The Vaccine

EyesClosed

skooterblue2 wrote: »

The conspiracy is there is a UN agenda (outlined in Agenda 2020 and 2030) to cull the world population (called sustainable population growth) using vaccines as a vehicle.

Do they actually say they are going to use vaccines too cull the population... Link?

Timberrrrrrrr

skooterblue2 wrote: »

You had maths and theories but no actual working applications. like saying Leonardo da Vinci invented the helicopter.

Actually

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_nanotechnology

In nanoelectronics, nanoscale thickness was demonstrated in the gate oxide and thin films used in transistors as early as the 1960s

runawaybishop

skooterblue2 wrote: »

The conspiracy is there is a UN agenda (outlined in Agenda 2020 and 2030) to cull the world population (called sustainable population growth) using vaccines as a vehicle.

Thank you.

Why not use existing vaccines? How will this vaccine cull the world population? Will we not notice when people start dying? Or do you also not know what a cull is?

ohnonotgmail

skooterblue2 wrote: »

The conspiracy is there is a UN agenda (outlined in Agenda 2020 and 2030) to cull the world population (called sustainable population growth) using vaccines as a vehicle.

why not use the same ray guns they used to cull the pigs?

runawaybishop

Jesus it's arose than we thought. A lot worse.

https://scontent-mia3-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/131580027_854948128634317_4750091341986384970_n.jpg?_nc_cat=102&ccb=2&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=GUrV4pdIseIAX8oLKmf&_nc_ht=scontent-mia3-2.xx&oh=c4868374f5b4f3005022423a85f30569&oe=5FFFD61A

skooterblue2

EyesClosed wrote: »

Do they actually say they are going to use vaccines too cull the population... Link?

How would you "lessen" the population in a short working time frame without raising alarms?

enno99

runawaybishop wrote: »

He posted an image of a report. Can't locate the original report and can only see the image on shady sites.

First reply was a bit harsh. Sorry

skooterblue2

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

why not use the same ray guns they used to cull the pigs?

Excellent Idea if we could like mount them in tower in communities without raising suspicions?

ohnonotgmail

skooterblue2 wrote: »

Excellent Idea if we could like mount them in tower in communities without raising suspicions?

how far do you intend to go with your bull****? your posts are a complete joke.

EyesClosed

skooterblue2 wrote: »

How would you "lessen" the population in a short working time frame without raising alarms?

So no link then... Grand... Your imagination is nice though I must admit

runawaybishop

enno99 wrote: »

Stop lying

Prove me wrong.

skooterblue2

runawaybishop wrote: »

Thank you.

Why not use existing vaccines? How will this vaccine cull the world population? Will we not notice when people start dying? Or do you also not know what a cull is?

You have to create a demand for vaccines. There is no point trying to get some old git like me to try an already working vaccine. I am not going to take a useless flu vaccine or MMR vaccine. Now create a panic with hysteria, that is how you get everyone to take a vaccine.

Ever notice how the autism numbers are rising? Do you think it is strange? Do you notice how cancer rates are rising and we are told it is normal?

runawaybishop

skooterblue2 wrote: »

You have to create a demand for vaccines. There is no point trying to get some old git like me to try an already working vaccine. I am not going to take a useless flu vaccine or MMR vaccine. Now create a panic with hysteria, that is how you get everyone to take a vaccine.

Ever notice how the autism numbers are rising? Do you think it is strange? Do you notice how cancer rates are rising and we are told it is normal?

There is huge demand for vaccines. Nearly every child in the country gets vaccinated.

Why bother vaccinating a 90 year old, they aren't going to reproduce and they won't exactly be around for long.

Your theory has more holes than my underpants.

Your mention of autism and cancer is laughable.

skooterblue2

runawaybishop wrote: »

There is huge demand for vaccines. Nearly every child in the country gets vaccinated.

Your mention of autism and cancer is laughable.

Exactly who is going to refuse this vaccine with all the hype? The vast majority are recovering. There is no need for a vaccine.

enno99

runawaybishop wrote: »

Prove me wrong.

Posted the link to the document check and see

you were just trying to score petty points rather than read the thread

runawaybishop

enno99 wrote: »

Posted the link to the document check and see

you were just trying to score petty points rather than read the thread

A link to an image of a doc that doesn't appear anywhere except dodgy conspiracy sites. Feel free to post the original report.

enno99

runawaybishop wrote: »

A link to an image of a doc that doesn't appear anywhere except dodgy conspiracy sites. Feel free to post the original report.

Doubling down now rather than checking LOL

enno99

runawaybishop wrote: »

Prove me wrong.

Post 845.

runawaybishop

enno99 wrote: »

Post 845.

Sorry, I didn't see that you had posted the report. I'll edit my post.

enno99

runawaybishop wrote: »

Sorry, I didn't see that you had posted the report. I'll edit my post.

Its cool it happens thanks

Dohnjoe

enno99 wrote: »

LOL you didnt debunk anything

You done what you accused others of and dodged the question

You claimed that the AMA rescinded their decision on HCQ - they didn't.

enno99

Dohnjoe wrote: »

You claimed that the AMA rescinded their decision on HCQ - they didn't.

Yes why not. ?
They had no concern's on Oct 30th.

skooterblue2

skooterblue2 wrote: »

you know Nano machines will be able to repair and do invasive brain surgery, where a surgeon wont be able to go. You are also not grasping the size of Nano. These nano robots could pass on all sorts of information about your vital statistics. Take a moment out, stop seeing them as medical assistants for a moment and see them as pathogens in the body..... now see the fun you could have?

And if you had any knowledge of field, you'd know it's pretty much in its infancy so what you're proposing is simply not realistic in present day... Your lecturer would say as much if you asked him.

Dohnjoe

enno99 wrote: »

Yes why not. ?
They had no concern's on Oct 30th.

What are you talking about?

Your conspiracy: the American Medical Association didn't back HCQ to spite Trump, and they started backing it after he was elected

Reality: They didn't rescind their decision. And even if they do at some future stage, that isn't evidence that it's some medical conspiracy against Trump (appeal to motive fallacy)

enno99

Dohnjoe wrote: »

What are you talking about?

Your conspiracy: the American Medical Association didn't back HCQ to spite Trump, and they started backing it after he was elected

Reality: They didn't rescind their decision. And even if they do at some future stage, that isn't evidence that it's some medical conspiracy against Trump (appeal to motive fallacy)

But its evidence they are holding up a drug that would help victims of a global pandemic

Think about that.

So to be clear. The conspiracy is that the covid vaccines contain nanomachines that use 5G signals to power themselves. And the machines will be used to track people and also make people infertile.
And this is shown because some kid's friend told him that Korea zapped so me pigs with a ray gun.

Cool. This is what all you conspiracy guys believe then? Not hearing any objections between you lot so have to assume you're on the same page here.

Also how does this vaccine being the mark of the beast since you guys also seem to buy into that too?

runawaybishop

enno99 wrote: »

But its evidence they are holding up a drug that would help victims of a global pandemic

Think about that.

There is no evidence that it assists and the FDA still doesn't recommend it.

runawaybishop

runawaybishop wrote: »

There is no evidence that it assists and the FDA still doesn't recommend it.

But Trump said it works and he is the perfect man and therefore incapable of lies.

Dohnjoe

enno99 wrote: »

But its evidence they are holding up a drug that would help victims of a global pandemic

Think about that.

Lol, no it's not. Some treatments are on the fence because they have their own levels of risk and effectiveness with specific illnesses and conditions. The FDA and AMA have generally not supported it's use. Trump supported it, but then again he supported ingesting bleach.

There is no strong scientific evidence to support the use of hydroxychloroquine for preventing or treating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19).[3][4][52][53] While its use is not approved by the FDA for COVID‑19 treatment, from April to June 2020, there was an emergency use authorization for its use in the United States,[54] and it has been used off label for potential treatment of the disease.[55] On 24 April 2020, citing the risk of "serious heart rhythm problems", the FDA posted a caution against using the drug for COVID‑19 "outside of the hospital setting or a clinical trial".[56] On 15 June, the FDA revoked its emergency use authorization, stating that it was "no longer reasonable to believe" that the drug was effective against COVID-19 or that its benefits outweighed "known and potential risks".[50][57][58][59]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroxychloroquine

enno99

runawaybishop wrote: »

There is no evidence that it assists and the FDA still doesn't recommend it.

But they said it cold have more benefit than harm. Paraphrasing

And there is tons of evidence