Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Stratosphere watch 2022-23

  • 18-01-2023 12:33am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭


    This thread is quite late on arrival this year as I have not been bothered to make a new one but I think now is as good a time as any to do so to avoid flooding the FI thread with stratospheric charts and there is some ongoing interest with regards to what is likely in the stratosphere later in January.

    First, I won't be doing my in-depth long explanation as I have been doing for the past few years. If you want to learn about how the stratosphere works and why it's of importance to our weather, please see last year's thread here.

    Second before I get into the current outlook, I need to correct myself on a recent post in the FI thread with displacements vs splits. Recent analysis was done by James Peacock at Metswift (known as Singularity on Netweather). Initial results of 2m temperature during impact period following a PV displacement or split event showed results you would not expect which I outlined in the FI thread. I somehow missed that the impact period was recalculated subsequently and results were much more in line with what you expect, especially over North America. Both displacement and split events do create blocking in the Atlantic sector but displacements have a tendency more for this blocking to be over towards Canada (west based -NAO) with the storm track further northward into Europe whilst splits have a more well rounded blocking feature over Greenland that is conducive to widespread below average temperatures over Europe. As you'd expect there is a strong signal for colder than average temperatures in the eastern seaboard which could also blow up cyclogenesis and cause that storm track to be further northwards across Europe. Note how strong the cold signal is for Scandinavia following a displacement event though and northern UK is also favoured to be cold.

    Meanwhile for the past week, the GFS has been hinting at a significant deceleration in zonal mean zonal winds at 60N 10hPa (which shall be referred to as U-60N from this point in the thread) in the stratosphere in the final week of January. The model has been consistent in showing this and the ensembles are starting to pick up on this somewhat too. Any sign of a major SSW (reversal of the U-60N) is way out into fantasy land towards the final few days of January or even the first days of February. At the moment this all looks largely wave-1 driven and a displacement which as shown above is unreliable for this part of the world if it's severe cold conditions you seek (provided the downwelling occurs in the first place).

    The latest ECM ens from Monday also show a significant deceleration but no major SSW for the majority of ensembles. The ECM ens have been catching up with the GFS in this regard rather than the other way round, there was much more stronger than norm U-60N on previous EC46 runs. Still no apparent signal of a major SSW from Glosea but can only go by the Met Office longer range outlook on that as Glosea data is not in the public domain.

    Now does the fact the U-60N achieve an arbitrary number of going easterly make a difference in the grand scheme of things? No, not to a great extent anyway. Tropospheric blocking positioning is key as always from other drivers such as the MJO regardless of the stratosphere. However, the more significant the U-60N reversal is, the higher likelihood it is to be of a wave-2 PV split event which as outlined holds the greatest potential for cold, blocked patterns in most of Europe.

    Whatever the end result, it's always fascinating to watch the dynamics of the stratosphere unfold. Will it be a major SSW? Will the GFS' call finally be on the ball after numerous failed attempts this winter? Will it be a wave-2 split? Or will the GFS do a 180? Feels like I always end these posts with questions, questions, questions but we're always left second guessing with weather..

    One to keep an eye on.

    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,383 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Well on the latest GFS it looks like the Zonal Winds won't reverse at the all important 10 hpa level, so no technical ssw. Whether or not we still get any sort of cold spell cannot be ruled out entirely - there was one in February 1991, which I mentioned before, that had some sort of warming in January, but it fell short of being a ssw. You have to think though it's unlikely we will get one.

    In any event, The Mjo in its next cycle could lead to further opportunities for blocking to the North West by Mid February onwards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,383 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    According to a poster on Netweather, who has researched 12 Sudden Stratospheric Warmings events in February since 1958, 8 of them failed to deliver a meaningful cold spell to the UK.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    I saw that post. I wonder did he look at the AO because that is the main way of classifying downward propagating (dSSW) and non downward propagation (nSSW) SSW events and if they were dSSW, we would have likely just found ourselves on the wrong side of the blocking as is typically the case. Judging by the fact he said there's been 12 February major SSW events since 1958, he seems to have used the NCEP dataset - various datasets have different major events due to differing reanalysed data on borderline events.

    Doing a similar analysis to that of Simon Lee using D3-D30 MSLP anomalies following the central date of those 12 February major SSW events, I get the following results. NAO data is via NOAA/NCEP and PV classifications are via Cohen et al. The NOAA NAO data is based more on 500mb heights rather than MSLP so expect some divergence between the reanalysis and the NAO values. I used NAO here as it is more relevant as a means of signifying impact here than the AO. This dataset also tends to underestimate the strong nature of the NAO periods compared to other datasets which are primarily focused on MSLP.

    Using these results, I get 5 of the 12 February major SSWE that were succeeded by a -NAO on the NOAA index. These years being 1980, 1984, 2001, 2010 and 2018. 2001, 2010 and 2018 were PV splits whilst 1980 and 1984 were PV displacements. If I'm able to guess, the 4 years that the NW user speaks of are 2018 (obviously), 2010, 2001 and maybe 1979? The first three I am certain on anyway. The NOAA index indicates a +NAO for 1979 but mid-March 1979 featured a severe cold easterly that coincided with St. Patrick's Day. Another year I would add is 1973 which featured an unusually cold and snowy northwest to northerly regime around Valentine's Day which I mentioned in the Irish Weather Statistics thread. March 1966 featured various cold snaps but nothing too remarkable. Mid-March 1980 had a very cold easterly with widespread snow showers between the 17th and 23rd so I would definitely include that one as another. March 1984 was just a cold, very cloudy month whilst 1989 was a nSSW following on from an exceptionally mild winter but April 1989 would later turn out to be notably cold. Early March 1999 featured northerly and easterly winds but it was not severely cold and the month later turned very mild to warm. Late February/early March 2001 brought one of the most wintry spells of the 2000s with a snow event for the east of Ireland and severe frost. 2007 and 2008 were nSSW - in fact, the February 2008 is officially the last nSSW that has occurred. Mid-February to mid-March 2010 was often cold, very frosty and light snowfalls at times during February whilst early March was dry and sunny. 2018 goes without saying so won't go there.

    So from that I get 1979, 1980, 2001, 2010 and 2018 as having a notable easterly spell following a February major SSWE. 1973 is a strange and unique case. That's just under half the February events in the database so not the best odds indeed but who's to say this isn't just coincidence and our luck rather than anything deep? Interesting how, according to Cohen, most of them are splits and only 4 of them were displacements.


    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,383 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Well I am even less confident of a cold spell now. You have some memory!

    Was there any kind of strat warming at all before the December 2000 cold spell? Matt H seems confident enough that contrary to the seasonal models winter will end cold now. He is a pro, but he likes the cold too, so maybe he is not completely objective. I am just getting the nagging feel this is not our Winter to get deep snowy cold. I know we had the great December cold spell and we had some snow this week, but I mean very cold upppers where we don't have to concern ourselves with things going the wrong side of marginal like what happened last night. Then again it's not all about very low uppers as 2010 showed. The problem last night maybe because we did not have a true Arctic Northerly to begin with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,383 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    A bit about the Stratosphere towards the end of the video.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    There was a very delayed development of the stratospheric polar vortex in Nov/Dec 2000, see the U-60N below for 2000-01 indicated by the red line. There was no official major SSW at 10hPa as no reversal but it was a significant SSW nonetheless. Pretty much the entirety of December 2000 had slower than average U-60N and even at its strongest in meteorological winter through January 2001, it was just barely around average. This likely had a big hand in 2000-01 being a colder winter than most of the 1990s/2000s up to 2008.

    This cross-section shows the NAM/AO from 1-1000hPa during the 2000-01 season, you can see the significant minor SSW that occurred in December 2000 around 10-14 days before the Christmas to New Year cold spell. There was clear downwelling from both this and the major SSW split in the following February which would result in that cold end to February/start of March.

    Another one of those minor SSW events that had significant impacts for Europe much like the January 1991 event despite no reversal.


    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44 LaoisWeather


    Are SSW events more likely under La Nina or El Nino? Or does the ENSO state influence it?

    Interestingly I've read that since 2000, La Nina months out number El Nino months by 116 to 36, whereas from 1979 to 1999 there were 86 El Nino months to 58 La Nina months.

    Food for thought.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,383 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    It seems the mjo in phase 3 can lead to blocking, i thought it would promote a positive NAO. One poster over on Netweather seems fairly confident that we will see height rises to the North West towards Mid Februrary arising out of this. Also that the weakened strat will aid in all of this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    May as well bank this 18z before it's gone, a wacky major SSW. Can't say I've seen anything like it.


    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    Still looking like a minor wave-1 displacement is what is expected. No definitive sign of major (reversal) or a split.

    The green lines below are the GEFS showing forecast U-60N on the 06z run this morning. Some go for a reversal, most do not but there is a significant group that do in the early days of February.


    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 17,075 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gonzo


    Just after looking at all the GFS ensembles and if anything today is a downgrade for the SSW. Only 3 or 4 members do a proper split while the others go for a displacement and the PV regains it's strength very quickly rather than a proper weakening.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    There has been no split at all in the outlook as far as what I've seen. If you're hoping for or expecting one, be prepared to be disappointed.

    The temperature charts, which I also used to look at myself all the time, are not a good way of seeing if the PV is displaced or being split. They can be good to identify a significant warming occurring. But in terms of identifying the state of the PV, 10mb wind or height charts are far superior. WXCharts has the easiest one to read under Polar - Northern Hemisphere - 10mb Wind but Weatheriscool charts are also good. I am not aware of others at this time. There's numerous sites to view U-60N which are used to identify whether an event is major or minor.

    I was also meant to say the latest EC46 on Thursday seemed to show less perturbations going for a major event with a minor displacement still signalled.

    If it's blocked, cold setups you are hoping for from stratospheric effects, well then you'd hope the GFS 12z is on steroids for early February as there sure is no quick way out of what it shows with the North Atlantic jet stream raging across to Ireland with masses of explosive cyclogenesis.

    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,383 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    I don't think we will see a split without wave 2 type warming. that is why the Vortex keeps rebounding after each wave 1 warming. We just have to hope a displacement and the weakening of the zonal winds t may go in our favour this time. I would not bet the house on it though, especially if the GFS op is correct.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    Indeed.

    Although perhaps the GFS OP is not as bad as I initially thought as NE Europe still has a lot of high pressure which would in theory send further planetary waves to give more disruption and an increased risk of wave-2 type warming. However, we'd be fast running out of time as spring would be upon us for earliest likelihood of tropospheric response unless a January 2009 scenario were to happen which is another extreme altogether. Gotta admit it gives me January 2014 vibes that 12z with the NE Europe ridging and active Atlantic.

    As for the MJO phase 3 being blocked, composite for such shows strong signal for high pressure around Iceland/Greenland with a deep trough in the Atlantic. Looks cold but wouldn't be textbook snowy I'd have thought due to the alignment of the troughs, we would want that trough centred over the Low Countries. Then taking into account the displacement of the PV, would this blocking probably be further south?


    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,383 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Could well be. It would just be our luck that the the mjo produced a block in the right area only for the displacement of the strat to scupper it. I see the US is going to go very cold. Another potential spanner in the works, there always is!

    Post edited by nacho libre on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    Any small chance of a major SSW (reversal and displacement) have vanished on the GEFS now. Not a single perturbation showing a reversal from what I’ve seen on the latest run.

    Still looking like this displacement will help produce an intensified vortex over Greenland which will increase the likelihood of stormy episodes.

    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,383 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Yes, indeed it's likely Glosea foresaw a ssw not taking place , which is why the UKMO long range was confident about a return to unsettled conditions with no mention of blocking in any previous updates over the last couple of weeks . It's the double whammy of a weak strat enforcing westerlies on an already mobile trop pattern. It is hard to see how the Mjo in phase 6 or 7 can override this to deliver deep cold. Maybe if we are lucky we could get conditions like last week at some stage. It could be though that the seasonal model end up being right about February. It's a grim outlook, unless some wave 2 warming shows up in the future, but then we will looking to March



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    There's the confirmation from Butler that any small chance of a major SSW has diminished.


    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    Some stunning nacreous or polar stratospheric clouds showing in Scotland where the stratosphere temperature is sub -78C which is required for visibility of these clouds. Ireland last seen them in 2016 to my knowledge with some great displays in early February 2016, could be sighting of some in the north today/tomorrow as the core of the coldest stratosphere temps gets displaced towards our shores. Shame there looks to be too much cloud cover with rain expected to approach later today, typical ain't it.



    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    Some slight signs perhaps of a renewed warming during second half of February from the EC and GFS as presumably wave activity occurs from Ural blocking being forced by the MJO. Another case of watching to see what happens but it's a long way away and hypothetically if a major SSW event did occur that time of year, effects wouldn't likely be felt until the start of spring has passed.

    As expected, too cloudy to see any possible nacreous clouds this evening over Ireland.

    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,383 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Yes, if we do get an early final warming it could end up being a very cold March. The CFS in recent runs has been showing just that scenario.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,300 ✭✭✭pauldry


    Saw a bit of sky yesterday evening in Sligo and it was quite green like the one above. Any chance tonight as there are somewhat clearer sky's about away from NW



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    There's a possibility this evening of a small last chance of seeing them in the north of the country but those cold temperatures are quickly dissipating and going above -78C at 10hPa. If it was green you did likely see nacreous, just very faint type-1 structure.

    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,383 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    An early final warming?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    Doubt it. A February final warming has never happened before. The record earliest final warming is March 2016 when the U-60N reversed on 5th March. It resembled a mid-winter major warming by how extreme it was but the U-60N never recovered to westerly so it's regarded as the final warming of the 2015-16 season. This is a month and 10 days early. The average date of the final warming is April 15th.

    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    GFS yet again up to its old tricks right at the end of its run. Posting just for archival sakes. It shows a major displacement. We well know how the GFS goes by now with its new version since early December. Saying that, knowing our luck one will happen and we get a very blocked March. One hasn't happened since 2018..


    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,383 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Yes it would be having chased deep cold all winter, watch it arrive right on cue for spring. The CFS was showing a lot of blocked runs throughout March recently.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 17,075 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gonzo


    Just took a look at the latest CFS extended and if it verifies we are in for a cold Spring with plenty of cold spells and these carry on into the start of June.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    Another det run showing a major displacement and it looks prolonged too rather than a short affair.

    The reversal starts on the 15th and ends the run with -19.9 m/s on the 18th.

    Just realised the GEFS 06z had a significant cluster reversing too but the spread is large, as you'd expect at such a timeframe. The GEFS have been performing better than the OP for the stratosphere again this winter as you'd expect - though not necessarily so for our weather!

    EC46 update to come this evening... Monday's update as a reminder was supportive of a significant weakening again in the second half of the month but not quite going to reverse like the GEFS above.

    This possibility has more of a base to it than the previous two with more support but does that mean it's any more likely to occur? No but I'm probably going to be like a broken record saying this for numerous posts, it'll be typical for one to occur and result in a blocked March or mid-spring and sometimes the effects from a major event can continue into the final month too as U-60N take a deep dive through the spring season naturally and meridional patterns are much more likely.

    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    Whilst I usually say CFS is Can't Forecast System or Complete Failure System, I can't say I disagree with what you describe here for what it shows. Although we got a cold, blocked April and a cold, wet May in 2021, we have not had a genuine cold early spring since 2018 (March 2020 was a bit chilly for some). We've had a good run of Marches as far as fine March weather is concerned, especially last year. I hope I am very wrong with my feeling - not scientific at all of course - that we'll get a cold spring unless it guarantees a stunning summer to follow like 2013.

    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    This evening's EC46 has brought forward the deceleration but again no reversal indicated by the ensemble mean. Interesting how much it keeps significantly under the average for a prolonged period of time though. More time and more runs needed. Talking like 2 weeks away after all for any shot of this. Health warnings and all that.


    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,383 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    It will be interesting to see if there are any changes to the UKMO long range for the end of February to Early March within the next week. If we see a change stating that colder conditions are more likely, then we will know Glosea forsees something interesting happening in the strat with a good result for us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    The saga continues on the GFS today, no backtracking this morning. Reversal starts on 13th and still goes on to the end on the 19th.

    A significant cluster of the GEFS 0z reversing again.


    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    No changes, looks like a major displacement will occur next week. This evening's EC46 a big "upgrade" on the reversal.


    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 244 ✭✭Keithchap



    This popped up in my news feed today, I thought it might be worth sharing as it explains it quite well for people not that familiar with the topic, like me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,719 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    UK Met have a good SSW explainer on their SM. Makes clear that an incident of one doesn't always influence NW Europe weather and that at the moment, a neutral temperature profile is indicated, ie close to seasonal norms.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 884 ✭✭✭thejuggler


    The independent seems to think Beast from the East 2 is imminent.

    ‘Beast from the East 2’ a possibility later this month as Sudden Stratospheric Warming event looms

    https://www.independent.ie/weather/beast-from-the-east-2-a-possibility-later-this-month-as-sudden-stratospheric-warming-event-looms-42335708.html




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    Don't be posting this nonsense on the thread please.

    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,300 ✭✭✭pauldry


    Nonsense indeed.

    Not really sure what SSW is but it is happening.

    Is it a split in the Polar Vortex displacing the cold South. I told my wife its something like this but the cold can get displaced to any country.

    Looking at Models a lot of the cold gets shifted to Greenland and North America while we stay average.

    So initially this SSW event seems to bring cold to Greenland Canada and the Northern States. Then later in February or March our weather may get cold but this strong high pressure near or over us could just bring frost.

    What I have observed is the JAXA in the Arctic has begun to decrease but this may be the strong Southerlies over the Barents more than anything else.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,404 ✭✭✭Packrat


    Is there then no chance at all that there's any truth in the Indo article and it's totally made up bs?

    (For those of us who aren't meteorologists and don't understand all the lingo)

    Sorry if non-boffins aren't allowed post in this thread, I came to the forum to see if there was any better analysis of what they're saying might happen.

    “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    Please refer to the FI charts thread. The "Beast from the East" part of it is totally made up bs and goes without saying.

    Wait for the major SSW event to happen first of all, it's to begin Wednesday next week according to the latest GFS model run. Any effects from that directly wouldn't be 'til at least 2-4 weeks away when we reach the start of March.

    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,719 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Its a possible outcome, but a low one. Maybe 10%.

    Most SSWs either don't affect or only marginally effect the dominant weather pattern in this part of the World.

    Put it this way, how many Emma/Beast situations can you recall in your lifetime?

    Exactly.

    They are called 1 in 100 year events for a reason.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,427 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    There will almost certainly be an ejection of seriously cold air from the pole but where is the question.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 17,075 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gonzo


    Hopefully not down into Greece yet again! We've been 5 years waiting for winter to happen, time we had a bit of luck.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,383 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    P16 please Bob.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    Okay so here's the latest on what's happening.

    The stratospheric polar vortex right now is weaker than average, the U-60N today was 13.2 m/s according to the GFS. It's only going to go down further in the next few days as warming of the stratosphere continues reversing to easterly (negative U-60N) by Wednesday afternoon which would likely peak by this time next week. The most recent GFS run shows a prolonged reversal where the U-60N continues to hover between 0 and -10 m/s up to day 13 then a secondary warming occurs bringing yet another descent in the U-60N back down into the double digits with a big ridge over the Arctic. If that were to occur, there is very little remnants of the stratospheric polar vortex to be seen anywhere. It is still a wave-1 major displacement as it's all one big ridge but the troughs are set up in a conducive position to bringing the North Atlantic Oscillation into negative territory and therefore, a heightened risk of Greenland or Iceland blocking high pressure. This is not your run of the mill displacement event if the GFS is correct. Generally speaking, it is said that the deeper the reversal and more prolonged it takes place, the higher the likelihood a shake up in the weather patterns occurs. Of course then comes the million questions as to where Ireland would find itself on which side of the jet stream to determine our weather.

    Until the first spike (assuming the GFS is correct with forecasting a second spike in warming) occurs by later next week, I don't think there is much use in looking at if downward propagation takes place from the strat to the trop. Models will be playing lots of solutions. For the sake of it as I know some will not resist it, here's the latest GFS North Annular Mode (NAM) forecast anyway. The orange colours are indicative of a negative NAM (also known as a negative Arctic Oscillation (AO) which refers to blocking over the north pole and is associated with the major sudden stratospheric warming. The left side of the chart is the various layers of the atmosphere, if there's downward propagation visible you'll see those orange colours descending towards 1000hPa. At the moment, the GFS does not show this but note the model only takes us to final few days of February and if we are to see effects directly from this warming event, it'll likely be in the early days of March at earliest. Any earlier is probably down to other drivers such as the MJO.

    After being inactive all season, University of Berlin have finally updated their ECM stratosphere charts though the latest run available is yesterday's 12z (10 February). The EC sees the U-60N reverse later Wednesday into Thursday, in line with the GFS. However, the warming is less dramatic on this model and does not reverse the U-60N quite as much. Details like that to be revealed though closer the time. It's variations on a theme.

    In summary... A major SSW is happening, the U-60N will reverse mid-week next week and it waits to be seen whether there will be tropospheric impacts from this. Ignore the talks of beast from the east, it's usual media drivel. Let's wait for the event to happen first before thinking of the effects of our weather, shall we?

    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 162 ✭✭cudsy1


    Any update guys? Great thread, thanks for the information



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,383 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Zonal Winds should be reversing today or tomorrow so it will officially be a SSW at that stage. If we are to see any impacts that lead to cold weather, that can take two to four weeks with a pv displacement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,738 ✭✭✭✭sryanbruen


    GFS starting to show signs of downward propagation for the start of March.

    Latest run analysis suggest we should see the reversal occur around midnight tonight.

    Photography site - https://sryanbruenphoto.com/



  • Advertisement
Advertisement