Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Can't chase inflation... Hmmm

Options
  • 01-07-2023 12:59pm
    #1
    Posts: 0


    So I can understand the government's reasoning, during the public sector pay talks, about not chasing inflation.


    Kinda confused why they then think that it's just dandy to allow increases to public infrastructure (I know it's PPP but they agree the increase), in line with inflation and consumer price index.

    They are literally shafting their employees here. They have forced their employees into commuter towns, with zero reliable public transport, admit that there are "costs to business" but will deny costs to their employees. Why is it fine to pay private business an increase but not the people struggling on depreciating pay?

    Before anyone asks; I don't use the tolls, I just admire their bald hypocrisy


    Post edited by Nody on


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 85 ✭✭readoutloud


    I reckon this is an interesting argument to consider in the chasing inflation debate..


    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/jun/28/wage-rises-inflation-rightwing-myth-greed-business



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,260 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    Mod:

    OP I've moved it to a more suitable forum; note a new charter is in place.



  • Registered Users Posts: 15,009 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Inflation is too much money chasing too few goods.

    I am paid €100 a day to produce 100 units of a product.

    Inflation has risen to 10%.

    So let's say I start getting paid €115 to beat inflation.

    What happens?

    Inflation only gets worse because I'm still only producing 100 units and I now have more money.

    So just increasing wages for the sake of it to match or beat the inflation rate will get you nowhere.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,362 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    The trouble with inflation, is that price rises that are justified by 'it is because of inflation' are self fulfilling inflation chasing.

    If I must increase my prices because of rising input costs, that is OK, but if it is because of inflation - then that causes inflation.

    My 48 mobile contract, a 'for ever' contract, has been changed from 'a calendar month' to a 'four week' contract, meaning 13 charges per year rather than 12 charges. This represents an unjustified increase of 8.3%. That is unjustified inflation.

    Vodafone and other companies have written into their T&C that price rises for their services will rise annually by 3.9% plus the rise in the consumer price index. They are forcing a 3.9% inflation on top of inflation. This should be deemed unlawful. It also gives permission to other providers to copy, as there is little real competition in the market.

    I know it is counter-intuitive, but the 'buy one, get one free' and multi-buy offers should be banned because they are encouraging waste (buy more than you want) and are illusory - because the product is (or probably is) a loss leader, and it is the producer that bears the cost of the offer. Below cost selling should be banned, and unit pricing should always apply for most products. For example, selling a 24 can slab of beer (or soft drinks) should cost 24 times the cost of a single can - there should be no advantage for such selling offers - it only causes greater purchases than are needed. You do not see this activity in fuel sales, or even loaves of sliced pan bread.

    This inflation chasing activity should be called out, and action taken by regulators to stop it. [If that is possible.]



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,898 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    This inflation is the same money chasing too few goods.

    Let's be honest, wages have been fairly static over the past 10 years but everyone is producing less over the past few years due to BREXIT, COVID, Ukraine, chip shortage etc..



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 15,009 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    And that's why we have the current inflation spike.

    Once China gets back to full production post COVID (if they ever do) then things might ease.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,805 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ...our current inflation is whats called 'supplied side' lead, it has little or nothing to do with the demand side, i.e. money supply, and central banks can do little or nothing about this form of inflation, as they dont supply our goods and services, we now also have sufficient data to support this such as...




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It's supply side and I know that they're trying to not bake it in but it's frustrating to hear them say that employees can't expect pay raises while jacking up government co-pricing, to the maximum level, whoc6h is directly linked to the rate of that inflation



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,705 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I'm pretty sure the increase in tolls on PPP roads is due to clauses in the contracts which link tolls to CPI or similar mechanism, rather than just an increase for the sake of it.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    It is but, again, government can deal with consumer price index and inflationary pressures, for business, but not employees



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,705 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    If contract clauses require toll increases on PPP roads, then the government can't avoid them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,078 ✭✭✭salonfire


    Are you also willing to take pay cuts in times of deflation then? If so, your pay would have been cut a lot more with widespread job losses with the collapse of the economy 10 years ago.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I lost my job, during the recession, that's a hefty paycut I think. Also there was not much actual deflation back then



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,078 ✭✭✭salonfire


    Of course there was. Landlords couldn't give apartments away to rent. All take and no give from you it appears.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah one broken sector of the economy which was correcting (for all of 16 months then flew up again) and even that "correction" drove -5% vs the recent 10%+

    A sector which, like today, was allowed to inflate beyond reason.

    There was feck all in the real day to day purchases deflation for people.

    Companies used that excuse to shed thousands of jobs, just like they are doing now, as I had first hand experience of.

    Our government used the crisis to stagnate wages, pretty much, so our PS still is understaffed at the critical points. They implemented hiring freezes so that our services are still not recovered. Post pandemic and we're STILL chronically short of ICU beds.


    So yeah there were effective pay cuts. People were expected to do more with less resources.


    Our government is baking in increased costs or allowing profiteering, across the economy. Tolls, heating, transport, energy. Increasing taxes/charges on critical supplies, while ignoring companies making a killing.

    A lot is out of their control but a lot could've been countered. They've not bothered to try and are creaming in the extra taxes.

    In the same breath they're saying that pay increases will solidify price increases.



    "All take and no give from you it appears."

    Ad hominem



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,959 ✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    It's pretty rich to hear economist talk about how wages shouldn't be raised for fear of driving inflation, when the real value of minimum wage has been stagnant since the 70s (in the US at least). It's naked profiteering.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,362 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Actually, the USA federal minimum wages is not much above the actual level of the 1970s. However, there are state minimum wage rates that have advanced, but certainly have fallen back in real terms.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,194 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The problem with that is that it doesn't take into account business profit.

    You are paid €100 a day to produce 100 units of a product which sell at €2 each, making total revenue of €200, other costs are €50 and the business makes €50.

    So inflation means that the other costs go to €75, a 50% increase. The business hikes the price of the product to €3, a 50% increase, and claims it can't increase your wage because that would be chasing inflation. After all that happens we have a situation where revenue is now €300, up 50%, wages are €100 unchanged, costs are €75, up 50%, and business profit is €125, up 150%.

    Hardly fair?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,362 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    You did not include taxation in you example. Taxes on business include LA Rates/Property taxes, Profit taxes, etc. Employee taxes should be included - PRSI, Income tax, etc. That is normally referred to as fiscal drag - which also gives rise to added inflation.

    There is also the effect on margin to a business. Businesses usually try to keep inflationary prices down for fear of losing trade. However, when they see trade is unaffected because all businesses must react to prolonged inflation, they restore or increase their margins - causing more inflation.

    Most workers measure their pay in the take-home figure in the pay packet. However, the last €1 has a higher tax element than the first €1, so to balance the actual cost of a 5% inflation might require a gross pay rise of 7% or 10%, depending on actual pay level. This gives rise to more inflation.

    Inflation is nasty for everyone.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,194 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Assuming all taxes remain the same, they don't affect the example.

    Inflation is nastiest to employees, less nasty to businesses.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 28,805 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ...say that to the many sme's struggling the last couple of years cause of it, and the some that had to permanently shut! too much is simply too much, for everyone!



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,362 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Taxes cause fiscal drag because they remain the same - income tax is the biggest example of it. This affects discretionary income after taxes, and obligatory costs like rent, energy, and basic food. The loss of such discretionary spending affects many businesses, particularly SMEs.

    It drives some businesses into closing down and bankruptcy. At least employees can move jobs.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,194 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Phoenix businesses are all around us. Businesses can start again.

    Business profits should be squeezed during inflationary times, while workers should be protected from the effects of inflation.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,362 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Absolutely - workers suffer from inflation - always.

    Businesses appear to be able to add a bit for themselves, one way or another.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,805 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ...if only life was that simply, yes people can move jobs, but sometimes that means retraining, along side some time on the dole, in order to make the change happen. then of course what happens to those business owners, and their own personal situation, their own debts, their critical needs, property etc??? if you default on your debt obligations, what happens then, how do you start all over again?

    margins for many, if not most sme's are probably very small, and its always important to remember, most are in fact employed by these sme's, squeeze these businesses too much, and you ll know all about it fairly quickly!

    most of the major profiteers in this game is more than likely with the larger businesses/corporations, but we re still deeply unwilling to chase these profits, and tax appropriately.....



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,073 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    This isn't happening.

    The post-COVID recovery has allowed many firms to increase prices faster than their input costs have risen.

    As a result, profit margins have increased.



  • Registered Users Posts: 191 ✭✭Unflushable Turd


    Open to correction, but it may even be part of EU/government procurement rules, so completely unavoidable for state bodies even if it wasn't in the contract.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 38,871 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    There have been various events which have led to an increase in costs since Covid, most notably the increase in the cost of oil and certain foodstuffs (e.g. grain) as a result of the Russian invasion.

    What you are claiming is that it is down to price gouging but aren't supplying any evidence of this.

    I know that my own company have seen various costs increase (both for energy and raw materials) and thus have had to increase theirs. However, I can see that there is no gouging happening.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,073 ✭✭✭✭Geuze



    The ECB have repeatedly stated that profit margins have widened.


    The red slice below shows the contribution of higher profits to inflation:





  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,073 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Profits have surged during the last 18 months:





Advertisement