Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on [email protected] for help. Thanks :)
Hello All, This is just a friendly reminder to read the Forum Charter where you wish to post before posting in it. :)
Hi all, The AutoSave Draft feature is now disabled across the site. The decision to disable the feature was made via a poll last year. The delay in putting it in place was due to a bug/update issue. This should serve as a reminder to manually save your drafts if you wish to keep them. Thanks, The Boards Team.
Hello all! This is just a quick reminder to ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere.

Authorities' response to possibility of asymptomatic infection early in the pandemc.

  • 28-04-2022 5:06pm
    #1
    political analyst
    Registered Users Posts: 3,760 ✭✭✭ political analyst


    https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-61227709


    In London, the High Court ruled that the British government's policies on the discharging of untested patients from hospital and into care homes was unlawful.

    The government claimed that asymptomatic spread of the virus had not yet been proven. Even if that claim was true, why didn't authorities on both sides of the Irish Sea and in other countries have a policy of presuming asymptomatic infection would happen unless it was proven otherwise.

    After all, if you're not sure, why take the risk? Therefore, what the Chinese government did or didn't disclose when the Wuhan outbreak was reported by the world's press is beside the point.



Comments

  • #2
    Goldengirl
    Registered Users Posts: 7,337 ✭✭✭ Goldengirl


    Yes. We said exactly this in the start . We always presume asymptomatic infection especially in elderly.

    Wonder when this will be examined in our courts and who will be in there .

    Should be brought back from their private sector jobs to account for some of these decisions.

    Doesn't absolve the Chinese authorities though , pa . Morally.



  • #3
    political analyst
    Registered Users Posts: 3,760 ✭✭✭ political analyst


    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/118991213#Comment_118991213

    My point is that the policy on admissions to care homes at the start of the pandemic shouldn't have been dependent on what what was disclosed or not disclosed by the Chinese government - or on what was said by Dr Tedros.

    It appears that the authorities in our part of the world used a biological version of 'innocent until proven guilty' regarding the transmission of coronavirus, i.e. whether asymptomatic transmission was taking place.



Advertisement