Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Stay working as a PAYE worker or switch to contractor?

  • 06-04-2023 9:36am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 bobertbedford


    Would really appreciate any advice on this. I've been a PAYE worker with the same company for over 10 years (working from home all this time). I have the option to work with them (doing the same role) as a contractor. In my company there's a mix of PAYE workers and contractors doing the same job. I decided when I started with the company 10 years ago to become a PAYE worker, but am wondering now would I be better off working with them as a contractor. My current salary is 52K per annum (doing a 40 hour week), this includes: 21 days holidays, pension scheme, income protection and health insurance (health insurance is the lowest premium). They've offered me 43 euros an hour (doing a 40 hour week) as a contractor. And obviously I'd lose all the benefits if I decide to switch to a contractor role. I'm just not sure would I be better off financially if I stick to working as a PAYE worker or should I make the switch to a contractor role? I will make an appointment to see an accountant after the Easter holidays as I haven't a clue when it comes to tax stuff, etc. But I was just wondering if anyone had some advice off the top of their heads, I'd love to hear it.



«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,046 ✭✭✭✭L'prof


    There’s no way your benefits package comes anywhere close to the extra €37k they’re offering. That’s nearly double your wages. You’d have to sort your own healthcare and pension but would still be up a lot



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,138 ✭✭✭gipi


    As a self-employed contractor, you'll be responsible for your PRSI which will change from class A to class S. Check what benefits you'll be entitled to under the new class (unemployment, illness, pension).

    https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/social_welfare/irish_social_welfare_system/social_insurance_prsi/social_insurance_classes.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,525 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    I make it an extra 30k, assume its over 48 weeks?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 bobertbedford


    Yes it would be over 48 weeks, I guess I need to factor in taking roughly 20 days holidays too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 bobertbedford


    I will look into this, thank you - very helpful



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,984 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Only you can answer this but what are the long term prospects for the company? Is the work you do with them transferable to other companies?

    What are they like to work for generally?


    Only asking this as you won't have any redundancy rights as a contractor. Your security of tenure is pretty much non existent.

    So while you would be financially much better of on the gross income side of things you do need to factor in the type of pension scheme you are leaving, medical insurance, salary protection cover, contracting costs, annual leave, sick leave etc as well as, in your case, ten years service.


    There is a worst case scenario where the company offer this to employees, some employees resign and take them up on the office and a month or two later the company terminate the contracts saving them much redundancy and headaches. Would be poor form but only you would have an idea whether that might happen or in the case of if happening, how easily you got get a permanent or contracting role elsewhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 bobertbedford



    The company (IT based) are doing very well and if things went belly up, I would be able to get another job pretty easily. To be honest one of the reasons I looked into switching to contracting is because their benefits aren't that great compared to other companies. I get the same holidays I did when I started 10 years ago (21 days) and they only recently brought in health insurance. So I don't think I'd be losing a whole pile of benefits.

    But you've raised some very interesting points and I definitely need to give it some thought - thanks a million as these are things I need to hear about!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭paul71


    It is €27,120 extra not €37,000 or €30,000.


    52 weeks per annum less 4 weeks statutory annual leave less 11 public holidays per annum.

    52-4-2=46

    46*40=1840 hours per annum

    1840 x €43 hours = €79,120

    €79,120 - €52,000 = €27,120


    You will need to file an annual tax return, and pay your taxes on time. You can do that yourself or engage an accountant to do it for you. If you fail to file your annual tax return on time you are subject a surcharge of 10% of Tax payable, that is Tax payable not Tax actually paid. Meaning you may have already paid your tax but if you fail to file on time you will still be hit with a 10% surcharge.

    You will have no entitlement to statutory redundancy and no recourse in the event of dismissal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 bobertbedford


    Thank you for this! Very helpful to see the maths, I didn't know where to start to be honest. I will still need to see an accountant but at least I'm not as clueless as I was before!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 bobertbedford


    Thanks everyone for your replies, appreciate it



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    To make it financially worth while over the long term you'd need to be making around 140% of your current salary.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,102 ✭✭✭afatbollix


    Also know its harder to get mortgages or credit as self employed.


    Also they could let you know with a days notice that they don't need you anymore. Unless you get something put in your contract.

    With PAYE you do have the security of not being told you don't have a job tomorrow they have to do pay you off.

    As a self-employed contractor at the moment, I am saving on Tax as my wife is on maternity leave and were both directors in the company but its not worth it in the long run as we're finding it very hard to get a mortgage or even income protection insurance. If I had a minor injury tomorrow which meant I couldn't work I can't send in my invoice at the end of the month and the bills won't get paid whereas depending on the company they might pay you for a week or 6 months.

    You're giving up a lot of your rights for a bit more cash.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 bobertbedford



    Thanks - that is all helpful stuff to know. I have a mortgage with about 10 years left on it so that is something I guess. I didn't realise it might be tough getting income protection as a contractor, that is something I'd need to be aware of. I guess I need to weigh up if the extra chunk of money is worth it overall.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,345 ✭✭✭Squall


    Expanding on the maths.. from a tax perspective you're going to be paying the higher rate on all of your increase given you are already over the standard rate cutoff point for the year. You'll also be subject to the highest rate of USC on some of your earnings which will drop your actual take home increase further. Taking the other posters figures above (assuming you work 46 weeks and bring in 79,120) below is roughly how your tax would compare.

    This is assuming standard credits. You might be entitled to others (like medical insurance relief if you dont get a reduction at source etc). I havent factored in pension here. Any contribution you make would drop your tax amount (but your take home wont go above the below if my calcs are correct). I have also assumed you currently pay BIK on your health insurance policy. As a contractor you would need to get your own health insurance (price will obviously depend on your age, any dependants etc. but you should factor this in as something that reduce the impact of any increase you get! Pretty sure itll run into a couple of grand a year)

    Roughly, you'll take home 14.8K more a year than your currently do. A pretty good increase but worth considering what you are losing and the cost to replace them. A few things below...

    1) Health Insurance as above

    2) Income protection.. you'll need to pay for your own policy here. Especially relevant I think if you go looking for a mortgage as I think this is a requirement

    3) Sick days... if you're sick you'll lose a full days pay. You can claim from DSP but think there's a cap of 110 a day

    4) Pension contributions... If your company currently matches pension contributions you'll lose that. For example, if you company matches up to 5% and you currenly pay 5% into your pension (on your 52 salary) that is an annual contributon of 5,200 per year. You would have to pay all of this in your self if you wanted to keep the same level of pension contributions up

    The last one if obviously job security, as a contractor you can be let go pretty easily with limited notice. As a PAYE employee you would have to be made redundant. Its worth giving it some thought but not something to do lightly




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,498 ✭✭✭NewClareman


    My advice is that you thread carefully. I think that you are underestimating the risks and overestimating the benefits of working as a contractor. I make the difference in gross pay at less than 23k and take home pay of around 10k*. For that:

    1. You lose your sick pay, so if you have an accident or get sick, you are in real trouble.
    2. You can be let go with no notice. IT is currently under pressure, so this is a real possibility - in fact this is probably why your company is recommending the contractor route. (Think about it, why else would the want to suggest a route that costs them more.)
    3. Getting another job if you end up unemployed is not as easy as you think, it can be extremely difficult.

    *(You have to factor in the cost of health insurance, pension and income protection.

    Health Insurance is worth at least €1300 pa and double that if your spouse/partner is also covered.

    The typical employer pension contribution is around 6% - worth, say, 3k pa.

    Now the difference is less than 23k.

    Factor in tax at 40%, PRSI at 4% and USC at 4.5% and the difference in take home pay is closer to 10k.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 bobertbedford



    Thank you for putting those figures together! Re my pension scheme, yes I contribute 5% and my employer matches it. Our health insurance scheme is worth 1300 annually, it's the lowest premium, infact it's pretty useless. So I would have to fork out more for a better premium if I go solo. There is definitely a lot to mull over from what looking at your figures.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,000 ✭✭✭Allinall


    If you're working solely for the one company, then revenue will deem you to be an employee. You and the company could be in a whole world of pain in that situation if you go the self employed route.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 bobertbedford



    I think you're right, plus if it's only looking like I would be gaining an extra 10K in take home pay, it doesn't look as worthwhile. (On a side-note, my salary normally goes up by 2K a year, so i should be on 54K this time next year).

    One thing to add is that it was myself who asked the company about making the switch. It's a small enough company, under 50 people working there, but the clients are huge multinational ones. It's a mix of contractors and PAYE workers, the multinational clients see us all as vendors/contractors and I know they pay the same rate to my company for each worker. I don't know what that rate is but imagine it's over 100K annually for each worker. I would have thought my company makes more out of the PAYE workers (all roughly on 50K-ish) on its books even factoring in the benefits they take care of?

    I have an existing mortgage (joint mortgage with my PAYE-working partner) so that is one positive, and there's about 10 years left in it. However, I'm in my late 40's and I don't know if it's too much of a risk at my age looking at all these figures! At the same time, many of the contractors working at my company are older than me and don't seem any way fazed.

    Thanks again for all your feedback and insight, I'm definitely not as enthusiastic about the offer as I was a couple of days ago!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Aren't there hundreds if not thousands, particularly in IT, operating in this way though? Working M-F, 9-5 for the one company, and then under an umbrella company with the likes of Fenero.



  • Posts: 11,614 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I've been contracting for the last 4 years but am now looking to go permanent, despite losing a bit of money on paper, I feel its a lot more secure. If a recession or downturn comes, the contractors are usually the first ones to be shown the door - and with little to no notice.

    Also, from my job hunting the last few weeks, there are a lot less openings than I would have expected. The layoffs from Twitter and Google seem to have saturated the market, and jobs are being snapped up left right and centre. As well as the usual benefits, does your company provide training? If contracting, you have to pa for that yourself.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 bobertbedford


    That is interesting hearing another side of it. And yes I agree job security is one of the main things I've been thinking about. It is still a turbulent time in I.T that's for sure. My company doesn't really provide any training, well they don't openly go on about it. But I'd say if I approached them, they probably wouldn't say no. Though our clients are multinational, the company itself is small and the benefits are pretty basic. They only introduced a (very basic) health insurance scheme recently and that only happened as I kept asking them about bringing one in for the past couple of years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,000 ✭✭✭Allinall


    There are indeed, and if any of those get audited, they will be in for a very difficult time.

    I have first hand experience of this. Not myself, but have been directly involved in a revenue audit where this was a major issue, and cost both the company and contractor a lot of money and grief.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,733 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    There is a company called Contracting Plus that do the tax affairs of contractors.

    I've done IT contracting before and even though it is very attractive there are drawbacks, but it all depends on your own circumstances.

    Contracting Plus have various resources on their site that you can use to calculate your take home pay as a contractor, what you can claim as expenses etc.

    Try them and see how you get on, it will give you a good indication of what you're net pay will be.

    There are other companies out there that do the same but Contracting Plus are the ones I have used over the years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 bobertbedford


    I will definitely look into this company - thanks for the recommendation!



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Also, from your net extra take home pay, deduct the cost of an accountant to manage your affairs. Could be between 1 to 2k annually for even basic services.

    You’ll also need to get insurance, another 1-2k.

    Even if through a company it’s likely Revenue would deem you an employee, although this is more of an issue for your employer. It could, potentially, put them out of business if caught.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 bobertbedford




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,599 ✭✭✭newmember2


    I'm self-employed as well with mortgage currently AIP. I didn't encounter any extraordinary difficulty

    Please expand.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    “Please expand.”

    Look up Revenue contract ‘for service’ versus ‘of service’ rules. It’s based on case law.

    True self employed versus employee. IF effectively 100% ‘contracting’ to one company you will be deemed an employee despite how you or the company arrange your affairs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,000 ✭✭✭Allinall


    Have a read of this.

    If you are deemed an employee, revenue will look to gross up the payments made by the company, and charge PAYE, USC, PRSI and employers PRSI on the grossed up amount.

    Technically there is no extra financial liability on the employee as far as I am aware, but the working relationship would be shot.



  • Advertisement


  • Have there been many cases where Revenue have pursued companies (typically IT) over having contractors as de facto employees? All Revenue have to do to get an idea of any company having a sizeable number of de facto employee contractors, is to filter through LinkedIn. I have t heard about Revenue doing a big trawl, but I very much stand to be corrected. They are effectively ignoring RTÉ contractors who are essentially long term employees of the broadcaster.

    On another note I was informed by a contractor in an umbrella company managed by Fenero that all tax and professional indemnity insurance is managed as part of the deal. But of course if there is other additional income of any kind (dividends, gains eg ) not handled by Fenero or whatever company is used, Form 11 would need to be submitted to Revenue or a tax accountant hired to do that.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,430 CMod ✭✭✭✭Pawwed Rig


    Is the €43 per hour including or excluding VAT? Not sure if mentioned already but you will need to register for VAT and do ruturns every 2 months



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Being a contractor means you have to become more professional about yourself, nobody else will give a toss so long as you show up and do what you're payed to do.

    You can approach the decision from a financial point of view in two ways:

    • Figure out what the costs would be of getting the same terms and benefits as an independent.
    • Figure out what the costs of having the kind of terms and benefits you'd like to have and convert it to a required hourly or daily rate.

    One of the things you'll need to calculate is the billable hours per year. Using the typical accounting year you have 13 periods of 4 weeks or 52 weeks. Allow say: 6 weeks for holidays as you'd like longer holidays, another 2 for public and bank holidays and as you are in IT add another week for training and education. So you have about 43 weeks at 40 hours for a total of 1,720. So your expected revenue would be around 74K.

    As an individual, you represent higher risk for insurance companies and pension funds than the kind of group schemes operated by your employer. So even if you don't think your current benefits are not much, you most likely will discover that it is pretty expensive to get the same coverage as you currently have.

    From an employers point of view one of the big advantages of having contract staff is that you can swap them out when you need a different skill set at no expense to the company. So your career development is left up to you and as technology changes that can be a bit hit and miss because training and giving exposure to new technology to a contractor is not on anyone's list but yours. You might be lucky and get the exposure you need or you might not, so you need to have your own plan and finance it. So expect to kick in a few Ks on professional development if you want to stay at it long term.

    Another thing to consider is the additional administration involved - you are going to have to be a business person. If you have a payroll company, you need to check up on what they are doing and make sure it is correct. If you do it yourself, then you have to chase down invoices, deal with invoicing, vat returns, accountants and so on. Depending on what route you take there will time and money consumed here as well.

    Out of a career spanning over three decades I only worked as an employee for about two years, the rest of the time was contracting, consulting, retainers, equity shares and directorships. My gut feeling is that your numbers are borderline. I don't feel you're going to bring in a significant amount of extra cash to make it really worth the hassle. And if as you say all you are looking for is better benefits, then a new job might be a better answer.





  • Sage advice. You certainly do need to have well-honed business acumen and a financial head on you to succeed as a contractor and if you don’t it could end up a personal financial sh1tshow, I’ve seen it happen. You have to want to and like managing your tax affairs & investments, you have to be a good life planner, it has to be part of your career beyond the area of your core expertise. To say “my umbrella manager does all that fit me, I don’t need to check up or bother” is to live with one’s head in the sand.

    By nature most people do not enjoy reading the fine print of the world of taxation, doing lots of sums on spreadsheets, and lots of admin work on top of their daily job, but this is exactly what a contractor needs to have a head for. Some people are terrific at this and can hack out a lucrative work life as a contractor. I think if you don’t actually sort of enjoy this kind of stuff, don’t go near contracting. If you just want to do your daily job, become a “permanent” employee.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on




  • In these times of pressure in the IT world I recall some short couple of years ago somebody in a specialised area of that sphere emphatically stating that they would never be out of work. That alpha male type of mindset of being indispensable made me shudder at the time. In areas of IT change can be so rapid that the very job you do today will be done tomorrow by an algorithm & set of instructions, somebody else has created, whilst you were stood still busily applying past skills which may be of limited interest to your next employer.

    Being a contractor your skill set is at risk of becoming less relevant unless you put in the hard yards of catching up in areas where your employment is not giving you the opportunities to upskill. When your contractor needs somebody with more updated skills, put you go and the next person with those skills may replace you.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 bobertbedford


    That is something I will need to check, good question



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 bobertbedford


    Thank you for your very helpful insight - a lot of things to consider here and I'm beginning to think that overall I am probably better off sticking to working as a PAYE worker. I didn't realise there was so much in switching to a contractor, it seems like an awful lot of hassle. I just assumed (naively) that I could pay an accountant and they would take care of what needs to be done with regards to taxation/filing accounts. And obviously I'd need to take care of all the other elements/benefits. Taxation/accounting is like a foreign language to me unfortunately. I do think you have a great point that maybe I just need to get a better paying job. I possibly could earn another 10 to 15K in other companies. I do really enjoy the work I'm doing in my current job which is why I am hesitant to leave it and I thought contracting was the perfect solution.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 bobertbedford


    Yep great advice I agree. I absolutely do not have a financial head on me so I'm beginning to think that perhaps I'm not the best fit for a contractor. Plus reading the figures from various posters makes me think I am really not gaining much financially in the end, and I'd be gaining a lot of extra hassle in the process...

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Paul on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 bobertbedford


    Very true and wise words. I was only recently chatting to a colleague and we both laughed at how AI technology will probably easily replace what we do very soon. We won't be laughing if and when it does!

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Paul on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,672 ✭✭✭Zimmerframe


    In a nutshell, imho if you are doing 40 hours now and it remains 40 hours as a contractor, then €43 per hour is not enough.



  • Advertisement


  • Without a doubt permanent employment is the way to go for you. From a good many people I’ve known over the years who’ve been full-time employed versus contracting, accounting/planning has been a an area of almost special devotion in those who have been able to live the life of mortgage, running a decent car, raising a family, enjoying the holidays and playing golf or whatever hobby you might pursue.

    I’ve seen one or two contractors find themselves way out of their depth because that sort of planning is just not part of their skill set, they have no interest in it and have relied on pure “it’ll be grand” optimism in a cut throat world. It will never be grand when you have to juggle those balls with one hand tied behind your back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 bobertbedford


    I think you're right, it does seem like I'm better suited to to PAYE working. I guess I've known nothing else either for the past 25 years - it would be a massive change, and I think I'd be overwhelmed very quickly by all the admin and financial planning. Appreciate all the feedback as it has been a real eye-opener.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Paul on


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    No harm to ask for peace of mind, but I’ve never seen a company reference deductible VAT when quoting work as the relevant price. If they reference VAT it will be X excl. VAT, but this is normally just assumed.

    Retail businesses do/need to quote VAT inclusive when dealing with end users.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,498 ✭✭✭NewClareman


    I think he is right and that becoming a contractor would be a very bad move, for you. If it didn't work out you could find it very difficult to get another permanent job. In the meantime your pension situation could be seriously impacted. It takes an iron level of discipline to set up a personal pension plan and fund it to at least the same level as your current one. The temptation is always there to put it on the long finger.

    When I worked in IT I frequently hired contractors. Mostly I hired subject matter experts with a skillset I required for a particular project. Here I was looking for proven experience and depth of knowledge. They were often expensive but were worth it, for short periods of time.

    I sometimes hired programmers for longer periods, when we were under resourced for ongoing work. Here I generally hired younger guys (and gals) who were quick to learn and would blend in quickly. (If it didn't work out they were easy to replace.)

    Even moving job is a risk in the current climate. You would be first in the queue if your new employer wanted to downsize and you could easily end up unemployed. You would then be competing for a job with former employees of major players, who could have a far greater breath and depth of expertise.

    You've now got a lot of very informed feedback that should help with your decision. Whatever you decide I wish you well in your career.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,138 ✭✭✭MacDanger


    I disagree with most here who are saying that it's a bad idea in and of itself. On a few points:

    - income protection, it's easy enough to check whether you can get this rather than worrying that you might not be able to

    - if you have a good accountant & financial advisor, you'll be able to get plenty of advice re setting up your pension, etc. It's not rocket science. Cost will be ~2k but obviously that's paid by the company so it's pre-tax

    - VHI again is paid for by the company pre-tax rather than from your salary

    - mortgage isn't an issue since you already have one so no need to worry there. If you were applying for one though, you'd need three years worth of accounts.


    IMO, it ultimately comes down to your particular role, company & industry. I work for a multinational company as a contractor but am essentially treated the same as an employee, have moved teams several times over the years, etc. Not all companies/industries treat contractors like that however.

    If the squeeze comes, typically it's the contractors that go first but that's not always the case (contractors may not be part of "headcount" which is often what needs to be cut) but if the squeeze really comes, staff will be cut also - the 10 years service you have in this situation is worth a lot but only you can assess the likelihood of that situation arising (changing companies for more money also means losing this)

    I think it's an opportunity that's worth exploring more than just asking advice on boards. Either way, good luck with it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,498 ✭✭✭NewClareman


    We know the Industry is IT and that the op is in their late 40's. Unless he a skillset that is in strong demand the op could find it very difficult to get another permanent job if the contractor route doesn't work out. (Whether we like it or not, and I don't, companies prefer to hire younger staff.)

    The squeeze has already started and is likely to spread further across the IT industry. Most contractors will be directly in the firing line, when that happens. If I were the op I'd be checking the permanent job market, before moving to a contractor role. Recruitment agencies looking for experienced staff, with his/her skillset and experience would be a good place to start. If it is clear that there are multiple opportunities, at a substantial premium to his current salary, contracting might be worth considering.

    Just asking for advice on boards is a very good place for the op to start. Unless the op has access to an experienced career advisor, most other sources have an ax to grind. Umbrella companies for contractors will obviously push the contractor route since that is their livelihood. Similarly accountants and financial advisors. Managers in his current company may have pressures of their own that he has no visibility of.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,284 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    My very rough rule of thumb:

    Your hourly rate as a wage worker is your annual salary divided by 2000.

    If you're contracting, to cover all the additional expenses you have, then your hourly rate (ex VAT) needs to be twice your hourly rate as a permie. Otherwise it's just not worth the risk.



    And I totally agree with the last poster, at the OPs age and in the current climate, anyone would be mad to give up a permanent job.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,684 ✭✭✭triggermortis


    I worked as a contractor for many years and it worked well for me. I set up a limited company and paid myself a wage from that, and paid myself expenses for travel, tools, training etc from the company account. A decent accountant can advise how to maximise the expense side, which is tax free, and also ensure you pay as little corporation tax as possible.

    You have to take into account that when you take holiday or are sick, there's no income, but the extra hourly rate will mean more money coming in the rest of the time



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,597 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    It addition to the financial stuff we have already discussed there is the need to drum up business as well. Even if you are working through agents, it's important you work on the relationship with them, because when your current gig finishes it will be important that they put you top of their list of candidates for the open slots on their books otherwise you could have a couple of months with no income.

    Back to the finances, it's important to understand that the way agencies work is that their objective is to put as much money as possible into your hands, that means things like pensions and insurances are done at the required legal limit to keep the deductions low and as a long term freelance that usually is not what you want. Some of the better ones, at least in mainland Europe, have a couple of offerings depending on what you want.

    Good luck with your decision.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21 bobertbedford


    Thanks for your feedback. Good to hear from someone who is in the hiring field too. If I did switch to a contractor role, it would be with the same company I'm with now as a PAYE worker. Absolutely, the feedback I've received has been fantastic. Great to hear the different insights.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement