Forced to work from home

floorpie

floorpie wrote: »

Nobody's saying any of those things, please read the thread properly

Few people actually read posts these days. They just see what they want to see, make stupid assumptions and respond based on their broken interpretation.

oisinog

missmelo wrote: »

Not to scare you even more or anything but I heard, simply put if you can work from home why would they pay you a proper wage when they can outsource your work to India. So many are terrified of this happening.

WFH is not making companies outsource to other countries the internet is, Its much easier to communicate now than it has ever been.

Its been happening for years many companies had started to move their core contact centers back from Aisa to Ireland and the UK.

I work for a company that outsources some of our work to India because our company lacked the skilled staff and we didnt have the skillsets in Ireland at that point. At the same time but we still have thousands of people working in Ireland.

ineedeuro

missmelo wrote: »

Not to scare you even more or anything but I heard, simply put if you can work from home why would they pay you a proper wage when they can outsource your work to India. So many are terrified of this happening.

If they could have done that it would have been done already.

WFH will actually make your job more secure because the company can reduce the overhead of having people in Ireland. Companies look at overall cost, wages, pension, laptop, rent, electricity etc etc. If office location is smaller then rent etc is reduced so the cost per head is reduced making you more competitive than a person oevrseas

Christy42

oisinog wrote: »

WFH is not making companies outsource to other countries the internet is, Its much easier to communicate now than it has ever been.

Its been happening for years many companies had started to move their core contact centers back from Aisa to Ireland and the UK.

I work for a company that outsources some of our work to India because our company lacked the skilled staff and we didnt have the skillsets in Ireland at that point. At the same time but we still have thousands of people working in Ireland.

The real question is why didn't they open office in India in the first place and do those reasons still apply. If they do there is little benefit to them exporting those jobs to India or elsewhere.

As you say it was happening before and will likely to continue whether or not I work from home. Indeed modern wfh being mentioned here is largely hybrid which is hard to do from India.

Flinty997

floorpie wrote: »

Funny, I would've assumed the same about Singapore :P


It isn't a part of the office "uniform" in cities so essentially nobody wears them. Anyone can go to Google Images and type "salarymen Japan" or "Tokyo packed train", look at results pre-Covid, and see hundreds of people crammed into small spaces with zero masks.

The norm in Japan for the non believers in the thread:

https://img.kyodonews.net/english/public/images/posts/89486604bea564646800b306b36759ef/photo_l.jpg

https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-9f83fbdd8eee1d5f222e7edf31160877.webp

Paolo has great videos on Japan

https://youtu.be/opZAkJlG3nU

Also life where I'm from

https://youtu.be/eS0ZBadNZ1I

ELM327

missmelo wrote: »

Not to scare you even more or anything but I heard, simply put if you can work from home why would they pay you a proper wage when they can outsource your work to India. So many are terrified of this happening.

Skill gap.
We've already closed some outsourcers over the past 2 years and re-inhoused the work due to poor work quality. It's not all about the bottom line.

Flinty997

missmelo wrote: »

Not to scare you even more or anything but I heard, simply put if you can work from home why would they pay you a proper wage when they can outsource your work to India. So many are terrified of this happening.

I've been hearing that for decades, and worked with outsourcing in IT for that long also. There is value in local knowledge and local business knowledge, the domain. You can certainly outsource lots of thing's. But there are pros and cons. I've seen it work but I've also seen it fail.

oisinog

Christy42 wrote: »

The real question is why didn't they open office in India in the first place and do those reasons still apply. If they do there is little benefit to them exporting those jobs to India or elsewhere.

As you say it was happening before and will likely to continue whether or not I work from home. Indeed modern wfh being mentioned here is largely hybrid which is hard to do from India.

The company has been established for many years and primarly deals in Europe. As technology moved forward when they relaised that we didn't have the skill set in this country to meet the needs of the business the scoured the word looking for this skillset and opened an office in India.

Now as Ireland has moved forward some of the big tech companies have moved here because we now have that skill set (and a tax benefit)

floorpie

Flinty997 wrote: »

Also life where I'm from

https://youtu.be/eS0ZBadNZ1I

Ah I stayed in Asakusa for some months, what a great place

Mango Joe

floorpie wrote: »

Nobody's saying any of those things, please read the thread properly

floorpie wrote: »

I'm also hearing rumours of the same thing in my place.

Will I be paid for the company's use of my facilities (room, equipment, electricity, heating etc)? Or is this essentially a permanent pay cut and worse conditions?

I'm especially annoyed that it seems like they'll mandate a day or two in office a week. So not only will the employer get free use of my rented house, but I can't even move to a low cost area of the country.

I'm very annoyed by the whole thing but it seems most people are in favour of WFH.

Eh? You were?

I think you should measure the pile depth and integrity of your carpets and charge your Company some reasonable wear and tear fee monthly for making you work from home.

Mango Joe

Deleted User wrote: »

Few people actually read posts these days. They just see what they want to see, make stupid assumptions and respond based on their broken interpretation.

I said I'd take your point at face value and read your posts on this thread.

Shocked to then discover that you have an incredible 46 posts on this very thread!!! Just you delighting in expressing your opinion on this very deep and complex topic in 46 plus exciting new ways.....


You really can't comment on the topic of 'working' from home if you spend all of your working day spamming threads with your no doubt sage thoughts and wondrous wisdom.

ineedeuro

At this stage if every company could they would already have everyone working in the lowest paid countries possible.

The fact is they can't. Loads of reasons why

floorpie

Mango Joe wrote: »

Eh? You were?

I think you should measure the pile depth and integrity of your carpets and charge your Company some reasonable wear and tear fee monthly for making you work from home.

Yes I asked if we'd be paid for our use of electricity and heating, or should we consider this a paycut. I did not say:

Its so unfair - I'd like to know when my Employer is going to come into my home and compensate me for the extra wear and tear on my toilet seat and toaster because I'm being forced to be in my own house/rented accommodation.

I listed my work equipment above, go and work out the costs for running it all for 10 hours a day at the average price of kilowatt hour if you think I'm being petty. Just my desktop PC will cost up to €600 for the year if I'm running demanding jobs. Then work out the cost of having adequate heating through winter for 10 hours a day. At an average wage you're talking about a 2-10% "pay cut" per year. Is that really a petty consideration?

Whether this is offset by not having to commute or buy lunch out is irrelevant to me, because what I eat or how I travel are not my company's business.

That's not even factoring in wear and tear on my toilet seat.

ineedeuro

floorpie wrote: »

Yes I asked if we'd be paid for our use of electricity and heating, or should we consider this a paycut. I did not say:



I listed my work equipment above, go and work out the costs for running it all for 10 hours a day at the average price of kilowatt hour if you think I'm being petty. Just my desktop PC will cost up to €600 for the year if I'm running demanding jobs. Then work out the cost of having adequate heating through winter for 10 hours a day. At an average wage you could be talking about 2-10% "pay cut" per year. Is that really a petty consideration?

Whether this is offset by my commute or buying lunch is irrelevant to me, because what I eat or how I travel are not my company's business.

That's not even factoring in wear and tear on my toilet seat.

You get tax allowance for everything you listed.

I have worked from home since 2006 and got nothing. The saving on fuel/time made up for that. Last year I got a tax allowance and this year my company have provided money toward BB. I also get a set fee every 3 months to buy home equipment for my office. I never had it so good :-)

But back to the main saving which is time and fuel for commute. Also I work in quite a fancy part of town, having lunch out each day cost a fortune:P

floorpie

ineedeuro wrote: »

You get tax allowance for everything you listed.

I looked into the tax allowance and it seems to cover 10% of costs for the above, and 30% for the cost of broadband, am I incorrect? If so that's not significant enough imo.

I have worked from home since 2006 and got nothing. The saving on fuel/time made up for that. Last year I got a tax allowance and this year my company have provided money toward BB

I also get a set fee every 3 months to buy home equipment for my office.

But back to the main saving which is time and fuel for commute. Also I work in quite a fancy part of town, having lunch out each day cost a fortune:P

It'd be different if I were electing to work from home. My issue here is that it's being demanded of people for at least 3/5 the week. Apparently we should be so grateful that we shouldn't consider the negative implications.

ineedeuro

floorpie wrote: »

I looked into the tax allowance and it seems to cover 10% of costs for the above, and 30% for the cost of broadband, am I incorrect?



It'd be different if I were electing to work from home. My issue here is that it's being demanded of people for at least 3/5 the week.

I don't know the exact number but it is something.

If you and the OP have a specific issue then go to manager/HR and explain. I am sure for specific cases they will offer a desk.
Have they offered nothing to help set up a home office?

dmigsy

floorpie wrote: »

Yes I asked if we'd be paid for our use of electricity and heating, or should we consider this a paycut. I did not say:



I listed my work equipment above, go and work out the costs for running it all for 10 hours a day at the average price of kilowatt hour if you think I'm being petty. Just my desktop PC will cost up to €600 for the year if I'm running demanding jobs. Then work out the cost of having adequate heating through winter for 10 hours a day. At an average wage you're easily talking about 2-10% "pay cut" per year. Is that really a petty consideration?

Whether this is offset by not having to commute or buy lunch out is irrelevant to me, because what I eat or how I travel are not my company's business.

That's not even factoring in wear and tear on my toilet seat.

The temperature you like to keep your house at, or the quality of your home insulation is surely also irrelevant as it's none of your companies business. So why would you include that cost in your calculations but exclude the savings of commuting costs/lunch/time? Sounds like you want to have your cake and eat it.

floorpie

dmigsy wrote: »

The temperature you like to keep your house at, or the quality of your home insulation is surely also irrelevant as it's none of your companies business. So why would you include that cost in your calculations but exclude the savings of commuting costs/lunch/time?

I'm pretty sure that the suitability of my workspace is my company's business, and that what I eat is not my company's business.

Sounds like you want to have your cake and eat it.

? I already said that I'm happy to 100% WFH or 100% work from office. Before Covid I was WFH a lot (at my discretion) and travelled a lot, so I'm used to being flexible for work. Again, my issue is that it's now being demanded without much consideration. If you don't mind the costs then that's up to you.

ineedeuro

floorpie wrote: »

I'm pretty sure that the suitability of my workspace is my company's business, and that what I eat is not my company's business.


? I already said that I'm happy to 100% WFH or 100% work from office. Before Covid I was WFH a lot (at my discretion) and travelled a lot, so I'm used to being flexible for work. Again, my issue is that it's now being demanded without much consideration. If you don't mind the costs then that's up to you.

Ok so you worked from home prior to covid and now because they asked you to work from home you have a problem with it?

I can't wait for the pubs to open

Mango Joe

Mango Joe wrote: »

I said I'd take your point at face value and read your posts on this thread.

Shocked to then discover that you have an incredible 46 posts on this very thread!!! Just you delighting in expressing your opinion on this very deep and complex topic in 46 plus exciting new ways.....


You really can't comment on the topic of 'working' from home if you spend all of your working day spamming threads with your no doubt sage thoughts and wondrous wisdom.

You actually went through this thread and counted each individual post I made.

Let's pause to consider that for a moment.

irelandrover

Deleted User wrote: »

You actually went through this thread and counted each individual post I made.

Let's pause to consider that for a moment.

You can easily see the amount of posts by everyone who contributed to the thread. Just click the posts number on the forum page

ineedeuro

irelandrover wrote: »

You can easily see the amount of posts by everyone who contributed to the thread. Just click the posts number on the forum page

and why would you need to do that?

irelandrover

ineedeuro wrote: »

and why would you need to do that?

To see who contributed the most to the thread? Does it matter why you would want to? Its very easy to see how many posts a contributor has without counting them individually.

floorpie

ineedeuro wrote: »

Ok so you worked from home prior to covid and now because they asked you to work from home you have a problem with it?

Yeah? What's so confusing about this

For example, if I'm 100% WFH I can move wherever I please to suit. If I have a permanent desk in my office I can keep the bulk of my work equipment there and visit the office as needed.

Conversely, if I have no permanent desk in work and also have to come in 2 days a week, I must live somewhere with space for a desk at home, keep my equipment at home, run my equipment at home, and must live within a reasonable distance of the office.

You get the difference? One is at my discretion and I can arrange everything to suit, the other is demanded in order to subsidise a company's office expenditure.

I'm surprised that this forum can see "your permanent desk is expected to be in your own home" in an OP and not have any concern

oisinog

floorpie wrote: »

I looked into the tax allowance and it seems to cover 10% of costs for the above, and 30% for the cost of broadband, am I incorrect? If so that's not significant enough imo.



It'd be different if I were electing to work from home. My issue here is that it's being demanded of people for at least 3/5 the week. Apparently we should be so grateful that we shouldn't consider the negative implications.

You talk about the extra costs but dont discuss the offsets.
How much per week have you saved on you commute to work?
How much have you saved on Coffee/Tea/Lunch?

floorpie

oisinog wrote: »

How much per week have you saved on you commute to work?
How much have you saved on Coffee/Tea/Lunch?

Irrelevant imo.

ineedeuro

ineedeuro wrote: »

and why would you need to do that?

I know. Why on earth would you care?

ineedeuro

floorpie wrote: »

Yeah? What's so confusing about this

For example, if I'm 100% WFH I can move wherever I please to suit. If I have a permanent desk in my office I can keep the bulk of my work equipment there and visit the office as needed.

Conversely, if I have no permanent desk in work and also have to come in 2 days a week, I must live somewhere with space for a desk at home, keep my equipment at home, run my equipment at home, and must live within a reasonable distance of the office.

You get the difference? One is at my discretion and I can arrange everything to suit, the other is demanded in order to subsidise a company's office expenditure.

I'm surprised that this forum can see "your permanent desk is expected to be in your own home" in an OP and not have any concern

Sorry I don't really. Anyway as I said, go ask your manager/HR. I'm sure they will be happy to give you space in the office.

oisinog

floorpie wrote: »

Irrelevant imo.

But its not when you are saying you are more or less taking a paycut.

Both myself and my wife are working from home I commuted to work by bike so I had no cost but I childcare costs.

Working from home has saved me childcare costs and also reduced my spend on food and coffee (I even bough an espresso machine for home).

Using your logic I have had a payrise as I have more money in my bank account at the end of each month.

irelandrover

ineedeuro wrote: »

Ok so you worked from home prior to covid and now because they asked you to work from home you have a problem with it?

I can't wait for the pubs to open

I dont see it as that unusual. Being able to do something and being forced to do something are very different things.

I will probably be back in the office 2 days a week when we go back. I used to be 4 days a week in the office with no WFH.

It is a change and it costs me money. I dont live in ireland so get paid 19 cents a km to commute to work, and i cycled so i had no expenses. Coffee was supplied by teh company and i bought a packed lunch most days anyway.

So now i have to pay for coffee, lose the travel money and have to heat my office.

I dont mind as i like the flexibility. BUt i can fully understand why someone would be annoyed by this.