Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Corruption in charities

1457910

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,440 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko



    That's one of these 'all politicians are corrupt' populist claims that it's very easy to make but very hard to prove. Name five charities where "the only major beneficiaries are the trustees/management of the charity". BTW, it is illegal for any charity trustee/director to be paid for their work.


    And the many frauds in private sector businesses that Google will report are the tip of the iceberg. Normally, when something like this is discovered in a private business, it gets hushed up very quickly, to protect the business. Somebody 'resigns' suddenly, somebody's manager gets moved to a less attractive spot, the business swallows the loss and makes sure that clients don't hear about it.

    With charities, in the present day, it gets reported - a tiny number of chases for the number of charities in existing - but we all throw our eyes up to heaven and say 'all charities blah blah blah....'.

    Have you actually tried getting charitable status in the last five years? Have you seen the reporting requirements involved?

    Does it baffle you why we have multiple butchers shops and multiple engineering contractors and multiple vets? To amalgamate them all would mean the end of empire building, surely?

    Keating is a twat, and I wasn't enamoured by that particular charity. I did have a good look at their annual report a few years back, and there was no sign that anyone was dipping their hand in the pot. In fact, it looked like senior people were working for very, very little.


    Again, have you any idea of the mandatory reporting requirements and governance requirements for charities since the new regulator came into being?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,427 ✭✭✭dublin49


    the Bothar con men were at it for 20 years,signing off bogus projects to beat any oversight.We don't do rigorous enforcement in this country so I expect the scandals to continue in this sector,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,440 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    So no sign of you naming just of a few of the "lot of cases where the only major beneficiaries are the trustees/management of the charity" then?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,427 ✭✭✭dublin49




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    I think I read somewhere before that 35k per year gets spent on each homeless person. A lot of that money is getting zipped off somewhere.

    There's also the well known stat that 5.5bn gets handed over from the government to charities and NGO's. Defund these for 2 years and Dublin has an underground railway or we could even host an Olympics. I'm not saying host an Olympics but that's the scale we're talking about.

    Ireland has 10,000 charities. 1 charity for every 500 people.

    This is greatest scam in our history. Perpetuated by media and meek politicians. Media are driving this. Trying to give profile to each one, knowing there could be future job potentials, politicians know there are jobs going too.

    I guarantee tomorrow or Friday, something like The Journal will have a flashy new report by a charity/NGO to publicize. Backs all scratched, everyone mates, future job potentials ticked off.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,408 ✭✭✭corner of hells


    There was duplicity in homeless services years ago when all that really existed was night shelters and drop in services .

    Individual homeless services now provide a variety of services including different types of accommodation from One Night Only services up to Long Term Supported Housing, others provide different types of addiction support from residential stabilisation up to detox.

    To give you an example , Sophia Housing provides Long Term Supported Housing but has no residential addiction treatment , MQI has residential addiction treatment but no LTSH.

    There's accommodation provided specifically for individuals diagnosed as HIV , there's support for homeless ex defence members.

    Homeless services are not all providing the same service .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,408 ✭✭✭corner of hells


    Let's start getting rid of some of the charities , Dogs Trust annoys me , they can go first , ALONE annoys me too , feckin' old people, they can go too , your turn.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    If the public were supportive of their work, they would donate to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,440 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    How many people got counselling from Pieta House last year? How many people got fed by Goal? How many days of day service did CRC provide last year? How many days of training and employment did Rehab provide last year?


    How's your "mainly for the benefit of trustees [unpaid] and management" to be measured?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,440 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    So you reckon we should cancel all the residential disability services that are funded through charities for a couple of years?

    And all the mental health services funded through St John of God and Pieta?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    I'm pretty sure Pieta house raise a lot of money themselves. Although a lot of questions have been put out about the running of the organisation in recent years. As for St John of God's, psychiatric care had aways generally been looked after through the health authorities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,427 ✭✭✭dublin49


    google will enlighten you on whether you want to support these charities ,personal choice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,440 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Both get funded through the 5.5 billion funding that you suggested that we should be cutting above. You did know what made up the 5.5 billion before you made the suggestion, didn't you? Try reading past the Grift headlines next time.

    Absolutely, personal choice, that's how charity donations work. It was good of you to produce a list of those charities that have been through the mill and either got their act together or just shut down though. It's great to see confirmation that the new governance regulations are actually working.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,996 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    We as taxpayers contribute about 750 million per annum to International Aid. Heard some anecdotal stories about some of the NGO's funded by this. And yet we have appeal after appeal from the likes of Trocaire, Goal etc. for more donations despite our existing contribution. It would be good if the International Aid Fund had an in built contingency for natural disasters like in Haiti etc. But no, just gimme more, every single time.

    I will no doubt be told that they all provide different services.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,408 ✭✭✭corner of hells




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,440 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    So just to be clear, you expect charities to start looking for charitable donations, because they make you feel a bit uncomfortable?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,996 ✭✭✭✭Spanish Eyes


    If you read my comment again, you will see that I said quite the opposite. The taxpayer funds International Aid just like in other countries that are part of the agreement. I have no issue with that. My point is that despite our existing contribution, charities like Goal, Trocaire are still hustling for money from us. Is the International Aid program not good enough, meaning certain charities want a piece of the action too. More duplication, same old, same old.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    Pieta House should not get any forced state funding. They should only rely on private and corporate donations. If the government wish to set up a Charity/NGO donation fund account where people can donate and it can be distributed to whoever lobbys the government best, then go ahead. Surely if people are happy with 5.5bn being handed over, we'll surely reach the 5.5bn. instead of whipping over €1,000 from each citizen every year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,440 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Pieta House gets state funding because the State knows well that official mental health services are totally under resourced, so they can get a fair bit of counselling provided on the cheap through Pieta and other organisations. Do you actually want to cut mental health services or do you want the State to fund proper mental health services at a higher cost - because they're your two options if you cut funding.

    Your 'voluntary taxation' idea is intriguing though. Can we apply this to all state funding / taxation? So we each decide how much to give for transport and health and higher education, and the State has to make do with that amount? Or is it just things like disability services and mental health services that you want to cut?


    Apologies, typo on my part. I meant to say "So just to be clear, you expect charities to stop looking for charitable donations, because they make you feel a bit uncomfortable?" Why would you think you get a say on them looking for donations? If you don't want to donate, then don't donate.

    To answer your question literally, no the International Aid program is not good enough, if there people still dying for want of basic food and clean water. But hey, once your conscience doesn't feel any twinges, that's the important thing, right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,817 ✭✭✭Darc19


    Seems he had a rather nasty private side to his life.

    Preying on vulnerable people who came to him for help - but he rapes them.

    Used charity taxi account to drive these people to his house where he attacked them


    Wonder how many other victims are out there.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/social-affairs/late-charity-chief-allegedly-assaulted-men-for-whom-he-secured-housing-report-says-1.4682261



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83,416 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    It's clear that the Charity Regulator isn't worth a flying fook, charities are continuing along with a complete lack of compliance to incredibly basic regulations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,427 ✭✭✭dublin49


    ho ho ,you've done it now,his agents will be in touch shortly.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    That is very hard reading. People who were up in arms about private individuals running soup kitchens should read it. No doubt there are many good people who mean well, but there are some bad apples there too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,584 ✭✭✭ahnowbrowncow


    In their defence, they told the Public Accounts Committee that they didn't have the resources to uncover corruption and fraud in Charities and were reliant on individuals raising concerns.

    They have a budget of €4m and a staff of 37. With this they're supposed to oversee 10,370 charities that have 65,904 trustees, employs 189,900 and have over 300,000 volunteers.

    It's not hard to see why there's so much corruption in charities when the probability of getting caught is extremely low. And even when you are caught, there's little to no penalty.

    The Charity regulator received 686 concerns in 2018 and 649 in 2019, for 423 and 521 individual organisations respectively. In 2019 91% of these concerns related to 'financial controls and transparency', 'governance issues' or 'legitimacy of charity'

    That's simply astounding, that means in one year, 5% of all charities in Ireland had concerns reported to the charity regulator.

    That's before we mention the numerous national scandals relating to the charity sector.

    And yet there are those in this thread insisting that there's nothing to see here and that there are only a few bad apples.

    They either have their head in the sand or they have a vested interest in trying to portray charities in a positive light.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 5,804 Mod ✭✭✭✭irish_goat


    I worked in a bank for a few years and would have spent a lot of time analysing charity bank accounts and it's turned me off donating to charities unless I know where the money is going.

    Big charities tended to have so many expenses, constant little amounts that would eat up the funds e.g. catering, flights, hotels. On the flipside there were smaller charities set up by people who, in my opinion, simply wanted to get themselves a guaranteed income as CEO. There's a serious amount of small charities set up with a view to sending money abroad to build schools, fund missionaries etc and barely anything ever gets sent. We actually had to file a report to the Charity Commission about one charity in particular which hadn't sent a penny abroad. The sad thing is you could see the direct debit donations coming in from the likes of old folks and churches who probably have no idea how little good their donation is actually doing.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    There should be maybe 5-10 charity licenses per each sector. There is no need for any more than that. Less money spent on multiple CEO's, multiple ad campaigns, multiples of staff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,615 ✭✭✭✭mariaalice


    The ig issue is the government using ngo and charities to provide services



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭maestroamado


    I had a conversation with a good friend last week about Pieta House which his family are into... most of the people on ground level with Pieta, raising funds on walks etc are people who have had family/friend who took their own life... i know little of how it is funded...

    I asked him if he every heard of an individual intervention that prevented suicide... the reply was people watch waters at night... I have heard of people getting councilling after an event but never heard of prevent apart from people saying how great they are.... I know of one unqualified eejit who called to a house a house offering advise after a berevement based on the fact that his famly had same experience some time before.

    I am asking because this is what i see... i be more than happy if i am wrong...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,427 ✭✭✭dublin49


    agree totally,some like Console hide behind a good cause and employ friends and family on big salaries while releasing some funding for charitable endeavours to keep the money rolling in.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,181 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    Homeless charities are the best of them. Seriously.

    Take one unnamed charity which house homeless people. That is so humane and nice of them only that they charge 60 quid a week for a bed in room shared with another person. Who also pays 60 a week. If they do not pay "the rent" off they go. Being homeless again.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,177 ✭✭✭Fandymo


    AFAIK Pieta won't deal with anyone that is actively suicidal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭maestroamado


    That's more or less what i thought... they turn up when the game is over and analyze the result to get ready for the next game...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,440 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    What specific charities and what specific basic regulations are you referring to please?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,440 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    No, they provide counselling to people who aren't actively suicidal, huge amounts of counselling to large numbers of people. I actually don't like Pieta, but if you're going to have a go at them, please do so fairly, based on facts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭maestroamado


    What did i say was unfair? I am not having a go... i am saying what i see and am happy to be corrected... If the object is to help prevent suicide i expect they need to identify the people at risk and try to help... from the info you provide it seems what i said pretty well correct....



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,817 ✭✭✭Darc19


    The problem is there's a catch all "charity" designation.


    Most schools are charities, most churches are charities, there are benevolent funds that are charities, hospitals are charities, almost all disability services are charities.

    There needs to be a totally new structure and all called "NFP's" (not for profits)

    So you have Education NFP, Medical NFP, Disability NFP, Benevolent Fund NFP etc


    Then you have "Community Charity NFP" and "National Charity NFP" to cover what many people would call "charities" and the Community Charity NFP would cover charities with admin expenditure under €100,000 and annual income under €250,000 and anything above these levels are listed as National and have a higher level of reporting



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭maestroamado


    You can add gaa clubs, golf clubs etc etc... the list is available online... i think expenditure should be capped for MD etc as there needs be dome permanent staff.

    I also think there should he a %% limit on spending in relation to revenue...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,440 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Your criticism of Pieta for not dealing with actively suicidal people is unfair. It is beyond their skills. You need consultant psychiatrists and support teams, not psychologists and counselors. It's a totally different league. It's a bit like criticising the Red Cross on the sideline of your local GAA match for not doing open heart surgery. It's just silly.

    They do what they do. I'm not a fan of theirs, because of how they pay (or don't pay) their staff, their religious background. I'm not a fan of the HSE paying Pieta to provide counselling instead of employing professional staff at proper rates to provide a professional service.

    How exactly would this complicated and confusing new structure help anything?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,440 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    What kind of cap would have that applies to organisations with hundreds, if not thousands of staff providing professional, regulated, medical services as well as applying to your local Tidy Town committee? What kind of % limit of spending were you thinking of? What should they do with the % of revenue that they don't spend?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭maestroamado


    You need to start reading what i am saying as i said from the outset i do not know what they do except "darkness to light" funding exercise, i did refer to a conversation with a friend and our different views...

    I agree with you totally this job is for professionals and the HSE have the duty here instead of what you say is happening....



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭maestroamado


    Your comment is too loose for reply... have you an example...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,440 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    You said "i think expenditure should be capped for MD etc as there needs be dome permanent staff". Charities vary greatly, from entirely volunteer organisations like some of thecCat rescue and rehoming groups, to professional medical organisations like St John of God and Mater Foundation. What kind of salary cap would you propose that would be valid for organisations of such varying size.

    You also said "I also think there should he a %% limit on spending in relation to revenue", so I'm wondering what % of limit you had in mind.

    And what do you think they should be doing with the remainder of their revenue that comes over the % limit you are proposing?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,440 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    If you don't know what they do, maybe a comment like "they turn up when the game is over and analyze the result to get ready for the next game" is just a tad unfair?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭maestroamado


    I looked at their web-page before i wrote that and it said they were involved in preventing suicide ... you told me that they do not intervene on personal level...

    What do you think is unfair if its what is happening...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭maestroamado


    Give an example of what kindof organization you want to talk about... too many variations to give general answer...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,440 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    No, I didn't tell you that they 'don't intervene on a personal level'. I told you that they don't deal with people who are actively suicidal, the most serious end of the spectrum. They're not an emergency service, rushing in on blue lights and sirens. They provide counselling at low cost or no cost to people with mental health difficulties, but not to people who are actively suicidal.

    That's not 'turning up when the game is over'.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,440 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    I don't want to talk about any organisation to be honest. You made two proposals, one about capping MD salary and one about spending a % revenue. You didn't seem to bothered about the 'too many variations' when you came up with your proposals. I'm just asking you to explain your two proposals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭maestroamado


    The webpage talks about suicide not counselling which is where i got my info... either i read it wrong or its incorrect....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,440 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    There's a difference between feeling suicidal and being actively suicidal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭maestroamado


    I would expect these organizations should be able to identify this or let the people that can do this do so...

    As i said at the outside i just had a conversation with a supporter of Pieta a couple of weeks ago and they said all they do.... For me most charities is about funds and what they do is a side show....



  • Advertisement
Advertisement