Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Authorities' response to possibility of asymptomatic infection early in the pandemc.

  • 28-04-2022 4:06pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,685 ✭✭✭



    In London, the High Court ruled that the British government's policies on the discharging of untested patients from hospital and into care homes was unlawful.

    The government claimed that asymptomatic spread of the virus had not yet been proven. Even if that claim was true, why didn't authorities on both sides of the Irish Sea and in other countries have a policy of presuming asymptomatic infection would happen unless it was proven otherwise.

    After all, if you're not sure, why take the risk? Therefore, what the Chinese government did or didn't disclose when the Wuhan outbreak was reported by the world's press is beside the point.



Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,842 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Yes. We said exactly this in the start . We always presume asymptomatic infection especially in elderly.

    Wonder when this will be examined in our courts and who will be in there .

    Should be brought back from their private sector jobs to account for some of these decisions.

    Doesn't absolve the Chinese authorities though , pa . Morally.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,685 ✭✭✭political analyst


    My point is that the policy on admissions to care homes at the start of the pandemic shouldn't have been dependent on what what was disclosed or not disclosed by the Chinese government - or on what was said by Dr Tedros.

    It appears that the authorities in our part of the world used a biological version of 'innocent until proven guilty' regarding the transmission of coronavirus, i.e. whether asymptomatic transmission was taking place.



Advertisement