Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Where did all the power go?

Options
124

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 6,189 ✭✭✭Ubbquittious


    Also if they ever decide to go nuclear they better take on the contractor that is furthest away from Ireland if they want it finished in a reasonable time. Don't bother hiring anyone from close by, they'll waste too much time checking for leaks



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,332 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Cost kills nuclear. Forget the environment or other arguments against


    On a purely business cost analysis Nuclear is a dead duck.


    All current nuclear plants should be kept open.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,332 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Money no object, pay it back on the never ever. Don't mind the costs.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,717 ✭✭✭YFlyer




  • Registered Users Posts: 6,189 ✭✭✭Ubbquittious


    Only with strict electricity rationing for plebs or massive imports through interconnectors.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 9,717 ✭✭✭YFlyer


    Was there not using Turlough Hill and Silvermines Mountain along with electric vehicle batteries for excess electricity?



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,189 ✭✭✭Ubbquittious


    Silvermines won't be enough and I doubt you'll find loads of people wanting to shorten the life of their expensive EV battery for the public good. Maybe if new battery technology arrives that isn't limited to a few 1000 recharge cycles.



  • Registered Users Posts: 9,717 ✭✭✭YFlyer


    Thanks. I think we are not fully utilising our potential.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,111 ✭✭✭Ger Roe



    I totally agree.

    There was some government sub minister on the radio recently talking about this ... sounding like he had just learnt that we had basically decided to let other countries supply our energy needs through lack of investment and planning for our own circumstances. He was taking about having to be more self sufficient... as though it was a new revelation and he and other previous governments had nothing to do with the policies and total lack of foresight that brought us to this point.

    We haven't a hope of providing energy for ourselves, or cutting carbon emissions either, when the only tactic politically promoted is to punish the consumer for using the inefficient energy options that we have been left with. We are a small island that could be a world leader in these aspects, but because our political leaders have no clue and no view beyond a four to five year election cycle ... we are officially and self admittedly, laggards.

    The world is entering very challenging times, any country that relies heavily on another to provide key energy resources is putting itself at risk. When the energy and environment situation worsens, it will be every country for itself and suppliers won't be shy in restricting supply to little ole Ireland, or hiking prices.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,189 ✭✭✭Ubbquittious


    6,303MW yesterday

    Few frosty nights in December and that record will be exceeded



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    yeh it jumped really quickly after the hour went back.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 90,816 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    How far ? Korea had to shut down half their reactors over a fake parts scandal. Japan nearly lost two other reactors during the tsunami. A reactor made of Chinesium ? with their health and safety record ?


    The mantra from the nuclear power industry is "this time it'll be different" when the previous fúckups get mentioned. All you have to do is look at the UK's project to have six nuclear power plants up and running before they phase out the current ones. It's kinda important since by 2030, all but one of Britain’s 15 currently operational nuclear facilities are to be taken offline, equating to a 35% reduction in the country’s total power.

    Hinkley Point C - delays and insane cost overruns AND a guaranteed 35 year index linked market for it's power which is twice the wholesale market price. (Lifetime cost ~ £100Bn)

    Sizewell C - no permissions

    Bradwell B - no costs, no permissions

    Moorside (ye olde Calder Hall/Sellafield/Windscale site) - After negotiations to sell it to Korean firm Kepco broke down, the Japanese conglomerate Toshiba closed its UK nuclear business NuGeneration Limited.

    Wylfa Newydd and Oldbury-on-Severn - Hitachi announced it was officially pulling the plug on its UK nuclear programme until further notice.


    Ten years down the road only one out of six plants is actually under construction and the original timescales and budgets have proven to be pure fantasies.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,956 ✭✭✭green daries


    Ya well put Dan ludicrous ideas to just shut down in such a short time frame



  • Posts: 3,801 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    80% renewables - exporting 13%.

    God bless a windy day.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29 grassmoon


    It's about time Ireland grew up and adopted nuclear power. It's an extremely safe, reliable and clean source of electricity. Rolls-Royce's small modular reactors would be perfect for a small country like ours. They can be built off site in the UK, transported by HGV and installed in an existing power station site. No big infrastructure planning is required. Uranium is an affordable and abundant fuel. It would give Ireland energy independence.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,431 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Brilliant idea , do you want to nip over to England and pick a couple up ?

    No need to rush they're not designed yet , let alone tested so you've about 15 to 20 years to hang around ...any plans for what you'd like to do in the meantime ?

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 12,616 Mod ✭✭✭✭JupiterKid


    The energy situation really seems to be a complete shambles.

    I had always been of the view that the ESB was one of the most competent State agencies in terms of delivering capacity long before it was actually needed - but now we are in a mess, largely of our own making. Maybe I missed something but when the energy sector was deregulated and opened up to competition did we take our eyes off the ball, so to speak?

    It's clear that wind power, as abundant as it is on this windy island, is simply not reliable enough to carry us over and there is little to no backup/reserve to cover any closures or power stations going offline.

    Being so dependent on the interconnector with the UK post-Brexit with dangerous imbeciles like Bojo in power is a recipe for disaster.

    I think that the potential of micro generation by households seems like a great idea. We have to really up our game in terms of energy - where is the power to recharge all those new electric cars going to come from?

    Post edited by JupiterKid on


  • Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Not a hope would i trust the clowns running this country to be honest with the public,if an accident occured at a nuclear plant.....


    we'd be left here in chernobyl mk2,while they'd have their own families to safety first



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,332 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Is paying for the most expensive option, that will take years to build being grown up now?


    Nuclear is safe enough but from an economic point of view, it's bat shi7 insane.


    Every other energy source would meet our demand at a much cheaper and faster schedule.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 14,995 Mod ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    We should be pursuing a renewables + storage policy in Ireland….


    Solar Farms should be dotted around the country. Give farmers a viable option to switch their land to Solar PV farms moving away from high carbon agri (they’d probably earn more anyway as a generator)

    Solar PV should be more accessible to every home in the country with a roof - government backed interest free loans could help this along.

    Wind - We should be installing a lot more offshore wind generation, consuming what we generate, and any excess being sold abroad or put into storage.

    Objections to offshore wind should be dealt with & rejected swiftly (you don’t have a right to that sea view) (for the record my sea view is a planned offshore wind site and I say bring it on: 1,000%)


    Tidal - while the technology is in its infancy, we should be following its development very closely.. Ireland has some very strong tidal currents. The tide comes in and out twice a day. Every day. Forever (as long as we still have a moon). You can predict it for years into the future. The tide changes direction 4 times a day, and an hour either side of that change is ‘slack water’ where the flow slows down to a stop before changing direction, but that aside there is a good 16-18 hours a day of strong steady tidal flow - harness this abs and you have a never ending supply of guaranteed predictable generation.


    Storage - in the 1960’s, the ESB built Turlough Hill, a highly advanced storage facility that uses water as its energy source (when demand is low and you have excess, pump the water up the hill (charge the battery), and when demand is high, drain the water back down the hill through generators (drain the battery)). Battery technology is also rapidly advancing. So install huge battery banks that charge up when there is lots of excess Solar/wind being generated, only to use it later when system demand is greater than renewables supply.


    of course we’ll always need some local fossil fuel back-up, but if you’re using it sparingly, only when needed, emissions remain low.


    then as a final backup, we have the inter connectors.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,111 ✭✭✭Ger Roe


    JupiterKid:

    "Maybe I missed something but when the energy sector was deregulated and opened up to competition did we take our eyes off the ball, so to speak?"

    Yes... this exactly. The Irish electrictity network was established as a state service ... commercial operators would not have touched it, even if they existed at the time, and so it was a national project - world leading. Then we were pushed through EU policy to open up to commercial operation so as to encourage competition that never happens in our effectively insulated and isolated economy. Commercial company operation is to do the least possible for the maximum amount of profitable return - we should never have agreed to give up some of our sate operated services to commercial enterprises, where they now have to be persuaded (through subsidy) or forced (through penalty that is then passed on to the consumer) to provide services that would have been state obligations previously.

    The large scale economic principles of competition in the larger European mainland or world economies, do not work here. We have a country with a population of a medium sized city in other parts of the world. We need to think more like managing a city and stop trying to adopt large country or continent scaled economic policies for our small damp rock on the outskirts of civilisation.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭RandomViewer


    If you drive through the North you'll see wind turbines at any middle sized farmyard, why didn't the ESB push that in the South



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 14,995 Mod ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    I remember reading/hearing a few years ago about a new wind farm that was built down the country, and they were located 900m from the nearest HV lines they’d need to feed into the grid, and they were waiting for ESB networks to do the final connection for them, but they’d been waiting for something like a year, and still had no idea when they’d eventually be connected up to start generating revenue for their investors……


    so when the private sector is up against such circumstances, it’s understandable why there’s little to no appetite to invest in Ireland.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Everything you mention is being done now or is underway with the exception of tidal.

    Don't get me wrong, I love the idea of tidal, but the 3 problems it has are

    1. Anything with moving parts, in seawater, does not last long and has horrendous maintenance costs
    2. If you want a strong current, you are very VERY limited in the locations you can set it up
    3. If you settle for weaker currents you can't generate enough power to make it viable

    Truly I hope someone cracks the tidal nut because on paper it looks amazing, but putting it into practice is the struggle



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Are you really trying to argue that we were be terr off with a monopoly? Seriously?

    Not sure how old you are but I recall well, plenty of power cuts when I was a child. The situation is a million times better now than before



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,111 ✭✭✭Ger Roe


    I am old enough to have been there too - plenty of power cuts alright, but all due to labour disputes as was rife throughout every industry at the time. Labour relations procedures and employee protection has improved since then. I don't remember ever hearing about potential cuts arising due to perfectly predictable demand.

    At least with a government monopoly, we know where the buck stops and can take action at the ballot box. Now with independent regulators, departmental lack of responsibility separation and EU legislation to blame, we are given the responsibility runaround whenever hard questions have to be asked.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    we are given the responsibility runaround whenever hard questions have to be asked.

    In the case of electricity in Ireland, can you give an example, curious to see who is giving who the runaround



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,991 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    ireland has grown up by not adopting a disproportionately expensive, disproportionately subsidized power generation solution that is expensive to the consumer and the tax payer.

    the small reactors are only still in development so it's a very long time before they will be viable.

    renewables, and gas with scrubbed emissions will do the same job at a fraction of the cost of currently available and proven nuclear solutions.

    it just would not pass a BCR.

    ticking a box on a form does not make you of a religion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 29 grassmoon


    They'll be available from 2030 onwards. Planning should start now. Continue expanding renewables and replace coal/oil/peat with natural gas in the meantime.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 29 grassmoon


    This is just hysterical ignorance. The chance of an accident is extremely low, especially with current and future generation reactors. The Chernobyl accident was caused by gross human incompetence. Even then it would have been prevented with either a containment building or using water as a moderator. Both of these features are present in every other reactor design on the planet. A Chernobyl type accident is impossible now. The containment building at Fukushima did its job as it survived an earthquake, tsunami and a hydrogen explosion. The radiation release was minimal and controlled.



Advertisement