Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on [email protected] for help. Thanks :)
Hello All, This is just a friendly reminder to read the Forum Charter where you wish to post before posting in it. :)
Hi all, The AutoSave Draft feature is now disabled across the site. The decision to disable the feature was made via a poll last year. The delay in putting it in place was due to a bug/update issue. This should serve as a reminder to manually save your drafts if you wish to keep them. Thanks, The Boards Team.
Hello all! This is just a quick reminder to ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere.

State is buying half of all new homes - this has to stop!

  • 22-02-2022 11:02am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 671 ✭✭✭ Fred Cryton


    Recent figures show the State is hoovering up around half of all the new homes built last year, either directly or through housing bodies.

    No wonder it's so difficult for private buyers and renters! Banning the State from buying or leasing would instantly double the number of houmes available to buyers and renters.

    It's the State which is crowding out hard working first time buyers, not funds. The narrative in the media is completely wrong...the funds are financing the development of new homes which otherwise would not be built, while the State is taking them off the market!

    We need to get our piroirites straight here....is our top prioirty to give a new A rated house to a welfare dependent single mother, or is our priority to have that house available for hard working taxpayers to buy? There is no-one standing up for the private buyer in the face of huge govenrment intervention in the market.



«134

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 26,770 ✭✭✭✭ Wanderer78


    more state involvement in the property market is the only game in town, we ve done the fire sector approach, and it has clearly failed, spectacularly, as the main source of money in the fire sector approach is credit, and credit is hardwired to maximise returns, which in turn just leads to speculation in markets.... government debt just needs to be serviced, i.e. its less likely to lead to speculation, thus inflated prices....



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 671 ✭✭✭ Fred Cryton


    More state involvement just means less supply for private buyers and renters so how is that a good thing?



  • Registered Users Posts: 671 ✭✭✭ Fred Cryton


    Not asking anyone to move up the social classes, just asking them to work and contribute. Like they do in every other functioning country except Ireland.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 26,770 ✭✭✭✭ Wanderer78


    funnily enough, more state involvement generally means a far more stable property market, as it limits speculation in those markets, as what has occurred here and in many other countries, by primarily prompting the fire sectors to dictate and dominate the markets, Singapore is a perfect example of having very strong state involvement, and a far more stable market

    ...so theres no lower/welfare classes in other countries???



  • Registered Users Posts: 26,770 ✭✭✭✭ Wanderer78


    .....different times, property price inflation has been astronomical in those decades, and modern political and economic ideologies have significantly curtailed states in building, but we must push back on these beliefs now, in order to get the job done



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,128 ✭✭✭ Fattybojangles


    Except of course it's not free Anto and Tracy pay rent.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,128 ✭✭✭ Fattybojangles


    Ah sure God love them they're saints really they're only charging 2k a month plus to rent shoebox apartments out of the goodness of their hearts really.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,964 ✭✭✭ paul71


    So what they are part of the solution if they were not there those apartments would not have been built at all, because developers cannot afford to build enough. The REITS are the only ones providing the capital to build.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,750 ✭✭✭ LillySV


    And the usual reply from someone who probably pays into a fund so must know it all… foreign investors pay frig all nothing on their returns, buy up full estates in many instances, resulting in less available houses for the ordinary folk who then have to rent and pay these same Assholes over the odds figures in rent … rents are kept high as no competition… afew landlords control most of the housing

    but don’t just take my word

    https://www.rte.ie/brainstorm/2021/0513/1221319-ireland-housing-property-reits-tax-investment-funds/



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,599 ✭✭✭ whippet


    This post shows that you actually haven't a clue about what you are talking about.

    But if it lets you let of steam ....



  • Registered Users Posts: 182 ✭✭ Ahherelads2022


    Depends if they are on welfare and not working the rent they pay comes from jobseekers Which the state pay. Ie the tax payer.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,128 ✭✭✭ Fattybojangles


    Yes that's true but those are a minority the vast majority of people in social housing work and pay rent as a % of their income. Also what do you suggest we do with those people let their children starve because their parents are lazy cnuts?



  • Advertisement
Advertisement