have been broken. I created a thread about a recent fatal RTA earlier this month and commented on how the driver of a truck involved in he accident has to live with consequences of actions outside of his control. A mod/admin deleted it, citing that it was inappropriate or disrespectful to create the thread. Although I have seen dozens of similar threads discussing such accidents over the years, it is my thread that got his attention and not for the first time. Zero point in discussing with the mod, as it goes nowhere. No rules broken, but the thread was deleted anyway because the mod didn't like it. Can't bring it higher up, because the whole thing, including the comments from others was removed from the site.

    Mods are undermining themselves every time they do this.

    Stay Free



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,354 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart


    yeah this is hilarious, a supposed adult can't handle that a precious thread they started has become a point of ridicule, because it was plainly ridiculous - running off to the daddy admin and getting it shut down. Pathetic behaviour, both the thread starter (mod) and whatever jobsowrth admin closed the thread - when you see accusations of mod bias and wagon circling, this is what people mean.

    No "normal user" would get such favours done for them, not a chance in hell.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,580 ✭✭✭gameoverdude


    I kinda like the idea of going back and seeing some of idiotic posts and going doh! Lesson learned and I'll put my hands up if I'm wrong.

    Also I've crap memory. How am I supposed to reply to post if my original post is deleted because of somebody else. It ends up with needless squabbling that could have be sorted out with context. And I'd probably agree with them!

    It does seem like threads/posts are deleted on a whim. Delete stuff, grand. Just give a reason and a decent one keeping the charter in mind.



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 78,393 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    No one came running to the Admins, despite the wording in that last post

    The thread was closed by a Region CMod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,354 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart


    Oh! that's alright then! Nothing to see here at all, everything's rosy in the garden.

    You always do this Beasty, a "gotcha" for the complainant to make the complaint go away, but absolutely nothing to say about the behaviour of the mod and their mate the "regional cmod".

    As I said, no "normal" user would get this favour done for them by anyone in the heirarchy. That mod was definitely trolling in that thread, but no, the thread is closed after they have a little whinge about people pointing out how ridiculous they are being and no further action taken.



  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 78,393 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    So how many times did you report the trolling?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,354 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart


    Zero times, because other reports I've made recently, in another forum, have gone ignored, and the outcome on that thread shows what the outcome would have been anyway.

    Another "gotcha" Beasty. And absolutely no reference to what actually happened.

    Which is that a mod has become upset because a thread didn't go well for them, and they were ridiculed for a ridiculous post. Got their mates in the heirarchy (Cmod, Admin, whatever) to shut the thread down on a whim, and even when a CMod is looking at the thread - no action then either. Did the CMod just close the thread at the request of their mate the mod? Did they not look through the thread? How many other users would have the facility to post in a thread, or make a report or however they contacted the powers that be, to have a thread they don't like summarily shut down without even a note from the CMod/Admin doing the closing?

    Anything in there to "gotcha" me about, or are you just not in the mood for answering questions?


    Stock reply incoming.....



  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 78,393 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    So you do not go through the relevant procedures, just come over here to try and make a big deal about the mod you claim was trolling

    The poster in question is just that in that thread. They are not a mod of that forum.

    The process is to discuss with a local mod via PM. Did you do that? After that try a CMod.

    And no, I am not allowing posters to come over here to have a whinge about stuff they do not like if they are not prepared to go through the established processes to get attention to their concerns



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,354 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart


    Did the mod who got the thread closed go through established procedures? The answer to that is no, they had strings pulled because they were embarrassed, a facility open to no normal user.

    Once again Beasty, you are hiding behind red tape to avoid answering legitimate questions. Gotcha!!!

    What would you have me do now? Go and report the posts and wait for nothing to happen? Will I give it a week before coming back here? should I DM the CMod who summarily closed the thread and just accept the handwaving they come out with?

    It's quite obvious what's going on here - you are abusing red tape and "procedure" in an attempted evasion of anyone daring to question a pretty nefarious incident.

    No normal user would get this action done for them, so saying that this mod is just a user in that forum is not really true, now is it?

    You love hiding away, apart from when you can slap people down. And that is standard procedure from you.

    If I do go down the report/DM Cmod route I can almost guarantee the outcome of that - I'll be called a timewaster/timesink and again, nothing will be done to actually address the issue.

    Nothing to see here, nothing happened, it's all good.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,661 ✭✭✭kowloonkev


    I do think mods hide behind the 'did you report it? defence, but then they don't need anyone to report the things that really annoy them.

    I think mods should not really be interested in the forums that they moderate, because it's too easy to have favourites and be biased.

    We're all adults. We all live in the real world and know that bias and bs is in everything. Boards is no different, but the thing is to try as best you can to limit the bias and bs.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators Posts: 12,526 Mod ✭✭✭✭miamee


    If they have no interest in the forum, why would they moderate it or spend any time in it? It makes more sense that they have an understanding of the topic they are moderating.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,641 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Perhaps the problem is that the relevant procedure isn't working?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,354 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart


    Not only that, but a select few can short-circuit the "procedure" and whinge about something to get it summarily shut down.

    I reported posts in another forum what were very obviously shilling, and verging in trolling. Zero done. And it's pretty obvious why too.

    There is definitely a "them and us" thing now, with the mods and other people associated with the heirarchy allowed to do things, get away with things, outside of "procedure" and the way to shut down complaints and feedback about it is to tell the "them" to follow procedure.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,891 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    echoing what miamee said - for two reasons, it's not sensible to have mods who aren't active in the forums they moderate. for one, things which will need to be acted on will take longer to be acted on; a mod active in that forum is far more likely to see it happening in real time and nip it in the bud. also, they're more likely to know who the users are who are likely to be deliberately stirring.

    secondly, context would be key in many forums. for example, people could be saying things about rugby which would sail right over my head, things which if you know the context, are inflammatory; but i have no clue about that and that would make modding much harder.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭DownByTheGarden


    Happened in one of the property threads too. A mod started pretending he knew everything about the law on the subject and it was pointed out by a fair few people how wrong he was, with proof. His comments actually were really stupid tbh, but he wasnt about to be wrong. It must have been terribly embarrassing for him. Thread deleted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,354 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart


    no way this happened, you haven't used the correct channels to let me know about it, so it couldn't have happened, there's just no way something like this could happen if you aren't reporting through a system that nobody takes responsibility for.

    Why are you saying mods are doing this stuff, and being supported by cmods and admins, when clearly this simply didn't happen


    move along now



  • Administrators Posts: 54,424 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I'm going to look into this particular instance. Bear with me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,641 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Another issue is that there isn't a post at the end to say WHY it was closed and WHO closed it. I'm sure i'll be told that mods/admins are far too busy to do that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭DownByTheGarden


    I never reported it. I doubt anyone did. It was just funny. Couldnt be bothered reporting it. Much like crimes in Dublin - just wasting your own time reporting them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,354 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart


    One person reported it; the mod who was upset their ridiculous thread was being ridiculed. Then one of their mates in the heirarchy did them a solid and closed the thread no questions asked, no explanations, not even the courtesy of a note to let the "normal" users what was going on.

    No doubt we'll get some absolutely mental mental gymnastics from the "admin" looking into it to tell us that everything was done correctly, nothing to see here, it was done for the good of everyone don't you know. Now stfu and go away, case closed.

    What this proves, for once and for all in my mind, is that no matter how many times Beasty, Mike or anyone else in charge pretends, mods are not never were and never will be "just normal users" in forums they don't mod. They can and will call in favours and get differential treatment to everyone else



  • Administrators Posts: 54,424 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Maybe you could give me a chance to actually look into it before starting with the dramatics?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,354 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart


    The outcome here is pre-determined my man, no admin is going to say any mod did something wrong, never mind a cmod. And certainly not say that mods get treated preferentially in forums they do not mod.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,580 ✭✭✭gameoverdude


    Also can we stop poster's that use phopes/ism's please!?

    Try to shut down conversation and interesting thoughts. Usual few.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,891 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    what is a phope?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,580 ✭✭✭gameoverdude






  • Maybe there needs to be a “Deleted Threads” threat, so to speak, so that admins/nods can post, eg:

    “Weather prediction tomorrow Dublin” already well covered by another thread, and as such deleted. #modname



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,076 ✭✭✭con747


    ...

    Don't expect anything from life, just be grateful to be alive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 204 ✭✭supermans ghost


    I’d have to agree with you, I think certain moderators get their buddies to intervene in threads in which they are posting in, particularly if they are loosing the argument. I was issued with a “do not post” instruction a few months back for so called “attacking the poster” not the post, which is fair enough, but when certain posters then seem to get away with attacking all manner of posters with no warnings or threadban, you have to wonder.

    Also, what is to stop moderators setting up second accounts with a different username and then posting in the very thread they are supposed to be moderating.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,354 ✭✭✭Hodors Appletart


    Hi @awec

    Just wondering, since your post on the 30th August (today being the 3rd of October) if you've had a chance to look into this particular issue, and what, if anything, have you found?

    You've asked that people bear with you, that implies that there is an expectation that you would come back to this thread and update the users with anything you've found out.



  • Administrators Posts: 54,424 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Yes, I did. Sorry, I forgot to come back here.

    I am satisfied as to the reason as for its closure, and more importantly I am satisfied that the OP of the thread being a mod had no bearing on it being closed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,479 ✭✭✭The Continental Op


    Didn't realise you were doing it to satisfy yourself?

    Wake me up when it's all over.



  • Administrators Posts: 54,424 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I wasn't.

    I checked into this allegation:

    Then one of their mates in the heirarchy did them a solid and closed the thread no questions asked, no explanations, not even the courtesy of a note to let the "normal" users what was going on.

    And this allegation:

    They can and will call in favours and get differential treatment to everyone else

    I am satisfied that nobody did anyone a solid, and nobody did anyone a favour, and the OP of the thread being a mod was completely irrelevant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,547 ✭✭✭droidman123


    Did anyone honestly expect anything else? Nothing is going to change,so best to just drop it,do not feed their egos



  • Advertisement
Advertisement