Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Civil Service - Post Lockdown - Blended Working?

1606163656693

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 170 ✭✭Shuffl_in


    You're definitely in the minority but I'm sure there are others.

    Have you asked about attending the office for more days than you currently are?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,358 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    • Start date.
    • End date.
    • Blended working location.
    • Percentage.
    • Remote days.

    It is incredibly poorly worded, but hey, PeoplePoint (sorry - NSSO). But long? Tedious? 😂

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,043 ✭✭✭✭Dodge


    From what I can see, there’s no obligation in most places now to work from home so you should be fine going forward. I’m not being dismissive here either when I say you should seek help with your mental health. Best of luck



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 802 ✭✭✭C4000


    I'd be the same. Spent a year and a half working from home and it wasn't for me. Spending an extra 45 hours a week in the house had no appeal at all. Back in the office full time for the last year....much prefer the routine and the separation of work and home.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 139 ✭✭KnicksInSix


    Are many places still without a policy? No sign of ours despite weekly emails to HR. Currently 1 mandatory office day.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40 forrest gump


    It is not the NSSO application form. But hey you keep on making assumptions. It is a local form within the department.



  • Posts: 4,575 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    By now, every department should have their policies published and be asking their staff to make official applications to WFH via NSSO. If you don't want to WFH, don't apply!

    Part of the Blended Working Framework published by DPER does allow for NOT working from home, though everyone is encouraged to do at least one day. However if it doesn't suit you, your dept should be able to facilitate you WFO full time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,583 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 357 ✭✭LegallyAbroad


    Im the same. Absolutely hate it.

    Back in office full time now a few months and it is a genuine relief.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭hardybuck


    Some of the key Departments haven't published/agreed their policies yet.

    As an aside, I've also heard of some organisations asking staff to jump through a fair few hoops to ensure the right facilities are in place at home to ensure the work station is safe etc., but at the same time offering nothing in terms of provision of necessary equipment etc. All heavily weighted in the employer's favour.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,358 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    There appears to be a spectrum, ranging from "Let's crush this. Make it impossible, or just rule it out entirely as an option," through to "We know productivity went up during lockdown - let's embrace this!" and everything in between. Most departments seem to have a fairly reasonable balance available - 2 or 3 days in office seems to be the average for those who want it - and are reasonably accommodating with setups.

    Employees also seem to be on a spectrum ranging from "Let's exploit this for all it's worth - I'd like to WFH fulltime, please, and I'll need two monitors and a new desk and oh, you'll have to pay for my broadband, too!" through to... well, just getting on with the work, without having to commute.

    It'll be interesting to see what happens with increased energy costs kicking in, effecting both the commute for those who have to drive, and the cost of heating a house during the day for those WFH for a lot of the week - maybe the whole week if a couple have different WFH days.

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭hardybuck


    A lot of sense in this post, balance is key.

    For me the writing is on the wall when a Department starts engaging with staff regarding ergonomic risk assessments for the first time about 18 months into the pandemic when they wanted people to start coming back to the office, especially when they don't do those assessments for the Departmental work spaces (at least not at an individual level anyway).

    Departments could also use more supportive language to set out that they'll work will staff to ensure that they'll work with people to try and ensure that people have the right tools to be productive and safe wherever they're working, and to ensure business needs are met and achieved. But instead you're getting asked to fill in some form and apply for something you've had for the guts of three years.

    I find the whole thing fairly deflating. I think people are starting to gravitate towards the organisations, and the managers within organisations, who are a bit more progressive.



  • Posts: 4,575 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I know, its poor form really. Ours was published in July.

    Doing a home ergonomics assessment is part of the conditions laid down by DPER - I've done mine already and it was honestly okay, mostly focused on height of laptop screen, chair and lighting conditions. It took about 20 minutes and was done Zoom with an external company.

    My dept sent around a questionnaire on home workstations at least six months ago, and offered to supply anything the employee needed, if they didn't already have suitable equipment of their own. They also put up online training videos in how to set up an ergonomic workstation. I got a new chair on foot of the questionaire, as they did not think mine was suitable. Delivered to my door, fully assembled. I already had an office laptop, and everything else was okay.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭hardybuck


    Yeah we had none of that support for equipment. A few months into the pandemic people were invited to call into work to collect the chair or screen they were using and bring it home, which was about the height of it.



  • Posts: 4,575 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    This is one of the great disparities between departments that I really don't understand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 513 ✭✭✭skidmarkoner


    Did they mention anything about standing desks I refuse to sit even when in the office. I have my setup very ergonomic for my role so hopefully it's not an issue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,358 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    Ironically, my home setup is much better, ergonomically, than my office setup. At home, I two decent widescreen monitors perpendicular to the window, a "gaming" chair (sooo comfortable!), upright mouse, webcam with privacy cover, headset with mic (all my own). In work, I've two smaller monitors with a window behind me (so sun streaming in all morning/early afternoon), ordinary mouse, webcam with no privacy cover, wired earphones with no mic, and a basic seat that's grand, like, but nowhere near as good for my back as my own one. Last job still had square monitors, like it was still the early noughties!

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,583 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    We didn't even get that offer to call into work to take stuff home, though a few people did it anyway.



  • Posts: 4,575 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Not at my assessment, as I have a regular height desk, but I don't think it would be an issue - we have some standing desks in our offices.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 513 ✭✭✭skidmarkoner


    Fingers crossed



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 522 ✭✭✭gerbilgranny


    I hated WFH. So much so that when I hit 60, I retired. I wasn't that enamored with my job anyway, but would probably have plodded on until at least 65 if we hadn't switched to WFH. I had the option to retire at 60, and even if I stayed on for years, would never have a 'gold-plated' pension that some of my other public service colleagues would have.

    And here's the worst thing - now a year after I retired, my colleagues are all still WFH. We worked partly in a call-centre setting, answering queries. But truth is, many of us didn't know the answers to the queries, and being able to lean on the experience and generosity of colleagues in an office setting was invaluable. My manager was difficult to tie-down in the office, but once we changed to WFH, it was almost impossible to get any guidance from him.

    I have never regretted retiring, even though I have a very modest income now. But I do sometimes miss the routine of getting up, commuting, leaving the building at the end of a working day (alleluia!) and travelling home in a state of exhaustion. I liked meeting and mixing with all sorts of different people too. There had been a time when I had a role in the same department that enabled me to be really good at my job - I knew what to do, and how to do it - and those years were very happy indeed.

    I can really understand how WFH could impact your mental health. I hope your situation improves soon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 64 ✭✭JoeSexton


    Not every department is using Peoplepoint/NSSO for blended working applications. Some have their own format.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,970 ✭✭✭BrianD3


    I'm hearing from people working in a few local authorities and parts of other public bodies that it's as if the great Covid WFH experiment never happened. Staff who had worked from home successfully and could have continued doing so have "returned to work". Nothing to see here, back to normality, back to printing emails for the file. Fuel prices and CO2 emissions from long commutes, shur who cares. Local jobs should be for local people. Buildings full of people typing away - looking good.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 40,005 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Pathetic. A generation of senior managers stuck in the past. Really it's they who should be asked to justify a return to traditional work practices, not the other way around. But that's local authorities for you tbh.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭hardybuck


    Probably a cohort or generation of staff who are conditioned to accept that sort of approach also.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 338 ✭✭rostalof


    So, September is here and the blended working pilots have begun at this stage or will begin next week for most departments and offices I think. The cabinet is meeting today to discuss energy and fuel saving measures to be adopted in all publicly owned buildings. What are the chances they'll consider not needlessly forcing staff back to long daily commutes, burning large volumes of expensive and polluting petrol and diesel, when it has been proven over the last two and a half years that a lot of this work can be carried out efficiently and to a high standard at home. Personally, I have no complaints about the levels of attendance expected in my unit, but from some of the comments in this thread, it's obvious that a lot of offices and departments are forcing people back for no good reason. But I suspect the answer to my question is, slim to none.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 50 ✭✭sasco


    Our WFH policy is still in draft. It has been in draft all year. Hopefully it will be finalised soon to allow people to apply and agreed before year end. All new job specs state we are now a blended working organisation, but I'm not sure what new contracts have in place in relation to this as the policy is not finalised.



  • Site Banned Posts: 5,975 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge




  • Posts: 4,575 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'd prefer not to, sorry.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,817 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    Not in the CS, but we have a few people who prefer to be in the office. So they happily come into the Office.

    I know one person in another job who quit when they went fully remote.

    I think most people like a hybrid. With common anchor days for teams and units.

    I think many places can accommodate different working practices. But a lot will just return to the old ways.



Advertisement