Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Lord Mountbatten - paedophile?

  • 25-08-2022 10:10pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 892 ✭✭✭


    A previous thread on this issue in the History and Heritage forum was closed by Manach as apparently it had become non-historic.

    But it appears that the issue is still live, as Andrew Lownie, a still living author (obviously) has published a book making accusations against Mountbatten, whereas two brothers from Mullaghmore (also still alive, obviously) have been quoted in the media ridiculing the accusations.

    https://www.independent.ie/regionals/sligochampion/news/sex-abuse-claims-about-lord-mountbatten-are-unfounded-say-mullaghmore-brothers-41933062.html

    I find this intervention by the Barry brothers rather curious. They recall visiting and working in the property as kids or young adults and state that only his grandkids were in the house, but of course that does not prove that he was not a child abuser, as there are many proven cases of child abusers leaving their own kids and grandkids alone but abusing kids outside of their family. Additionally, it could be argued that one of the brothers has a vested interest, as he subsequently went to work for Mountbatten in England. I also do not put much credit on Mr Barry's assertion that if something untoward was going on, the guards would have done something about it, as it is well known and testified to that some of the guards during that era were very corrupt and/or unduly deferential to authority and in several known cases, facilitated child abuse, by, for example, bringing kids who escaped from 'care' homes where they were being abused back to their abusers.

    Additionally, we know not everyone under 18 in Mountbatten's circle were grandkids or in any way related, given that two of the people assassinated on his boat in 1973 were children unrelated to the Mountbatten family. So we can at the very least state as a fact that Mountbatten had associations with children other than his grandkids, contrary to the recollection of the Barry brothers.

    Btw, I should state that I place no credence whatever upon claims by IRA supporters that the assassination of Mountbatten was motivated by some kind of rightful justice on behalf of kids that he allegedly abused.

    If the IRA cared so much about children, they obviously would have taken precautions not to have killed the two kids who were on the same boat as he when they assassinated him.

    Post edited by Beasty on


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,419 ✭✭✭corner of hells


    Was the assassination not later than 73 , I can remember it happening , 1980 or thereabouts.

    One of the dead was his grandson another a local lad and the third an elderly female.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,006 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Was apparently one of the reasons he was sent off to British occupied India. Remember that coming from a British media source too.

    Whether true or not, have no idea.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I mean the allegations were from FBI files, they had no vested interest


    How many times have you seen something come up about an abuser and people say "well he was always nice to me". Just because it didn't happen to some people doesn't mean it didn't happen



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,955 ✭✭✭Conall Cernach


    He was killed in 1979



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    I always thought it odd it was himself and the young boys on the boat. RIP the young boys.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 402 ✭✭Shank Williams


    I’d say a fairly good chance- those aristos seemed to be fairly into it in general.

    not a good human being regardless even if not true



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 555 ✭✭✭tmh106


    Why? What on earth was odd about it? There were other adults on the boat.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 555 ✭✭✭tmh106


    There were three children on the both. Two were Mountbatten's grandsons, their parents were also on the boat. How can you consider them 'not family'? The third child was local boy who got a summer job crewing on the boat. Not family, for sure. But hardly odd that a child would get a summer job helping out as crew on the boat.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    It would if the skipper is a royal, IRA target. Anyway, seems he may have been fond of children.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,419 ✭✭✭corner of hells


    Would it not be worth reading up on who was actually on the boat ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,716 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    It seems you haven't a clue what you're talking about.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,947 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    My 2 cents

    read a number of books where Mountbatten featured either minor or majorly in them

    that lownie book stands out as it makes various accusations

    my gut feeling is Lownie sensationalised to get attention.



  • Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You'd wonder why security detail of what was an open secret paedophile royal was withdrawn as next generation of royals being born,when he was visiting Ireland in middle of troubles


    Prince Andrew may avoid boats and small planes for foreseeable future🧐



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,106 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    What happened on August 27th 1979 is generally known and the information is available widely online from many sources.

    The question asked about Mountbatten in the OP is another story.

    You will find many conflicting opinions and little hard evidence one way or the other.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,716 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    Then perhaps wait until you have informed yourself before making statements.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    I come in here to discuss things not post my thesis.

    Maybe chill the **** out?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,018 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Additionally, we know not everyone under 18 in Mountbatten's circle were grandkids or in any way related, given that two of the people assassinated on his boat in 1973 were children unrelated to the Mountbatten family. So we can at the very least state as a fact that Mountbatten had associations with children other than his grandkids, contrary to the recollection of the Barry brothers.

    Being associated with children or being around children does not mean you are a paedophile. Is there any actual evidence of such, like scores of victims coming out after the fact?


    Btw, I should state that I place no credence whatever upon claims by IRA supporters that the assassination of Mountbatten was motivated by some kind of rightful justice on behalf of kids that he allegedly abused.

    That would be ironic, given the PIRA of the day murdered more children than Jimmy Saville abused.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,018 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Em, his daughter (who was 55 at the time) was there with her husband (who was 54) and his elderly mother (who was 83). So he was not thereby 'himself'.

    Unless they were part of some paedo ring, QANON style? Maybe that's it!?*


    *God, some people go to any lengths to spout nonsense and untruths.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,018 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    It seemed odd to me. They weren't family. Wondered why they were there.

    Do you mean his daughter, his son-in-law and his wife-in-law, are not family?

    Are you hitting the pints early BB?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,018 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    The truest statement in this thread to be fair.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,022 ✭✭✭skallywag


    It was 1979, the same day as the Warrenpoint ambush.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Wasn't it the FBI who said Mountbatten was suspected of being a paedophile



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,123 ✭✭✭Trigger Happy


    He is entitled to the assumption of innocence unless there is factual, witness testified, evidence that he was an abuser of kids.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,559 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    Marko is exercised anyway



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    You'd want to lay off the qanon and the caffeine horse.

    There were kids on the boat. You're fond of the aul' making things up.

    Was a time you could discuss things with out people hovering looking to have a go. All I said was I found it odd there were kids on the boat. I have been told some where his grandkids. I'm not sure what has you so uppity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,419 ✭✭✭corner of hells


    I can vaguely remember it happening along with Warrenpoint, I was a young kid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 892 ✭✭✭mazdamiatamx5


    Mea culpa, for some reason, I thought the kids on the boat were not related to Mountbatten but in fact two of them were his grandkids. I don't think the fact a boy not related to him was on the boat was necessarily suspicious in itself.

    The fact that long before his assassination, FBI records apparently implicated Mountbatten in having inappropriate relations with boys is certainly odd.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 892 ✭✭✭mazdamiatamx5


    Kevin Myers wrote a very critical piece about Mountbatten.

    I cannot say if all the allegations Myers makes are true, but I would give it credibility as Myers is in general pro-British establishment and very critical of the IRA and Irish republicanism. He describes Mountbatten as 'a vile psycho killed by thugs'.

    https://www.independent.ie/opinion/columnists/kevin-myers/kevin-myers-mountbatten-a-vile-psycho-killed-by-thugs-26788852.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,309 ✭✭✭evolvingtipperary101


    This is a letter by a man who has worked on the subject for a long time..

    Dear Sir,

    It is natural and admirable that John Barry should seek to defend Lord Mountbatten, who employed him, his mother and brother but, just because Mountbatten’s ‘family, friends, staff and local staff’ saw no paedophile activity, it does not mean that it did not happen. By its very nature such proclivities are kept private. In fact my research shows that only one member of staff was well aware what was happening but chose to remain silent.

    If he reads my book ‘The Mountbattens: Their Lives and Loves’, rather than dismiss my findings as “implausible fictional claims” , he will see I have produced extensive evidence to back up my claims of Mountbatten’s paedophilia.

    Stories about Mountbatten’s proclivities have circulated in the media for over forty years including accounts in Private Eye and the International Times where the newspaper proprietor Cecil King described Mountbatten as a “sexual pervert”. There was also a report in Now Magazine in 1990 where the Northern Ireland author Robin Bryans claimed that “leading British establishment figures were in a vice ring which abused boys from the notorious Kincora Home in East Belfast” and named Mountbatten as one of them. It also reported that Mountbatten “was particularly attracted to boys in their early teens”. Bryans in private correspondence, which I have seen, wrote that “Kincora and Portora Boys’ Schools were used as homosexual brothels by many prominent figures, including Lord Mountbatten”. Joseph de Burca in Village Magazine has written extensively about Mountbatten’s paedophile networks.

    In my book I reproduce FBI files going back to 1944 with interviews with people in Mountbatten’s circle . One, the American writer and society figure, Baroness Decies, when interviewed on another matter reported ‘that Lord Louis Mountbatten was known to be a homosexual with a perversion for young boys’. Interestingly I was told that other FBI files I had requested under Freedom of Information legislation had been destroyed – after I requested them.

    Mountbatten’s wartime driver Norman Nield is on record saying he “was ordered to take young boys who had been procured for the admiral to his official residence in Lord Mountbatten’s Humber car” . According to Nield, Mountbatten, known as LL, used brandy and lemonade to help seduce the boys, who ranged in age from 8 to 12.

    I interviewed two boys who said they were abused by Mountbatten. Knowing of the controversy their testimony would generate, I was particularly keen to ensure what they said was true. Everything I could check was found to be accurate but clearly these were recollections over forty years after the event. One boy was abused in Classiebawn’s boathouse, away from the house, another in a local hotel where before the days of cctv it was very easy for a visitor to nip briefly upstairs. I have never suggested that boys stayed at Classiebawn castle itself let alone overnight.

    Contrary to claims, one has gone public with his claims and has brought legal action which is almost concluded. I am hoping he will shortly appear in a television programme on Mountbatten.

    Likewise my interviewee had agreed to participate in the HIA Inquiry but the Inquiry served several hundred pages of information on his solicitors just before the weekend prior to his appearance at the Inquiry. His solicitors rightly told the Inquiry that, in the time allowed, it was impossible for them to read and study all the documents, let alone advise him properly. 

     In ‘The Mountbattens’,  I reveal that Mountbatten was probably himself abused as a teenager by a bachelor clergyman Frederick Lawrence Long who acted as a private tutor.

    On legal advice, some material was removed from my book , referring to Mountbatten’s paedophilia and murder, which further supported my paedophilia claims. I hope at some stage that material can be restored.

    Various people have contacted me since my book was published last year providing fresh evidence of Mountbatten’s activities and I also hope to incorporate that testimony in future editions.

    One has to ask why so many files from Kincora still remain closed after all this time, why files scheduled for release several years ago are still held by government departments and were not supplied to the relevant abuse inquiries and why the Garda have refused to supply the car logs for Classiebawn for August 1977 when the boys were abused. Why not? What is there to hide?

    Many files on Mountbatten’s murder remain closed forty years later and questions remain. Why was his security reduced in 1979 and his boat no longer watched when it was known there was an enhanced threat that year and there had been recent attempts on his life, including an attempt to place a bomb on Shadow V? Why was the bodyguard Graham Yuill’s security audit warning of threats in July 1979 ignored and he quickly reposted to Hong Kong? Might it be possible, for whatever reason, that Mountbatten did not want too much security?

    For years friends, family and staff claimed Mountbatten was not bisexual. My book, drawing on dozens of sources, shows that was not true. I fear the same campaign by supporters is being mounted again on another issue trying to smear Mountbatten’s two brave victims with the Carl Beech brush. I have always dismissed Beech as either a complete fantasist or someone who received a large amount of money to invent his absurd stories to discredit genuine survivors of sex abuse. It is now well known that Beech had massive funds available to him, far more than he could have earned or saved.

    I am a Cambridge-trained historian who follows the evidence and stand by what I have written.

    Yours sincerely,

    Dr Andrew Lownie



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭Andrea B.


    We will probably find out he was in Apache Pizza in Kiltimagh on any alleged dates.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,419 ✭✭✭corner of hells


    Kevin Myers has made a career out of writing controversial articles , managing to get accused of both misogyny and antisemitism to the point he had to apologise and can no longer writarlue for a couple of newspapers.

    He could have similarly written military critiques on Market Garden , the Warsaw Uprising , the Dresden Firsetorm etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,001 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Mountbatten was a known child abuser going back to the 50s.


    It's like posting a revelation about Jimmy Saville at this stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,443 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    Nah man, the difference being at least with Saville he was found guilty of abusing children.

    (he wasn’t, that was my mistake)

    There’s nothing but gossip and rumours so far in this thread, nothing substantive, nothing credible. What IS common knowledge however, is that their political opponents liked to smear anyone with the paedo label, making it that much more difficult to determine who was, and wasn’t abusing children, and who was just trying to inflict reputational damage on their political opponents.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭brokenangel


    Edit



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,006 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,443 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    Made the same error myself. Only one kid was local/not related. Not that that stops some.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,106 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Paul Maxwell was from Enniskillen.

    He was 15 when he was killed by an IRA bomb which was placed on Mountbatten's boat.

    This is his picture in school uniform.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,419 ✭✭✭corner of hells


    To err is human, to forgive is devine

    Nobody's perfect.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,924 ✭✭✭Large bottle small glass


    It was the worst day in troubles for British for losses I think.

    Warrenpoint really showed how IRA had developed as a guerrilla force. They placed a bomb in a hay trailer and denotated it from safety across the water in Co Louth when the Army Patrol passed.

    They had realised after an incident the Army normally set up command in nearest building. In this case the castle had been rigged with explosives.

    This is what killed most of the soldiers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 984 ✭✭✭Still stihl waters 3


    A brilliant ambush, it's such a pity about the innocent lives lost that day in Warrenpoint and Mullaghmore, there's no excuse for the cowardly murders that happened that day

    Post edited by Still stihl waters 3 on


  • Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Always was suprised their wasn't more made of British paratroopers firing live rounds across the border into the state,what other country would put up with this


    Though the memorial at warrenpoint hasn't been damaged since Willie Frazier went to his eternal reward🧐



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,022 ✭✭✭skallywag


    They killed one civilian that day who they saw in the distance and assumed was responsible. I cannot remember which side of the border he was on.

    Ironically it was an English chap on holiday in the region as I recall.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,001 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    War is not a nice or clean business. The IRA in the North had about 7 of 10 it killed being involved in the State or military. Incredibly high.


    Not much comfort to the unfortunates innocents who died.


    Mountbatten and the soldiers in Warrenpoint found that their actions caught up with them. It was a great success.

    Ironically the civilian killed in Warrenpoint was an Englishman fishing. He was shot by a soldier, little did he realise that his Army had an open season policy on the natives when on duty in Ireland.


    He was standing on the shore in County Louth.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,419 ✭✭✭corner of hells


    Pretty impressive kill of the Lady Dowager Mountbatten, all of 83 years .

    Her actions definitely caught up with her.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,001 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Like I said it was not ideal, no conflict ever is, the day overall was a good one for the Irish forces.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    Nope, Saville was never convicted of abusing kids or anyone at all for that matter. He died before he could be charged as far as I can recall.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,006 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    A woman who happily lived off the wealth stolen by empire.

    Fck her.



  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement