What's the youngest you'd date?

mr_fegelien

It's a social norm ever since time immemorial that men go for younger women due to wanting a fertile partner and women go for older men due to wanting financial stability and maturity.

I'd be in a different category in the sense that I prefer older women. (25-29). I'm 22 and only entering college so don't have much to offer a woman my age let alone an older women. I don't find younger women attractive, funnily enough, and not because i think they're immature (emotionally) but because they just aren't attractive enough to me. Look a bit like kids.

So, what's the youngest you'd date?

Atlantic Dawn

Half my age plus 7.

facehugger99

Half my age minus seven.

Grassey

Divide by 7 plus 2 is the rule no?

Rodney Bathgate

mr_fegelien wrote: »

It's a social norm ever since time immemorial that men go for younger women due to wanting a fertile partner and women go for older men due to wanting financial stability and maturity.

I'd be in a different category in the sense that I prefer older women. (25-29). I'm 22 and only entering college so don't have much to offer a woman my age let alone an older women. I don't find younger women attractive, funnily enough, and not because i think they're immature (emotionally) but because they just aren't attractive enough to me. Look a bit like kids.

So, what's the youngest you'd date?

I thought you were a bisexual virgin?

un5byh7sqpd2x0

Half your age plus 7

tastyt

Wait until your 32 and 42 and come back and tell us you don’t find twenty yr old women attractive

StevenToast

When will this thread be closed?

frag420

StevenToast wrote: »

When will this thread be closed?

When the OP gets laid, so never!!

monkeysnapper

Canaan Raspy Xerography wrote: »

Will you ever fcuk off fegelien you gimp

You need to follow your own advice my friend ......

Icemancometh

Half your age plus 7, minus whatever it takes to get to 18.

mr_fegelien

mr_fegelien wrote: »

It's a social norm ever since time immemorial that men go for younger women due to wanting a fertile partner and women go for older men due to wanting financial stability and maturity.

I'd be in a different category in the sense that I prefer older women. (25-29). I'm 22 and only entering college so don't have much to offer a woman my age let alone an older women. I don't find younger women attractive, funnily enough, and not because i think they're immature (emotionally) but because they just aren't attractive enough to me. Look a bit like kids.

So, what's the youngest you'd date?

Why would a woman that looks for maturity and financial stability go with a 22 year old college student? Plenty do though so that that theory gone

GarIT

17, that's the law!

mr_fegelien

mr_fegelien wrote: »

So, what's the youngest you'd date?

18.

Although, TBH, I've done it at this age (40s) and i don't quite have the patience for all the insecurities and hand holding involved.

Nowadays I consider 26 to be the perfect age for a woman.

And F, most men date younger women because they generally have better bodies... it's not anything to do with fertility, since we'd prefer not to get her pregnant.

Tig98

I'm 22, wouldn't go younger than 20.

It feels like babysitting. One of my friends started dating an 18 year old and the differences in maturity are glaringly obvious

mr_fegelien

Tig98 wrote: »

I'm 22, wouldn't go younger than 20.

It feels like babysitting. One of my friends started dating an 18 year old and the differences in maturity are glaringly obvious

How old is your friend?

In what sense is the difference in maturity obvious?

It's funny you say that because I've heard the wisdom is that men of all ages generally lust for women between teenage years up to their late 20s.

greenspurs

mr_fegelien wrote: »

How old is your friend?

In what sense is the difference in maturity obvious?

It's funny you say that because I've heard the wisdom is that men of all ages generally lust for women between teenage years up to their late 20s.

This is the creepiest thing Ive read on here In a long time! :eek::mad:

How is this allowed on Boards now ????!

Grassey

Why?

Is "between teenage years up to their late 20s" not the range of > 19 and < 27

greenspurs

Grassey wrote: »

Why?

Is "between teenage years up to their late 20s" not the range of > 19 and < 27

`you turn a teenager at the age of 13 !!!

GooglePlus

greenspurs wrote: »

This is the creepiest thing Ive read on here In a long time! :eek::mad:

How is this allowed on Boards now ????!

I'm sure the poster means legal teenage years but yeah, it sat weird with me as I read it..

greenspurs

GooglePlus wrote: »

I'm sure the poster means legal teenage years but yeah, it sat weird with me as I read it..

Well , when you take into context his posting history on here, it would cause alarm....

Grassey

greenspurs wrote: »

`you turn a teenager at the age of 13 !!!

True, but what was said was between two specified age ranges....

Between "teenage years" and "late 20s" would therefore be the years after teenage years and before late 20's, so 20 - 26ish no?

I find it more weird that people jumped straight to an assumption he meant early teens.

Padre_Pio

greenspurs wrote: »

This is the creepiest thing Ive read on here In a long time! :eek::mad:

How is this allowed on Boards now ????!

How is that surprising?
Just because you get a bit older doesn't mean you find younger women less attractive.

EDIT: When you said teenager, my mind went to 18/19. Not 13. So who's the creepy one now?

greenspurs

Grassey wrote: »

True, but what was said was between two specified age ranges....

Between "teenage years" and "late 20s" would therefore be the years after teenage years and before late 20's, so 20 - 26ish no?

I find it more weird that people jumped straight to an assumption he meant early teens.

"Between teenage years up to late 20s"

In any (normal) persons reasoning that is from Thirteen (13) up to late 20s...
It maybe thinly veiled, but it is a very dangerous statement in my opinion !

And what he said is NOT 'two specified age ranges' ,
"Between teenage years and late 20s" - that is very vague, with just a hint towards under age girls !

Specified would be if he said "between 19 and 29"

It is a very dangerous thing to post, when it can be left open for discussion due to its hint of underage and vagueness !!

greenspurs

Padre_Pio wrote: »

How is that surprising?
Just because you get a bit older doesn't mean you find younger women less attractive.

EDIT: When you said teenager, my mind went to 18/19. Not 13. So who's the creepy one now?

"Between teenage years and late 20s"


13 year olds are teenagers ffs ! :mad:

Padre_Pio

greenspurs wrote: »

"Between teenage years up to late 20s"

In any (normal) persons reasoning that is from Thirteen (13) up to late 20s...
It maybe thinly veiled, but it is a very dangerous statement in my opinion !

And what he said is NOT 'two specified age ranges' ,
"Between teenage years and late 20s" - that is very vague, with just a hint towards under age girls !

Specified would be if he said "between 19 and 29"

It is a very dangerous thing to post, when it can be left open for discussion due to its hint of underage and vagueness !!

If you do a porn search for "teen", they're not showing you thirteen :eek::eek:

greenspurs

Padre_Pio wrote: »

If you do a porn search for "teen", they're not showing you thirteen :eek::eek:

I have a 13 yr. daughter.

And I wouldn't be fcuking searching teen porn .. weird

D3V!L

mr_fegelien wrote: »

men of all ages generally lust for women between teenage years up to their late 20s.

so you mean children ?

I've heard that men of all ages who lust after children are paedophiles.

timsey tiger

greenspurs wrote: »

`you turn a teenager at the age of 13 !!!

But you're not a woman, you're still a girl. The poster did say women, so can't be referring to early to mid teens.

Padre_Pio

greenspurs wrote: »

I have a 13 yr. daughter.

And I wouldn't be fcuking searching teen porn .. weird

One of the most popular searches in the world..

https://www.inverse.com/article/26011-pornhub-post-popular-porn-report-2016

greenspurs

timsey tiger wrote: »

But you're not a woman, you're still a girl. The poster did say women, so can't be referring to early to mid teens.

Really ??

Would that swing a court case in your favour?
"sorry boss, when I looked up teen porn on the company laptop, I was only expecting 19 year olds"

You sticking up for him is strange.

Wibbs

Right. I've cleaned up the thread and removed the insults towards the OP. Cardinal rule on Boards is attack the post not the poster. I've already warned people once. Next time you'll be banned if you do it. Fair warning.

Wibbs

greenspurs wrote: »

Really ??

Would that swing a court case in your favour?
"sorry boss, when I looked up teen porn on the company laptop, I was only expecting 19 year olds"

You sticking up for him is strange.

I hate to break it to you, but unless the company laptop was used to dig through the dark web and not mainstream porn sites you won't find underage porn. Most porn comes from America and is heavily regulated, especially on the legal age aspect and any site that breaks that rule will be hit hard legally. Other countries who produce the stuff are very similar. Never mind that "teen" usually means anyone not over 30. As one ex porn actress noted with some amusement she'd regularly do a "teen" shoot in the morning and do a "MILF" shoot in the afternoon.

timsey tiger

greenspurs wrote: »

Really ??

Would that swing a court case in your favour?
"sorry boss, when I looked up teen porn on the company laptop, I was only expecting 19 year olds"

You sticking up for him is strange.

I'm not sticking up for him, just interpreting a sentence written in English. I don't know why you are talking about porn.

Wibbs

Wibbs wrote: »

I hate to break it to you, but unless the company laptop was used to dig through the dark web and not mainstream porn sites you won't find underage porn. Most porn comes from America and is heavily regulated, especially on the legal age aspect and any site that breaks that rule will be hit hard legally. Other countries who produce the stuff are very similar. Never mind that "teen" usually means anyone not over 30. As one ex porn actress noted with some amusement she'd regularly do a "teen" shoot in the morning and do a "MILF" shoot in the afternoon.

Was't there a story about a featured model on pornhub who was trafficked and underage?

Link:

https://twitter.com/LailaMickelwait/status/1289341107348938752

Wibbs

Deleted User wrote: »

Was't there a story about a featured model on pornhub who was trafficked and underage?

Link:

https://twitter.com/LailaMickelwait/status/1289341107348938752

Oh I'm quite sure it happens TD and is yet another of IMHO the long list of the troubling aspects of porn and how it's become strangely mainstream, even "respectable", which is another debate in of itself.

Padre_Pio

Deleted User wrote: »

Was't there a story about a featured model on pornhub who was trafficked and underage?

There are a few stories like this, but seems that once identified, they're dealt with quickly. Unfortunately I doubt they go to great lengths to verify age. If you can easily get a fake ID to buy alcohol, surely you can do the same to act in porn.

banie01

Grassey wrote: »

Divide by 7 plus 2 is the rule no?

:eek:
You may want to check your maths there buddy, before the paedo police are on the way to have a word!

ronivek

I'd like to think I would judge everyone on their own merits and not just because of their age. As cliche as it sounds; it is just a rather meaningless number especially once you've hit your mid to late 20s.

greenspurs

Wibbs wrote: »

Other countries who produce the stuff are very similar. Never mind that "teen" usually means anyone not over 30. As one ex porn actress noted with some amusement she'd regularly do a "teen" shoot in the morning and do a "MILF" shoot in the afternoon.

"A teenager, or teen, is a person who falls within the ages of 13 to 19 years old. The word "teenager" is often associated with adolescence. However the World Health Organization considers anyone between the ages of 10 and 21 to be an adolescent"

WHO -
Teenage Development
Adolescence is defined by the World Health Organization as a period between the ages of 10 and 19, though this can vary from one young person to another. To understand broadly the different stages, they can be described as early, mid and late adolescence. Changes occur for young people due to physical development and hormonal changes in their bodies. These changes happen in the following areas – physical, psychological, emotional and behavioural. These areas will be described in detail in the different stages as follows:
• Early adolescence (10–13) • Mid-adolescence (14–16) • Late adolescence (17–19)

Homelander

Give it a rest, you're coming across as a hysterical attention seeker. The poster literally said "between teenage years to late 20s".

Most normal people interpret that to mean 18-29 or whatever range in the context of a discussion like this one.

The fact that you yourself immediately leap to, and keep banging the drum of, paedophilia, over the simple use of a word, is in itself disturbing.

Gruffalux

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Was't there a story about a featured model on pornhub who was trafficked and underage?

Link:

https://twitter.com/LailaMickelwait/status/1289341107348938752

Exactly. Laila Mickelwait is a lovely bolshie woman who has been standing up to Pornhub for long ages. On her Twitter account and elsewhere she provides details regularly about the widespread abusive nature of what appears on Pornhub. There are kidnapped and underage girls who have had their rapes broadcast as porn. In their twitter feeds those girls themselves detail how they often have to engage in protracted communications with Pornhub to have their rapes removed. She is well worth a follow to know these stories. The idea that porn is highly regulated is a joke.

Wibbs

Gruffalox wrote: »

The idea that porn is highly regulated is a joke.

Oh it is highly regulated, enforcement is where it falls down as her experience shows. The fact it's not more effectively enforced is a considerable worry. And that's something more current too. Years back I watched a documentary about one period in that industry, 80's or 90's IIRC and again IIRC there was one actress who got quite popular and it was later discovered she had been 17 when she got into it with a false ID and heads rolled and the authorities got involved pretty quickly. These days it seems not so much.

The sheer volume of it these days is a large part of it, plus the rise of self shot "amateur" instagram with sex type stuff which could come from anyone or anywhere and it seems with little more verification than ticking a box on a web page. When it was mostly "professional" stuff with a small number of people involved that stuff was more likely to be caught. Like I said earlier the mainstream availability of porn and the "ah sure it's harmless" attitude is a debate that's wide ranging and we're not really having it as a society IMHO. That's before the subject of the genres of porn that are being peddled comes up.

Gruffalux

Wibbs wrote: »

Oh it is highly regulated, enforcement is where it falls down as her experience shows. The fact it's not more effectively enforced is a considerable worry. And that's something more current too. Years back I watched a documentary about one period in that industry, 80's or 90's IIRC and again IIRC there was one actress who got quite popular and it was later discovered she had been 17 when she got into it with a false ID and heads rolled and the authorities got involved pretty quickly. These days it seems not so much.

The sheer volume of it these days is a large part of it, plus the rise of self shot "amateur" instagram with sex type stuff which could come from anyone or anywhere and it seems with little more verification than ticking a box on a web page. When it was mostly "professional" stuff with a small number of people involved that stuff was more likely to be caught. Like I said earlier the mainstream availability of porn and the "ah sure it's harmless" attitude is a debate that's wide ranging and we're not really having it as a society IMHO. That's before the subject of the genres of porn that are being peddled comes up.

Agreed. Especially re the debate that is not happening because Heaven forbid one commit the cardinal sin of being square.
But the fact that young girls are having to beg over prolonged times to have their rapes removed from Pornhub - which lets face it is as mainstream a company now as Twitter or any other big digital media hub - tells me it is more than weak enforcement. That is willful. Just like minor attraction discussions on Twitter are willfully left on display. Why is something I cannot guess at. Maybe the heads behind the scenes in these places ARE actually nasty types. Because if I got one single email report that something I was involved in had harmed someone there would be an instant very serious reaction on my part - yet some ones, many ones, not robots but actual humans, get these reports from victims and their reps day in day out and do nothing it seems. That is very strange.

Wibbs

Gruffalox wrote: »

Agreed. Especially re the debate that is not happening because Heaven forbid one commit the cardinal sin of being square.

That was part of the fall out from the sexual revolution. A great idea that mostly went towards the positive, but for one demographic, the ones who were fine with others doing whatever, but didn't want to go along with it themselves.

greenspurs

Homelander wrote: »

Give it a rest, you're coming across as a hysterical attention seeker. The poster literally said "between teenage years to late 20s".

Most normal people interpret that to mean 18-29 or whatever range in the context of a discussion like this one.

The fact that you yourself immediately leap to, and keep banging the drum of, paedophilia, over the simple use of a word, is in itself disturbing.

How dare you suggest that.
Your slightly veiled accusation is offensive. And borderline slander

Wibbs

greenspurs, there's a long list of your posts accusing another poster of being creepy and suggesting they meant underage girls and nothing was veiled, slightly or not. Don't post in this thread again or you'll get banned. Only warning.

Dravokivich

Gruffalox wrote: »

Exactly. Laila Mickelwait is a lovely bolshie woman who has been standing up to Pornhub for long ages. On her Twitter account and elsewhere she provides details regularly about the widespread abusive nature of what appears on Pornhub. There are kidnapped and underage girls who have had their rapes broadcast as porn. In their twitter feeds those girls themselves detail how they often have to engage in protracted communications with Pornhub to have their rapes removed. She is well worth a follow to know these stories. The idea that porn is highly regulated is a joke.

The issues with the likes of Pornhub, are the same issues faced with Twitter, Facebook, Youtube and Periscope. It's user submitted. When you are looking at things produced professionally, that's where the regulations are at work. But when the video is uploaded by "unknown" or a weird alias that's made up of gibberish, that's where you're going to run into problems.

They all need to review very carefully how content gets submitted. Until that's addressed, these issues will persist. But I think it's unfair to say it's a pornhub problem. They are just a medium that have high accessibility like the others.

Gruffalux

Dravokivich wrote: »

The issues with the likes of Pornhub, are the same issues faced with Twitter, Facebook, Youtube and Periscope. It's user submitted. When you are looking at things produced professionally, that's where the regulations are at work. But when the video is uploaded by "unknown" or a weird alias that's made up of gibberish, that's where you're going to run into problems.

They all need to review very carefully how content gets submitted. Until that's addressed, these issues will persist. But I think it's unfair to say it's a pornhub problem. They are just a medium that have high accessibility like the others.

It most definitely is a Pornhub problem. They are biggest porn providers in world. They are minting it. If Gruffalox Inc was making a single penny airing rape videos, or minor abuse videos, not only would I be disgusted with myself but I would be in jail. Pornhub is no better in this regard than the vile sale of gangrape videos from under the counter in rural Indian chai stalls. You are completely right that they need to get submissions monitoring correct but it is not like they don't have the money to do that. It is also about disgusting consumer demand.The too big to monitor argument like the too big to fail argument is immoral.

Dravokivich

Gruffalox wrote: »

It most definitely is a Pornhub problem. They are biggest porn providers in world. They are minting it. If Gruffalox Inc was making a single penny airing rape videos, or minor abuse videos, not only would I be disgusted with myself but I would be in jail. Pornhub is no better in this regard than the vile sale of gangrape videos from under the counter in rural Indian chai stalls. You are completely right that they need to get submissions monitoring correct but it is not like they don't have the money to do that. It is also about disgusting consumer demand.The too big to monitor argument like the too big to fail argument is immoral.

I made a point of stating Twitter, Facebook, Youtube and Periscope as these aren't even platforms for distributing porn. Yet still face issues with user submitted content, that is abusive and pornographic, including child porn.

Gruffalux

Dravokivich wrote: »

I made a point of stating Twitter, Facebook, Youtube and Periscope as these aren't even platforms for distributing porn. Yet still face issues with user submitted content, that is abusive and pornographic, including child porn.

They do. And they should do more to remove. But at least they are not actually selling it. If you read Laila's Twitter you will see this is a very widespread problem and girls can beg for months sometimes years and their rapes are still monetised.

I mean you are right - the internet is a hive of abusive content.