Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on [email protected] for help. Thanks :)
Private profiles - please note that profiles marked as private will soon be public. This will facilitate moderation so mods can view users' warning histories. All of your posts across the site will appear on your profile page (including PI, RI). Groups posts will remain private except to users who have access to the same Groups as you. Thread here
Some important site news, please read here. Thanks!

Skoda Superb Combi - choose Age vs Miles

  • 06-08-2021 2:24pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 7,402 ✭✭✭ Gregor Samsa
    Registered User


    Trying to decide between these two 2.0 D Superb estates. Spec wise they’re pretty much equivalent, and both have all the stuff I want. So it’s really down to the individual cars. The difference is the age, mileage and price (although both are within my budget).

    Option A: 2015 (mk ii), 162,000 km, €15,950

    or

    Option B: 2017 (mk iii), 216,137 km, €18,950


    So option B gives a 2 year benefit (with a model revision), but a 54,000 km deficit, and a 3 grand difference.

    Assuming both run well and have no issues, which one to go with?



Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 4,070 ✭✭✭ Stallingrad
    Registered User


    I really wouldn't get hung up on the mileage difference between the two, makes no odds really assuming they both have FSH.

    Think the real decision is whether the new model is worth the extra €3k to you? Personally I would go for the newer car as it is far more up to date inside and out than the aging, but well equipped and still very capable Mark 2.



  • Registered Users Posts: 708 ✭✭✭ 3d4life
    Registered User


    Go for the FWD unless you need a 4 X 4



  • Registered Users Posts: 72,782 ✭✭✭✭ colm_mcm
    Registered User


    The 2017 without a doubt.



  • Registered Users Posts: 194 ✭✭ Zylias
    Registered User


    I'd go for the 2015, the money on the 2017 is far too high for the miles. I think if you could get the 2015 for 15k you'd be doing well.


    Best of luck.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,402 ✭✭✭ Gregor Samsa
    Registered User


    Well, nobody’s budging at all on price. They know it’s a seller’s market at the moment.

    Drove them both, and I went with the 171.

    Thanks all for your input.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement