Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Can a motoring conviction be quashed upon presentation of new evidence?

  • 11-08-2022 10:28am
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9


    Long story.

    I’m always a careful driver and always set my cruise control to 10 km/h below the speed limit. For example, 40 km/h in a 50 km/zone, 110 km/h in a 120 km/h zone.

    My car was clocked doing 55 km/h in a 50 km/h zone a while back.

    I was on an extended unpaid sabbatical with my wife and we were travelling around the mainland in her camper (she has her C licence 😎). We went from Lisbon to Helsinki and everywhere in between.

    Upon return I saw that court proceedings were issued due to an ignored FCPN (the original FCPN arrived in my absence) and court proceedings happened in absentia.

    The date of the alleged speeding offence was a date when I was still in Ireland.

    I always knew that I never speed and that 55 in a 50 zone is out of character for me. I ended with a criminal conviction now and I have to apply for a visa to enter the US (presumably for the rest of my life).

    Recently, the guilt got to my cousin who admitted borrowing my car without my permission. He told my dad (who lives at a different address and has a spare key for emergencies) that I had given him permission (which I didn’t). It turns out HE was the one caught speeding a month or so before the original FCPN arrived.

    I must’ve been at work at the time of the offence as I work very irregular and haphazard shifts and I usually walk or cycle the 2 km to work.

    Can I use this admission to quash my conviction? What if he denies saying this to me? Will I have to report my cousin for theft in order to quash the conviction? I’d be the rat of the family then.

    Cheers for reading,

    Simon.

    Post edited by L1011 on


Comments

  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,235 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    ignore - delete



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,716 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge


    Give a solicitor a few quid and see what he says. At least he's qualified and not making it up as he goes along on boards.

    He may even believe the saga.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,426 ✭✭✭McGrath5


    Sounds like one for the Special Criminal Court and don't forget Simon being a rat means you'll have to go into witness protection for the rest of your life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,267 ✭✭✭mikeecho


    A driving offence isn't considered a criminal matter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,638 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,344 ✭✭✭Thoie


    "Have you ever been arrested or convicted for a crime that resulted in serious damage to property, or serious harm to another person or government authority?"

    The ESTA eligibility question is above. If the only thing you've ever done wrong is getting a speeding fine, you can answer "no" to that question. So in that sense it's not the kind of criminal matter they're interested in for ESTA/visa purposes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,638 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    a motoring offence decided in court is a criminal conviction. The ESTA does not decide what is or isn't a criminal conviction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,344 ✭✭✭Thoie


    Yes, as I said: "it's not the kind of criminal matter they're interested in", which I suspect is what @mikeecho was alluding to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,638 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    perhaps best to let them explain what they mean.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,234 ✭✭✭✭Dial Hard




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9 damn it


    Not per se.

    Speeding is a criminal offence which attracts a conviction.

    However, if you pay the FCPN and take the points on the chin you avoid the conviction. If it reaches court, you get convicted.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,267 ✭✭✭mikeecho


    In ireland road traffic matters, are considered just that... A road traffic matter.

    Getting a parking ticket, or being caught for speeding etc, does not make someone a criminal.

    It's a conviction.. but not a criminal conviction. .. unless you kill someone


    https://vetting.garda.ie/VettingProcedure/WhatIsDisclosed


    1. Subsection (2) shall not apply to a conviction imposed on a person in respect of an offence—


    1. under the Road Traffic Acts 1961 to 2014, other than section 53 (2) of the Road Traffic Act 1961 , (Dangerous driving causing death or serious harm)




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,638 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    A conviction in court for a RTA offence is criminal conviction. Garda vetting may not disclose them but they are still criminal convictions. If the op had paid the FCPN there would have been no conviction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,184 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    It's a criminal conviction. There isn't another type. That its filtered for Garda vetting; and many of them have unlimited allowances for being considered spent (other convictions can only have one of a type spent) doesn't stop them being criminal convictions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 648 ✭✭✭MakersMark


    Setting your cruise control to 40 in a 50 zone means you're really travelling at about 35..


    That should be a fine right there!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,267 ✭✭✭mikeecho


    Tomato, Tow ma toe.

    We can split hairs on this, but if I was charged with a crime, I would employ a good solicitor in criminal law,

    If I was drunk driving, I would get a solicitor who specialises in road traffic matters.

    I'm this country. The judiciary and the gardai , don't view traffic matters as criminal offences. (Unless causing death)

    Well... That's what they taught me.


    What's your legal background?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,006 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    Who the hell uses cruise control anywhere other than a Dual Carriageway or a Motorway?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,037 ✭✭✭SteM


    Certainly not in a 50 zone! That's that the speed limiter is for surely?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,559 ✭✭✭RoboRat


    OK, let me get this straight...

    You were traveling Europe but you were back in the country when the offense took place - or you hadn't left? Therefore traveling in Europe really has nothing to do with this.

    You were at work when the offence happened, and you usually cycle/ walk to work as it's only 2km away. I assume that your cousin then lives within a reasonably close radius to you (can walk/ cycle), and the offence happened locally, otherwise, this would have been simple to challenge - I was at work when it happened and it was 150km away (or however far away it was)... I say this as I had a fixed penalty notice issued for speeding in Dundalk but I was at work in Dublin at the time (plus I have never been to Dundalk). Turns out my reg was cloned and being used in the same make/ model car as mine. It was easy enough to prove as the colour was wrong and I had proof that I was at work.

    If the above is true, then I'm a bit perplexed as to why would your cousin go to your dad's, get your keys, go to your house, and take your car to drive it locally.

    Now getting to the key issue, does your dad live close to you? For this to be plausible, your dad and cousin must live close to your residence. I'm asking because how does the cousin get to your dad's house, then to your house, if you don't live close to each other?

    You say you work irregular and haphazard shifts, so your cousin knew when you're out as it's hard to predict when you would be home if you live 2km away from work, and don't work regular times.

    Regarding missing the FPN, well if you can prove you were out of the country for a sustained period, then that should be simple to resolve.

    Finally, I have never heard of someone being issued a FPN for being 5km over the limit. Speedometers are often inaccurate and as far as I know, you have to be given leeway for speeding due to speed camera calibration, road gradients etc. I think this may be 10%, but I am open to correction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9 damn it


    It’s all in the OP. Is English your first language? How did you find reading comprehensions in school? They must’ve been hard for you.

    My cousin took my keys without my knowledge when I was at work.

    Over a month later when I was travelling the FCPN arrived and thus went “ignored” for that time.

    My dad and cousin and most of my family all live in a 2 km radius (my dad’s side of the family). How is this part relevant though?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9 damn it


    @RoboRat


    You’re right about the over reading of the speedo, but you’re right for the wrong reasons.

    Again, you have a piss poor understanding of how it works. A FCPN for 55 in 50 zone is entirely plausible.

    55 on the FCPN would be 60ish on the speedometer, so we’ll deserved. The over reading of the speedo has no bearing on what’s on the Garda camera.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9 damn it


    Why? 50 is a target.

    Fined for what specifically?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9 damn it


    The limit is 50 km/h on the approach to Drumcondra. Using adaptive cruise control allows you to watch your surroundings whilst stopping the car reaching dangerous speeds.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,006 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    Probably shouldn't be using cruise control in an area that is that busy

    Have a feeling this is a joke thread though given the new account that was created to make it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,897 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Shouldn't this be in the creative writing forum?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9 damn it




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,006 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    I do indeed

    I still wouldn't be using ANY cruise control in a 50 km/h area

    Imagine driving without full care in a 50 km/h zone? Braindead



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9 damn it


    Who said I’m driving without full care?


    Tell me what adaptive cruise control is then.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9 damn it




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71,184 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Ok, any last belief I had this thread was posted in good faith is gone.

    The only valid advice for the OP, if the story is real, is to consult a solicitor anyway.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 724 CMod ✭✭✭✭LIGHTNING


    @damn it your attitude in your replies is frankly poor. Drop the snark or dont reply. This thread is getting close to being locked



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement