Do small men resent large men?

Quantum Baloney

Lets get this out of the way: females of the species like big, tall men with a bit of weight on their bones and the ability to put on muscle. Now they might settle for a shrimp, but from an evolutionary perspective they are looking to settle with hulks, and also from a sexual standpoint, they do not want to perform as a couple with shrimp spaghetti men or five-footers.

I am fifteen stone, six and a half feet tall, and I have always been aware of my superiority as a specimen to smaller men, even as a child. Obviously, our penises are larger and fuller, and no matter what females say, they do enjoy that extra girth/length.

But my question is: do smaller men look at us larger men with awe, almost like we are a different species? Do they resent us? Because to be honest, when I see prawn men or spaghetti men in town or in the supermarket and I have to bend my neck to see the their beady eyes staring back at me timidly from under a fragile recessive fringe, I really can't say that I feel like these dudes are the same species as myself, they seem more like chinchillas or syrian hamsters, not fully developed, and I mean that intellectually as well as physically.

Look, I don't mean to be mean, we all have our talents, but if you look at many indigenous people before the sweaty greasy soy eating western men came to their shores and they led simple lives with simple diets born to young mothers who were not burdened by the office grind, these dudes had really great teeth, great musculature, good mental attitudes etc. and the weedy prawn men or spaghetti men just have a dysgenic feeling to them, especially in Ireland. The sooner we are honest about these things the sooner we can do something about it.

Church on Tuesday

Whatta load of baloney.

dontmindme

If I did, I don't now.

Quantum Baloney

Let me guess? A five footer?

Hercule Poirot

Jesus, think someone needs an early night

I see sheep

Lame enough wind up attempt - 2/10.

Your Face

Quantum Baloney wrote: »

I am fifteen stone, six and a half feet tall...

That's not particularly big nowadays.

dd973

Try being 5ft 10, talk about stuck in the grey zone.

Quantum Erasure

Quantum Baloney wrote: »

Let me guess? A five footer?

Six, if you count the other foot

Deeper Blue

Quantum Baloney wrote: »

Obviously, our penises are larger and fuller, and no matter what females say, they do enjoy that extra girth/length.

I assume it's like a button on a fur coat then OP?

Quantum Baloney

I see sheep wrote: »

Lame enough wind up attempt - 4/10.

Which part do you disagree with?

What height are you?

Tefral

Can't say I look at any lad taller than me with envy. I'm 6'1" and think anyone taller than me must have serious grief with clothes and airplanes.

I dunno on the women thing either. I know a couple of lads that would max be 5foot9 and they definitely have had more notches in the bed post than some of the lads my height. Maybe they try harder or something.

Going on your analogy about *cough* size OP, theirs might not be the biggest, but it's certainly the busiest.

I see sheep

Quantum Baloney wrote: »

Which part do you disagree with?

What height are you?

All of it

6ft 2

You sound overweight tbh (if true)

Type 2 diabetes waiting to happen

barneystinson

The butter has really worked wonders for you OP, seems you've gained all sorts of pounds, and inches, since this thread... https://touch.boards.ie/thread/2058161075/1/#post116315992

talla10

A lion doesn't concern himself with the opinion of sheep.

But obviously the OP does

talla10

barneystinson wrote: »

The butter has really worked wonders for you OP, seems you've gained all sorts of pounds, and inches, since this thread... https://touch.boards.ie/thread/2058161075/1/#post116315992

Maybe he couldn't tell the difference between butter and i can't believe its not butter!

Leg End Reject

Penis length and girth are not linked to height. In fact, 'my friend' reassures me that things can appear more impressive on a shorter man.

I'm not a short man either, I'm a short woman.

Pete Moss

Quantum Baloney wrote: »

Lets get this out of the way: females of the species like big, tall men with a bit of weight on their bones and the ability to put on muscle. Now they might settle for a shrimp, but from an evolutionary perspective they are looking to settle with hulks, and also from a sexual standpoint, they do not want to perform as a couple with shrimp spaghetti men or five-footers.

I am fifteen stone, six and a half feet tall, and I have always been aware of my superiority as a specimen to smaller men, even as a child. Obviously, our penises are larger and fuller, and no matter what females say, they do enjoy that extra girth/length.

But my question is: do smaller men look at us larger men with awe, almost like we are a different species? Do they resent us? Because to be honest, when I see prawn men or spaghetti men in town or in the supermarket and I have to bend my neck to see the their beady eyes staring back at me timidly from under a fragile recessive fringe, I really can't say that I feel like these dudes are the same species as myself, they seem more like chinchillas or syrian hamsters, not fully developed, and I mean that intellectually as well as physically.

Look, I don't mean to be mean, we all have our talents, but if you look at many indigenous people before the sweaty greasy soy eating western men came to their shores and they led simple lives with simple diets born to young mothers who were not burdened by the office grind, these dudes had really great teeth, great musculature, good mental attitudes etc. and the weedy prawn men or spaghetti men just have a dysgenic feeling to them, especially in Ireland. The sooner we are honest about these things the sooner we can do something about it.

At a guess, from the tone and sense of insecurity, this fella works in some sort of customer service focused role - Supermarket, call-centre, etc. At some point he was most likely belittled by a man, superior in financial and social status to him, but smaller in physical stature to him.

Quantum Baloney

talla10 wrote: »

Maybe he couldn't tell the difference between butter and i can't believe its not butter!

Believe me, i know my butter from my margarine. Sometimes on a Sunday afternoon I find myself peeling back the foil on a brand new pound of butter after having scoffed another full pound in the course of the week.

circadian

Church on Tuesday wrote: »

Whatta load of baloney.

Don't forget it's quantum, therefore it is and it isn't baloney.

Quantum Baloney

Leg End Reject wrote: »

Penis length and girth are not linked to height. In fact, 'my friend' reassures me that things can appear more impressive on a shorter man.

I'm not a short man either, I'm a short woman.

Doubt you have a clue to be honest. Women that spend a lot of time on message boards like yourself are typically not much sought after, certainly not by triple A hulks like myself.

gozunda

Church on Tuesday wrote: »

Whatta load of baloney.

Is this the mickey measuring thread I heard about?

Off to get the tape measure

I may be away a long time ....

Your Face

Your Face wrote: »

That's not particularly big nowadays.

Indeed. The fncker sounds undernourished.... Likely couldn't lift his leg

shtpEdthePlum

I think I know the OP. Something familiar about their posting style. Now to wait and see if they take a long leave of absence from the thread.

https://twitter.com/heeyysway/status/1185297588712624128

Quantum Baloney

Pete Moss wrote: »

At a guess, from the tone and sense of insecurity, this fella works in some sort of customer service focused role - Supermarket, call-centre, etc. At some point he was most likely belittled by a man, superior in financial and social status to him, but smaller in physical stature to him.

Wrong. My job could be better but this goes beyond that. This is a spiritual or metaphysical thing. You put me in the Amazon or with the indigenous people in the South Pacific or Australia before they were spoiled by western diets, and those tribes people would understand just by looking at me that I was part of the master race. We over-complicate things in our modern world and soy boys and spaghetti men or chinchilla men have become dominant.

corner of hells

shtpEdthePlum wrote: »

I think I know the OP. Something familiar about their posting style. Now to wait and see if they take a long leave of absence from the thread.

Mr F ?

shtpEdthePlum

shtpEdthePlum wrote: »

I think I know the OP. Something familiar about their posting style. Now to wait and see if they take a long leave of absence from the thread.

Must have been the laptop gremlins acting up again. Is reality for people who can't face drugs? Does online dating boost your social value? I'd like to offer you my opinion on such exciting topics, but that new thread isn't going to mint itself.

Leg End Reject

Quantum Baloney wrote: »

Doubt you have a clue to be honest. Women that spend a lot of time on message boards like yourself are typically not much sought after, certainly not by triple A hulks like myself.

And what's a triple A hulk doing here?

If you had some subtlety you could have gotten better responses. Still, being too obvious is a small compromise for your physical perfection.

Leg End Reject

Leg End Reject wrote: »

Still, being too obvious is a small compromise for your physical perfection.

Among other shortcomings.

Quantum Baloney

Leg End Reject wrote: »

If you had some subtlety you could have gotten better responses. Still, being too obvious is a small compromise for your physical perfection.

Not interested in being subtle sweetness. Just spitting truths.

Deseras

I find they do.they think we get all the girls

Samsonsmasher

Quantum Baloney wrote: »

Lets get this out of the way: females of the species like big, tall men with a bit of weight on their bones and the ability to put on muscle. Now they might settle for a shrimp, but from an evolutionary perspective they are looking to settle with hulks, and also from a sexual standpoint, they do not want to perform as a couple with shrimp spaghetti men or five-footers.

I am fifteen stone, six and a half feet tall, and I have always been aware of my superiority as a specimen to smaller men, even as a child. Obviously, our penises are larger and fuller, and no matter what females say, they do enjoy that extra girth/length.

But my question is: do smaller men look at us larger men with awe, almost like we are a different species? Do they resent us? Because to be honest, when I see prawn men or spaghetti men in town or in the supermarket and I have to bend my neck to see the their beady eyes staring back at me timidly from under a fragile recessive fringe, I really can't say that I feel like these dudes are the same species as myself, they seem more like chinchillas or syrian hamsters, not fully developed, and I mean that intellectually as well as physically.

Look, I don't mean to be mean, we all have our talents, but if you look at many indigenous people before the sweaty greasy soy eating western men came to their shores and they led simple lives with simple diets born to young mothers who were not burdened by the office grind, these dudes had really great teeth, great musculature, good mental attitudes etc. and the weedy prawn men or spaghetti men just have a dysgenic feeling to them, especially in Ireland. The sooner we are honest about these things the sooner we can do something about it.

Bigger men need to eat more and are bigger targets and are harder to carry when wounded.
At Stalingrad the bigger men starved and died before smaller more wiry men did. They found it harder to stay low and under cover.

The most highly decorated American soldier of WW2 was Audie Murphy who at 15 lied about his age when he joined and was a pint sized kid barely over 5 foot tall. Didn't stop him from winning the Medal of Honor.

Courage and character are what matter not size.

Men come in all shapes and sizes. Some are cowards and others are heroes. Some are rich and some are poor. Some are womanizers and some happily married and some are alone.

Ask Joe Pesci or Danny De Vito or Al Pacino if they dad trouble getting women?

Quantum Baloney

Quantum Baloney wrote: »

Lets get this out of the way: females of the species like big, tall men with a bit of weight on their bones and the ability to put on muscle. Now they might settle for a shrimp, but from an evolutionary perspective they are looking to settle with hulks, and also from a sexual standpoint, they do not want to perform as a couple with shrimp spaghetti men or five-footers.

I am fifteen stone, six and a half feet tall, and I have always been aware of my superiority as a specimen to smaller men, even as a child. Obviously, our penises are larger and fuller, and no matter what females say, they do enjoy that extra girth/length.

But my question is: do smaller men look at us larger men with awe, almost like we are a different species? Do they resent us? Because to be honest, when I see prawn men or spaghetti men in town or in the supermarket and I have to bend my neck to see the their beady eyes staring back at me timidly from under a fragile recessive fringe, I really can't say that I feel like these dudes are the same species as myself, they seem more like chinchillas or syrian hamsters, not fully developed, and I mean that intellectually as well as physically.

Look, I don't mean to be mean, we all have our talents, but if you look at many indigenous people before the sweaty greasy soy eating western men came to their shores and they led simple lives with simple diets born to young mothers who were not burdened by the office grind, these dudes had really great teeth, great musculature, good mental attitudes etc. and the weedy prawn men or spaghetti men just have a dysgenic feeling to them, especially in Ireland. The sooner we are honest about these things the sooner we can do something about it.

You sound like a candidate for T2DM. Lose the weight or you'll get erectile dyfunction

Pete Moss

Quantum Baloney wrote: »

Wrong. My job could be better but this goes beyond that. This is a spiritual or metaphysical thing. You put me in the Amazon or with the indigenous people in the South Pacific or Australia before they were spoiled by western diets, and those tribes people would understand just by looking at me that I was part of the master race. We over-complicate things in our modern world and soy boys and spaghetti men or chinchilla men have become dominant.

But you'll never be in a master race, nor Amazon-esque society. You've landed on the side of time whereby intellect and ingenuity have replaced and, almost harnessed, physicality. If Genghis Khan was born recently, Bill Gates would have him as a security guard, obeying regular toilet breaks, in his Sandyford office.

Fionn1952

Quantum Baloney wrote: »

but if you look at many indigenous people before the sweaty greasy soy eating western men came to their shores and they led simple lives with simple diets born to young mothers who were not burdened by the office grind, these dudes had really great teeth, great musculature, good mental attitudes etc. and the weedy prawn men or spaghetti men just have a dysgenic feeling to them, especially in Ireland. The sooner we are honest about these things the sooner we can do something about it.

All of the responses to the dodgy trolling an not one picked up on this absolute travesty of poor statistic, which actually demonstrate that people have been getting taller and heavier throughout history.

Those towering alpha natives would be scrawny midgets compared with the average person today. The pros and cons of modern nutritional availability, you see?

Given the extra stone or so I'm carrying, I could probably do with a little bit less of the red meat and animal fat. Perhaps adding a bit of soy or tofu would make me alpha like the OP.

Quantum Baloney

Sure but having straight teeth is just objectively better. Being able to push a car when a damsel can't get it started without snapping your wristicle is just better. The ancient Greeks liked great big temples with giant columns and in Victorian times the rich built houses with tall ceilings because height is related to self-respect.

Sure, in the trenches of the first world war five footers and gnomes and chinchilla men were perfect because society had already devolved, but in the times of Homer large athletic specimens were needed for war and were the subject of painting and sculpture.

Rodin

Quantum Baloney wrote: »

Lets get this out of the way: females of the species like big, tall men with a bit of weight on their bones and the ability to put on muscle. Now they might settle for a shrimp, but from an evolutionary perspective they are looking to settle with hulks, and also from a sexual standpoint, they do not want to perform as a couple with shrimp spaghetti men or five-footers.

I am fifteen stone, six and a half feet tall, and I have always been aware of my superiority as a specimen to smaller men, even as a child. Obviously, our penises are larger and fuller, and no matter what females say, they do enjoy that extra girth/length.

But my question is: do smaller men look at us larger men with awe, almost like we are a different species? Do they resent us? Because to be honest, when I see prawn men or spaghetti men in town or in the supermarket and I have to bend my neck to see the their beady eyes staring back at me timidly from under a fragile recessive fringe, I really can't say that I feel like these dudes are the same species as myself, they seem more like chinchillas or syrian hamsters, not fully developed, and I mean that intellectually as well as physically.

Look, I don't mean to be mean, we all have our talents, but if you look at many indigenous people before the sweaty greasy soy eating western men came to their shores and they led simple lives with simple diets born to young mothers who were not burdened by the office grind, these dudes had really great teeth, great musculature, good mental attitudes etc. and the weedy prawn men or spaghetti men just have a dysgenic feeling to them, especially in Ireland. The sooner we are honest about these things the sooner we can do something about it.

I would have no wish to be 6 foot 6. Planes must be a nightmare.

Quantum Baloney

Quantum Baloney wrote: »

Lets get this out of the way: females of the species like big, tall men with a bit of weight on their bones and the ability to put on muscle. Now they might settle for a shrimp, but from an evolutionary perspective they are looking to settle with hulks, and also from a sexual standpoint, they do not want to perform as a couple with shrimp spaghetti men or five-footers.

I am fifteen stone, six and a half feet tall, and I have always been aware of my superiority as a specimen to smaller men, even as a child. Obviously, our penises are larger and fuller, and no matter what females say, they do enjoy that extra girth/length.

But my question is: do smaller men look at us larger men with awe, almost like we are a different species? Do they resent us? Because to be honest, when I see prawn men or spaghetti men in town or in the supermarket and I have to bend my neck to see the their beady eyes staring back at me timidly from under a fragile recessive fringe, I really can't say that I feel like these dudes are the same species as myself, they seem more like chinchillas or syrian hamsters, not fully developed, and I mean that intellectually as well as physically.

Look, I don't mean to be mean, we all have our talents, but if you look at many indigenous people before the sweaty greasy soy eating western men came to their shores and they led simple lives with simple diets born to young mothers who were not burdened by the office grind, these dudes had really great teeth, great musculature, good mental attitudes etc. and the weedy prawn men or spaghetti men just have a dysgenic feeling to them, especially in Ireland. The sooner we are honest about these things the sooner we can do something about it.

The natives brought really great teeth, great musculature, and good mental attitudes to a gun fight. That’s why they lost.

You need small guys with guns.

Fionn1952

Quantum Baloney wrote: »

Sure but having straight teeth is just objectively better. Being able to push a car when a damsel can't get it started without snapping your wristicle is just better. The ancient Greeks liked great big temples with giant columns and in Victorian times the rich built houses with tall ceilings because height is related to self-respect.

Sure, in the trenches of the first world war five footers and gnomes and chinchilla men were perfect because society had already devolved, but in the times of Homer large athletic specimens were needed for war and were the subject of painting and sculpture.

Those macho men of Ancient Greece, with their glorious temples and huge columns averaged around 5ft 6. Probably weren't a huge pile of cars that needed pushing then either.

Low grade Saturday night after a few beers trolling should at least be better thought out.

Boards threads are increasingly reading more like the comment sections of xHamster.

Quantum Baloney

Fionn1952 wrote: »

All of the responses to the dodgy trolling an not one picked up on this absolute travesty of poor statistic, which actually demonstrate that people have been getting taller and heavier throughout history.

Those towering alpha natives would be scrawny midgets compared with the average person today. The pros and cons of modern nutritional availability, you see?

Given the extra stone or so I'm carrying, I could probably do with a little bit less of the red meat and animal fat. Perhaps adding a bit of soy or tofu would make me alpha like the OP.

Sorry you are wrong. You don't have to go back very far to find examples of native people with perfect teeth and phenomenal musculature. Of course there may be racial differences that you are alluding to with regards height, I never said there wasn't, but its clear Western diets and cultural attitudes (pornography etc.) have led to a subspecies of gnome men and chinchilla men becoming dominant in society. I doubt very much that Homer would have written any literature at all if his world had been filled with fiver footers and dweebs.

endacl

Church on Tuesday wrote: »

Whatta load of baloney.

Quantum baloney, no less! The branch of baloney that allows the baloney to occupy two states at the same time!

Quantum Baloney

Fionn1952 wrote: »

Low grade Saturday night after a few beers trolling should at least be better thought out.

Lets face it. You are a miniature man and I have pinched a nerve.

AlejGuzman68

Deeper Blue wrote: »

I assume it's like a button on a fur coat then OP?

Probably more like a dimple lol.

Fionn1952

Quantum Baloney wrote: »

Sorry you are wrong. You don't have to go back very far to find examples of native people with perfect teeth and phenomenal musculature. Of course there may be racial differences that you are alluding to with regards height, I never said there wasn't, but its clear Western diets and cultural attitudes (pornography etc.) have led to a subspecies of gnome men and chinchilla men becoming dominant in society. I doubt very much that Homer would have written any literature at all if his world had been filled with fiver footers and dweebs.

Homer was surrounded by five footers. The Celts and Vikings were considered towering being about 5ft 9, the average Spartan warrior stood at 5ft 7, 2 inches taller than the average Greek. I'm presuming you're alluding to shortness with gnome men, I've no idea what a chinchilla man is.

Amazing that a pound of butter had led to a 3 week increase of five stone for you though....not quite the muscled titan you'd imply putting on so much in under a month though.

Quantum Baloney wrote: »

Lets face it. You are a miniature man and I have pinched a nerve.

Tall by the standards of Homer, fairly average by modern standards. Compared to a titan like yourself though how could one feel anything but outmanned?!

Piriz

OP I'm slightly below average height and build. sure I think it must be great to be a tall built man but if I notice a tall built man is an asshole I feel distaste for him and look down on him.. (metaphorically:)

perhaps you have views on physical or mental disability or race that you would also like to share..

Quantum Baloney

Fionn1952 wrote: »

Homer was surrounded by five footers. The Celts and Vikings were considered towering being about 5ft 9, the average Spartan warrior stood at 5ft 7. I'm presuming you're alluding to shortness with gnome men, I've no idea what a chinchilla man is.

Didn't you say earlier that people have been getting taller and heavier over time and now you are referring to the average ancient Celt being almost 6 ft tall?! And ideals of beauty are not based on the average specimen lol. And you are not being forthcoming with the stats because it suits you to believe that people have always been ugly and small and weak, whereas in reality, we can look at indigenous people from even very recent times and see gleaming white teeth, very straight, with perfect dental arches, powerful arms, and positive mental attitudes.

Chinchilla men are men with crooked teeth or buck teeth obviously.

Potential-Monke

As a 5'6" man at 37, I have to say that I sometimes do look in envy at taller, better built men. I do relate my size and, ah, width to be inferior to those taller, better built men. But then I remember that quite a lot of them think like you OP, so I wholeheartedly prefer my smaller lest built size if it meant I had to turn into a bit of a cunt like you and your ilk.

Edit: queue response from OP saying my anger and use of profanity is an obvious sign of my inferiority, blah, blah, blah.

happyoutscan

at 6'6" and 10 stone your BMI is well underweight.

Weird looking underweight at that.

So keep that palm greased scan for the foreseeable.

Eire Go Brach

Yoda vs Count Dooku – Size Matters Not