Renting with pets

Away With The Fairies

I'm viewing properties for rent. Is there any way to get landlords or estate agencies to accept pets. I don't have a huge collection of pets, just a small cat.

Away With The Fairies

Away With The Fairies wrote: »

I'm viewing properties for rent. Is there any way to get landlords or estate agencies to accept pets. I don't have a huge collection of pets, just a small cat.

Try a much bigger deposit.

Baby01032012

Or just don’t mention it. No landlord or agent is likely to accept a pet. There was a thread few weeks back about a tenant over holding because he couldn’t move on as no one was accepting pets leaving his current landlord stuck not being able to sell his property and receiving no rent.

Graces7

Baby01032012 wrote: »

Or just don’t mention it. No landlord or agent is likely to accept a pet. There was a thread few weeks back about a tenant over holding because he couldn’t move on as no one was accepting pets leaving his current landlord stuck not being able to sell his property and receiving no rent.

Rural is easier for them accepting pets.... but for one small cat?

I agree, say nothing.

Often they have had a bad experience with a dog etc. and just overreact.

I wouldn't risk not disclosing a pet to the landlord.

A friend of mind didn't disclose to her landlord that her daughter had a pet cat, and indoor cat, and as soon as the landlord found out, she was given notice.

She tried to reason with the landlord but her non-disclosure totally ruined the good relationship they'd had up to that point. Landlord was furious. Turns out they were allergic to cats! (what are the odds?!?)

Lesalare

I was in same situ as you the past 3 years and feel your pain. I had to look at apartments in Dublin which are new builds as they mostly accepts cats and dogs now. Only downside to this is my rent is far too expensive. It's ridiculous here that is you are allowed a small indoor cat, you have to pay about 2200 a month or more for a new apartment. I can't understand why landlords won't allow people to have a small pet. It's good for mental health and they rarely do any damage. Even offering them a 'pet deposit' most fo them say no. Dublin is such a backwater 'city'.

forestgirl

I love pets very much but I cannot blame any landlord not wanting them

Lesalare

forestgirl wrote: »

I love pets very much but I cannot blame any landlord not wanting them

Why?

So only home owners (and let's face it that's a nightmare to achieve in Dublin) are allowed to have a pet?!

Lesalare

Lesalare wrote: »

Why?

So only home owners (and let's face it that's a nightmare to achieve in Dublin) are allowed to have a pet?!

Only the person who owns the home can decide if they allow pets, one of the rights that come with investing hundreds of thousands in a property.

Lesalare

Dav010 wrote: »

Only the person who owns the home can decide if they allow pets, one of the rights that come with investing hundreds of thousands in a property.

What damage does a quiet, mature cat which mainly sleeps all day, do to a property? She is indoors, doesn't claw the furniture, doesn't have fleas etc.

Same with a small dog (no-one should be keeping large dogs in apartments IMO).

What about people who live on their own. Don't have kids etc. or a partner? Think of all the small pets esp. over the past year which have offered their owners a huge amount of companionship during lockdown.

I've seen more mates houses which are in a state from having 3 kids under 6 than any rental property where an animal resides.

Caranica

Dav010 wrote: »

Only the person who owns the home can decide if they allow pets, one of the rights that come with investing hundreds of thousands in a property.

Not true. Management companies routinely ban pets, particularly in apartments.

Caranica

Caranica wrote: »

Not true. Management companies routinely ban pets, particularly in apartments.

Very good point.

Lesalare

Lesalare wrote: »

What damage does a quiet, mature cat which mainly sleeps all day, do to a property? She is indoors, doesn't claw the furniture, doesn't have fleas etc.

Same with a small dog (no-one should be keeping large dogs in apartments IMO).

I suspect few applicants tell landlords their pets are going to wreck furniture.

Lesalare

Dav010 wrote: »

I suspect few applicants tell landlords their pets are going to wreck furniture.

Hence why you pay an extra pet deposit or if you are a negligent tenant and allow your animals to destroy the furniture, you expect to have the damage amount deducted from your main deposit.

Lesalare

Lesalare wrote: »

Hence why you pay an extra pet deposit or if you are a negligent tenant and allow your animals to destroy the furniture, you expect to have the damage amount deducted from your main deposit.

You would think.

Lesalare

Lesalare wrote: »

What damage does a quiet, mature cat which mainly sleeps all day, do to a property? She is indoors, doesn't claw the furniture, doesn't have fleas etc.

Same with a small dog (no-one should be keeping large dogs in apartments IMO).

I am a huge animal lover, I had my last cat for 18 years, and my dog just passed a couple of months ago, age 14.

But if I was a landlord I would not allow pets. Cats spray and like to scratch and claw - even my female neutered cat sprayed occasionally. Of course the renter will tell you their cat doesn't do these things, but its a risk the landlord is taking.

Dogs smell - it doesn't matter how much you love them, you can always tell a home that has a dog in it, as opposed to one that doesn't. Wet dog is the worst!

So I can understand a landlord refusing to allow pets.

Lesalare

Deleted User wrote: »

I am a huge animal lover, I had my last cat for 18 years, and my dog just passed a couple of months ago, age 14.

But if I was a landlord I would not allow pets. Cats spray and like to scratch and claw - even my female neutered cat sprayed occasionally. Of course the renter will tell you their cat doesn't do these things, but its a risk the landlord is taking.

Dogs smell - it doesn't matter how much you love them, you can always tell a home that has a dog in it, as opposed to one that doesn't. Wet dog is the worst!

So I can understand a landlord refusing to allow pets.

I'm presuming you are a home owner.

I moved back from overseas after 15 years 3 years ago and am being forced to pay high rent in order to keep my cat which I brought back with me, as no one in Dublin other than new apartment blocks will allow pets. I'm unable to save for a mortgage due to said inflated rent - I do this so I don't have to put my cat down. I took her as a 6 weeks old kitten from an RSPCA shelter there 14 years ago. I'm not going to fly her across the globe only to kill her due to irrational, old-fashioned Irish landlord rules.

Why is it most people in NYC apartments are allowed pets? Or in London etc...?

If landlords of these numerous dumps you see hovering around the 1700 euro mark, with shi**ty 1980's stained furniture etc. were a little more accommodating, I'd be able to save for my own place where I can keep a dog or another cat without having to ask permission. I can understand if these rentals were stunning and newly furnished to a high spec, but the standard here is below any other city for the exorbitant monthly cost.

This is veering from OP's original question. OP your only option really is just to hope you can offer to pay a pet deposit and try and negotiate with a decent landlord who will pop up in time. Best of luck.

Pythagorean

I was in a similar situation, having a cat (elderly, female, very clean, and sleeps a lot). I was looking to rent, and found my cat was proving to be a major obstacle. Your best bet is to find a landlord/lady who likes cats, which I did eventually. Make sure to stress the fact that your cat is perfectly ok indoors. Ads that state" pets ok", should be viewed with caution, as it could mean that the landlord has a dog of his own, or a cat, which can cause problems.

Away With The Fairies

Pythagorean wrote: »

I was in a similar situation, having a cat (elderly, female, very clean, and sleeps a lot). I was looking to rent, and found my cat was proving to be a major obstacle. Your best bet is to find a landlord/lady who likes cats, which I did eventually. Make sure to stress the fact that your cat is perfectly ok indoors. Ads that state" pets ok", should be viewed with caution, as it could mean that the landlord has a dog of his own, or a cat, which can cause problems.

Thanks. Looking at a few places advertised through agencies. I'm guessing I stand no chance with them?

Fol20

Lesalare wrote: »

I was in same situ as you the past 3 years and feel your pain. I had to look at apartments in Dublin which are new builds as they mostly accepts cats and dogs now. Only downside to this is my rent is far too expensive. It's ridiculous here that is you are allowed a small indoor cat, you have to pay about 2200 a month or more for a new apartment. I can't understand why landlords won't allow people to have a small pet. It's good for mental health and they rarely do any damage. Even offering them a 'pet deposit' most fo them say no. Dublin is such a backwater 'city'.

Given ireland doesn’t offer much protection for ll vs other countries. What incentive does a ll have to allow pets. If pets damage more than the pet deposit there is very little recourse for ll. noise complaints. Smells etc, general higher wear and tear all add up and when you have a second tenant without pets. It’s a no brainer.

Lesalare

Fol20 wrote: »

Given ireland doesn’t offer much protection for ll vs other countries. What incentive does a ll have to allow pets. If pets damage more than the pet deposit there is very little recourse for ll. noise complaints. Smells etc, general higher wear and tear all add up and when you have a second tenant without pets. It’s a no brainer.

The Op is talking about a cat. Not a rhinoceros.

Lesalare

Lesalare wrote: »

I'm presuming you are a home owner.

I am now. I wasn't always.

You can rant how unfair it is all you like, but the bottom line is, it's the landlord's property, not yours, so they get to decide whether to allow pets, or not.

It's really that simple.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Lesalare

Fol20 wrote: »

Given ireland doesn’t offer much protection for ll vs other countries.

Side note and can't help by say: You are taking the P*ss? Surely?

Landlords are ruling Dublin and destroying their tenants lives due to excess rents. (and also due to a no rent cap regulations from our gov - but hey - not hearing LL's complaining!)

Yeah, I feel really sorry for landlords here getting 2200+ per month for a 1 bed apartment. And their concern for a few scratches on their black 'Pleather' repulsive sofa from Harvey Norman circa 1997.

Lesalare

Deleted User wrote: »

I am now. I wasn't always.

You can rant how unfair it is all you like, but the bottom line is, it's the landlord's property, not yours, so they get to decide whether to allow pets, or not.

It's really that simple.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

So you've been a home owner for 18 years?

Not exactly 'ranting' thanks. It's a subject I feel strongly about. And am aware as I was a landlord in Aus for 6 years.. I had zero issue with my tenants having a cat or small dog. I understand they are just the same as anyone else who would like a pet and are in situ to have to rent.

Pythagorean

Away With The Fairies wrote: »

Thanks. Looking at a few places advertised through agencies. I'm guessing I stand no chance with them?

I think a meeting/ chat with the landlord would be a better approach. If they like you, they may look more kindly on the pet. Agencies will probably give you the standard response, though I have no direct experience of them. I found the best approach was to build a rapport with the landlord, and mention the cat later in the process. timing is important here, not too early, not too late.

Fol20

Lesalare wrote: »

What damage does a quiet, mature cat which mainly sleeps all day, do to a property? She is indoors, doesn't claw the furniture, doesn't have fleas etc.

Same with a small dog (no-one should be keeping large dogs in apartments IMO).

What about people who live on their own. Don't have kids etc. or a partner? Think of all the small pets esp. over the past year which have offered their owners a huge amount of companionship during lockdown.

I've seen more mates houses which are in a state from having 3 kids under 6 than any rental property where an animal resides.

The ll doesnt know the above and tenants cant be trusted as even the best behaved animals do some form of damage to any property, you are just oblivious to it as its your pet. I love dogs and have one myself and can see the general wear and tear my dog with scratches and dirt that normally wouldnt be there.

Being a ll isnt a social responsibility, its a business where you try and maximise profit and minimise risk. Pets are an extra form of risk. All i see with pets is the downside from a ll POV, please tell me once upside that is offered to the ll.

Fol20

Lesalare wrote: »

Hence why you pay an extra pet deposit or if you are a negligent tenant and allow your animals to destroy the furniture, you expect to have the damage amount deducted from your main deposit.

A deposit is a token gesture. damage can be several months worth of damage

Fol20

Lesalare wrote: »

I'm presuming you are a home owner.

I moved back from overseas after 15 years 3 years ago and am being forced to pay high rent in order to keep my cat which I brought back with me, as no one in Dublin other than new apartment blocks will allow pets. I'm unable to save for a mortgage due to said inflated rent - I do this so I don't have to put my cat down. I took her as a 6 weeks old kitten from an RSPCA shelter there 14 years ago. I'm not going to fly her across the globe only to kill her due to irrational, old-fashioned Irish landlord rules.

Why is it most people in NYC apartments are allowed pets? Or in London etc...?

If landlords of these numerous dumps you see hovering around the 1700 euro mark, with shi**ty 1980's stained furniture etc. were a little more accommodating, I'd be able to save for my own place where I can keep a dog or another cat without having to ask permission. I can understand if these rentals were stunning and newly furnished to a high spec, but the standard here is below any other city for the exorbitant monthly cost.

This is veering from OP's original question. OP your only option really is just to hope you can offer to pay a pet deposit and try and negotiate with a decent landlord who will pop up in time. Best of luck.

LL have far more protections in place in london and NYC if a tenant damages the property. I know for example in america, it can impact your credit rating and they can pursue you for damages. In ireland, most ll do not chase tenants for damages as tenants can claim they have very little money and could be paying back 50e for the next two decades and then after a few months stop paying.

Decent ll do not accept pets. Generally the only houses that accept pets are undesirable areas or properties that are not in good condition as a result of neglect from the ll.

Why do ll need to be more accommodating. Its all based on supply and demand, and ll will always pick the top of the crop that is offered to them. Animals are a big red flag so why should they choose you?

Lesalare

Lesalare wrote: »

So you've been a home owner for 18 years?

Not exactly 'ranting' thanks. It's a subject I feel strongly about. And am aware as I was a landlord in Aus for 6 years.. I had zero issue with my tenants having a cat or small dog. I understand they are just the same as anyone else who would like a pet and are in situ to have to rent.

Yes, but thats not the point of the thread. For the record, I have no pets now and I'm still a homeowner.

You were entitled to allow pets in your rented properties in Aus, if that was your choice, just as the landlords here have the right to decide whether to allow to pets in theirs, or not.

I honestly dont know what you're complaining about either, seeing as you are in rented accommodation that allows pets, so it obviously does exist.

But carry on.

Lesalare

Fol20 wrote: »

please tell me once upside that is offered to the ll.

In my situation I pay my LL 2.5K per month almost for a 1 bed apt.
I initially had 2 cats but had to put one down last year.
He was old and unwell and started getting sick a lot on the bedroom carpet.
I cleaned it up, and notified my LL that I would fully replace the carpet on my leaving the apartment. Other than that my remaining cat has not caused one single issue in the place.

No scratching furniture. No smells (I've asked pet-less mates and they say 'No nothing") I clean the litter tray daily. She sleeps on the bed probably half the day and other than that lies on the balcony.

She's an indoor cat. No fleas and causes zero damage to this or my last house rental.

Some people just judge all pet owners as having smelly animals and allow them to run wild etc.

On a daily basis here I see about 50% of the apartment owners walking their small dogs. It's nice to see that they can.

Fol20

Lesalare wrote: »

Side note and can't help by say: You are taking the P*ss? Surely?

Landlords are ruling Dublin and destroying their tenants lives due to excess rents. (and also due to a no rent cap regulations from our gov - but hey - not hearing LL's complaining!)

Yeah, I feel really sorry for landlords here getting 2200+ per month for a 1 bed apartment. And their concern for a few scratches on their black 'Pleather' repulsive sofa from Harvey Norman circa 1997.

You are strictly looking at it from a tenant POV, LL are complaining as taxes,legislation, new costs, limits on profit, very anti ll legislation from government and populism all lead to investment decisions where if it was all rosy for LL, they wouldnt be leaving the sector which they have been doing for the past decade. Stats back this up.

You just see the high level rental price of 2.2k. You need to ask yourself if you were an investor, how much of my capital is tied up to get that 2.2k. Could i get more than 2.2k if i invest it elsewhere? If so why stay in the rental sector with all the hassle that tenants can cause.

Lesalare

Lesalare wrote: »

In my situation I pay my LL 2.5K per month almost for a 1 bed apt.
I initially had 2 cats but had to put one down last year.
He was old and unwell and started getting sick a lot on the bedroom carpet.
I cleaned it up, and notified my LL that I would fully replace the carpet on my leaving the apartment. Other than that my remaining cats has not caused one single issue in the place.

No scratching furniture. No smells (I've asked pet-less mates and they say 'No nothing") I clean the litter tray daily. She sleeps on the bed probably half the day and other than that lies on the balcony.

She's an indoor cat. No fleas and causes zero damage to this or my last house rental.

Some people just judge all pet owners as having smelly animals and allow them to run wild etc.

It is difficult to distinguish between a tenant with a good and bad pet when first meeting them, as I previously posted, not many admit to having a pet that’s going to piss and ****e all over the carpet or chew the furniture, so what should a LL look for?

You have a good pet and you will replace the carpet, but others don’t and will not. If anything, you should be blaming bad tenants rather than property owners for your predicament.

the_syco

Lesalare wrote: »

Hence why you pay an extra pet deposit or if you are a negligent tenant and allow your animals to destroy the furniture, you expect to have the damage amount deducted from your main deposit.

The deposit often won't cover the damage.

My friends that own pets who rent are sensible tenants, and cover their furniture with large throws, etc, to prevent the pets from destroying the furniture. Fairly sure they offered a larger deposit to cover possible damage. But I have seen the damage a cat can do to a set of furniture, doors, stair rails, etc, of people who don't care what their pets do to the property.

Lesalare wrote: »

Side note and can't help by say: You are taking the P*ss? Surely?

Landlords are getting stricter on who they rent to, as they have getting less rights. Also, I'd say there'll be a lot less landlords after the COVID lockdowns finish, driving up the demand, allowing LL's to pick and choose who they let to.

=-=

On Daft, 170 properties rent to people with pets, with only 4 being outside Dublin. Pre COVId, this was a few thousand. I'm guessing the sort of LL that would accept a pet will be leaving the market shortly.

Lesalare

Dav010 wrote: »

so what should a LL look for?

Maybe the same thing they should regarding the person renting the place. It's all a risk/gamble how someone is going to treat your place or if they are going to pay the rent on time. There is only so must trust you take on as a LL (as I was) with my tenants. References and such only prove so much.

Fol20

Lesalare wrote: »

In my situation I pay my LL 2.5K per month almost for a 1 bed apt.
I initially had 2 cats but had to put one down last year.
He was old and unwell and started getting sick a lot on the bedroom carpet.
I cleaned it up, and notified my LL that I would fully replace the carpet on my leaving the apartment. Other than that my remaining cat has not caused one single issue in the place.

No scratching furniture. No smells (I've asked pet-less mates and they say 'No nothing") I clean the litter tray daily. She sleeps on the bed probably half the day and other than that lies on the balcony.

She's an indoor cat. No fleas and causes zero damage to this or my last house rental.

Some people just judge all pet owners as having smelly animals and allow them to run wild etc.

These are all personal pros of your specific cat. I have no relationship with you, wouldnt give you the benefit of the doubt and genuinely wouldnt believe you if you told me that in person as i have let to tenants with pets in the past and have stopped after several issues with them. Nothing against you or your pet as i do like dogs myself however none of the above are upsides for the LL. If you are specifically talking about the price, would the price of that specific 1 bed be any cheaper if you had no pets or is everyone in that block paying the same price irregardless of pets.

stereo_steve

Fernbank has a whole block dedicated to people that have pets.

https://fernbank.ie/

Fol20

Lesalare wrote: »

Maybe the same thing they should regarding the person renting the place. It's all a risk/gamble how someone is going to treat your place or if they are going to pay the rent on time. There is only so must trust you take on as a LL (as I was) with my tenants. References and such only prove so much.

It is a gamble, but then it goes back to the fact that you will have several applicants for your property. A few could be a good fit so why would they pick someone with a pet rather than someone without one? They cant increase the rent of say an extra 100pm as 'pet rent ' as this could be in breach of the rpz.

Lesalare

Fol20 wrote: »

It is a gamble, but then it goes back to the fact that you will have several applicants for your property. A few could be a good fit so why would they pick someone with a pet rather than someone without one? They cant increase the rent of say an extra 100pm as 'pet rent ' as this could be in breach of the rpz.

They can actually. Fernbank above as noted charges an extra 100 euro per month for a pet friendly apartment. Even though they don't state it.
They also furnish the pet-friendly apartments blocks with slightly different furniture. Same look but more hard wearing.

Mount Argus apartments are doing same. Developers are realising that renters want the option to live in an apartment with a small pet.

LL will always have preferred applicants for who they want to reside in their property and it doesn't always come down to dosh. Personality and your gut for how they will treat your place overall is more important and sometimes those people you see as the best match might have a small cat or dog. I don't personally think I'm the sort to disallow the right person from renting my place just because they have a small animal they love. 3 wolfhounds - fair enough...

If they wreck they place, they don't get their deposit back. Simple.

Antares35

We just gave up on it. We are renting from family (and therefore are allowed have our pets here) but the dynamics are beyond toxic for other reasons to the point that my mental health suffered. We really wanted to get out and get away from it all but we literally could not find anywhere. Eventually we just had to sit it out and we will be buying in a few months but I'm not the better of being unable to escape tbh. At one point we did a search on daft and selected pets allowed in facilities and I think there were like 100 properties in the entire country. So depressing.

Lesalare

Lesalare wrote: »

Maybe the same thing they should regarding the person renting the place. It's all a risk/gamble how someone is going to treat your place or if they are going to pay the rent on time. There is only so must trust you take on as a LL (as I was) with my tenants. References and such only prove so much.

Exactly, there is risk enough with a tenant, why increase that risk to tenant and pet?.

Lesalare

Dav010 wrote: »

Exactly, there is risk enough with a tenant, why increase that risk to tenant and pet?.

You are clearly a LL with a ****ty place to rent out and you attract the wrong sorts of people all the time.

Lesalare

Lesalare wrote: »

You are clearly a LL with a ****ty place to rent out and you attract the wrong sorts of people all the time.

Actually I have 3 beautiful apartments with excellent tenants, none of whom are allowed to have pets.

Lesalare

Dav010 wrote: »

Actually I have 3 beautiful apartments with excellent tenants, none of whom are allowed to have pets.

Not surprised.

Lesalare

Dav010 wrote: »

Actually I have 3 beautiful apartments with excellent tenants, none of whom are allowed to have pets.

I'm be keen to know - obvs you won't admit it. But I'd put money on it that you wouldn't rent to a couple with 2 toddlers either...

Fol20

Lesalare wrote: »

They can actually. Fernbank above as noted charges an extra 100 euro per month for a pet friendly apartment. Even though they don't state it.
They also furnish the pet-friendly apartments blocks with slightly different furniture. Same look but more hard wearing.

Mount Argus apartments are doing same. Developers are realising that renters want the option to live in an apartment with a small pet.

LL will always have preferred applicants for who they want to reside in their property and it doesn't always come down to dosh. Personality and your gut for how they will treat your place overall is more important and sometimes those people you see as the best match might have a small cat or dog. I don't personally think I'm the sort to disallow the right person from renting my place just because they have a small animal they love. 3 wolfhounds - fair enough...

If they wreck they place, they don't get their deposit back. Simple.

This would be a breach of the RPZ rules unless its a brand new rental which a lot of REITS could be.

Most LL gut is to not allow pets and so far your argument for ll to allow pets has not been too convincing unfortunately. Based on your above logic, why allow only small pets when a good large pet wont cause any damage either. Should we not allow large humans live in homes as well as they are might cause more wear and tear. A pet is a pet no matter what size they are, as a ll we wont be able to gauge how good the pet is as at the end of the day, it is still an animal.What happens if the damage is greater than the deposit which it easily can be.

Lesalare

Lesalare wrote: »

I'm be keen to know - obvs you won't admit it. But I'd put money on it that you wouldn't rent to a couple with 2 toddlers either...

I had a house which I sold in December 19, it was rented to families over the years, no issues.

Fol20

Lesalare wrote: »

You are clearly a LL with a ****ty place to rent out and you attract the wrong sorts of people all the time.

Not sure how you can get this from his comments. My worst tenants have been from respectable areas with good paying jobs. Bad tenants come in all sorts and its all about minimising risk.

Lesalare

Fol20 wrote: »

This would be a breach of the RPZ rules unless its a brand new rental which a lot of REITS could be.

Most LL gut is to not allow pets and so far your argument for ll to allow pets has not been too convincing unfortunately. Based on your above logic, why allow only small pets when a good large pet wont cause any damage either. Should we not allow large humans live in homes as well as they are might cause more wear and tear. A pet is a pet no matter what size they are, as a ll we wont be able to gauge how good the pet is as at the end of the day, it is still an animal.What happens if the damage is greater than the deposit which it easily can be.

I was speaking from a humane level of keeping a large dog - aka a doberman or Alsatian or such in a confined environment. These animals need space to move like a back garden etc. Not a small apartment.

Fol20

Lesalare wrote: »

I'm be keen to know - obvs you won't admit it. But I'd put money on it that you wouldn't rent to a couple with 2 toddlers either...

Kids cause more general wear and tear as well. My latest property that came back up for let had kids colourings on the walls, window sills and in side lockers. Kids stickers on wardrobes also. If the tenant pays for all this wear and tear, fair enough but all i see is hassle hassle hassle. Instead if you have a young couple who are more likely to be outside the house post covid again have similar jobs to the parents, have greater disposable income due to having no kids, its a no brainer.

Its always based on the applicants that are willing to live in your home. Its not that i dont accept kids as i have kids in some of my rentals. Its more about what are all the options and which aspects make one tenant more appealing than the other.

I think you are making it too emotional when renting is a business transaction and nothing else.

Lesalare

Fol20 wrote: »

Kids cause more general wear and tear as well. My latest property that came back up for let had kids colourings on the walls, window sills and in side lockers. Kids stickers on wardrobes also. If the tenant pays for all this wear and tear, fair enough but all i see is hassle hassle hassle. Instead if you have a young couple who are more likely to be outside the house post covid again have similar jobs to the parents, have greater disposable income due to having no kids, its a no brainer.

I think you are making it too emotional when renting is a business transaction and nothing else.

You've just cemented the nightmare that is the current rental situ in Dublin re LL's for anyone who is not a double income Goggle earning cohabiting couple with no kids and no animals.

You're the utter model of a FG snobbish LL in Dublin in 2021. And who are driving people out of this country/city.

Lesalare

Lesalare wrote: »

You've just cemented the nightmare that is the current rental situ in Dublin re LL's for anyone who is not a double income Goggle earning cohabiting couple with no kids and no animals.

You're the utter model of a FG snobbish LL in Dublin in 2021.

To be fair, rents seem to have fallen in Dublin and there are more properties available. You choose to have a pet which limits your choice and means you pay more. This is not a LL problem, it is a tenant problem.