What I meant to say was.....

Without Borders

Go back in time and change what you said to what given hindsight you should have said.

Me: I dont think this is working out anymore.

Should have said: I love you but I dont think you feel the same. Change my mind.

flowerchild

I was shocked to learn that you are married, and that your wife is here and distressed. I would never have been with you if I had known your marital status and I feel that removing your wedding ring was deliberately deceitful. Ignoring me and doing nothing when I was attacked and called a ‘slag’ was both hurtful and gutless. The pain has always remained with me.

I behaved with courtesy, grace and dignity and I remain proud of myself.

Sheridan81

Me: My first job on a luxury liner and look at the crummy role I'm lumbered with. Sitting with a telescope, freezing my balls off. Didn't they read my C.V.? Screw this Jack, I'm going to bed.

Should have said: Iceberg!

karlitob

Without Borders wrote: »

Go back in time and change what you said to what given hindsight you should have said.

Me: I dont think this is working out anymore.

Should have said: I love you but I dont think you feel the same. Change my mind.

IMHO - both ways would not get you the result that you wanted. They say men need to learn how to speak to women. Looks like it works both ways.

I have to say, they’re both shocking ways to speak to someone in a relationship about issues in your relationship.

Sheridan81

karlitob wrote: »

I have to say, they’re both shocking ways to speak to someone in a relationship about issues in your relationship.

I would hardly describe them as 'shocking'. You want shocking-look at what happened to me back in 1912.

karlitob

Sheridan81 wrote: »

I would hardly describe them as 'shocking'. You want shocking-look at what happened to me back in 1912.

Well you’re only one half of that relationship so that’s only your opinion. I’m giving you a different perspective - take from it what you will. You put up the post on a public forum.

Not sure what your point about 1912 is. Can’t wait to be enlightened.

Sheridan81

Pay attention to the posts and posters.

What you highlighted wasn't 'shocking' at all. 'Shocking' is being ignorant about Jack and Rose and their doomed relationship.

karlitob

Sheridan81 wrote: »

Pay attention to the posts and posters.

What you highlighted wasn't 'shocking' at all. 'Shocking' is being ignorant about Jack and Rose and their doomed relationship.

I did - but thanks for matronising me.

While I love being womansplained to about what I should or shouldn’t feel based on what you think - I am shocked, and I remain shocked. It is my opinion and you don’t get to tell me what I do or don’t think or feel.

You might have your own standards for being shocked - they’re your business.

I’m still waiting to be enlightened about your reference to 1912. Dis something happen at 12 minutes past 7pm that is somehow related to the post that you wanted me to pay particular attention to.

Sheridan81

I have no idea what you're talking about and I'm not sure you do either.

I'm not a woman and neither are you so maybe we should just leave this thread to the ladies.

Read my first post in this thread, I'm just joking around.

karlitob

Sheridan81 wrote: »

You want shocking-look at what happened to me back in 1912.

This reference. What’s your point?

Sheridan81

karlitob wrote: »

This reference. What’s your point?

The year the Titanic sank. All my fault.