Terminator Werewolf - Game thread

Doris WW · 27-01-2021 04:17PM

Jake WW wrote: »

Doris - how do you pick the 5 people? The five most villagery, in the hope you're right and get a clean scan and clear five for certain?

Put the names into a randomiser website or something. I'll write them down and pull them from a hat on zoom if you like.

Gabriel WW · 27-01-2021 04:17PM

Barbara WW wrote: »

Vote in for Doris but if Gabriel keeps up the drivel posts I may swap.

if there's something fundamentally incorrect with what i'm saying, present a counter argument. should be easy if its drivel i'm speaking.

Clodagh WW · 27-01-2021 04:17PM

Doris WW wrote: »

Before anyone else votes can we look at this idea please.

Also, I hate the idea of telling people they must vote for x person. Would much rather see the pool of those up for the lynch narrowed down and people can vote from that than assigning votes. Gives wolves too much control imo.

Doris WW · 27-01-2021 04:18PM

Gabriel WW wrote: »

the only way we get full value from the scanner is if everyone declares on thread who they voted for, or if we engineer ~4 votes on a particular player.

so the 4 who have voted already...who did you vote for?

I voted for Barbara.

Jake WW · 27-01-2021 04:18PM

Jake WW wrote: »

Hey Babs, hissy fit over? Fancy answering my question...?

Barbara WW wrote: »

Whoever has the scanner, keep it secret.

Barbara WW wrote: »

Vote in for Doris but if Gabriel keeps up the drivel posts I may swap.

Barbara WW wrote: »

Why don't we all vote for you?

Babbsy babe, you keep ignoring me...

Jake WW wrote: »

OK - answer me something then. Why all the fecking poetry, why the immediate claim that a bullet has flown off? It seems to me like all you're doing is muddying the waters when we need them to be clear. It's just so OTT I was assuming you can't be wolf, that would be too mental, right? But everything I've thought has been wrong. Give me one good reason for all the bull. Do you somehow think it'll bring the wolves to the surface? I just don't see how. The only person you've rattled is Emily (well, and me now), and I don't see her being a wolf

Gabriel WW · 27-01-2021 04:18PM

Doris WW wrote: »

Put the names into a randomiser website or something. I'll write them down and pull them from a hat on zoom if you like.

thats throwing away a lynch though. 5 people vote for the 1 person, fine. that 1 person needs to be the most likely to be a wolf.

Doris WW · 27-01-2021 04:19PM

Clodagh WW wrote: »

Also, I hate the idea of telling people they must vote for x person. Would much rather see the pool of those up for the lynch narrowed down and people can vote from that than assigning votes. Gives wolves too much control imo.

What control? I'm the one getting lynched. The 5 people vote for me I die and you get a list of players to work with.

It depends of course on how much we trust the scanner.

Jake WW · 27-01-2021 04:19PM

Doris WW wrote: »

Put the names into a randomiser website or something. I'll write them down and pull them from a hat on zoom if you like.

But if you draw five at random you likely get a wolf, but won't know how many you have. The best use of the scanner is on as large as possible a group that's pure villager so they're all cleared for sure. I just don't see how you engineer that

Doris WW · 27-01-2021 04:21PM

Gabriel WW wrote: »

thats throwing away a lynch though. 5 people vote for the 1 person, fine. that 1 person needs to be the most likely to be a wolf.

Its info vs a random lynch. There's nothing to lose with me going for the village. I'm not a wolf and no power.

Doris WW · 27-01-2021 04:22PM

Jake WW wrote: »

But if you draw five at random you likely get a wolf, but won't know how many you have. The best use of the scanner is on as large as possible a group that's pure villager so they're all cleared for sure. I just don't see how you engineer that

5 is an example, numbers can be decided however the group wants. It's an idea and I'm happy to go with it if it helps the village.

Clodagh WW · 27-01-2021 04:23PM

Doris WW wrote: »

Its info vs a random lynch. There's nothing to lose with me going for the village. I'm not a wolf and no power.

Numbers do matter. If you're telling the truth and you are a villager, why not let people try to narrow down the wolves first.

Vernon WW · 27-01-2021 04:23PM

Gabriel WW wrote: »

the only way we get full value from the scanner is if everyone declares on thread who they voted for, or if we engineer ~4 votes on a particular player.

so the 4 who have voted already...who did you vote for?

Voted for Babs

Clodagh WW · 27-01-2021 04:24PM

And if you are T-1000? Information is instantly crap.

Barbara WW · 27-01-2021 04:24PM

Doris WW wrote: »

Because how would you tell who was a wolf? Contribute something or quiet down.

Your idea is absolute scutter.

If this is what you're gonna contribute, go back to not posting.

Doris WW · 27-01-2021 04:26PM

Clodagh WW wrote: »

And if you are T-1000? Information is instantly crap.

You still know if there a wolf caught in the voters.

If I am the t1000 then the lynch will tell you I've moved to a new body and you can not trust the people in that group as you see fit.

Gabriel WW · 27-01-2021 04:26PM

Barbara WW wrote: »

Your idea is absolute scutter.

If this is what you're gonna contribute, go back to not posting.

why do you think whoever the scanner should keep it a secret?

Clodagh WW · 27-01-2021 04:27PM

Barbara WW 144
Steve WW 140
Emily WW 126
Nigel WW 126
Derry WW 116
Clodagh WW 109
Eva WW 99
Angus WW 98
Jake WW 83
Fiona WW 79
Gabriel WW 78
Tegan WW 77
Frank WW 74
Vernon WW 69
Conor WW 63
Isla WW 61
Mary WW 59
Gertrude WW 55
Orla WW 55
Lucy WW 53
Doris WW 53
Phil WW 35
Brendan WW 33
Patrick WW 25

Would definitely like to hear more from Patrick. That is a shockingly low post count for Day 3.

Doris WW · 27-01-2021 04:27PM

Barbara WW wrote: »

Your idea is absolute scutter.

If this is what you're gonna contribute, go back to not posting.

It is actual light years ahead of anything you've posted up to now.

Barbara WW · 27-01-2021 04:28PM

Jake WW wrote: »

OK - answer me something then. Why all the fecking poetry, why the immediate claim that a bullet has flown off? It seems to me like all you're doing is muddying the waters when we need them to be clear. It's just so OTT I was assuming you can't be wolf, that would be too mental, right? But everything I've thought has been wrong. Give me one good reason for all the bull. Do you somehow think it'll bring the wolves to the surface? I just don't see how. The only person you've rattled is Emily (well, and me now), and I don't see her being a wolf

You've given me nothing to answer.

The waters are as clear as they could possibly be.

- I said on the first day that if I got a gun I'd use it.

- I got a gun

- I put in an order 30 secs after I got it

- I told everyone what I had done

- People began to whinge and wanted a village consensus

- I agreed to change if there was a village consensus

- Phil was the consensus

- I shot Phil

- Phil died

- People still don't believe/trust me.

I can't make the water any clearer than that.

Gertrude WW · 27-01-2021 04:29PM

Emily WW wrote: »

Personally, I think I have done more then enough for people to get an opinion of me, whether that's good or bad. We need to start getting reads on others.

Fiona was a high level poster, as was Lucy when she was munched so wolves arent going after low posters. Maybe its because wolves are hiding in the lower ones ?

Lucy was not munched, but Katie was.

Barbara WW · 27-01-2021 04:30PM

Gabriel WW wrote: »

why do you think whoever the scanner should keep it a secret?

Because the wolves are already far more clued in than the village dullards.

The last thing they need is assistance.

Jake WW · 27-01-2021 04:30PM

Barbara WW wrote: »

You've given me nothing to answer.

The waters are as clear as they could possibly be.

- I said on the first day that if I got a gun I'd use it.

- I got a gun

- I put in an order 30 secs after I got it

- I told everyone what I had done

- People began to whinge and wanted a village consensus

- I agreed to change if there was a village consensus

- Phil was the consensus

- I shot Phil

- Phil died

- People still don't believe/trust me.

I can't make the water any clearer than that.

Dodge, dodge, dodge. Let me narrow it down.
Why all the fecking poetry, why the immediate claim that a bullet has flown off?

Barbara WW · 27-01-2021 04:32PM

Jake WW wrote: »

Dodge, dodge, dodge. Let me narrow it down.
Why all the fecking poetry, why the immediate claim that a bullet has flown off?

Dodge me bollocks.

IMMEDIATE CLAIM BECAUSE I PUT IN AN IMMEDIATE ORDER

Gertrude WW · 27-01-2021 04:32PM

Clodagh WW wrote: »

The person with the scanner should absolutely NOT follow on thread consensus for where to use it.

IDIOT VILLAGERS: Use it on Clodagh

Wolves: Let's not vote for Clodagh so.

PS I consider myself an idiot villager.

Well, if that came to pass, then everybody who voted for clodagh would be cleared, making that a very good use of the scanner.

Clodagh WW · 27-01-2021 04:33PM

Honestly, the scanner is a massive distraction. We could spend the whole rest of the day on it and in the end, it may help or it may not. I think that the priority should be on reading back and trying to find wolves so that's what I'm going to be doing.

Jake WW · 27-01-2021 04:34PM

Barbara WW wrote: »

Dodge me bollocks.

IMMEDIATE CLAIM BECAUSE I PUT IN AN IMMEDIATE ORDER

Dodge

Why the immediate order?
Why the poetry?

Clodagh WW · 27-01-2021 04:35PM

Gertrude WW wrote: »

Well, if that came to pass, then everybody who voted for clodagh would be cleared, making that a very good use of the scanner.

I posted too soon. Did you see my follow up. If we do it, wolves put the T-1000 on that person and presto chango, scanner info is useless.

And why am I still responding to scanner chat. It's a distraction.

Eva WW · 27-01-2021 04:35PM

Derry WW wrote: »

This makes sense to me also.
I think we need to be more organised and logical about this - there seems to be a lot of bullets flying around, and if we are using them, we don't want to waste any, i.e. Babs and Conor aiming for the same player for whatever reason.

Derry WW wrote: »

3 bullets. He said one each to Babs and Conor, and he kept one. He didn't say who got the tracker.

Derry WW wrote: »

Poem by Francis Quarles

"A Good Night"

Are you planning a good night tonight Babs? What are your plans for that bullet of yours?

Derry WW wrote: »

Jury is out on Lucy for me... I need more than not posting like a villager to be sure.
Barbara is adding nothing for me, almost like she wants to be voted out.
It is downto 3 for me tonight do far...
Barbara. Isla. Brendan. Purely for lack of posting and contribution to the village.

Derry WW wrote: »

Barbara has stated her bullet is for Phil. @Barbara, why do you think Doris is a wolf?

Angus and Conor - have you decided?

My FFA is:
Frank
Isla
Jake (this is weak, but jumping off the bandwagon is suss to me, I need to read over the posts from last night again thougj)

Derry WW wrote: »

@Barbara @Conor @Nigel what are your plans for the bullets then?

Tried to look through contributions and interactions between babs and Derry to see why Derry would pick Babs. Cant see anything particularly if anything Derry was suss of Barbara

Barbara WW · 27-01-2021 04:36PM

Jake WW wrote: »

Dodge

Why the immediate order?
Why the poetry?

Obviously because I wanted to shoot Doris.

The poetry is my way of communicating with the wolves.

Jake WW · 27-01-2021 04:39PM

Barbara WW wrote: »

Obviously because I wanted to shoot Doris.

The poetry is my way of communicating with the wolves.

Duck dive, duck dive, it's like Ali's fecking rope-a-dope (yes I get that in that analogy I'm the dope but feck it)

You wanted to shoot Doris, fine. Explain the timing. It was a night shoot. Did you get what you wanted from the tactic?

I'm sorry - communicate with wolves. What the actual f-ck?

Terminator Werewolf - Game thread

Comments