Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Pension at 70.

24

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,700 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    It would put most in an early grave. Feck that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,310 ✭✭✭✭Dodge


    Most people (correctly) won’t care about the cost to the state. For the first time, it looks like retirement will factor into the state pension

    So the individual has to add in what they’d earn in salary for the years not claiming for those years too

    In reality, the vast majority of people retire as soon as they can do so comfortably. So while the changes may help some, for most it’ll make no change to their choice



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,205 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    It'll be interesting to see what constitutes "working" to qualify for this.

    Does it have to be full time work?

    Will it require that you are a PAYE worker or that you are paying PRSI etc.?

    If you retire from your current role , perhaps with a company pension and take up part time work doing something else , will that qualify?

    Will periods of unemployment etc. count against you?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭Mongfinder General


    Agreed. Living in dream land. And the PRSI needed to cover these changes would need to be greatly increased. So that’s another chunk of their wages gone. We currently have 4/5 working for every retired person. It’ll be closer to 2/3 in 20 years time.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭Mongfinder General


    Aye - until your husband or wife decides they don’t like you anymore and goes after half of your pension. You might be better off paying tax on the money now and stuffing it in a box somewhere



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,700 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    Does anyone know if this will be pro rata? If one was to working until 68 would they get the benefit of the extra 2 years worked? So not the €315 but €284?

    So lets take the €315 for example. That's an extra €62 euro per week.

    Let's say you live until 82. That's an extra €38688 you would get if you retired at 70.

    You wouldn't need a huge AVC or private pension pot to make that up. It would workout about 90 euros a month over 20 years.

    158 x 12 = 1900 per year. After you get that tax relief thats costing you 1140 per annum persuing you pay tax @ 40%.

    I think most people in their early 40's could afford 95 quid a month. You wouldn't miss it after a a while. And in actual fact you find yourself putting more money in once mortgages are paid down and kids are moved out etc.

    GET A PENSION !!!!


    Got my answer

    This means that a person who continues working until the age of 67 would receive an additional €13 each week, bringing their pension to €266 a week.

    It will see 68-year-olds given €281 a week, 69-year-olds given €297, and those aged 70 and over given €315.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Oh it served a purpose all right. And maybe next time you'll think a bit longer before posting utter tripe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 641 ✭✭✭sportsfan90


    When they were talking about it on the radio this morning I presumed that people would be able to claim their pension at 66 at the lower rate of €253 as normal while still working, and that any PRSI, USC contributions they'd make until age 70 would go towards the higher payment of €315 then when they do eventually retire. That to me seemed like a very good system.

    But now I'm reading that you don't get the pension payment at all until you officially retire? So that means you'd be 86 before you'd even break even with payments. That's not a good deal by any stretch!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,532 ✭✭✭crossman47


    So you weren't educated by the state, never attended a public hospital, never needed a passport, never drove on public roads, ets, etc.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,834 ✭✭✭Allinall


    It's not supposed to be a good deal.

    The government are trying to save on the amount they have to pay out in pensions.

    The increased amount is to encourage people to work longer. A while ago they were contemplating increasing the eligibility age for any pension to 68.

    One way or another, everyone is going to get less of a pension. This way just encourages people who can to work longer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,404 ✭✭✭✭Vicxas


    With people living longer, surely it makes sense to have some kind of system in place that gradually increases the working age for younger people while not screwing people who are nearly retired.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,228 ✭✭✭The Mighty Quinn


    And you didn't factor any pension grown into that. If you assumed a very modest growth of 3% per annum, using your figures, you'd have 51,000 after 20 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,700 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    I don't think that should be the aim though. Having an affordable pension model whereby people contribute more at an early age needs to be the mechanism. Not telling a youngster who is starting work in a part time job at 16 that they'll be clocking in and out for the next 52 years minimum.

    Auto enrollment and benefits that go with such a system need to be pushed in the education setting for a start.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,125 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    If I'm still able to work past retirement, I will be doing it cash in hand! Not a notion I'll be deferring the pension until 70 just to benefit the government



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,495 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    The other numpty already said that, it wasn't particularly interesting the first time and certainly didn't need repeating.

    My point was very simple, I have no intention of relying on the state to give me anything in my old age, because the bottom will fall out of that entire concept before I ever get there.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,078 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    Screw that, my goal is 50



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,831 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    People might be living longer but how many people do you know.. in your family, friends , parents of friends, neighbours …who are 65-70 and who don’t have ailments like bad back, bad arthritis, dickie heart, cancer, recovered from cancer or would have the general health, wellbeing and stamina to be working until 70…anyway…

    precious few I’d imagine.

    my dad took early retirement, lucky he was well placed to afford to courtesy of a very good wage and pensions but…a guy with a heart condition, arthritis… a chance he wouldn’t be here if he’d kept going, in fact I know he wouldn’t. No question about it.

    country is just a poorly managed utter kip now. With the wellbeing of Irish people secondary now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,553 ✭✭✭✭Varik


    The average life expectancy being 82 is what it is now in 2022 from the people dying now.

    A 66 year old back in 2006 would have been told it was 79 years, but he lived past that and died in 2022 at the age of 82.

    Average is meant to be 3 month increase per annum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    The divil will be in the detail and from what we know of the state's exposure to pensions, it's unlikely really to be some great win for all. More likely to be winners and losers as usual but more losers than winners!



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,205 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Auto enrollment and benefits that go with such a system need to be pushed in the education setting for a start.

    Absolutely - They should be including financial planning into school all the way through secondary - Pensions , Household budgeting etc.

    They can use the slot currently occupied by religion classes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,033 ✭✭✭spaceHopper


    My Father was 76 when he died, he's taken a package and retired early thankfully he got to enjoy retirement. My mother's health is terrible she's 78 and has parkinsons. My wife's father retired at 60 at 66 he was diagnosed with cancer, it's treatable it's still there. He's 70 and enjoying life.

    Nope it the answer, I'm out as soon as I can.

    If you are thinking about it go to your local graveyard and count how many people died in their 70's it will open your eyes



  • Registered Users Posts: 627 ✭✭✭DLink


    I don't care how they pay for it, tax the young more for all I care, but out the gap by 65, 66 at the very latest.

    Leave at 65, spend a year on the dole, 9 months of which would be non-means tested... happy days.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,700 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    They could use the USC for pension purposes. Its temporary but rather than getting rid of it fully they could keep it at 30percent of its current rate maybe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,700 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    I wonder how many td's will work until 70.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,132 ✭✭✭malinheader


    I never heard such Bo##ocks from the government. Play the life or death roulette for 5 or 6 years hoping you Don't croak it for a Higher pension at 70.

    The elephant in the room here is that it's a ploy to raise the prsi. I know one thing any more money taken off me and I'll be signing on and working on the side.

    Don't agree with doing the double but it seems to me the only way to get ahead in this country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,132 ✭✭✭malinheader


    None. And don't even bother looking into what pension they get. It's unbelievable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,258 ✭✭✭Kalimah


    I’m just gone 60 and have been working for most of the time since 18, bar a couple of years when the kids were small. I’m going at 65 and I want my full pension of 253! At the moment it seems like I won’t have enough contributions to get the full amount. My neighbour who has barely worked in the last 40 years managed to get a disability pension and will go onto a full contributory pension at 65.

    There are so many anomalies with pensions that need to be addressed. As to ever working until 70 - not a chance - my parents were dead at 50 and 56 so I’m off to enjoy myself at 65.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,288 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    People need to be encouraged from an early age to pay into an AVC. Life is for living not for punching the clock till you have 10 years left in you. I have been paying into one since I was 21, alot more the last 5 years but I've paid as little as 50 p/m when things were very tight.

    Say I retire in 40 years, what is my life expectancy then? What sort of state will the state pension be in then? You'd be a fool to depend on it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,230 ✭✭✭realdanbreen


    Of course none of this matters a whit to the hundreds of thousands of public servents who apart from being in jobs where its virtually impossible to get the sack they get their pensions topped up and their wage increases regardless of the state of the nation. And the next time you go abroad and wonder why just about everything is cheaper than it is in Ireland wonder no more, the answer is the obscene way that our public servants have their snouts permanently in the trough!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,700 ✭✭✭Gusser09




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,408 ✭✭✭SuperBowserWorld


    Putin about to annex part of Ukraine. Those pensions could go up in a puff of smoke. 😝



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,260 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    No. It will be a choice between starting to draw it down at 66 vs say 70. So they'll work out on an actuarial basis an amount that will be equal in total overall for your remaining years.

    To give you the idea with a silly simplistic example, suppose the average person is expected to die at 74. They will give you 200 Euro pension if you start drawing it down at 66 and a 400 Euro pension if you start drawing it down at 70. In both cases you will receive the same overall. Whether you actually work or not during the 4 years won't be so relevant.

    Before anyone complains, I've already said this is a silly simplistic example to explain what they appear to be proposing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,021 ✭✭✭✭anewme


    Great to hear the inputs from everyone. Good discussion.

    Im not hanging round fot 60 a week.

    I was one of the 67 retirement batch , if I’m now paid from 66, I’m gone then, or 65 if I can.

    Would love to get out at 60 or just past but the nearer you get to it, the further away it looks financially.

    My Dad got Dementia from 70, I’d hate to think I’ve five years of living after working for the man for close on 50 years.

    Going to do my sums for 60 or be one of the oldies in b&q directing you to the Crown paints.

    id love to have some time to do some additional volunteering, use my corporate skills to help others.

    Post edited by anewme on


  • Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What of someone between age of 66 and 70,through no fault of their own ends up on the dole/let go etc??


    Are they to be forced onto a lower paid pension,while they wanted to remain working until reach 70?? (Many fishing families tend to live well into their 90s from my experience)




    Looks like a breeding ground for supreme court challenges tbh



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,260 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    It will be a choice. No more and no less. You will be able to choose when you want to start drawing it down. Common enough in private pensions when you can decide to draw down early and receive a lower pension, or delay it and receive a higher one. Or draw down at the standard time and receive the standard one.



  • Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    This is not an answer to the qs I asked....what will happen to someone between ages of 66 and 70,


    whom through no fault of their own find emselves out of work....will they be allowed dole/seek work until 70 or be forced onto the lower pension payment??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,260 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Nobody forces you onto anything. It will be your choice. It is in addition to what you have already. It is something extra.

    I'd imagine you can get the dole up to age 66. After that you are entitled to the pension. You can't expect to be able to say "well I'm entitled to the pension but I want dole instead AND I want a higher pension in 4 years because I didn't start until then".



  • Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Why can you not???.....if someone between age of 66 and 70 is actively seeking work(as is requirement to get the dole),



    On what grounds can they be denied the higher payment at 70??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,831 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    They means test people claiming disability so I guess the same will happen with pensions.

    They may in fact say if you retire owning your own property and 40 grand savings you can forget about a pension till 72 etc…

    best off buying one of these…I’m deadly serious btw I can see this happening the way things are going and the way this government are frittering away our resources, money and wellbeing.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,260 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    As has already been explained, the "higher payment" is not based on you working or not in the intervening years. It is based on you delaying starting to draw down the payments. On an actuarial basis, you will get the same money in total over your life in pension payments. You've just decided to take them in fewer portions so that each portion is larger

    Consider it as them giving you the money between 66 and 70 and you deciding to save it in another account and take it out bit by bit from that other account when you are 70. That is not literally what is happening but it is a way of explaining it. If you put that money into that account then you have it when you are 70. If you don't put it in then you can't take it out. That is completely fair.



  • Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So will someone out of work between 66 and 70,be entitled to draw dole,and if can't find a job be then allowed take higher payment at 70?


    Or be (as I imagine the case to be) forced onto lower pension payment......your spitting out alot of words,that simply are not providing clarification for what seems a relatively obvious conundrum that will inevitably pop-up



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,260 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Where are you imagining this dole between 66 and 70 from?

    Once you hit 66 you don't have dole. You have pension. If you decide to delay your pension (your choice) you will be able to draw down the delayed money on top of your regular pension amount.


    Do you know that you can currently work 66+ and receive your pension AND your salary?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Wouldnt a whole load of people in the 65 to 70 age bracket end up on disability if they had to work on (or even some the 60 to 65 too).

    Depending on the work type of course. I`ll throw in that your average office job isnt what it used to be say in the 1980s or 1990s. Back then if you had to look up a file you got out of your chair and walked to a filing cabinet etc. Sitting still all day long it very detrimental and I reckon many will have repetitive strain and bad backs from sitting all day by their 60s. In what would be perceived as a fairly physically easy role. As for physically demanding roles..............



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,834 ✭✭✭Allinall


    Because they haven’t worked between the age of 66 and 70.

    Its quite straightforward.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,330 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    Great discussion.

    Not a hope I'll be working anymore than needs be. I've seen so many people croke it young, retire and then get sick. Not be able to retire and work to the death, no life. Not for me.

    Thankfully, I have a financial plan in place that if things stay ok, will see me through to being out the gap at 60 or near to that.

    What will be interesting is, plenty of people work and claim the pension after 66. What will happen to them, if they keep working, can they not get the pension?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,310 ✭✭✭✭Dodge


    Last question remains to be seen when the details emerge (which are few and far between at the moment)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,021 ✭✭✭✭anewme


    I think when you are looking at your own pension



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,230 ✭✭✭realdanbreen




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,021 ✭✭✭✭anewme


    Lol! Sorry had half typed something and didn’t think k it updated, sorry!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,339 ✭✭✭SAMTALK


    So can you draw pension at 66 and still work if your workplace is willing to let you stay on ?



  • Advertisement
Advertisement