Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Autumn Series ‘21 - Ire v NZ 13thNov Kickoff:3:15PM TV:RTÉ2/C4 Radio:RTÉ1 Streaming:RTÉPlayer/All4

1252627282931»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,808 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Great to watch it from the NZ perspective




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,375 ✭✭✭ersatz


    -If we had beaten South Africa, I don't think it would be any smaller of an achievement. Yet people wouldn't be celebrating as much.

    We've beaten SA with some regularity but it's only now become a habit with NZ. And the result is pleasing but the manner in which we dismantled them and attacked made the game exciting. I wouldn't be planning outfits for the world cup final, or even a 6N decider just yet tho.

    The Irish forwards played exceptionally in the loose but the scrum was one area where NZ stayed in touch and edged it a lot of the time. And i think NZ are always 'tired' on these tours, but this year there is something to it. Dane Coles (I think) played an hour in the first Aurora game ten months ago. Throw in Covid bubbles and isolation and thats a long season. Was our new front row, that seems like it's really clicking, a bit underpowered?

    The short passing game with multiple runners and angles worked to get us territory inside their half and we left a few tries out there (Kelleher won't have enjoyed rewatching Furlong's disallowed effort). Doris's line break is the kind of score you want those tactics to produce but there's still a lot of room to improve the attack. They were mixing it up inside the 22 and on the line, looking more quickly for longer passes off the base and I'm sure Catt and POC are looking for ways to sharpen it up. This area will get better and better.

    Anyway, if we can build on it for Argentina and rotate some of the team, this Autumn have been a tidy bit of work for Farrell.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    Was our new front row, that seems like it's really clicking, a bit underpowered?

    It would be very hard to assess that off one game. Nothing we have seen so far would suggest that they are underpowered. One team getting a scrum advantage in a single game could be down to a lot of things. Including the referees interpretations. The advantage at scrum time is usually a tactical one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 547 ✭✭✭Blue4u


    Watch Furlong at every scrum, he was pointing to the ref and to the assistant ref constantly that the nZ front row was doing something, I am no expert but a lot of messing was going on. One thing I wouldn't have called them is underpowered.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    With Porter just switching to lh, I wouldn't expect dominance! The results of the switch have been great so far. He will probably improve with game time. This front row could be world class.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,779 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Moody was boring in a few times anyway. Nothing every other LH wouldn’t do, but it probably should have been pinged.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,270 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Thought Porter had the nudge in general. Hard to guage from the tv, but the NZ TH was stretched out flat on the deck a good few times.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,286 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    I missed this the first time but what is this rule that if a substitution is tactical the replacement can't kick the penalty?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    The sub came on after the penalty was blown for. So it’s my understanding, that if the sub was for a HIA, he could kick the pen, but if a regular tactical sub, he couldn’t. (I think, at least).



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,286 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Does that only apply to the first kick/touch after coming on?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,825 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Someone on the pitch when the penalty is awarded has to kick it basically. There is an exception for someone has gone off for an HIA or blood.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 547 ✭✭✭Blue4u


    Yeah totally missed that, NZ coverage has a lot better audio fo the ref. I thought at the time Fogarty said somethign tothe NZ captain to wind him uop....interesting



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 547 ✭✭✭Blue4u


    That was a bit of a lie by Ireland, no way was he going off for a HIA



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,825 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    He was going off for a HIA and if he wasn't its more than a bit of a lie, it would be terrible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 547 ✭✭✭Blue4u


    I would swear both RTE and NZ tv said the same thing at the end about Low having the first say and the last say......



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,280 ✭✭✭Ardillaun




  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,286 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    I don't think it was either a HIA or a tactical substitution. I think he went off because his leg was injured. Some of these rules are completely stupid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,048 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    I can't find any reference of this rule. There's an rfu regulation but it's not applicable here. As far as I know if the ref allows a sub then they can kick.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,825 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Indeed you are correct. There is an element of clarification here:

    https://www.world.rugby/the-game/laws/clarification/2021/1/

    Ultimately, it is not standard practice to allow replacements between a penalty being awarded and the kick, but in the case of blood or HIA the referee has no choice.



  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 9,209 ✭✭✭fitz


    It's a completely ridiculous rule imo. Say your kicker is injured by the table you were awarded the penalty for and has to go off...that his replacement can't take the penalty is rewarding the offending team imo. The only reason I can think for it is so there won't be time taken up by the subbing on top of getting ready to take the penalty. But really, how frequently is it going to happen? Is it really going to delay that many games that frequently? One of those rules that feels like a solution of search of a problem.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    It’s a direct response to actions of some teams in games. Can’t remember the game but France did something very similar to get a distance kicker on the field a few years ago. It’s to stop teams getting a tactical advantage by bringing on specialist kicker to win a close game.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 44,316 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Iirc they actually had a rule at one stage where the temporary replacement WASN'T allowed to take a kick at goal



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,779 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Sexton had a nasty head clash with Savea and the docs were on to look at him after it. They def weren’t looking at his knee at the time. I reckon he was off for a HIA.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 882 ✭✭✭Lsdrugbyfan


    potentially best front row ever...

    Furlong already best ever irish tighthead... wait and see how Porter/Kelleher go.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,544 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    I've watched match back again(x4!!) And also read Sextons quotes and I'm pretty sure they made the wrong calls on 2 of them.

    “In hindsight maybe the first penalty, I wanted to take three (points), but they just got a sin bin and the pack wanted to have a go. Then they were accumulating penalties so we sort of said, ‘well, let’s go again’.

    The 1st pen (12min) after the Taylor YC was a no brainier. You have a full 10mins to capitalise and wear them down. Plus Taylor is always a threat at breakdown. I don't know why Sexton was thinking 3.

    The 2nd pen (23min) was bad judgement and game management. Very kickable pen after a great penalty from a scrum. Mo'unga had come on 21min. Then Taylor came back on plus Blackadder. So that was 3 fresh players that came on after a big Irish effort at scrum.

    The 3rd pen (39min) is up for debate - Fatigue v 3 points. But Havili had also just come on. So NZ actually had 4 fresher players on the pitch. It was a very kickable pen. I would always take the points going into HT. Particularly if you are trailing by 5.

    The only thing i can think of is that Sexton himself didn't fancy his chances kicking the points. He was 1 for 3 in the game. The second miss after Kelleher's try was very unlike him (although, same spot as 2013). In his defense he was probably injured.

    Btw when Sexton went off it was from his third head clash in the game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    The conversion misses were not easy kicks. Maybe Sexton had a niggle? He was great v Japan. I always think if the 3 points is better than going into the corner. Keeping the scoreboard moving puts pressure on the other team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,375 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Yeah, that was a brutal collision and Savea was rattled for a few minutes too. Surprising that both of them weren't referred for HIA by the match officials but Sexton was certainly affected, regardless of his other injury, and he defo should have had a HIA.



Advertisement