Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Lowering the driving age

«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,248 ✭✭✭hoodie6029


    Remember seeing a show years ago, maybe 20 plus years ago, and they were in Sweden. 15 year olds could drive a certain class of car. Basically an old Volvo, reduced down to two seats and a metal box welded around the gear stick so that it only had 3 forward gears. I’m sure there were a lot of other regulations around it but it was a good way for teenagers in rural Sweden to get around.

    The younger generation just don’t seem to have the love for driving that people of my generation (40 y.o.) do.

    I couldn’t wait to turn 17 and get driving on the road. Driving in my friend’s fields whetted my appetite. Even people that weren’t car mad were interested in getting driving and it was seen as a good thing to have when looking for a job.

    Like anything here, insurance will be the kicker even if they do lower the age, so few will be able to afford it the number of extra drivers and car will be negligible in the greater scheme of things.

    This is water. Inspiring speech by David Foster Wallace https://youtu.be/DCbGM4mqEVw?si=GS5uDvegp6Er1EOG



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭Ramasun


    It should be raised to 18 not lowered.

    Ireland is not a massive country where the nearest town is out of reach without motorised transport. Raising the age to 18 would reduce traffic, which has more benefits for everyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,127 ✭✭✭Mech1


    We have no young drivers, insurance and red tape about licence rules have killed it. Where are our next batch of worker that have to drive coming from?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,464 ✭✭✭AyeGer


    The insurance companies will have the data to tell if this is a good idea or not. Are 17 year olds responsible for a lot of accidents and claims, i'd imagine actuaries working for the insurance companies are likely to know if letting 16 year olds drive is a good idea or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,674 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Would this be a good time to mention our climate crisis?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,380 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    According to the RSA waiting lists are up to 21 weeks to sit a test… that is as of last month, an article 3 weeks ago in fact in the Examiner confirmed.

    so it is supposedly a good idea to create a greater demand ? Even moderate demand ?

    any 16 year olds I know have still a reasonable amount of immaturity about them. Point of reference is that we are talking the age of kids in 5th year in secondary school, possibly even 3rd years… immaturity and good decision making don’t go hand in hand.

    Irish kids of these demographics seem to be VERY immature…. When compared to their European and American counterparts.

    Fatal road collisions are increasing. You won’t temper that statistic by making it legal for thousands of children to be allowed drive….dumb idea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,309 ✭✭✭✭wotzgoingon


    by making it legal for thousands of rich children to be allowed drive….dumb idea.

    FYP.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,148 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    The way forward here would seem to be smart boxes that ensure the driver is driving properly. The technology exists, what does not exist is the will to enforce the use of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,055 ✭✭✭beachhead


    Lowering could lower the population as well



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,182 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,037 ✭✭✭duffman3833


    There needs to be restrictions in place if this was to get the green light.

    As mentioned already, can only insure under 18 if they are monitored with a Smart Box with severe penalties and possibly can only insure on a max 1.2L engine which will rule out getting access to parents 2.0 diesel.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 736 CMod ✭✭✭✭LIGHTNING


    Ah yes the millions of under 17's in Ireland that are going to take up driving if this is put in place. Will make a massive change in the global impact that Ireland currently has.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 490 ✭✭NattyO


    😂

    There's always one.

    Yes, lowering the driving age in Ireland by a year will cause the planet to spontaneously combust.

    Religion has a strange effect on the mind.

    Meanwhile the 340 million cars in China can be ignored because "it's the wests fault"



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,182 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i can't listen to the audio in the OP in work.

    when they say 'plans in brussels' do they mean 'some lobby group has floated the idea and got some support from the car manufacturing regions in germany etc.'?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 490 ✭✭NattyO


    I'm guessing you live in Dublin.

    In most of Ireland, it is difficult or impossible to go anywhere without a car. Rural areas are spread out, with narrow winding roads, not ideal for cycling or walking, and, to take my own situation into account, when my kids were growing up, their GAA club was 7 miles away, their soccer club 5 miles, and their school 4 miles.

    Reducing traffic only benefits those who can still drive, it most definitely does not benefit those you prevented from driving.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,047 Mod ✭✭✭✭artanevilla


    I think in Finland you get your driving licence before your birth cert. This is because Finns have a natural and inherent ability to be incredible drivers.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,898 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 490 ✭✭NattyO


    Are you saying that one should either live in Dublin or not live in Ireland at all?

    Guess where much of the food you eat in Dublin comes from.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 889 ✭✭✭morritty


    Not everyone can afford rent or a mortgage in Dublin, sure just make everyone living in Rural Ireland stay at home all day everyday



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,182 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    for fear of putting words in his mouth, i suspect his question was along the lines of 'you chose to live 4 miles from your kids school, presumably?'

    not 'you chose not to live in dublin, presumably?'



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 490 ✭✭NattyO


    Same thing though.

    Is he (or you) suggesting that one should only be allowed to live, say, 500 meters from a school? Would that apply to everyone regardless of having kids or not? If not, would you be forced to move if you did have kids? What if you had kids and all the houses within 500 meters of all the schools were already occupied by parents? Would you then be banned from having kids?

    I don't think he (and possibly you) have thought through the implications of this question. As long as this is still a relatively free country, we can live where we like, and are entitled to drive to get places.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,609 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 889 ✭✭✭morritty


    FFS not everyone has the luxury to chose the ideal location within 500m or everything they need.


    BRB just gona build a school, shop, petrol station and a pub in me back garden



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,182 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    well, it's clearly not the same thing, just because you disagree with both possible conclusions.

    my wife grew up over 4km from the nearest village, necessitating being driven everywhere. it was her parents choice to move there, and this is similar for vast numbers of people who live in the country.

    the majority of people who live near my parents in law do not work on the land, they've chosen to live where they live, and as a result, have chosen to have to drive every time they need to run an errand.

    also, there was no implication that you don't have a right to do what you did. the implication was that if you chose to live where you did, you chose those implications of being car dependent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 490 ✭✭NattyO


    Yes I choose to live where I do, and that choice makes me "car dependent" as you put it - so what? I've no complaints.

    The poster I was responding to claimed that one didn't need a car anywhere in Ireland, I showed that you do.

    I've no idea what you are arguing with me about?



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,898 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    I'm saying neither.

    What I am saying is that if you chose to live in a rural location it's bizarre to moan about having to drive to places as a consequence.

    p.s. I live in a small village and drive a lot as a result. I'm happy with my choice



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,182 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    I've no idea what you are arguing with me about?

    it's clear based on reading back through the posts - i thought you had misinterpreted Henry Ford's question, and then you misinterpreted my response.

    anyway, you're obviously a farmer so the question is moot, no one would argue with you living where you farm.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 490 ✭✭NattyO


    Where did you get the idea I'm moaning?

    Like the poster above, you appear to be arguing with something I didn't say.

    My response was to a poster who claimed "Ireland is not a massive country where the nearest town is out of reach without motorised transport" - I simply showed that this in not true, something both you and the other confused poster appear to agree with.......



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 490 ✭✭NattyO


    Then we're both in agreement, as I thought!

    I'm not a farmer as it happens, though I am from a farming family.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,898 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    That's either a moan or a truly magnificent non sequitur.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 480 ✭✭Ramasun


    Look at it this way the roads will be a lot safer for kids to walk or cycle the 10 or 6km to GAA or school without more cars on the road. And they'll be fitter, probably having an avantage on the pitch to the kids driving their parent's car to training.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,182 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    ah - your 'Guess where much of the food you eat in Dublin comes from' comment made me assume you were a farmer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 490 ✭✭NattyO


    A kid walking 5 or 6 miles to GAA on winding country roads on a dark winters evening will certainly require good reflexes.

    I think you have a very romantic view of rural Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 490 ✭✭NattyO




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,182 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    the irony is a lot of the traffic which would be endangering kids walking to GAA training, would be from parents driving their kids to GAA training.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,898 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    But just nothing to do with my point. Touché!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 490 ✭✭NattyO


    The only solution to that is to ban anyone from driving to GAA training, and see how that goes.

    Of course, once you think about it, not ALL the traffic on the road will be parents driving to GAA practise, so you'd actually have to ban all traffic for a set time before, during and after GAA practice. Give it, what, 2 hours? for walking there, two back, and practice, so maybe 5 hours of a traffic ban. Given the different training times for different age groups and clubs, it's probably best to just ban all driving altogether.....

    And we're back where we started!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 490 ✭✭NattyO


    😂

    You're one of those lads that put "Touché!" after some inane sentence and think you've somehow won a argument (in your head presumably).

    It's an evolution of the old trick of putting "FACT!!!" after something that isn't.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,182 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    that people living out in the countryside not only become car dependent, they force people who would prefer not to be car dependent, into cars?

    getting back OT, can you imagine what those roads would be like during school rush hours, or GAA training etc., if parents were able to take the attitude 'i'm busy, drive yourselves to training'?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,501 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    Do they not have a bicycle with lights? It's a 20-minute cycle, and wouldn't you be with them as well?

    You take the time to drive them, surely you would also take the time to cycle.

    I'm in the same boat, the nearest everything is a 25 minute walk at least. People carry on as if going for a walk is a death sentence.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,148 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    You might just as well say that the government located their school 4 miles from your house. In many cases people did live near schools but their children have to attend schools further away because they closed the original school.

    As a general proposition, in a country where many people have no home it is ridiculous to assert that people should be required to abandon homes and move somewhere else.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,182 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    who asserted that people should be required to abandon their homes?



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,898 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    No. No I'm not.

    Unfortunately comedy 15 mins is now over and I need to go back to work. I hope you can now go on arguing with someone else about basically nothing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 490 ✭✭NattyO


    Yeah. because twisty rural Irish roads have nice bike lanes so they can safely cycle to training in the pitch dark on a winters evening.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 490 ✭✭NattyO


    I'd say it'll calm down once you're gone and no longer worried about losing face 😉



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 490 ✭✭NattyO


    If the correct safety procedures were put in place, I don't see why it would be worse, and would most likely be better - parents rushing home from work to drive their teenager to training could be replaced by one teenager picking up several of their friends, making for less traffic on the roads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,501 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 490 ✭✭NattyO


    You mean back when there was less traffic travelling much slower on the roads?

    Like say, 1983.

    When 535 people died on Irish roads.

    Or 1978.

    When 628 people died on Irish roads.

    Maybe you want that for your kids, but most people won't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,689 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Yeah. If those dumb kids had just filled out the correct forms before their birth then they wouldn't need access to transport in the first place, what idiots.

    And why don't they just build a town in their own bedroom? Too busy Tiktokking and instagramming, thats why.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,501 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    If you want to continue your strawman argument then have at it. Your numbers include all deaths, not cyclists or pedestrians.

    It's not a remotely equal comparison to make.



  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement