Terminator Werewolf - Game thread

Frank WW

Jake WW wrote: »

The ones that stand out to me are...

Nigel - went early, went hard and kept at it
Frank - only one mention, had her third behind Steve and Barbara
Angus - two mentions, but had her second to Barbara last mention

Those choices weren't weighted Jake. Read my posts on Lucy I was never 100% sure she was a wolf but you have to pick somebody, a gut feeling.
Actually came very close to picking Brendan but some posters were saying he might be having a mare of a day irl and players would pretend that-it would be bad form, so I gave him the benifit of the doubt.

Phil WW

Eva WW wrote: »

Hey Phil, what time did you vote for Lucy?

Where's your suss moving after Lucy ultimately coming back good?

Just before I made my last post, can't remember when that was.


I really am not too sure. I had originally though Nigel was good and then I thought maybe him and Lucy were a team and having a bit of friendly fire to put a distance between them.


As I said yesterday, I didn't get to really read through as I was packing as much into my day as I could as I would be off till Thursday. I plan to look much deeper into post today.

Doris WW

I wont be around until after 14:00 today so I will miss the contest.

Eva WW

Phil WW wrote: »

Just before I made my last post, can't remember when that was.


I really am not too sure. I had originally though Nigel was good and then I thought maybe him and Lucy were a team and having a bit of friendly fire to put a distance between them.


As I said yesterday, I didn't get to really read through as I was packing as much into my day as I could as I would be off till Thursday. I plan to look much deeper into post today.

This is interesting. Jake voted at 6.45ish

Orla at around 8.30-8.45

Nigel says he was likely the earliest vote.

Be interesting to keep getting ideas on vote times, simply to see if there are any outliers.

I'd be surprised if they weren't formatted in first to last or last to first. Its more work to randomise them which I don't see a mod doing

Jake WW

Frank WW wrote: »

Those choices weren't weighted Jake. Read my posts on Lucy I was never 100% sure she was a wolf but you have to pick somebody, a gut feeling.
Actually came very close to picking Brendan but some posters were saying he might be having a mare of a day irl and players would pretend that-it would be bad form, so I gave him the benifit of the doubt.

OK, I read "you're one Steve" as "you're number one" but I see your point, you meant he's one on the list?

Eva WW

Doris WW wrote: »

I wont be around until after 14:00 today so I will miss the contest.

What time did you vote Doris? You look like last on Lucy

Eva WW

Doris WW wrote: »

I wont be around until after 14:00 today so I will miss the contest.

What time did you vote Doris? You look like last on Lucy

Frank WW

I will be keeping a tight eye on Nigel today.


The amount of low poster worries me. Thinking out loud. I think the wolves would have a plan to split their team up maybe- some post a lot, some stay very quiet, some middle of the road.
Where would the T1000 be post-wise? Top, middle or bottom?

Frank WW

Eva WW wrote: »

What time did you vote Doris? You look like last on Lucy

I voted Lucy about 8:50.

Doris WW

Eva WW wrote: »

What time did you vote Doris? You look like last on Lucy

I was at home on the sofa so would have been around 18:30 to 19:00 I think

Jake WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

Morning Eva. Jake (I think) said he voted around 6:45. I had a quick skim through all of yesterday’s posts again relating to Lucy and there’s lots of them. I was nodding off to sleep so will review them all again this morning with fresh eyes.

I also think there’s possibly a wolf on wolf vote in the single votes.

Eva WW wrote: »

This is interesting. Jake voted at 6.45ish

Orla at around 8.30-8.45

Nigel says he was likely the earliest vote.

Be interesting to keep getting ideas on vote times, simply to see if there are any outliers.

I'd be surprised if they weren't formatted in first to last or last to first. Its more work to randomise them which I don't see a mod doing

I was actually 8:45...

Jake WW wrote: »

I voted very late*, think it was about 8:45, so I'm sure they are as I'm in the middle of the pile

*for Lucy. I was asked to resubmit by BeakerJoe but my first vote was a holding No Lynch this morning

When I typed that I meant "I'm not sure they are"!
I don't think the votes are in time order. Beaks said they weren't

Mary WW

Well done to the villagers who showed restraint by not killing randomers last night. Losing just one NRV was the best possible outcome this morning. Three guns up for grabs today. Hopefully the same restraint will be shown, unless we have consensus to use some of them.

Orla WW

Frank WW wrote: »

I will be keeping a tight eye on Nigel today.


The amount of low poster worries me. Thinking out loud. I think the wolves would have a plan to split their team up maybe- some post a lot, some stay very quiet, some middle of the road.
Where would the T1000 be post-wise? Top, middle or bottom?

You would have to think middle to bottom. Hardly draw too much attention by being top.
But then people who played more might have a different, more valid view.

Mary WW

Eva WW wrote: »

What time did you vote Doris? You look like last on Lucy

We've already been told that the votes are in no meaningful order

Angus WW

Eva WW wrote: »

This is interesting. Jake voted at 6.45ish

Orla at around 8.30-8.45

Nigel says he was likely the earliest vote.

Be interesting to keep getting ideas on vote times, simply to see if there are any outliers.

I'd be surprised if they weren't formatted in first to last or last to first. Its more work to randomise them which I don't see a mod doing

Again, I was the one who stated I voted at 6.45, when we thought we could make a timeline, it was stated then that the votes are not in order

Tegan WW

Gertrude WW wrote: »

Tegan,
Can you explain the obvious for me.

it was a tone read. Just like the aggressive nature of the tone for which he was pushing his cases. barbara the same. The villagery defiance of it all.

Tone is not an exact science, but nigel just felt very obviously like a villager to me

Jake WW

beakerjoe wrote: »

The tracking device is also a night action. Should a player visit another player and they are tracked, the player will know they moved and who they visited

I don't understand this, how do players visit each other? What does the tracking device do?

Frank WW

Orla WW wrote: »

You would have to think middle to bottom. Hardly draw too much attention by being top.
But then people who played more might have a different, more valid view.

Possibly, then again T1000 can afford to be noticed and be loud with their opinions- worst case scenario he loses one life and starts again in a new body.

Frank WW

Tegan WW wrote: »

it was a tone read. Just like the aggressive nature of the tone for which he was pushing his cases. barbara the same. The villagery defiance of it all.

Tone is not an exact science, but nigel just felt very obviously like a villager to me

I will be keepin a tight eye on you and Nigel both today, Tegan.

Tegan WW

Frank WW wrote: »

I will be keepin a tight eye on you and Nigel both today, Tegan.

I'm okay with that

Gertrude WW

Eva WW wrote: »

This is interesting. Jake voted at 6.45ish

Orla at around 8.30-8.45

Nigel says he was likely the earliest vote.

Be interesting to keep getting ideas on vote times, simply to see if there are any outliers.

I'd be surprised if they weren't formatted in first to last or last to first. Its more work to randomise them which I don't see a mod doing

Due to the miles mechanic, it is in the mods interest to obfuscate the vote order so they cannot determine who is in 2nd place in the event of tied 2nd place, like we had at yesterdays lynch.

Tegan WW

I wont be here at one

Well, I might be here via phone but I wont be checking the questions

Fiona WW

Jake WW wrote: »

I don't understand this, how do players visit each other? What does the tracking device do?

Let’s say you win the comp today and award the tracking device to A and give out two bullets to B & C and keep a bullet for yourself. You state you are shooting D. If I ask to track you, I will be told Jake visited D. Wouldn’t track those who had been given bullets though as I hope whoever gives them out says who got them.

Narrows down who to track tonight though so may shine a light on something. If someone is visiting then they have a power at least.

Derry WW

Eva WW wrote: »

This is interesting. Jake voted at 6.45ish

Orla at around 8.30-8.45

Nigel says he was likely the earliest vote.

Be interesting to keep getting ideas on vote times, simply to see if there are any outliers.

I'd be surprised if they weren't formatted in first to last or last to first. Its more work to randomise them which I don't see a mod doing

I don't think they are - both Steve and I voted for Brendan last night, Steve stated on thread he had voted for Brendan, and I switched after that to Isla - so they aren't in voting order.

Derry WW

Jake WW wrote: »

I don't understand this, how do players visit each other? What does the tracking device do?

I don't understand this at all either

Doris WW

Derry WW wrote: »

I don't understand this at all either

You put a tracking device on me

I do an action on Barbara (Kill/protect/Peek)

You will be told I did something.

No not necessarily what.

Fiona WW

It’s vital that as many villagers play the comp today as possible. Open up loads of tabs for googling. Also have PM for beaker ready with subject line written.

If a wolf wins the prize they could just give the prizes to themselves and have 4 kills at munch time plus the possibility of tracking a roled player. We could be annihilated pretty darn quickly.

Frank WW

Doris WW wrote: »

You put a tracking device on me

I do an action on Barbara (Kill/protect/Peek)

You will be told I did something.

No not necessarily what.

And you do not know that you are being tracked Doris?

Tegan WW

Players A is a tracker.

At night, he tracks Player B to see where Player B goes. To see who Player B visits. If Player B visits player C and player C dies, then Player A likely knows that Player B is the one who killed player C.

That;s how a tracker works.

If the tracker picks someone who is non-rolled or doesnt have a night action, then the person they track will go nowhere and they will get no result or be told they didnt go anywhere

Derry WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

It’s vital that as many villagers play the comp today as possible. Open up loads of tabs for googling. Also have PM for beaker ready with subject line written.

If a wolf wins the prize they could just give the prizes to themselves and have 4 kills at munch time plus the possibility of tracking a roled player. We could be annihilated pretty darn quickly.

Already got this setup and done - have a work call now, but it will be over by 1pm so will do my best!