Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Attitudes towards defilement of girls under 16 years of age in Britain.

  • 14-07-2022 1:57pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,687 ✭✭✭


    In 1975 and 1989, the late John Peel admitted to newspaper journalists that he had sex with under-age girls. Therefore, he was admitting that he had committed sexual crimes against children.

    On a separate but related matter, an inquiry into the Telford grooming scandal found that authorities thought that under-age girls who were defiled by older men were consenting to it. Obviously, like in other English towns and cities, fear of being accused of racism was a factor in the authorities' failure. Some police officers in Telford thought that the victims were 'prostitutes'.

    Regardless of perpetrators' ethnic or religious backgrounds, why would so many people who were aware of these crimes in Britain thought that girls who were sexually abused by some men were 'consenting' to sex with the perpetrators?



«134

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Because teenagers don't walk around with their date of birth written across their forehead?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    They were white, working class and English. As such, they are the last group anyone has any sympathy for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 687 ✭✭✭Subzero3


    Was Elvis cancelled yet. Didn't he marry his 14 year old lover.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,687 ✭✭✭political analyst


    Peel admitted that he believed that at least some of the girls he had sex with were under 16.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,028 ✭✭✭✭SEPT 23 1989


    The petition was started by Jack Owens, a 26-year-old from Manchester, who attended the festival and said he felt uneasy whilst in the tent.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 644 ✭✭✭TheWonderLlama


    I heard Jesus' mother was a bit on the young side as well, right? Or so we're told.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,290 ✭✭✭BruteStock




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,437 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    You really need to be in 1975 to judge , different era , there were little or no entertainers under 25 and the fans were young teens , I’m absolutely not condoning it but it was fairly wide spread a different planet to today , look how john peel could discuss it as if he had a sneaky spliff


    all the legendary 70s are paedos by today’s standards


    it’s still horrific



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 892 ✭✭✭mazdamiatamx5


    There's been a lot of talk about ant-white racism etc, some of it valid, but for me the elephant in the room is where the parents where in all of this. Is British society really so atomised?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 892 ✭✭✭mazdamiatamx5


    Er, no, it hasn't. In fact Professor Alexis Jay, who led the inquiry into the Asian grooming gangs, is now leading the UK's inquiry into Institutional Child Abuse (in relation to which most of the victims and perps were white British).

    The Asian grooming gang scandal is not racist garbage. It is true that racists seeks to make political capital out of the issue, but that's a separate point.

    As for what we let the Catholic Church get away with, we had the Ryan Commission well before the UK undertook a similar process. I'm glad they've caught up.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,016 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Now then, now then. Dear Jim, can you fix it for me to be molested...

    Joking aside I watched the recent Saville documentary and was stunned at the end of it. I was sure there must be a third episode where his litany of crimes were laid out with the evidence. There wasn't.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    They got married when she was 22, and apparently Elvis refused to have sex with her (when she wanted it) until they got married. So, they were engaged for 8 years before having sex, and she got married as an adult.



  • Posts: 18,962 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    A bit further back but Charlie Chaplin was some man for the young wans

    4 wives --

    Age at year of marriage

    17

    16 (he was 36, she was pregnant at 15, acting together since 12)

    24

    18 (he was 54)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,964 ✭✭✭growleaves


    There have been just as many abusers who were teachers as were priests so by your own standard of judgment the latter has been "debunked" as anti-clerical garbage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,763 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    It's possible they agreed to the sex at the time. It;s still not consent though, because obviously a child that age can't give legal consent; but it's not like he put a gun to the child's head (at least, not literally).

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,836 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    What was the legal situation in the UK at that time?

    Re: your use of "legal consent". An underage person may be fully capable of consenting to anything. Or they may not be capable due to their immaturity. That depends on the person. In Irish law, it is generally irrelevant (subject to some exceptions) - it is not that they necessarily cannot consent; but that a claim of consent itself can not be used as a defence to relevant charges.

    Not a huge difference in practice



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Strange one. Most of the time it's easy to tell when someone is an underage teenager.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,510 ✭✭✭batman_oh


    Post edited by batman_oh on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,412 ✭✭✭Jequ0n


    Seriously…”defilement”?

    Its not like teenagers can’t think for themselves before they make a decision.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Undoubtedly trolling, but who would thank that post?! 🤨



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,232 ✭✭✭TooTired123


    “those girls”. Indeed. I get the feeling that Ham Sandwich doesn’t really believe what happened to “those girls” was actually abuse. Or that the poor Asian men weren’t…enticed by the same girls.

    Everybody knows that only white catholic priests are paedophiles.



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    Yes, defilement. It literally means having sex with a child under the age of consent.

    Seriously your attitudes towards sex and women/girls should be raising alarm bells. Very creepy stuff that you're trying to downplay this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,763 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    16 was the age of consent. I think it was still the same crime at the time, but the penalties weren't as harsh. Public opinion wouldn't have been as outraged at the time as it is now.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,437 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    There are cases where the parents consented on their kids behalf , definitely with Steven Tyler possibly led zep



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,437 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    Another thing that has completely dated is white musicians who are totally onside with black people and write about their struggles and at that time felt it was ok to use racial terms , Pattie smith and elvis Costello are self cancelling nowadays, some white musicians who were downtrodden were even aligning their struggle with black people which one absolutely cannot do now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,437 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    Neil hamburger (anti comic legend:)) dropped this lovely one at a mr bungle gig during lock down


    knock knock

    who’s there ?

    Luke

    luke who ?

    luke up “Steven Tyler statutory rape on the internet, it’s very interesting, no seriously look it up it’s unreal “ 😂😂😂😂😂😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,503 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Bill Wyman met Mandy Smith when she was 13, and their relationship started shortly after (I mean... he was 47 - it's very disturbing).

    Elvis met Priscilla when she was 14 and he was 24/25. Unclear when their relationship started, but far from ideal either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,184 ✭✭✭riclad


    I find it strange when there's 21 year old men who have a girlfriend who is age 16, the point is a person under sixteen cannot give legal consent to any kind of sexual relationship

    Also are there men going around looking for girls who are 15 and a half just waiting till the girl is 16 before they go out with them

    It's very common in showbusiness theres loads of young female fans who are happy to talk to anyone that's famous or a celeb

    I think with the rise of twiitter social media me too, its all come out the no of young women who where being preyed upon or being sexually harassed of course life was totally different in the 80s 90s there was very little discussion of these subjects

    If you google it There's plenty of actors celebs who met their future wives when they were 16. I'm not saying it's a good thing

    Its a cliche on tik Tok and other media white singers dancers using black created songs art dances to get views



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,437 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    Ode to defilement by rod


    Stay away from my window

    Stay away from my back door, too

    Disconnect the telephone line

    Relax baby and draw that blind

    Kick off your shoes and sit right down

    Loosen off that pretty French gown

    Let me pour you a good long drink

    Ooh baby don't you hesitate 'cause

    Tonight's the night

    It's gonna be alright

    'Cause I love you girl

    Ain't nobody gonna stop us now

    Come on angel my hearts on fire

    Don't deny your man's desire

    You'd be a fool to stop this tide

    Spread your wings and let me come inside, 'cause

    Tonight's the night

    It's gonna be alright

    'Cause I love you girl

    Ain't nobody gonna stop us now

    Don't say a word my virgin child

    Just let your inhibitions run wild

    The secret is about to unfold

    Upstairs before the night's too old

    Tonight's the night

    It's gonna be alright

    'Cause I love you girl

    Ain't nobody gonna stop us now

    Mon Dieu, qu'est-ce qu'il va devenir?

    Mon amour viens, putain, embrasse-moi

    Oh, je t'adore beaucoup

    Ça veut rien donner

    Ah oui, c'est pénible, hein?

    Oh, je t'aime, je t'aime, je t'aime beacoup

    Et cette nuit, oh...

    Ah, cette nuit, oh...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,437 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    Iggy Bowie, thunders and page all seem to have the same underage girl in common



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,437 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    Ted

    I've got no inhibitions

    So keep your keys out of your ignition

    I steal a car like I got the curse

    I can't resist the old lady's purse

    Jailbait you look so good to me

    Jailbait won't you set me free

    Jailbait you look fine fine fine

    I know I've got to have you in a matter of time

    Well I don't care if you're just thirteen

    You look too good to be true

    I just know that you're probably clean

    There's one lil' thing I got do to you

    Jailbait you look so good to me

    Jailbait won't you set me free

    Jailbait you look fine fine fine

    I know I've got to have you in a matter of time

    So tell your mama that I'm back in town

    She likes us boys when it's time to get down

    She's got this craving for the underage

    I just might be your mama's brand new rage

    Jailbait you look so good to me

    Jailbait won't you set me free

    Jailbait you look fine fine fine

    I know I got to have you in a matter of time

    Honey you you you look so nice

    She's young she's tender

    Won't you please surrender

    She's so fine she's mine

    All the time, all mine mine

    It's all right baby

    It's quite all right I asked your mama

    Wait a minute officer

    Don't put those handcuffs on me

    Put them on her and I'll share her with you



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 414 ✭✭dorothylives


    I wasn't trolling. That's my opinion, nobody has to agree with that opinion. Shame my post was reported though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 432 ✭✭antfin


    Can I just clarify that, although this thread is about the UK attitudes, the age of sexual consent in Ireland is 17. Just so that it's clear.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Why would I be accusing you of trolling? All you said was "I really hope that you're trolling. Otherwise you're either lying or extremely misinformed" in response to someone who falsely stated that those child sex abuse rings were debunked (you'd think that they and their thankers might show a little empathy towards the victims). That's the comment I suspected of being trolling, not yours. No idea how yours could be deemed worthy of reporting.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,687 ✭✭✭political analyst


    I know you're not condoning it but it already was illegal in the 1970s. Why would the lack of entertainers under 25 cause people to turn a blind eye to the defilement? Being in favour of 'free love' didn't necessarily mean being in favour of letting men have sex with under-age girls.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 864 ✭✭✭Butson


    In Rochdale, which is the most infamous of all the towns where this has happened. In one instance one of the parents of a girl found out where she had been taken. Her and her friend were in a house with 6 or 7 "Asian" men. The Dad was banging and kicking down the door. A neighbour contacted the police over the racket and when they came, he told them what was happening. The police, instead of checking inside the house, arrested the Dad for breaching the peace. This was recounted in court and was also reported by the Times of London.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,687 ✭✭✭political analyst


    What was the outcome of the court case? Surely, a judge wouldn't turn a blind eye to what was done to the girl.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,687 ✭✭✭political analyst




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 864 ✭✭✭Butson


    Sure it was part of an overall massive court case against the men and also the police and social services. This was going on for years, but police were afraid to touch the subject over fears of racism. Sarah Champion, a very liberal Labour MP for the area, lost the party whip after she said there was a specific problem with men of Pakistanti heritage (a certain part of Pakistan it must be added for fairness) targeting white girls.

    https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/sara-rowbotham-sarah-champion_uk_59bbad52e4b02da0e14106d5

    They would ply them with drink and drugs and well.....I don't need to go into detail.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,687 ✭✭✭political analyst


    Just to clarify for the benefit of some readers - the age of consent in the Republic of Ireland is 17.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,510 ✭✭✭batman_oh


    I see the post has been deleted too - completely. Didn't think that was possible on the new site? The thankers were quite predictable really - they saw the word racism and jumped in



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,687 ✭✭✭political analyst


    Would the police's attitude to the crime have been any different if the white girls had been defiled by gangs of white men instead? After all, misogyny is still a common problem among policemen in England, e.g. the murder of Sarah Everard by a policeman and the Whatsapp texts that were revealed in the aftermath.

    By the way, Sarah Champion wasn't removed from Labour's parliamentary party at Westminster - she resigned from Labour's front bench - twice!

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarah_Champion



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 864 ✭✭✭Butson


    I think you should research the topic a bit.

    In short, yes it would have been different. This was going on for years, across multiple towns in the north of England. There have been court cases, documentaries, books...Also, there was a race element to this. Not to be repeated here as its disgusting.

    Do white men abuse girls? Of course they do. Is it organised on an industrial scale across multiple locations by a group who make up a small percentage of the UK population? No.

    Sometimes the truth is inconvenient.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,301 ✭✭✭Snickers Man


    Ah come on now! That's America's own Ted Nugent. You can't blame that idiot on the English.

    And, I'm sure I asked this once before to complete tumbleweed response but is there ANYONE here on this (European) side of the Atlantic who has EVER owned a Ted Nugent album? I certainly haven't, but that's because I really love good guitar playing. And Nugent is a cat-swinger.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,301 ✭✭✭Snickers Man


    Yes. But surely there is mitigation in the fact that the 18 year old he married (at the age of 54) stayed married to him for the rest of his life? 30 odd years.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yeah, Oona seemed very happy with Charles, but she lost contact with her dad, writer Eugene O'Neill (his reaction was understandable in fairness).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,040 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    This.

    People, today, judging what happened before many of them were even born, never mind sentient, are barking up a tree they have no idea about. Before the 80's, 16 was considered to be a young adult. It's only quite recently that 16 was turned into a "child".

    The late 70's and through the 80's and 90's saw numerous societal changes as to what constituted an adult, to the point where today we don't really reach adulthood until we're in our 20's. Back then, however, most people considered you an "adult" when you left school and got a job, and for a huge number of folk that was at 16, especially if you were of a working class background. It wasn't uncommon at all to be married at 16 or 17 years of age and to have knocked out a kid at 18.

    For generations and up until the latter part of the 1970's, that was the norm for a lot of people, while today we view it as something that probably shouldn't happen. My own parents left school at 16 and from that point they weren't considered "children" any more. My dad went to Liverpool and joined the army. My mother went and worked in a shop. They were married and had their first kid by 18 and all of that was considered perfectly normal for most of the 20th Century.

    Now, of course, none of the above is to be viewed as some sort of excuse for predatory behaviour by reprehensible characters. But when we are talking about those times it's always important to consider what were the norms of society in the period in question, and to not view things through the prism of what we consider to be "correct" behaviour today.

    These days we, generally, have a greater understanding of our growth and mental development and at what ages we reach certain points of that development. We understand today that at 16 years old we are still at a pretty delicate stage and that delicate stage can last until we're in our 20's. At 16 we are no longer children (16 is not a "child"), but we are not adults either and it's debatable as to what point we become "adults". There are plenty of people in their 20's who would still be harbouring the same immaturity they had in their teens and are just as susceptible to uninformed decision making.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Exactly. Most of this is social programming, and the encouragement to see teens as being children, but a hundred years ago things were far different. Teens were far more likely to be considered adults, and the social conditioning of the time prepared them for that role. In WW1 hundreds of thousands of young teens (14 year olds) fought in the war.. It was simply a different time, with different expectations regarding people.

    Applying modern standards to the past simply shows how little that person understands the way things were.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,437 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    In 1975 if you were a woman the same age as a pop/rock/tv star you were probably married with 5 kids



  • Advertisement
Advertisement