Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

What do ye cyclists think of this case?

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,171 ✭✭✭Rechuchote


    People tend to assume "Well, the victim could bring the driver to court". This isn't always so. People from outside Ireland and people with very little money will probably not do this. No one should assume they will, especially a judge in a criminal prosecution.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,862 ✭✭✭Large bottle small glass


    Have you any evidence for this suggestion?

    If you look at any of the personal injury lists on courts.ie, non traditional Irish surnames aren't exactly scarce.

    A plaintiff being poor and not a mark can be a very significant advantage in negotiations with a Defendant.

    A lot of immigrant populations in any given location will typically use the same lawyer and there will often be a translator (effectively an agent) being the contact point between lawyer and community.

    Plaintiff lawyers would eat each other alive to act for clients like the victim in this matter



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,171 ✭✭✭Rechuchote


    I hope you're right, Large Bottle Small Glass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,210 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    It is actually usually an easier decision for a poor person to make to bring a civil action (assuming they get granted legal aid) than it would be if they had money.



  • Posts: 13,688 ✭✭✭✭ Lennox Jolly Dart


    What would re-sitting a test do?

    Everyone here has done their driving test and then left the test centre and ignored everything they did 15 minutes beforehand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,210 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Sure what would any punishment do? It's just a deterrent to others that there are consequences to not obeying the rules

    Post edited by Donald Trump on


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    What would re-sitting a test do?

    act as a deterrent? assuming you're ordered to resit your test, you're (in theory) not allowed drive on your own till you do. that would be more onerous than the test itself.



  • Posts: 1,010 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    "He took into account in mitigation that she had no relevant criminal record,"

    So she has a criminal record then before this incident!!! Would be nice if the journalists dug up her record and published it. Did she provide evidential samples for drug and alcohol testing?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 891 ✭✭✭sy_flembeck


    The word relevant stood out like a sore thumb for me too - clearly she has a record. That used to mean something in subsequent court cases!


    Testing is mandatory these days in a RTC



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,171 ✭✭✭Rechuchote


    Not necessarily at all - the judge is using legalistic language from which I suspect ye're taking an incorrect inference.



Advertisement