Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Time for a zero refugee policy? - *Read OP for mod warnings - updated 11/5/24*

19779789809829831031

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,065 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    This is the problem and this is why the government are behaving as they are because they know more than likely they will be back so they really need to perform just go through the motions and with no one questioning them or calling them out on their lies and incompetence sure why would they up their game? Plus they can all sail off into the sunset like alot of FF did back in the 2011 and give everyone the 2 fingers and yet people will still vote for them.

    Sorry to say it but we deserve everything we get.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92 ✭✭amykl_1987


    We have no viable alternatives really.

    SF would walk it if they had read the room



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,984 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Well it's easy to say that someone is just "entrenched" isn't it? You aren't really tackling the logic or sense behind what I'm saying and — ironically for someone who wants to throw the "entrenched" label around — you clearly don't want to even consider the possibility that there are reasonable and understandable reasons for which people don't like being recorded by strangers and having their faces put up online.

    Are you seriously telling me that if I was to sit around outside your house or wherever else, record you, put you up on Twitter and make negative assertions about you that are then supplemented by a slew of negative comments from other people about you that make all sorts of negative assumptions about you and your character .... you'd just be fine with that? No worries?

    I'd have to presume the answer to that question is yes, because apparently taking any action to avoid this would appear, based on your logic, to invariably mean you're only doing so for nefarious reasons.

    But what do I know? I'm just entrenched.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    I think a good start point would be raising rates for 1st and 2nd trade apprentices above the minimum wage.

    Our construction industry is structurally in a very poor place. Fragmentation seems to be an issue worldwide with construction, but we're especially bad here.

    Funnily enough nobodies protesting these issues, it's all about IPAs who make up a small cohort of those needing houses here.

    Why is that? Is it hopelessness, ignorance, laziness, racism? How much is related to mental health and social media?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,487 ✭✭✭Vote4Squirrels


    "Small cohort" - 30k plus a year and the more they are housed in new builds, the greater that number will grow to.

    Your posts contain absolutely less than nothing in the way of solutions and continue to try to diminish a very real problem we are having to deal with.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,437 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    Great idea, pay new apprentices more, how long before all these apprentices qualify? Meanwhile there's upwards of 14,000 homeless in the state right now who are needing homes.

    So, no one objects to migrants needing a home, but join the queue: https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-41455573.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,266 ✭✭✭MegamanBoo


    The figure given earlier in the thread was 140k over the last 20 years.

    That would be 7k per year.

    And not all of those 7k will require a house, many will be sharing accommodation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,905 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    What happened 20 years ago is irrelevant, its the upward trend. Over 13k last year and 20k projected this year.

    https://www.rte.ie/news/ireland/2024/0404/1441672-asylum-latest/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,716 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    I already did? The article and leaflet you posted don’t say much, nor does the sentence you posted. Ireland is still the country of origin for the vast majority of cases of HIV in Ireland:

    IMG_4188.png

    https://www.hpsc.ie/a-z/hivandaids/hivdataandreports/2022reports/HIV_trends_to%20end%202022_final.pdf

    The prevalence of HIV in other countries is an entirely separate matter from the numbers of immigrants to Ireland, let alone those immigrants who are diagnosed with HIV. When Irish people and immigrants to Ireland are taken as a whole for new cases, that’s where the 118% rise mentioned in the article comes from:

    The HPSC data for HIV shows cases rose from 400 to 874 by the end of week 51 last year, a rise of 118 per cent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,944 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    20 years ago there was no social media, Internet access and use was pretty limited. Barely a mobile. 2 billion less people on the earth. Probably half the air traffic there is today.

    Or put simply, a different world to the one we live in today. Anyone using the history books to apply policy in the present is..



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,333 ✭✭✭bloopy


    I'm curious as to what the long term plan in general is.

    We are setting records in population growth, while services and housing are becoming an almost cut throat exercise for access.

    This cannot continue for too long before it breaks.

    Surely the government can see that this is going to lead to exceptional damage to social cohesion. They are not that thick.

    The current tactic of calling people far right or racists, bigots, etc does not change the fact that people are getting increasingly frustrated and angry with what is happening. Such a type of argument only serves to stroke the ego of the one making it. It does nothing to address what is becoming an potentially very dangerous situation.

    And I am not talking about about the recent disturbances in coolock or newtown mountkennedy, they are small fry compared to what is building at the moment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,485 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    https://www.thejournal.ie/masi-pbp-asylum-seekers-right-to-work-6463782-Aug2024/

    They’re barely even trying to mask that the majority of these people are actually just economic migrants coming here to work and using asylum as a back door in

    Fascinating to see PBP backing this despite it likely being a disastrous outcome for Irish working class people on low paying jobs.

    I suppose in their heads backing the “asylum seekers” gives them more virtue points so of course it is the logical course of action



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,333 ✭✭✭bloopy


    The old left is gone.

    Whatever is claiming to be the left now appears to be some sort of feel good shallow ideology that looks like it was dreamt up by some marketing firm somewhere.

    It has been successfully used as cover for western governments to embark on highly business orientated views on society, where profit and economy are all and the people come a distant second - viewed as little more than economic units, dispensible if not required as a better value unit becomes available.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,129 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Not sure why you're surprised. The Marxist parties like PBP, Sinn Fein, Labour, SocDems, etc. have never really shied away from this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,616 ✭✭✭OscarMIlde


    You seemed to have missed Slide 23 from that link.

    Screenshot 2024-08-15 160720.png
    “Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.”


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,815 ✭✭✭✭Headshot




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,888 ✭✭✭facehugger99


    The windfall tax from the FDI sector has been both a blessing and a curse. I don't think most people realize how dependent we have become on this money and just how fcuked we'd be if/when it stops rolling in.

    The problem is it has allowed to Government to absolve themselves from engaging in any kind of long-term strategic planning for any number of issues - including immigration. They are just fcuking money at the problems and kicking the can down the road.

    Instead of these billions being used to invest in our infrastructure and our future they are being pissed away making a small cohort of people very rich while doing nothing to solve the underlying issues.

    It's galling to see such waste being presided over.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,437 ✭✭✭Tenzor07


    Saw this on a famous Irish satire site, and wondered, "how did they get a copy of a real letter?"

    letter.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,104 ✭✭✭Mike Murdock


    If the FDI carousel stops, it's back to the 1980's for Ireland.

    So mass immigration of our young workforce. Only this time will there be no US safety net as we no longer have a Morrison Visa program. The UK is and will continue to be a basket case for a long time, and most of Europe is in trouble, too.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,584 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Yes but we're full and they can blame the illegitimate IPA's for that. And blame the Irish authorities for entertaining them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,716 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    I didn’t miss it, it’s just not saying much other than in recent years (post-Covid during which movement was restricted), the detection rates of HIV among immigrants is higher than the native population. One of the reasons for that is that HIV rates across all of Europe have risen significantly since 2022, but still we come back to your original point about higher rates of HIV among immigrant populations based upon region.

    If the rates of HIV among a population are based upon region, the rate of infection is about 90% of those with HIV are natives of any given region -

    IMG_4189.png IMG_4190.png

    https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/HIV-AIDS_surveillance_in_Europe_2023_%28_2022_data_%29_0.pdf

    If I wanted to engage in statistical figure fudging, I could, and I’d be able to write articles focusing on HIV rates among immigrant populations as though the native population didn’t exist, but that wouldn’t be at all helpful because it would leave people with the impression they already hold that the rise in incidents of HIV are due to increasing immigration. Articles like this, containing factual but misleading statements like this:

    Only 10 per cent of those diagnosed with HIV in Ireland last year were Irish, the lowest proportion of any country apart from Iceland. Twenty per cent were from eastern and central Europe, 22 per cent from sub-Saharan Africa and 25 per cent from Latin America and the Caribbean.

    https://archive.ph/9szMQ


    Your original point about the rates of HIV and other diseases among the immigrant population is valid (and that’s acknowledging that you distinguish between immigrants from wealthy nations and developing nations), but when it comes to the provision of healthcare, education and so on, immigrants even from poverty stricken nations (which might indicate the reason for asylum seekers applying for refugee status in Ireland), are not putting any greater pressure on healthcare, education or other public services. They are far more unlikely than the native population to be able to avail of those public services in the first place.

    I DO get the point you were making, but it’s just not a legitimate point. It’s no different to the point another poster made earlier about doubling the populations of cities outside of Dublin by 2040 and suggesting that UHL wouldn’t be able to cope if the population of Limerick City doubles to 200,000… ignoring the fact that UHL already serves a population of over 400,000, and most of that population are Irish, not immigrants.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,584 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Remember when the loonies tried to pretend the housing crisis and immigration have no correlation? Like I said before this country better pray there's not another recession in the next 10 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,616 ✭✭✭OscarMIlde


    The post I linked to was showing the rate of HIV diagnosed people who are resident in Ireland. They then broke it down based on where these people originated from. The rate of HIV diagnosed people in Ireland who are of Irish origin is 2.6 per 100,000. The rate of HIV diagnosed people in Ireland who are of non-Irish origin is 66 per 100,000. That is a massive disparity and these people need treatment. If they don't personally seek treatment it is a personal tragedy for them as well as being a public health concern. And if they don't interact with the Health Service for treatment of their HIV, they will eventually end up interacting with the Health service from complications of untreated HIV whether it is opportunistic infections, severe immune dysregulation or cancer. And none of these complications are in any way cheap to treat.

    I am not saying this to vilify people coming here whether they are seeking asylum or legal foreign nationals. But to plan and allow for a properly functioning health system these realities need to be acknowledged and it is simply wrong to state that asylum seekers cost the Health service less than native Irish people.

    As regards to this point:

    'immigrants even from poverty stricken nations (which might indicate the reason for asylum seekers applying for refugee status in Ireland).' Poverty in itself is not a valid region for seeking asylum, particularly with all the supports and services which are provided to asylum seekers relative to regular immigration. I'd love to live in a kumbaya world where we could help everyone but we don't, and we don't have the resources to cope with the influx of people entering Ireland and then seeking asylum. Government figures indicate that the vast majority of them are not genuine asylum seekers. Government efforts should be on identifying and deporting bogus asylum seekers and policies of deterrence to dissuade further bogus asylum seekers. The Dept. of Integration can continue to identify legal refugees abroad (often people who have spent years living in refugee camps) and bring them to Ireland in line with the International obligations we have signed up for, as they have been doing for years.

    “Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.”


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,584 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    So what you're saying is our immigrants are putting strain on the health system?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,954 ✭✭✭ShamNNspace


    Well like a good storm it might clear the air, something from the left field might save us all in the end, better off in the long run…either way it's gonna come to a head sooner or later and maybe it'll be some unexpected event that'll temper the madness and bring some pragmatism to the situation, we can't save the world, like a parasite the ngo complex has got far too large and gained far too much influence in government and media circles, they need to be culled and then maybe we can move on with the welfare of the citizens paramount and leave something better for our grandchildren than is promised by these fantasists if they're let have their way



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,061 ✭✭✭jackboy


    The way the government are burning through mountains of money for no benefit to the country, it is not inconceivable that the IMF could end up back here again.

    If that happens they will go hard, asylum seekers and citizens would be in for a rough ride.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 92 ✭✭amykl_1987


    So a 25% increase in population served by ONE hospital, with no discernible plan for increasing the capacity of a hospital already struggling to cope is not going to have any negative impact? And where are that extra 100,000 people coming from given the birth rate here currently is 1.7 (it needs to be over 2 for the population to grow without immigration of any sort)

    A 25% increase in population served by UHL means the hospital needs a 40% increase in beds, staffing etc to get it to some sort of acceptable service.

    At a time when Teachers, Nurses etc are being enticed abroad by better pay and far better working conditions.

    Are you for real?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,616 ✭✭✭OscarMIlde


    No, I'm not exactly. But the claim was made that asylum seekers would provide less stress on the health system than the equivalent native Irish person. I was pointing to a demonstrable health cost were this would not be true. It may be that there are other conditions were Irish people have a higher rate than asylum seekers, such as say diabetes or health disease (I have no figures to back this up). It's irrelevant anyway. The more people in the country the more stress on the health system. Asylum seekers by law are supposed to have certain needs met and the Irish health, housing and education system will not be able to cope with the number currently entering the country for long. The vast majority are demonstrably not genuine asylum seekers, but economic migrants abusing the system meant for people fleeing danger. The government should be focused on people legally resident in Ireland, whether born here, legally immigrated here or were allowed in as genuine refugees.

    “Never argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.”


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,680 ✭✭✭Downlinz


    In every other country people would put aside their differences with the main opposition party in order to remove an unpopular government. Keir Starmer and Kamala Harris aren't exactly inspiring leaders and wouldn't be high on the priority list for people in either country but they're able to recognise the choice is either them or more of the same.

    In Ireland we moan and complain as the country sinks further and further with the 100+ year duopoly yet convince ourselves the untested alternative would definitely be worse somehow.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement