Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Minimum Stairway Width in c.1920s small terraced house

  • 22-07-2023 4:25pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,812 ✭✭✭


    I’ve just gone Sale Agreed on a tiny end of terrace house in a town in the South East. The house was originally built in circa 1920. The staircase, which I think is fairly recent, is only 650mm wide. From what I can see in the Technical Document Part K the minimum required width for stairs is 800mm? I’m not worried about this myself as I live alone and I’m not borrowing money but I would be concerned that I may have a problem if I try to sell the house in the future and I know my solicitor will likely look for a “Certificate of Compliance” from the vendor. Is this likely to be forthcoming?



Comments

  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,590 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    The house was built when building regs did not exist.

    Repairs to the existing width of the stairs are allowed. I would not expect to see a TGDK stairs in a house of that vintage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,812 ✭✭✭C3PO


    Thanks Gumbo - would the fact that the house has had a significant recent renovation affect this? At what stage does the requirement to match latest regs kick in?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,260 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    In general, building regulations apply to new buildings and to extensions and material alterations to existing buildings. So in your 1920s house, if you were putting in a new flight to stairs to the attic, the new flight would have to be compliant. Or, if you were doing renovation which involved relocating or reconstructing the existing staircase, you would have to make it compliant. But simply leaving it untouched, as it was constructed, is fine, even if you are doing other work in the house. So if you put on an extension, the extension must be compliant. But if the work doesn't involve touching the existing staircase, then the existing staircase remains fine as it is.

    (This might be different if the building underwent a change of use - no longer a private home but offices, say, or a boarding house. But that's not the csae here.)



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,590 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    I would tend to agree with the above.

    No new or greater contravention of the existing stairs.

    If you built a new stairs in a new location, that would have to be compliant IMO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,812 ✭✭✭C3PO


    Thanks Gents



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,235 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    If they didn't upgrade the stairs when it was replaced it was likely as it structural ope issue and like for like was compliant.



Advertisement