Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

HAP tenant getting council house

Options
  • 28-03-2023 3:19pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 29


    My hap tenant of several years notified me today (verbally) that LA will be providing house for them. Tenant seems to think this will happen over the next few weeks. I've tried looking for info regarding this but I've come up against a brick wall. I did find out though that tenant is required to give 3 to 4 months notice and in writing.

    Currently, I have not sought or received any info from LA or HAP.

    Anyone got any experience of this situation?

    Does LA through HAP need to give notice etc?

    Will HAP cover rent for the notice period?

    Any help with what to do etc gratefully appreciated



«1

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,098 ✭✭✭Browney7


    Is your property going to be difficult to rent out to a new tenant even though there's a dearth of rental options for people?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭DubCount


    Notice from the tenant should be provided in writing for the term outlined in the legislation, but in practice, its never going to be enforced. Your tenant will stop paying their contribution when they move out and HAP will stop paying you. Attempts to legally enforce the required notice will bring you nowhere.

    Be happy. The great Irish Rental Market lottery has given you vacant possession from a good tenant who has not wrecked the place, and has not left you with years of arrears that you will never see. Take your good fortune and sell up. There are many landlords who would give their right arm to have this "problem".



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,967 ✭✭✭spaceHopper


    In May 2019 you dogged a bullet, and were thinking of selling. I'd sell now while you can. You could sell to the council. Set a price and see if they will match or better it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭DownByTheGarden


    I would look at this as getting lucky. Now run, while you still can. You may never get the chance to give up being a landlord again.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29 The Polisher


    Thanks for replies. All very sensible suggestions.

    I am seriously considering selling up. I doubt I would get as good a tenant .

    Selling to the council is an option of course , anyone have experience of this?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭DownByTheGarden



    Yes I sold mine to the council (well nearly, should be closing in a week or two). Their first offer was good enough for me but EA advised me to put it on the market anyway and hold that offer in reserve. Hsome more bidders and council bid again even higher. Enough of a difference to buy 2 cars :) So dont take the first bid you get. Put it to the market and let the council know they cam bid with everyone else.



  • Registered Users Posts: 17,970 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Sell sell sell, you've got a serious lifeline here I'd take it and get out.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,355 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    My tenant was told this 3 years ago and they said it would be a couple of months at most. They still haven't got a date. She has also been on the list for decades



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,836 ✭✭✭Rows Grower


    You are entitled to written notice of intention to quit.

    If you are not given the correct notice you are entitled to, retain any security deposit you are holding since the start of the tenancy up to the value of the rent your tenant has not paid to complete the mutually agreed contract.

    You have rights too and don't let anyone convince you that you do not.

    "Very soon we are going to Mars. You wouldn't have been going to Mars if my opponent won, that I can tell you. You wouldn't even be thinking about it."

    Donald Trump, March 13th 2018.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,723 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    General result at RTB hearings is that you can only retain the deposit for lost rent for as long as it remains empty; and that you must have made an effort to fill it. Claiming that you can't find a tenant in the current market would be laughed at.

    I also suspect that if you are intending to sell; you will have no justification for retaining the deposit for lost rent and will be made return it; but I've not seen that one played out before.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,836 ✭✭✭Rows Grower


    The RTB is there to protect the rights and responsibilities of both the landlord and the tenant, a landlord can take as long as they like to find a suitable replacement tenant. A tenant not giving correct notice to quit a contract is in breach of the contract and liable for any losses incurred by the landlord. Any new, inexperienced, or none the wiser landlord reading your first paragraph would think in this scenario they are fighting a lost cause, they are not. They are entitled to hold back any money due from the tenant as per the written contract.

    As for your suspicions in the second paragraph you haven't seen it played out because it hasn't happened. Some landlords are getting confused with what is actual law and what is an unqualified opinion on the internet. Landlords have rights too and if the tenant breaks a written contract the landlord has every right to hold back some or all of the deposit to right this wrong and is further entitled to pursue the tenant for any other money lost not covered by the deposit.

    "Very soon we are going to Mars. You wouldn't have been going to Mars if my opponent won, that I can tell you. You wouldn't even be thinking about it."

    Donald Trump, March 13th 2018.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,723 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Landlords who do not seek to limit their losses by finding a replacement tenant have had the amount of deposit they are allowed retain reduced or eliminated.

    It isn't a lost cause, but if someone followed your implication that its OK to "take as long as they like" they would end up losing money.



  • Registered Users Posts: 569 ✭✭✭Long Sean Silver


    there was a time in this country if a person/family stayed in LA housing long enough, then they were practically guaranteed a LA house. this model is now utterly broken and people are now expected to pay for their own house/flat by obtaining a mortgage, and paying it off over 20/25/30 years.

    i am LL and i would happily sell my properties to the LA in order to house people. BUT i must get a proper market price. if they are prepared to pay me that, then like many other LLs i will gladly sell up!



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,836 ✭✭✭Rows Grower


    Putting a word in bold doesn't make your argument any stronger, you are doling out supposition and scaremongering.

    "Very soon we are going to Mars. You wouldn't have been going to Mars if my opponent won, that I can tell you. You wouldn't even be thinking about it."

    Donald Trump, March 13th 2018.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 67,723 Mod ✭✭✭✭L1011


    And you restating that you're right doesn't make it so either.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,271 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Yea going through it at the moment. Getting market rate and saving estate agent fees



  • Registered Users Posts: 23,271 ✭✭✭✭ted1




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭DownByTheGarden


    They made an offer to me of what i thought was very good. EA told me to continue with the bidding. After a few bids then the council bid again, far higher than the highest bid. If id accepted their first one, and i was going to but the other half didnt want to, I wouldnt have got the higher price off them. The difference was enough to buy 2 cars. My lesson was, always test the market to find the real market price.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,980 ✭✭✭✭Cuddlesworth


    You ever heard of the phrase "drawing blood from a stone", its very applicable to the situation of recouping funds from lifetime social welfare recipients.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,836 ✭✭✭Rows Grower


    Yeah I've heard of the phrase and know exactly what it means but don't understand the relevance of it in this discussion.

    Do you know what a legally binding contract is, what a deposit on a rental house is, what the purpose of it is and who holds it?

    "Very soon we are going to Mars. You wouldn't have been going to Mars if my opponent won, that I can tell you. You wouldn't even be thinking about it."

    Donald Trump, March 13th 2018.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,019 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Two things LLs fear most, tenants who do not pay rent and tenants who refuse to leave/overhold. If the op has a good tenant who pays rent/has it paid up until the day they leave, and leave voluntarily, the op should do three things, say a prayer in thanks, give the tenant back their deposit less any fair and legal deductions, and then sell the house.

    The “blood from a stone” inference I presume, is in relation to getting any joy from taking a case against a social welfare recipient for any money owed as a result of not serving correct notice to the LL. If the op holds on to all the deposit, the tenant gets a free shot with the RTB and has a good chance of getting their deposit considering how easy it is at the moment for LLs to find tenants. In an earlier post you said the RTB is there to protect the rights of both LLs and tenants, it seems easier for a tenant to secure money from a LL than it is the other way round, because you can’t get blood from a stone.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,339 ✭✭✭robbiezero


    Fair play to you, but I do feel a bit for the people being outbid by the council for the house. Must be hard to take for them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    The blame here lays with the council who outbid normal Joe soap. Normal people cannot compete with the council,who spends tax payers money recklessly.

    Living the life



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,339 ✭✭✭robbiezero




  • Registered Users Posts: 7,877 ✭✭✭patrickc


    The new circular for LA's in they can only buy houses now with tenants with a valid NTQ in HAP or RAS. Not private rented.

    AHB's can buy private rented houses with valid NTQs



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,985 ✭✭✭Jeff2




  • Registered Users Posts: 7,877 ✭✭✭patrickc


    yes Notice to Quit



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭DownByTheGarden


    I agree. And I was very vocal and dead against the councils and the charities using taxpayers own money to outbid them on properties.

    But I was desperate to get out, and nothing focuses the mind like the potential to be trapped and then money on the table to be able to get out. And if someone that you dont want to do business in the first place is offering you several 10s of thousands of euro more than than the next person you will take it. I feel guilty and even annoyed that i sold to the council (well its not done yet. Should be completed this week or next week), but it was the right thing to do for my family.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,786 ✭✭✭DownByTheGarden




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,355 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    Ireland is notorious for the amount of empty properties.



Advertisement